H.R. 3569: Fit to Serve Act
Sponsor
Adam Smith
Democrat · WA-9
Bill Progress
Latest Action · May 21, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
If you can serve, gender identity shouldn't disqualify you
Why it matters
H.R. 3569 bars the military from taking 6 specific actions based on gender identity — including denying enlistment, reenlistment, medically necessary coverage, or continued service. It would put those protections directly into federal military law.
H.R. 3569, the Fit to Serve Act, is a military anti-discrimination bill focused on gender identity. Instead of creating a study, pilot program, or reporting requirement, it adds a direct prohibition to federal law governing the Armed Forces.
The bill lists 6 things military leaders could not do based on gender identity. They could not set service qualifications around it, involuntarily separate a service member, deny medically necessary health care coverage, require someone to serve as their sex assigned at birth, deny accession or reenlistment or continuation of service, or otherwise discriminate against a member of the Armed Forces.
That means the bill covers both people trying to join and people already in uniform. It also says the protection applies to an actual or potential diagnosis of gender dysphoria, not just gender identity in a narrower sense.
The definition is broad. Under the bill, gender identity includes gender-related identity, appearance, mannerisms, and other gender-related characteristics, regardless of sex designated at birth.
There is no new spending number in the text and no separate grant program attached. The main change is legal: H.R. 3569 would make these protections part of standing military law.
H.R. 3569 Bill Summary
What H.R. 3569 actually does.
Applicants can't be blocked from joining
The bill says the military could not deny accession or set service qualifications based on gender identity, including an actual or potential diagnosis of gender dysphoria.
Current troops can't be pushed out for this
Military leaders could not involuntarily separate a service member, deny reenlistment, or block continuation of service based on gender identity.
Medically necessary coverage can't be denied on this basis
The bill bars the military from denying medically necessary health care coverage to a service member because of gender identity.
No forced service as sex assigned at birth
The bill says the military could not require someone to serve as the sex they were assigned at birth.
The protection is written broadly
H.R. 3569 defines gender identity to include gender-related identity, appearance, mannerisms, and other gender-related characteristics, regardless of sex designated at birth.
Who benefits from H.R. 3569?
Transgender people trying to join the military
If you're seeking to enlist, H.R. 3569 says gender identity could not be used to set disqualifying service standards or deny your accession.
Current transgender service members
If you're already serving, the bill says you could not be involuntarily separated, denied reenlistment, or blocked from continuing your service because of gender identity.
Service members who need medically necessary care
The bill says medically necessary health coverage could not be denied on the basis of gender identity, making health benefits part of the protection.
Troops with a gender dysphoria diagnosis or possible diagnosis
The text specifically says the protection includes an actual or potential diagnosis of gender dysphoria, so the rule is not limited to formal identity labels alone.
Who is affected by H.R. 3569?
Military departments and service secretaries
They would be legally barred from using gender identity as a basis for enlistment standards, discharge decisions, reenlistment decisions, or coverage denials.
Recruiters, accession offices, and personnel commands
These offices would have to apply service-entry and retention rules without using gender identity or a gender dysphoria diagnosis as a reason to exclude someone.
Military health coverage administrators
They would have to make sure medically necessary coverage decisions are not denied on the basis of gender identity.
The broader Armed Forces personnel system
H.R. 3569 would add a uniform anti-discrimination rule to military law, affecting hiring, retention, separation, and health coverage practices across the services.
HR3569 Legislative Journey
House: Committee Action
May 21, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
About the Sponsor
Adam Smith
Democrat, Washington's 9th congressional district · 29 years in Congress
Committees: Armed Services
View full profile →
Cosponsors (119)
All 119 cosponsors are Democrats. Cosponsors represent 33 states: Arizona, California, Colorado, and 30 more.
