H.R. 6397: Dignity for Detained Immigrants Act
Sponsor
Pramila Jayapal
Democrat · WA-7
Bill Progress
Latest Action · Dec 3, 2025
Referred to the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Homeland Security, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. for review
Why it matters
The bill would quickly change how DHS detains immigrants by setting hard deadlines like 48-hour custody decisions, 72-hour hearings, annual surprise inspections, and a full phaseout of for-profit detention contracts within 3 years of enactment.
HR6397, the Dignity for Detained Immigrants Act, is a broad attempt to move immigration detention away from punishment-style practices and toward tighter legal protections and public oversight. The Secretary of Homeland Security would have to issue detention standards by regulation within 1 year of enactment, and those standards must at least meet the American Bar Association’s Civil Immigration Detention Standards from August 2012, as modified in August 2014. Those rules would then have to be reviewed and updated at least every 2 years.
The bill also speeds up detention decisions and raises the bar for keeping people locked up. DHS would have to make an initial custody determination in writing within 48 hours of taking someone into custody, and an immigration judge hearing would have to happen within 72 hours of that decision. The default would be release, unless the government can prove with clear and convincing evidence that detention is justified. Vulnerable people and primary caregivers could not be detained unless the government shows it would be unreasonable or not practicable to place them in a community-based supervision program. The bill also flatly prohibits detention of any individual under age 18 in ICE-operated or contracted facilities, creates community-based case management outside ICE control, and bans electronic surveillance like ankle monitors and any participation fees in those programs.
Transparency and enforcement are central to the bill. The DHS Inspector General would have to conduct unannounced, in-person inspections at least annually and publish reports online within 60 days. If a non-DHS-owned facility fails standards once in a 2-year period, it would face a fine of at least 10% of the contract value and a follow-up inspection within 180 days. If it fails 2 or more inspections in a 2-year period, detainees must be transferred within 30 days, the contract must be terminated, and DHS funds could no longer be used for that contract. For DHS-owned facilities, repeated failure would require transfer of detainees within 60 days and suspension of facility use. The bill also forces rapid death-in-custody reporting: Congress must be notified within 24 hours, an investigation with root cause analysis by qualified medical personnel must happen within 30 days, a public report is due within 60 days, and the Inspector General must review the death within 90 days.
The legislation would also sharply limit the detention system’s structure. DHS could not enter any new or extended contracts with for-profit entities for detention or nonresidential monitoring programs, and all existing such contracts would have to end within 3 years of enactment. After that 3-year mark, detention facilities would have to be owned and operated by DHS, while nonresidential programs would have to be run by DHS or a nonprofit. On top of that, the bill guarantees private, confidential access to counsel in person, by phone, or by video; requires access to a nonprofit-run Legal Orientation Program before the first immigration judge hearing; requires DHS to transport detainees to Federal or State court proceedings, including family court; and gives Members of Congress access to any detention facility without prior notice, while barring facilities from making temporary cosmetic changes before an oversight visit.
What does H.R. 6397 do?
48-hour custody decision, 72-hour hearing
DHS must make an initial custody determination in writing within 48 hours of taking an alien into custody, and an immigration judge hearing must occur within 72 hours of that initial custody decision. The bill creates a presumption of release, and the government must overcome it with clear and convincing evidence.
No detention for anyone under 18
The bill prohibits detaining any individual under age 18 in ICE-operated or contracted facilities. It also says vulnerable persons and primary caregivers cannot be detained unless the government proves it is unreasonable or not practicable to place them in a community-based supervision program.
Annual surprise inspections with 10% penalty
The DHS Inspector General must conduct unannounced, in-person inspections of detention facilities at least annually and submit reports to the Secretary of Homeland Security and publish them online within 60 days. A non-DHS-owned facility that fails once in a 2-year period faces a fine of not less than 10% of the contract value and a follow-up inspection within 180 days.
Repeat failures trigger closure steps fast
If a non-DHS-owned facility fails 2 or more inspections in a 2-year period, detainees must be transferred within 30 days, the contract must be terminated, and DHS funds may no longer be used for that contract. If a DHS-owned facility repeatedly fails, detainees must be transferred within 60 days and the facility’s use must be suspended.
