H.R. 925: Dismantle DEI Act of 2025

Introduced Feb 4, 2025108 cosponsors

Sponsor

Michael Cloud

Michael Cloud

Republican · TX-27

Bill Progress

IntroducedFeb 4
Committee 
Pass House 
Pass Senate 
Signed 
Law 

Latest Action · Feb 4, 2025

1/3

Referred to Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committees on the Judiciary, Education and Workforce, Armed Services, Foreign Affairs, Financial Services, Energy and Commerce, Transportation and Infrastructure, and Intelligence (Permanent Select), for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. for review

H.R. 925 would dismantle federal DEI in 90 days

4 min readLast updated June 24, 2026

Why it matters

Federal agencies would get 90 days to close their DEI offices through layoffs, every federal contract over $10,000 would carry new anti-DEI terms, and anyone who spots a violation could sue and ask a court for at least $1,000 a day. With 108 cosponsors, H.R. 925 would move DEI policy out of executive orders and into federal law backed by private lawsuits.

H.R. 925 is a sweeping attempt to unwind DEI across the federal government and any institution that takes federal money. It starts by writing a definition of a "prohibited diversity, equity, or inclusion practice" into the Civil Rights Act of 1964, then applies that definition everywhere.

The clock is fast. Agencies would have 90 days after the bill becomes law to close covered DEI offices, and the Office of Personnel Management and the Office of Management and Budget would have 180 days to rewrite government-wide policy. When a position is eliminated, the bill says the agency must run a reduction in force rather than move the person into another role.

The reach goes well past federal agencies. Contracts over $10,000 would need new clauses, grant and cooperative-agreement recipients would have to promise not to spend federal funds on covered DEI offices or training, and accreditors would have to certify that their standards don't pressure schools into practices the bill prohibits.

The bill also names specific programs for repeal. It would scrap the Offices of Minority and Women Inclusion created under the Dodd-Frank Act, eliminate the Defense Department's chief diversity officer and diversity-in-leadership program, and strike DEI provisions tied to Homeland Security, the Coast Guard, and the intelligence community.

Enforcement is where the bill has teeth. Any person who alleges a violation can file suit in federal court, and if they win, the court may award attorney's fees, compensatory damages, and a minimum of $1,000 per violation per day. Historically Black Colleges and Universities are expressly exempt from the grant funding restrictions.

H.R. 925 Bill Summary

What H.R. 925 actually does.

1

Federal DEI offices close within 90 days

Agencies would have 90 days after enactment to shut down covered DEI offices and programs. Employees in eliminated roles would have to be let go through a reduction in force, not transferred or renamed into other jobs.

2

Federal money stops paying for covered trainings

Federal funds could not be used for training related to diversity, equity, inclusion, accessibility, critical theory, intersectionality, sexual orientation, or gender identity, across agencies, contractors, and grant recipients.

3

Contracts over $10,000 get new anti-DEI terms

Federal contracts above $10,000 would have to bar work performed by contractors or subcontractors subject to the bill's prohibited DEI practices, pulling many prime contractors and their subcontractors into the compliance net.

4

Grant and college funding comes with conditions

Most grant and cooperative-agreement recipients would have to agree not to spend federal funds on covered DEI offices or training, and accreditors would have to certify their standards don't coerce schools into prohibited practices. HBCUs are exempt from the grant restrictions.

5

Named programs get repealed outright

The bill would repeal the Dodd-Frank Offices of Minority and Women Inclusion, the Defense Department's chief diversity officer and diversity-in-leadership program, and DEI provisions tied to Homeland Security, the Coast Guard, and the intelligence community.

6

Anyone can sue, with $1,000-a-day damages on the table

The bill creates a private cause of action: any person alleging a violation can sue in federal court. If they prevail, the court may award attorney's fees, compensatory damages, and a minimum of $1,000 per violation per day.

Who benefits from H.R. 925?

Workers who object to required trainings or statements

If you're asked to complete training or sign a statement the bill defines as a prohibited practice, H.R. 925 is written to block that in covered federal settings and federally funded programs.

