H.R. 273: REMAIN in Mexico Act of 2025

Introduced Jan 9, 2025110 cosponsors

Sponsor

Brandon Gill

Brandon Gill

Republican · TX-26

Congress wants “Remain in Mexico” written into law

4 min readLast updated September 21, 2026

Why it matters

Roughly 70,000 asylum seekers were sent back to Mexico to wait out their U.S. court cases the first time “Remain in Mexico” ran, from 2019 until it ended in 2022. H.R. 273 would turn that policy from something each administration can start or stop by memo into a standing order in federal law — one a future DHS Secretary could not end without Congress.

H.R. 273, the REMAIN in Mexico Act, is two sentences long. It tells the Secretary of Homeland Security to carry out the Migrant Protection Protocols — the program better known as “Remain in Mexico” — and to run it by the rulebook former Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen issued on January 25, 2019.

Under that program, certain people who arrive at the southern border and seek asylum are returned to Mexico while their cases move through U.S. immigration court. They cross back for hearings, then return to Mexico to wait for the next one.

The policy has already been switched on and off twice. It launched in 2019, the Biden administration ended it, and the Supreme Court ruled in 2022 that DHS had the authority to do so. The Trump administration moved to restart it in January 2025, days after this bill was introduced.

H.R. 273 would take the on-off switch away from the executive branch: a future administration could not end the program without Congress changing the law. The bill also says it applies regardless of any other law, which is Congress trying to prevent conflicting statutes from being used to get around it. Courts would decide how far that reaches.

The bill adds nothing else. It has no funding, no staffing levels, no new exceptions, and no deadlines of its own. Every operational detail — who is eligible, who is exempt, how hearings work — comes from the 2019 memo.

Bill Progress

IntroducedJan 9
Committee 
Pass House 
Pass Senate 
Signed 
Law 

Latest Action · Jan 9, 2025

1/4

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

H.R. 273 Bill Summary

What H.R. 273 actually does.

1

Asylum seekers wait in Mexico, not the U.S.

DHS must implement the Migrant Protection Protocols, under which certain migrants and asylum seekers who arrive at the southern border are returned to Mexico while their U.S. immigration cases are pending.

2

The 2019 rulebook becomes the law's rulebook

The bill ties the program to Secretary Nielsen's January 25, 2019 policy guidance. Eligibility, exemptions, and procedures come from that memo rather than from new rules written by the current department.

3

No future administration can end it alone

The Secretary “shall” implement the program. Once in statute, ending MPP would require Congress to amend or repeal the law, not a new DHS memo.

4

It applies regardless of other laws

The mandate is written to take priority over any conflicting provision of law. How far that override extends — for example, against asylum and humanitarian protections already in statute — would be settled in court.

5

No money attached

The bill includes no appropriation, staffing target, or grant program. The cost of running the program would come out of existing DHS and immigration court budgets.

Who benefits from H.R. 273?

Border communities in Texas, Arizona, and California

Supporters argue that keeping asylum seekers in Mexico while cases are pending eases pressure on U.S. shelters, local services, and Border Patrol processing along the southern border.

Advocates of stricter asylum rules

The bill turns a policy that has been ended once before into a mandate a future administration could not undo on its own. Sponsor Brandon Gill of Texas introduced it with 110 cosponsors, 108 Republicans and 2 Democrats.

DHS and border officers

Instead of policy shifting with each administration, officers would work under one fixed framework — the 2019 memo — that has already been used in the field.

Who is affected by H.R. 273?

People seeking asylum at the southern border

Those placed in the program would wait in Mexico, often for months, between U.S. court hearings. Critics of the original program pointed to reports of violence against people waiting in Mexican border cities and difficulty reaching U.S. lawyers from across the border.

Mexico and its border cities

The program depends on Mexico accepting people returned from the U.S. Cities such as Tijuana, Ciudad Juárez, and Matamoros absorbed large encampments and shelter demand under the first version.

Immigration courts

Judges would hear cases for people who must travel from Mexico for each hearing, which in the first program meant temporary tent courts at the border and cases dismissed when people could not appear.

