H.R. 3569: Fit to Serve Act
Sponsor
Adam Smith
Democrat · WA-9
Transgender troops shouldn't be discharged for who they are
Why it matters
The Pentagon has counted roughly 4,240 troops with a gender dysphoria diagnosis, and in 2025 it began moving them out of the ranks. H.R. 3569 would write the opposite rule into permanent military law: gender identity cannot be used to keep you out of uniform, push you out of it, or deny you medically necessary care. A future president could not undo that with a memo.
Transgender military service has swung with each administration since 2016: open service under one president, a ban under the next, open service again, then a new ban in 2025 that the Supreme Court allowed the Pentagon to start enforcing while lawsuits continue. Each swing came from an executive order or a Defense Department memo, not from Congress.
H.R. 3569 would take the decision away from the executive branch by putting a nondiscrimination rule directly into the law that governs the Armed Forces. Once there, only another act of Congress could remove it.
The bill lists six things a service secretary could not do because of gender identity. They could not set a qualification for service around it, involuntarily separate someone, deny medically necessary health coverage, require a person to serve as the sex assigned at birth, deny enlistment, reenlistment, or continued service, or otherwise discriminate against a member.
The protection reaches a diagnosis or even a potential diagnosis of gender dysphoria. That detail matters because the 2025 policy used the diagnosis, not the identity, as the trigger for separation. Under this bill, a gender dysphoria diagnosis could not be the reason you lose your career.
The definition of gender identity is broad: gender-related identity, appearance, mannerisms, and other gender-related characteristics, regardless of the sex designated at birth. The bill contains no funding, no new office, and no reporting requirement. Its entire effect is the prohibition.
Bill Progress
Latest Action · May 21, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
H.R. 3569 Bill Summary
What H.R. 3569 actually does.
Gender identity cannot disqualify you from enlisting
A service secretary could not prescribe a qualification for service based on gender identity, and could not deny accession on that basis.
You cannot be separated or refused reenlistment
The bill bars involuntary separation and bars denying reenlistment or continuation of service because of gender identity.
Medically necessary coverage cannot be denied
Military health coverage that is medically necessary could not be withheld from a service member on the basis of gender identity.
No requirement to serve as the sex assigned at birth
The military could not require an individual to serve in the sex assigned to them at birth.
A gender dysphoria diagnosis is covered too
The prohibition explicitly includes an actual or potential diagnosis of gender dysphoria, closing the route the 2025 policy used to identify troops for separation.
A catch-all against other discrimination
Beyond the five named actions, the bill bars the secretary from otherwise discriminating against a member of the Armed Forces on the basis of gender identity.
Who benefits from H.R. 3569?
Transgender troops now serving
The Pentagon has counted roughly 4,240 active-duty, Guard, and Reserve members with a gender dysphoria diagnosis. Under H.R. 3569 none of them could be separated over that diagnosis.
Transgender people who want to enlist
Recruits who would otherwise be screened out at a military entrance station could not be turned away because of gender identity or a dysphoria diagnosis.
Service members who rely on TRICARE for related care
Medically necessary care could not be denied because of gender identity, which puts health coverage inside the protection rather than leaving it to policy.
Commanders and units mid-deployment
Units that lost pilots, medics, and NCOs to the 2025 separations would no longer face that turnover from a future policy change.
Who is affected by H.R. 3569?
The Secretary of Defense and service secretaries
They would lose the authority to set gender-identity-based accession, retention, or separation policy. The 2025 ban could not be enforced if this became law.
Recruiting commands and entrance processing stations
Medical and administrative screening would have to be applied without treating gender identity or gender dysphoria as disqualifying.
The Defense Health Agency and TRICARE
Coverage determinations would have to be made on medical necessity alone, with gender identity removed as a basis for denial.
Any future administration
A president could no longer reverse transgender service policy by executive order. Changing it would require Congress to repeal or amend this section.
HR3569 Legislative Journey
House: Committee Action
May 21, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
About the Sponsor
Adam Smith
Democrat, Washington's 9th congressional district · 29 years in Congress
Committees: Armed Services
View full profile →
Cosponsors (169)
All 169 cosponsors are Democrats. Cosponsors represent 36 states: Arizona, California, Colorado, and 33 more.
