H.R. 569: Birthright Citizenship Act of 2025
Sponsor
Brian Babin
Republican · TX-36
Birth in America wouldn't guarantee citizenship
Why it matters
If you're having a baby in the United States, H.R. 569 says birthplace alone would no longer be enough for citizenship. Your child would qualify at birth only if at least one parent is a U.S. citizen or national, a green card holder living here, or a lawful-status service member on active duty.
H.R. 569 would rewrite the federal rule for who becomes a U.S. citizen at birth when they're born in the United States. Right now, the bill argues the law should be clarified so birth in the country is not enough by itself.
Under the bill, a newborn would count as being under U.S. jurisdiction for citizenship at birth only if at least one parent is a U.S. citizen or national, a lawful permanent resident who lives in the United States, or a person with lawful immigration status serving on active duty in the U.S. military.
That means future births — not past ones — are the real target. Anyone already born before the law takes effect would keep their current citizenship or nationality status.
The practical shift is bigger than the bill's short text suggests. Hospitals, records offices, and federal agencies would need a way to verify a parent's status at or around birth before citizenship paperwork is settled.
For families, the central question would no longer be just where your child is born, but whether one parent fits the bill's legal categories on that day.
Bill Progress
Latest Action · Jan 21, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
H.R. 569 Bill Summary
What H.R. 569 actually does.
Birthplace alone stops being enough
H.R. 569 says a child born in the United States would not automatically qualify for citizenship at birth based only on being born here.
One parent must fit three listed categories
A newborn would qualify at birth only if at least one parent is a U.S. citizen or national, a green card holder living in the United States, or a person with lawful status serving on active duty in the armed forces.
Green card holders are covered if they live here
The bill includes lawful permanent residents, but only when that parent's residence is in the United States.
Some military families are included
A parent with lawful immigration status who is serving on active duty in the U.S. military would satisfy the bill's test.
No change for people already born
The bill says it would not affect the citizenship or nationality status of anyone born before it becomes law.
Who benefits from H.R. 569?
Future U.S.-born children with a citizen or national parent
If you're a U.S. citizen or national having a child in the United States after enactment, your child would still qualify for citizenship at birth under the bill.
Families with a green card holder parent living in the U.S.
A baby born in the United States would still qualify if one parent is a lawful permanent resident whose residence is in the country.
Some lawful-status military families
If one parent has lawful status and is serving on active duty in the armed forces, a U.S.-born child would qualify at birth.
People already born before enactment
If you were born before this bill became law, the text says your current citizenship or nationality status would not change.
Who is affected by H.R. 569?
Future U.S.-born babies whose parents don't fit the listed categories
If neither parent is a citizen or national, a green card holder living here, or a lawful-status active-duty service member, the child would not automatically qualify for citizenship at birth under H.R. 569.
Mixed-status families expecting children
Your child's citizenship status at birth could depend on whether one parent fits the bill's categories at the time of delivery.
Hospitals and birth-record offices
Birth documentation may require new checks of parental citizenship, residency, or military status before records are finalized.
Federal immigration and citizenship agencies
Agencies would need to apply the new rule to births after enactment and decide what evidence is enough to prove a parent qualifies.
HR569 Legislative Journey
House: Committee Action
Jan 21, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
About the Sponsor
Brian Babin
Republican, Texas's 36th congressional district · 11 years in Congress
Committees: Science, Space, and Technology, Transportation and Infrastructure
View full profile →
Cosponsors (93)
All 93 cosponsors are Republicans. Cosponsors represent 30 states: Alaska, Alabama, Arizona, and 27 more.
Dan Crenshaw
Republican · TX
Earl Carter
Republican · GA
Derrick Van Orden
Republican · WI
Dale Strong
Republican · AL
Warren Davidson
Republican · OH
Ben Cline
Republican · VA
Troy Nehls
Republican · TX
Andy Biggs
Republican · AZ
Andrew Ogles
Republican · TN
Eric Burlison
Republican · MO
Diana Harshbarger
Republican · TN
Chip Roy
Republican · TX
Committee Sponsors
Judiciary Committee
18 of 44 committee members cosponsored
6 Republicans across this committee haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents
H.R. 569 Quick Facts
- Committee
- Judiciary
- Chamber
- House
- Policy
- Immigration
- Introduced
- Jan 21, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Jan 21, 2025
Official Sources
Official bill page with status, text, sponsors, and actions for the Birthright Citizenship Act of 2025.
This is the federal statute H.R. 569 would amend to redefine who is a citizen at birth in the United States.
The bill expressly invokes the 14th Amendment, and this official constitutional resource provides the background for the birthright citizenship debate.
This USCIS page helps explain lawful permanent resident status, which H.R. 569 uses as one of the qualifying parental categories.
USCIS administers citizenship matters and this page provides official information relevant to how citizenship rules are applied.
H.R. 569 references title 10's definition of the armed forces for the active-duty military parent category.
Official USCIS gateway to the Immigration and Nationality Act, the broader federal law that contains section 301 amended by this bill.
GovInfo hosts the official Constitution and related congressional materials useful for understanding the constitutional context of birthright citizenship.
H.R. 569 Common Questions
Does H.R. 569 end automatic citizenship for every baby born in the U.S.?
No. H.R. 569 would still allow citizenship at birth if at least one parent fits one of three categories listed in the bill.
Who would still qualify for citizenship at birth under H.R. 569?
A U.S.-born child would qualify if one parent is a U.S. citizen or national, a green card holder living in the U.S., or a lawful-status service member on active duty.
Would H.R. 569 apply to people who are already citizens?
No. The bill says it would not change the citizenship or nationality status of anyone born before it becomes law.
If one parent has a green card, would the baby still be a citizen?
Yes, if that parent is a lawful permanent resident and lives in the United States. H.R. 569 specifically includes that group.
What if neither parent fits H.R. 569's status rules?
Under the bill, a child born in the United States would not automatically qualify for citizenship at birth if neither parent falls into one of the listed categories.
Are military families covered by H.R. 569?
Some are. The bill includes a parent with lawful immigration status who is serving on active duty in the U.S. armed forces.
Would H.R. 569 change the Constitution or just federal law?
The bill changes federal statute. But because it deals with birthright citizenship, courts would likely be asked whether that change matches the 14th Amendment.
Based on H.R. 569 bill text
H.R. 569 Bill Text
“To amend section 301 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to clarify those classes of individuals born in the United States who are nationals and citizens of the United States at birth.”
Source: U.S. Government Publishing Office
Get notified when H.R. 569 moves
Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.
Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.
Immigration Bills
9 related bills we're tracking
American Dream and Promise Act of 2025
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H884)
Feb 27, 2025
Protecting Sensitive Locations Act
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Feb 6, 2025
Born in the USA Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
May 13, 2025
Dignity for Detained Immigrants Act
Referred to the Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations, and Accountability.
Dec 4, 2025
No Secret Police Act of 2025
Referred to the Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement.
Jun 27, 2025
NO BAN Act
Referred to the Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement.
Feb 4, 2025
Stop Excessive Force in Immigration Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Nov 7, 2025
REMAIN in Mexico Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Jan 9, 2025
Humanitarian Standards for Individuals in ICE and CBP Custody Act
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H2018)
Feb 4, 2026
Trending Right Now
Bills gaining momentum across Congress
Great American Outdoors Act 250
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by Voice Vote.
Jun 24, 2026
Humane Cosmetics Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Feb 27, 2025
Therapeutic Fraud Prevention Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
May 7, 2025
Tracking Immigration in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.