For-profit detention contracts end in 3 years
The Secretary of Homeland Security would be barred from signing new or extended contracts with for-profit entities for detention or nonresidential monitoring programs, and all such contracts must be terminated within 3 years of enactment. After 3 years, all detention facilities must be owned and operated by DHS, while nonresidential programs must be owned and operated by DHS or a nonprofit.
Solitary confinement banned entirely
The bill imposes a total ban on solitary confinement for anyone in DHS custody. It defines solitary confinement as being confined to a cell alone or with a cellmate for disciplinary, administrative, or classification reasons, excluding designated sleeping time.
Who benefits from H.R. 6397?
Immigrants in DHS detention
They would gain faster process rights, including a written custody decision within 48 hours, an immigration judge hearing within 72 hours, access to private and confidential counsel in person or by phone or video, and a right to sue in U.S. district court for injunctive relief, compensatory damages, and reasonable attorney fees and costs if Section 4 standards are violated.
Children under age 18
Anyone under age 18 could no longer be detained in ICE-operated or contracted facilities. That is a bright-line age protection, not a case-by-case standard.
Vulnerable people and primary caregivers
They would receive heightened protection because they cannot be detained unless the government proves it is unreasonable or not practicable to place them in a community-based supervision program. Those community-based programs also cannot use electronic surveillance, such as ankle monitors, and cannot charge participation fees.
Families, lawyers, and advocacy groups seeking transparency
They would get more public information because inspection reports and detention contracts would count as FOIA records under 5 U.S.C. 552 and could not be withheld under exemption (b)(4). DHS would also have to post facility data on the first day of each month and update the online detainee locator within 12 hours of custody changes, transfers, or removals.
Who is affected by H.R. 6397?
Department of Homeland Security and ICE
DHS would face major operational deadlines: detention standards by regulation within 1 year, biennial updates after that, monthly publication of facility data on the first day of each month, detainee locator updates within 12 hours, and 180 days' notice to Congress before new construction or expansion.
Private prison and detention contractors
For-profit entities would lose future business because DHS could not sign new or extended detention or nonresidential monitoring contracts with them, and all existing such contracts would have to end within 3 years of enactment. Facilities that fail standards once in a 2-year period face a fine of at least 10% of the contract value; after 2 or more failures in 2 years, detainees must be moved within 30 days and the contract must be terminated.
DHS-owned detention facilities
Government-run facilities would still be subject to annual unannounced inspections and public reporting. If they fail 2 or more inspections in a 2-year period, detainees must be transferred within 60 days and use of the facility must be suspended.
Congress and inspectors
Oversight bodies would gain stronger access and deadlines. Members of Congress must be allowed into any detention facility without prior notice, designated staff may be required to give 24 hours' notice unless accompanying a Member, and the Inspector General must inspect facilities at least annually and review any death in custody within 90 days.
H.R. 6397 Common Questions
How long would DHS have to end private immigrant detention contracts under HR 6397?
Under the Dignity for Detained Immigrants Act, DHS could not sign new or extended for-profit detention contracts, and all existing ones would have to end within 3 years of enactment (Section 7).
Can ICE detain someone under 18 in an immigration detention facility under HR 6397?
No. Under the Dignity for Detained Immigrants Act, no individual under age 18 may be detained in an ICE-operated or contracted facility (Section 9).
How quickly would an immigration custody hearing have to happen after arrest under HR 6397?
According to HR 6397 Section 9, DHS must issue a written custody decision within 48 hours, and an immigration judge hearing must occur within 72 hours of that initial determination.
Is there a presumption of release in immigration detention under the Dignity for Detained Immigrants Act?
Yes. Under the Dignity for Detained Immigrants Act, release is presumed unless DHS proves with clear and convincing evidence that detention is justified (Section 9).
What penalty would an immigration detention contractor face for failing an inspection once?
Under the Dignity for Detained Immigrants Act, a non-DHS-owned facility that fails once in a 2-year period would face a fine of at least 10% of the contract value and a follow-up inspection within 180 days (Section 5).
What happens if an ICE detention facility fails inspections twice in 2 years?
According to HR 6397 Section 5, a non-DHS-owned facility with 2 or more failures in 2 years must transfer detainees within 30 days, lose its contract, and stop receiving DHS funds under that contract.
Does HR 6397 ban solitary confinement in immigration detention?