Future DHS Secretaries

Any Secretary, regardless of party, would be legally required to run the program and could not end it by executive action.

Share this story
Tracking floor activity — no debate on H.R. 273 yet. Updates when a legislator speaks on the record.

HR273 Legislative Journey

1 actions

House: Committee Action

Jan 9, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

About the Sponsor

Brandon Gill

Brandon Gill

Republican, Texas' 26th congressional district · 1 years in Congress

Committees: the Budget, the Judiciary, Oversight and Government Reform

View full profile →

Cosponsors (110)

No new cosponsors in 165 days — momentum stalled

This bill has 110 cosponsors: 2 Democrats, 108 Republicans. Cosponsors represent 35 states: Alaska, Alabama, Arizona, and 32 more.

2Democrats108Republicans·35 states

Cosponsor Coverage Map

Committee Sponsors

13 Republicans across this committee haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents

H.R. 273 Quick Facts

Cosponsors
110
Nancy Mace
Andrew Ogles
Randy Weber
Eric Burlison
Troy Nehls
+105 more
Committee
Judiciary
Chamber
House
Policy
Immigration
Introduced
Jan 9, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Jan 9, 2025

Constituent Resources

Get notified when this bill moves

Official Sources

H.R. 273 on Congress.gov

Official bill page with text, status, cosponsors, and the House Judiciary Committee referral.

DHS: Policy Guidance for Implementation of the Migrant Protection Protocols (2019)

The January 25, 2019 Nielsen memo the bill names as the rulebook DHS must follow.

DHS Reinstates Migrant Protection Protocols (January 2025)

DHS announcement restarting the program by executive action, the step the bill would make permanent in law.

DHS Archive: Migrant Protection Protocols

DHS record of the program’s court-ordered restart and its 2022 wind-down.

Supreme Court: Biden v. Texas (2022)

The ruling that DHS had the authority to end the program, the executive discretion this bill would remove.

CBP: Migrant Protection Protocols Statistics

Customs and Border Protection enrollment data for the program at the southern border.

Executive Office for Immigration Review

The Justice Department office that runs the immigration courts where enrolled migrants’ cases are heard.

USCIS: Obtaining Asylum in the United States

Official overview of the asylum process that people placed in the program go through.

H.R. 273 Common Questions

What is the REMAIN in Mexico Act?

H.R. 273 orders DHS to run the Migrant Protection Protocols, known as “Remain in Mexico,” and to follow the January 25, 2019 memo that set the program up. It would put the policy in federal law instead of leaving it to each administration.

Would asylum seekers have to wait in Mexico?

Those placed in the program, yes. They would be returned to Mexico while their U.S. immigration cases are pending, crossing back into the U.S. for each court hearing.

Isn't Remain in Mexico already in effect?

The Trump administration moved to restart it by executive action in January 2025. H.R. 273 would go further: a future administration could not end the program without Congress changing the law.

How did Remain in Mexico end the first time?

The Biden administration terminated it. Texas and Missouri sued to keep it, and in 2022 the Supreme Court ruled in Biden v. Texas that DHS had the authority to end the program.

What rules would the program follow?

Former DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen's January 25, 2019 guidance, “Policy Guidance for Implementation of the Migrant Protection Protocols.” That memo, not the bill, sets out who is eligible and who is exempt.

Does the bill pay for the program?

No. It includes no appropriation, staffing level, or grant funding. Costs would come out of existing DHS and immigration court budgets.

Does H.R. 273 have Democratic support?

Some. Of its 110 cosponsors, 108 are Republicans and two are Democrats: Jared Golden of Maine and Marie Gluesenkamp Perez of Washington. Rep. Brandon Gill of Texas is the sponsor.

Where is H.R. 273 now?

It was introduced on January 9, 2025, and referred to the House Judiciary Committee, where it has not yet had a vote.

Based on H.R. 273 bill text

H.R. 273 Bill Text

PDF

“To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to continue to implement the Migrant Protection Protocols, and for other purposes.”

Source: U.S. Government Publishing Office

Bill Alerts

Get notified when H.R. 273 moves

Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.

Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.

Immigration Bills

9 related bills we're tracking

View all→

Tracking Immigration in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.