Mark Takano
Democrat · CA
Chrissy Houlahan
Democrat · PA
Sara Jacobs
Democrat · CA
Eric Sorensen
Democrat · IL
Eleanor Norton
Democrat · DC
Robert Garcia
Democrat · CA
Raja Krishnamoorthi
Democrat · IL
Delia Ramirez
Democrat · IL
Becca Balint
Democrat · VT
Joe Courtney
Democrat · CT
Marilyn Strickland
Democrat · WA
Janice Schakowsky
Democrat · IL
Cosponsor Coverage Map
Committee Sponsors
Armed Services Committee
13 of 57 committee members cosponsored
14 Democrats across this committee haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents
H.R. 3569 Quick Facts
- Committee
- Armed Services
- Chamber
- House
- Policy
- Armed Forces and National Security
- Introduced
- May 21, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
May 21, 2025
Official Sources
Official Congress.gov page for the Fit to Serve Act with status, text, sponsors, and actions.
The bill amends chapter 49 of title 10 by adding a new section 975, so this is the core statutory location affected.
Official government publication of Title 10, which governs the Armed Forces and provides the broader legal framework this bill would amend.
The Defense Health Agency oversees military health care administration, relevant to the bill’s prohibition on denying medically necessary coverage.
TRICARE is the military health coverage system, making it a useful official source for understanding the coverage side of the bill.
The Department of Defense is the parent department for the Armed Forces and would be responsible for implementing any enacted military-wide nondiscrimination policy.
Official military recruiting source relevant to the bill’s rule against denying accession based on gender identity.
Official Air Force recruiting site relevant to questions about enlistment and accession standards under the bill.
H.R. 3569 Common Questions
What exactly would H.R. 3569 ban?
It would ban 6 types of military action based on gender identity: disqualifying someone from service, discharging them, denying medically necessary coverage, forcing service as sex assigned at birth, denying enlistment or reenlistment, or otherwise discriminating.
Can the military still deny enlistment or reenlistment because someone is transgender?
No. H.R. 3569 says the military could not deny accession, reenlistment, or continuation of service based on gender identity or a diagnosis or potential diagnosis of gender dysphoria.
Could a service member be discharged over gender identity under this bill?
No. The bill says military leaders could not involuntarily separate a member of the Armed Forces on that basis.
Does H.R. 3569 protect military health coverage?
Yes. It says medically necessary health care coverage could not be denied to a service member based on gender identity.
Can the military require someone to serve as their sex assigned at birth?
Not if H.R. 3569 became law. The bill explicitly says the military could not require that.
Does the bill cover gender dysphoria diagnoses too?
Yes. H.R. 3569 says the protection includes an actual diagnosis or even a potential diagnosis of gender dysphoria.
Does H.R. 3569 apply to both recruits and current troops?
Yes. It covers people trying to join, people seeking to reenlist, and people already serving in the Armed Forces.
Does H.R. 3569 spend new money or create a new program?
No. The text provided does not include a new funding stream or grant program. Its main effect is to add an anti-discrimination rule to military law.
Based on H.R. 3569 bill text
H.R. 3569 Bill Text
“To amend title 10, United States Code, to prohibit discrimination in the Armed Forces on the basis of gender identity, and for other purposes.”
Source: U.S. Government Publishing Office
Get notified when H.R. 3569 moves
Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.
Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.
Armed Forces and National Security Bills
9 related bills we're tracking
Major Richard Star Act
Referred to the Subcommittee on Disability Assistance and Memorial Affairs.
Apr 4, 2025
Pay Our Troops Act of 2026
Referred to the House Committee on Appropriations.
Sep 16, 2025
Love Lives On Act of 2025
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.
Mar 26, 2026
Air America Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select).
Mar 18, 2025
Reproductive Freedom for Veterans Act
Committee Hearings Held
Mar 18, 2026
GUARD VA Benefits Act
Committee Hearings Held
Mar 18, 2026
Veteran Burial Timeliness and Death Certificate Accountability Act
Subcommittee Hearings Held
Jun 30, 2026
Caring for Survivors Act of 2025
Subcommittee Hearings Held
Jun 24, 2025
Veterans’ ACCESS Act of 2025
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.
Jul 23, 2025
Trending Right Now
Bills gaining momentum across Congress
Great American Outdoors Act 250
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by Voice Vote.
Jun 24, 2026
American Franchise Act
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 18 - 15.
Jul 21, 2026
Accelerating Access to Dementia and Alzheimer’s Provider Training Act
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Jul 21, 2026
Tracking Armed Forces and National Security in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.