H.R. 7836: Real Courts, Rule of Law Act of 2026
Sponsor
Zoe Lofgren
Democrat · CA-18
Immigration judges should not work for the prosecutor's boss
Why it matters
Every deportation and asylum case in the country is decided by a judge who is an employee of the Justice Department. H.R. 7836 would move those judges, their caseload, and their budget into a standalone court that the attorney general no longer runs.
Immigration courts today sit inside the Executive Office for Immigration Review, an office of the Justice Department. H.R. 7836 would turn them into the United States Immigration Courts, an independent court created by Congress, so the attorney general would no longer manage the judges who decide deportation and asylum cases.
The new court would have two levels: a trial division that hears cases, and an appellate division of 21 appeals judges appointed by the president. Their first terms are staggered — 7 end after 5 years, 7 after 10, and 7 after 15 — so roughly a third of the appeals bench comes up for appointment every five years.
The court would write its own budget, and the executive branch could not revise it before it goes to Congress. Staff would be paid on a scale consistent with the federal judiciary, and judges would file public financial disclosures like other federal judges.
If you already have a case pending, it moves to the new court without starting over and without losing any rights you already have. Past rulings from the Board of Immigration Appeals and the attorney general stay binding until the new court overrules them, and the old rules stay in effect until the appellate division rewrites them.
The handoff is gradual. The court can open only at the start of a fiscal year at least 180 days after enactment, and only once the president has appointed at least 3 appeals judges. Enacted in early 2027, that would mean October 2027 at the soonest. Every sitting immigration judge becomes an interim trial judge for a 4-year transition, capped at 5 years of interim service.
The bill also opens the court to outside scrutiny. The chief judge would report to Congress every April on wait times, representation rates, bond outcomes, and grant rates by judge and region, and the Judicial Conference of the United States would review the court's decisions at least every 4 years.
Bill Progress
Latest Action · Mar 5, 2026
Referred to the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. for review
H.R. 7836 Bill Summary
What H.R. 7836 actually does.
Your judge no longer works for the attorney general
Immigration courts leave the Justice Department and become the United States Immigration Courts, an independent court established by Congress under Article I of the Constitution, with a trial division and an appellate division.
A 21-judge appeals bench with staggered terms
The first 21 appeals judges are appointed by the president in three groups of 7, with terms ending 5, 10, and 15 years after the court opens. Judges can be reappointed when their terms end.
The court writes its own budget
Each year the court sets its own budget, which goes into the president's budget request without executive-branch changes. Staff pay is pegged as closely as feasible to comparable jobs in the federal judiciary.
Pending cases carry over intact
Cases before an immigration judge or the Board of Immigration Appeals on opening day transfer to the new court with no loss of rights and no break in jurisdiction. Existing precedents and rules stay in force until the court changes them.
Today's judges keep hearing cases
Every sitting immigration judge becomes an interim trial judge during a 4-year transition, serving up to 5 years. Interim service counts toward retirement, and the appellate division sets the permanent hiring process.
Public data on wait times and outcomes
The chief judge reports to the House and Senate Judiciary Committees every April on respondent demographics, representation rates, relief grant rates by judge and region, bond outcomes, pending caseloads, and average wait times.
Outside review by the federal judiciary
The Judicial Conference of the United States reviews the court's decisions at least once every 4 years and reports its findings to Congress, which prints the report in the Congressional Record.
Who benefits from H.R. 7836?
People facing deportation or seeking asylum
Your case would be decided by a judge whose employer is a court, not the department that also sets immigration enforcement policy. A pending case moves over without restarting.
Immigration judges
Judges gain a court structure with its own leadership, budget, and staff, and time already served in the Justice Department counts toward retirement, with up to 5 years credited for those who elect judicial retired pay.
Lawyers, legal aid groups, and families
Annual reports would show average wait times by region and grant rates by individual judge, data that can inform where to file, how to prepare, and what to expect.
Congress and researchers
The Judiciary Committees get a yearly workload report on demand, plus a Judicial Conference review every 4 years — oversight tools that do not exist for immigration courts today.
Who is affected by H.R. 7836?
The attorney general and Justice Department
The department loses control of immigration adjudication, including the power to review the court's budget, write its rules, and issue binding precedent decisions. It keeps the separate office that handles employer-sanctions cases.
The Department of Homeland Security
Many powers the law now assigns to the attorney general in removal cases shift to the Secretary of Homeland Security, while decisions on the merits shift to immigration judges.
Future presidents
Presidents still appoint appeals judges, but under staggered terms no single administration fills the whole bench at once, and the White House can no longer revise the court's budget request.
Immigration court staff
Employees of the Justice Department's immigration review office transfer to the new court along with its records, contracts, and unspent funds, and move off the standard civil-service hiring system.