Yes. Under the Dignity for Detained Immigrants Act, solitary confinement is fully prohibited for individuals in DHS custody, except designated sleeping time is not counted in the definition (Section 10).
Can immigrants sue over detention standard violations under the Dignity for Detained Immigrants Act?
Yes. Under the Dignity for Detained Immigrants Act, detainees injured by violations of the detention standards may sue in U.S. District Court for injunctive relief, compensatory damages, and attorney fees (Section 6).
Does HR 6397 ban ankle monitors in community supervision programs?
Yes. According to HR 6397 Section 9, community-based case management must be outside ICE, and electronic surveillance such as ankle monitors is prohibited.
How fast would ICE have to update the online detainee locator under HR 6397?
Under the Dignity for Detained Immigrants Act, the online detainee locator would have to be updated within 12 hours of intake, transfer, release, or removal (Section 5).
Based on H.R. 6397 bill text
HR6397 Legislative Journey
House: Committee Action
Dec 3, 2025
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Homeland Security, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
About the Sponsor
Pramila Jayapal
Democrat, Washington's 7th congressional district · 9 years in Congress
Committees: the Judiciary, the Budget, Foreign Affairs
View full profile →
Cosponsors (133)
All 133 cosponsors are Democrats. Cosponsors represent 34 states: Arizona, California, Colorado, and 31 more.
Adam Smith
Democrat · WA
Alma Adams
Democrat · NC
Gabe Amo
Democrat · RI
Yassamin Ansari
Democrat · AZ
Becca Balint
Democrat · VT
Nanette Barragán
Democrat · CA
Donald Beyer
Democrat · VA
Suzanne Bonamici
Democrat · OR
Brendan Boyle
Democrat · PA
Shontel Brown
Democrat · OH
Julia Brownley
Democrat · CA
André Carson
Democrat · IN
Cosponsor Coverage Map
Committee Sponsors
Homeland Security Committee
10 of 29 committee members cosponsored
Judiciary Committee
15 of 42 committee members cosponsored
7 Democrats across these committees haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents
What laws does H.R. 6397 change?
2 changes
Sections Amended
Section 236 of Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1226)
read as follows: ``apprehension and detention of aliens ``Sec
Section 287(a) of Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1357(a)(2))
striking the subsection designation and all that follows through ``United States;'' in paragraph (2) and inserting the following: ``(a) In General
H.R. 6397 Quick Facts
- Committee
- Homeland Security
- Chamber
- House
- Policy
- Immigration
- Introduced
- Dec 3, 2025
Referred to the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Homeland Security, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. for review
Dec 3, 2025
Official Sources
Official Congress.gov page for the Dignity for Detained Immigrants Act with status, text, and actions.
The bill assigns the DHS Inspector General to conduct annual unannounced detention facility inspections and review deaths in custody.
The bill requires faster updates to the online detainee locator after intake, transfer, release, or removal.
ICE’s detention management page is directly relevant to the bill’s changes to detention standards, facility oversight, and operations.
Official DHS civil-rights oversight resources are relevant because the bill creates enforceable detention standards and detainee protections.
EOIR oversees immigration judges, who would have to hold custody hearings within 72 hours under the bill.
H.R. 6397 Bill Text
“To provide standards for facilities at which aliens in the custody of the Department of Homeland Security are detained, and for other purposes.”
Source: U.S. Government Publishing Office
Get notified when H.R. 6397 moves
Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.
Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.
Immigration Bills
7 related bills we're tracking
Protecting Sensitive Locations Act
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Feb 6, 2025
NO BAN Act
Referred to the Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement.
Feb 4, 2025
Stop Excessive Force in Immigration Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Nov 7, 2025
Carnivals are Real Entertainment Act
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Apr 8, 2025
Protecting Children from Foreign Mutilation Act
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Dec 18, 2025
Venezuela TPS Act of 2025
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
May 8, 2025
Real Courts, Rule of Law Act of 2026
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Mar 5, 2026
Trending Right Now
Bills gaining momentum across Congress
Congressional Tribute to Constance Baker Motley Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Sep 11, 2025
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 890 East 152nd Street in Cleveland, Ohio, as the "Technical Sergeant Alma Gladys Minter Post Office Building".
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Apr 15, 2026
Love Lives On Act of 2025
Subcommittee Hearings Held
Feb 3, 2026
Tracking Immigration in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.