People who want to sue over alleged violations

The bill lets any person file suit in federal court over an alleged violation, and a winning plaintiff could recover attorney's fees, compensatory damages, and at least $1,000 per violation per day.

Contractors that don't run DEI programs

Companies that already avoid the practices the bill targets may find it easier to certify compliance when bidding on federal contracts over $10,000.

Historically Black Colleges and Universities

HBCUs are singled out for an exemption from the bill's grant funding restrictions, so they wouldn't face the same federal grant conditions as other schools and recipients.

Who is affected by H.R. 925?

Federal DEI staff and office leadership

If your job sits in a covered DEI office, the bill points toward closure within 90 days, and it says agencies must use layoffs rather than reassignment for eliminated positions.

Agencies rewriting internal policy

Agencies would have to close offices, rescind programs tied to listed executive actions, and stop funding employee resource groups, equity teams, data dashboards, and other covered initiatives on a 90-to-180-day clock.

Colleges, accreditors, and grant recipients

Schools and other recipients of federal money would face new grant conditions, and accreditors would have to review whether their standards pressure institutions into practices the bill prohibits.

Federal contractors and subcontractors

If you do federal contract work above $10,000, new clauses and compliance expectations could affect hiring, training, internal policy, and subcontracting relationships.

Share this story
Tracking floor activity — no debate on H.R. 925 yet. Updates when a legislator speaks on the record.

HR925 Legislative Journey

1 actions

House: Committee Action

Feb 4, 2025

Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committees on the Judiciary, Education and Workforce, Armed Services, Foreign Affairs, Financial Services, Energy and Commerce, Transportation and Infrastructure, and Intelligence (Permanent Select), for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

About the Sponsor

Michael Cloud

Michael Cloud

Republican, Texas's 27th congressional district · 8 years in Congress

Committees: Oversight and Government Reform, Appropriations

View full profile →

Cosponsors (108)

No new cosponsors in 62 days — momentum stalled

All 108 cosponsors are Republicans. Cosponsors represent 34 states: Alabama, Arizona, Colorado, and 31 more.

108Republicans·34 states

Cosponsor Coverage Map

Committee Sponsors

Intelligence (Permanent Select) Committee

12D15R
|6 signed21 not yet

6 of 27 committee members cosponsored

Transportation and Infrastructure Committee

31D35R
|17 signed49 not yet

17 of 66 committee members cosponsored

Energy and Commerce Committee

24D30R
|18 signed36 not yet

18 of 54 committee members cosponsored

Armed Services Committee

27D30R
|13 signed44 not yet

13 of 57 committee members cosponsored

Oversight and Government Reform Committee

21D26R
|19 signed28 not yet

19 of 47 committee members cosponsored

81 Republicans across these committees haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents

What laws does H.R. 925 change?

7 changes

Full Text

Sections Amended

Section 8527 of Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7907)

adding at the end the following: ``(e) Prohibition; Rules of Construction

Section 701 of Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e)

adding at the end of subsection (f) the following: ``The term `employee' includes any person who serves on a board of directors of an issuer that has a registration statement in effect as to a security under the Securities Act of 1933 and is compensated by the issuer

Section 15A of Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78o-3)

adding at the end the following: ``(o) Prohibited Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Practices

Sections Repealed

1319A of Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992 (12 U.S.C. 4520)

342 of Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (12 U.S.C. 5452)

821 of Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 296m)

37 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 656. SEC. 705. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY AND COAST GUARD. (a) In General.--Paragraph (3) of section 845(c) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 415(c))

Constituent Resources

Get notified when this bill moves

Official Sources

H.R. 925 on Congress.gov

The official Congress.gov page provides the bill text, status, sponsors, committees, and actions for H.R. 925.

OPM — Reductions in Force

The bill requires agencies to eliminate covered DEI positions through a reduction in force rather than reassignment, the process OPM governs here.

Office of Management and Budget

OMB is specifically tasked in the bill with rewriting government-wide policy within 180 days of enactment.

Federal Acquisition Regulation

The bill would add anti-DEI terms to federal contracts over $10,000, making the FAR the key official source for contracting clauses.

System for Award Management

Federal contractors and subcontractors register and bid through SAM, where new compliance conditions tied to contracting would surface.