HR7836 Legislative Journey
House: Committee Action
Mar 5, 2026
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
About the Sponsor
Zoe Lofgren
Democrat, California's 18th congressional district · 31 years in Congress
Committees: Science, Space, and Technology, the Judiciary
View full profile →
Cosponsors (15)
All 15 cosponsors are Democrats. Cosponsors represent 12 states: Arizona, California, Georgia, and 9 more.
Jamie Raskin
Democrat · MD
Henry Johnson
Democrat · GA
Daniel Goldman
Democrat · NY
Seth Magaziner
Democrat · RI
Shri Thanedar
Democrat · MI
Seth Moulton
Democrat · MA
Marc Veasey
Democrat · TX
George Latimer
Democrat · NY
André Carson
Democrat · IN
Janice Schakowsky
Democrat · IL
J. Correa
Democrat · CA
Paul Tonko
Democrat · NY
Committee Sponsors
Judiciary Committee
5 of 44 committee members cosponsored
27 Democrats across these committees haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents
H.R. 7836 Quick Facts
- Committee
- Budget
- Chamber
- House
- Policy
- Immigration
- Introduced
- Mar 5, 2026
Referred to the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. for review
Mar 5, 2026
Official Sources
Official bill text, cosponsors, committee referrals, and legislative actions for the Real Courts, Rule of Law Act of 2026.
The Justice Department office that runs the immigration courts today and whose functions the bill transfers to the new United States Immigration Courts.
The current appeals body for immigration cases, whose pending appeals move to the new court's appellate division under the bill.
Current caseload, asylum, and case-completion data, the baseline for the annual wait-time and grant-rate reports the bill requires.
The precedent decisions that would remain binding in the new court until it explicitly overrules them.
The federal judiciary's policymaking body, which the bill directs to review the new court's decisions at least every 4 years.
The Immigration and Nationality Act section governing the removal hearings that immigration judges conduct.
H.R. 7836 Common Questions
What would H.R. 7836 change about immigration court?
It moves immigration judges out of the Justice Department into a new independent court, the United States Immigration Courts. The attorney general would no longer hire, supervise, or overrule the judges who decide deportation and asylum cases.
Who controls immigration judges right now?
The attorney general. Immigration judges are Justice Department employees in the Executive Office for Immigration Review, and the attorney general can set their rules and issue binding decisions in individual cases.
What happens to my pending immigration case?
It transfers to the new court on opening day. The bill says you lose no rights and there is no break in jurisdiction, so the case continues rather than starting over.
Would my current immigration judge stay the same?
Likely, at first. Every sitting immigration judge becomes an interim trial judge for a 4-year transition, serving up to 5 years. Interim judges can be appointed permanently.
When would the independent immigration courts open?
At the start of a fiscal year at least 180 days after the bill becomes law, and only once the president has appointed at least 3 appeals judges. Signed in early 2027, the earliest date would be October 1, 2027.
Who would appoint the new immigration appeals judges?
The president appoints the first 21, in three groups of 7 with terms ending 5, 10, and 15 years after the court opens. Staggering means no single administration fills the whole bench at once.
Could I see how often a specific judge grants asylum?
Yes, in aggregate. The court's annual report to Congress would break down relief grant rates by individual trial judge and by region, alongside average wait times and representation rates.
Do old Board of Immigration Appeals decisions still count?
Yes. Precedents from the Board and the attorney general stay binding in the new court until it explicitly overrules them. Existing rules also stay in effect until the appellate division changes them.
Based on H.R. 7836 bill text
H.R. 7836 Bill Text
“To establish, under article I of the Constitution of the United States, a court of record to be known as the United States Immigration Courts.”
Source: U.S. Government Publishing Office
Get notified when H.R. 7836 moves
Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.
Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.
Immigration Bills
9 related bills we're tracking
American Dream and Promise Act of 2025
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H884)
Feb 27, 2025
Protecting Sensitive Locations Act
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Feb 6, 2025
Born in the USA Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
May 13, 2025
Dignity for Detained Immigrants Act
Referred to the Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations, and Accountability.
Dec 4, 2025
No Secret Police Act of 2025
Referred to the Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement.
Jun 27, 2025
NO BAN Act
Referred to the Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement.
Feb 4, 2025
Stop Excessive Force in Immigration Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Nov 7, 2025
REMAIN in Mexico Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Jan 9, 2025
Humanitarian Standards for Individuals in ICE and CBP Custody Act
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H2018)
Feb 4, 2026
Trending Right Now
Bills gaining momentum across Congress
America’s Olympic and Paralympic Games Commemorative Coins Act
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Jul 14, 2025
Fit to Serve Act
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
May 21, 2025
ASAP Act
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 40 - 0.
Sep 16, 2026
Tracking Immigration in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.