Mark Takano
Democrat · CA
Chrissy Houlahan
Democrat · PA
Sara Jacobs
Democrat · CA
Eric Sorensen
Democrat · IL
Eleanor Norton
Democrat · DC
Robert Garcia
Democrat · CA
Raja Krishnamoorthi
Democrat · IL
Delia Ramirez
Democrat · IL
Becca Balint
Democrat · VT
Joe Courtney
Democrat · CT
Marilyn Strickland
Democrat · WA
Janice Schakowsky
Democrat · IL
Cosponsor Coverage Map
Committee Sponsors
Armed Services Committee
21 of 57 committee members cosponsored
6 Democrats across this committee haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents
H.R. 3569 Quick Facts
- Committee
- Armed Services
- Chamber
- House
- Policy
- Armed Forces and National Security
- Introduced
- May 21, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
May 21, 2025
Official Sources
Official bill page with the current status, full text, sponsor, cosponsors, and committee referral for the Fit to Serve Act.
The as-introduced text of the bill as published by the Government Publishing Office.
The chapter of Title 10 the bill amends by inserting a new section 975 after section 974.
The January 2025 executive order that directed the Pentagon to end transgender service, which this bill would override by statute.
The order that stayed the district court injunction and let the Pentagon begin enforcing the 2025 policy while appeals continue.
The Military Health System policy governing gender dysphoria care that the bill's coverage provision would constrain.
Where TRICARE publishes what it covers, the system through which the bill's medically necessary care protection would apply.
The committee the bill was referred to; sponsor Adam Smith is its ranking member.
H.R. 3569 Common Questions
What would H.R. 3569 stop the military from doing?
Six things, all based on gender identity: setting a qualification for service, involuntarily separating a member, denying medically necessary health coverage, requiring someone to serve as their sex assigned at birth, denying enlistment or reenlistment, or otherwise discriminating.
Would H.R. 3569 overturn the 2025 transgender military ban?
Yes. The 2025 ban came from an executive order and a Defense Department policy. H.R. 3569 would put the opposite rule into federal law, which an executive order cannot override. Only Congress could change it afterward.
Does the bill cover a gender dysphoria diagnosis, not just identity?
Yes. The text says the protection includes an actual or potential diagnosis of gender dysphoria. That matters because the 2025 policy used the diagnosis in a medical record as the trigger for separation.
Could transgender recruits enlist under H.R. 3569?
Yes. The military could not set a service qualification around gender identity or deny accession because of it. Recruits would still have to meet the same medical and fitness standards as anyone else.
Would TRICARE have to cover gender-related care?
The bill bars denying medically necessary health coverage because of gender identity. It does not list specific treatments, so what counts as medically necessary would still be decided under military health rules.
How many troops would H.R. 3569 affect?
The Pentagon has counted roughly 4,240 service members with a gender dysphoria diagnosis across active duty, Guard, and Reserve. Outside estimates of transgender troops overall run higher, since not everyone has a diagnosis on file.
What are the chances H.R. 3569 passes?
Low as a standalone bill in a Republican-controlled House. Sponsor Adam Smith is the top Democrat on Armed Services, and the likelier route is an amendment to the annual defense authorization bill, where it would need Republican votes.
Does H.R. 3569 spend any money?
No. There is no appropriation or new program. The bill's only effect is the prohibition. The Pentagon has said gender dysphoria care cost about $52 million over the ten years through 2024.
Based on H.R. 3569 bill text
H.R. 3569 Bill Text
“To amend title 10, United States Code, to prohibit discrimination in the Armed Forces on the basis of gender identity, and for other purposes.”
Source: U.S. Government Publishing Office
Get notified when H.R. 3569 moves
Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.
Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.
Armed Forces and National Security Bills
9 related bills we're tracking
Major Richard Star Act
Referred to the Subcommittee on Disability Assistance and Memorial Affairs.
Apr 4, 2025
Pay Our Troops Act of 2026
Referred to the House Committee on Appropriations.
Sep 16, 2025
Love Lives On Act of 2025
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.
Mar 26, 2026
Air America Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select).
Mar 18, 2025
Veteran Burial Timeliness and Death Certificate Accountability Act
Subcommittee Hearings Held
Jun 30, 2026
Reproductive Freedom for Veterans Act
Committee Hearings Held
Mar 18, 2026
GUARD VA Benefits Act
Committee Hearings Held
Mar 18, 2026
Caring for Survivors Act of 2025
Subcommittee Hearings Held
Jun 24, 2025
VA Employee Fairness Act of 2025
Referred to the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations.
May 29, 2025
Trending Right Now
Bills gaining momentum across Congress
ASAP Act
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 40 - 0.
Sep 16, 2026
761st Tank Battalion Congressional Gold Medal Act
Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Feb 26, 2025
Federal Firearms Licensee Protection Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Mar 3, 2025
Tracking Armed Forces and National Security in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.