GSA — Federal Advisory Committee Act Management

The bill targets federal advisory committees and councils; GSA is the official secretariat governing committees under the Federal Advisory Committee Act.

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

The bill rewrites discrimination-related personnel and workplace rules, an area where the EEOC provides official federal guidance and enforcement.

SEC — Office of Minority and Women Inclusion

The bill would repeal the Dodd-Frank provision that created the Offices of Minority and Women Inclusion at financial regulators, including this SEC office.

H.R. 925 Common Questions

How fast would H.R. 925 shut down federal DEI offices?

Fast. Agencies would get 90 days after the bill becomes law to close covered DEI offices and programs. OPM and OMB would then have 180 days to rewrite government-wide policy to match.

What does H.R. 925 actually ban?

It writes a definition of a "prohibited DEI practice" into civil rights law, covering certain hiring, trainings, and required statements tied to race, sex, religion, national origin, and related concepts. That definition then applies across agencies, contracts, grants, and schools.

Can someone sue under H.R. 925?

Yes. The bill creates a private cause of action: any person alleging a violation can sue in federal court. If they win, the court may award attorney's fees, compensatory damages, and a minimum of $1,000 per violation per day.

Would H.R. 925 affect federal contracts over $10,000?

Yes. Contracts above $10,000 would have to include terms blocking work by contractors or subcontractors that are subject to the DEI practices the bill prohibits.

Could agencies reassign DEI staff instead of laying them off?

No. If a position is eliminated under the bill's office-closure rules, the agency must run a reduction in force. It can't transfer, reassign, or rename those employees into other roles.

Are colleges and universities covered by H.R. 925?

Often, yes. Schools that take federal grants or work with accreditors could be hit by new funding conditions and accreditation rules tied to the bill's definition of prohibited DEI practices.

Are HBCUs exempt from the grant restrictions in H.R. 925?

Yes. The bill expressly exempts Historically Black Colleges and Universities from its federal grant funding restrictions.

Does H.R. 925 touch the military or financial regulators?

Yes. The bill would repeal the Defense Department's chief diversity officer and diversity-in-leadership program, and scrap the Dodd-Frank Offices of Minority and Women Inclusion at financial regulators.

Based on H.R. 925 bill text

H.R. 925 Bill Text

PDF

To ensure equal protection of the law, to prevent racism in the Federal Government, and for other purposes.

Source: U.S. Government Publishing Office

Bill Alerts

Get notified when H.R. 925 moves

Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.

Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.

Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues Bills

7 related bills we're tracking

View all
H.R. 15

Equality Act

Mark Takano
Mark TakanoD-CA
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+213
217 cosponsors

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Education and Workforce, Financial Services, House Administration, and Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Apr 29, 2025

HouseCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues
H.R. 5309

Congressional Tribute to Constance Baker Motley Act of 2025

Rosa DeLauro
Rosa DeLauroD-CT
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+192
196 cosponsors

Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

Sep 11, 2025

HouseCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues
H.R. 4099

Ensuring Women’s Right to Reproductive Freedom Act

Lizzie Fletcher
Lizzie FletcherD-TX
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+141
145 cosponsors
+2 this month

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Jun 24, 2025

HouseCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues
H.R. 1954

Do No Harm Act

Robert Scott
Robert ScottD-VA
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+117
121 cosponsors
+1 this month

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Mar 6, 2025

HouseCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues
H.R. 722

Life at Conception Act

Eric Burlison
Eric BurlisonR-MO
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+108
112 cosponsors

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Jan 24, 2025

HouseCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues
H.R. 6091

Bivens Act of 2025

Henry Johnson
Henry JohnsonD-GA
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+26
30 cosponsors

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Nov 18, 2025

HouseCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues
H.R. 3950

Truth in Gender Act of 2025

Earl Carter
Earl CarterR-GA
Cosponsor
1 cosponsor

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Oversight and Government Reform, Foreign Affairs, Financial Services, Education and Workforce, Homeland Security, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Jun 12, 2025

HouseCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues

Trending Right Now

Bills gaining momentum across Congress

Tracking Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.