H.R. 569: Birthright Citizenship Act of 2025
Sponsor
Brian Babin
Republican · TX-36
Congress wants a parent's status to decide a baby's citizenship
Why it matters
For well over a century, being born on U.S. soil has been enough to make you a citizen. H.R. 569, backed by 94 House cosponsors, would add a second test: at least one parent must be a citizen or national, a green card holder living here, or a lawfully present service member on active duty. Children born after enactment who don't meet it would not be citizens at birth.
H.R. 569, the Birthright Citizenship Act of 2025, rewrites the federal statute that decides who is a citizen at birth. The 14th Amendment grants citizenship to people born here and "subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States. The bill defines that phrase for the first time in statute.
A child born in the United States after the bill becomes law would be a citizen at birth only if at least one parent falls into one of three groups. Those groups are U.S. citizens or nationals, green card holders whose residence is in the United States, and people with lawful immigration status serving on active duty in the armed forces.
Everyone outside those groups is left out, whether or not they are here legally. That includes the children of undocumented immigrants, but also babies born to two parents on student visas, H-1B work visas, or tourist visas, and to refugees, asylees, or people with Temporary Protected Status who have not yet received green cards.
Anyone born before the bill takes effect keeps the citizenship they already have. The bill does not say what status a newly excluded child would hold instead, or how hospitals and agencies would confirm a parent's status at birth.
The bill opens by "acknowledging" the 14th Amendment's guarantee, and sponsors contend that Congress can define who is subject to U.S. jurisdiction by ordinary law. Opponents point to the Supreme Court's 1898 decision in United States v. Wong Kim Ark, which recognized the citizenship of a U.S.-born son of Chinese immigrants, and argue only a constitutional amendment could make this change.
Bill Progress
Latest Action · Jan 21, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
H.R. 569 Bill Summary
What H.R. 569 actually does.
Being born here is no longer enough on its own
A child born in the United States would count as a citizen at birth only if a parent meets one of the bill's three status tests. Birthplace alone would not settle it.
A citizen or national parent still passes on citizenship
If either parent is a U.S. citizen or U.S. national, a child born in the United States is a citizen at birth, as today. Only one parent needs to qualify.
Green card holders count only if they live here
A lawful permanent resident parent qualifies when their residence is in the United States. A green card holder living abroad who gives birth during a visit would not meet the test.
Active-duty service members with lawful status qualify
A non-citizen parent who is lawfully present and serving on active duty in the U.S. armed forces satisfies the test, even without a green card.
Anyone born before enactment is protected
The change applies only to births after the bill becomes law. It does not affect the citizenship or nationality of anyone already born.
Who benefits from H.R. 569?
Families where one parent is already a citizen or green card holder
Your U.S.-born child's citizenship works the way it does now. The bill only needs one parent to qualify, so a citizen married to an undocumented spouse still has a citizen child.
Non-citizen troops serving on active duty
Lawfully present service members without green cards are written into the bill directly, so a child born to them in the United States would still be a citizen at birth.
Every American born before the law takes effect
The bill states that no one already born loses citizenship or nationality. Its reach starts with births after enactment.
Supporters seeking tighter immigration rules
Sponsors argue that automatic citizenship regardless of parents' status encourages unlawful entry and so-called birth tourism. The bill ties citizenship to a parent's lasting legal connection to the country.
Who is affected by H.R. 569?
Children of undocumented parents born after enactment
If neither parent has lawful permanent status or citizenship, a U.S.-born child would not be a citizen at birth. The bill does not say what status that child would hold.
Families here legally on temporary visas
Parents on H-1B, student, or other temporary visas, and refugees, asylees, or TPS holders who have not yet received green cards, would not qualify, even though they are lawfully present.
Hospitals, state vital records offices, and the State Department
A birth certificate would no longer be enough to prove citizenship for newborns. Offices issuing birth records, Social Security numbers, and passports would need a way to check a parent's status.
Every parent applying for a newborn's documents
To get a passport or proof of citizenship for a new baby, citizen parents too could be asked to document their own status, not just the child's birthplace.
HR569 Legislative Journey
House: Committee Action
Jan 21, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
About the Sponsor
Brian Babin
Republican, Texas's 36th congressional district · 11 years in Congress
Committees: Science, Space, and Technology, Transportation and Infrastructure
View full profile →
Cosponsors (95)
All 95 cosponsors are Republicans. Cosponsors represent 30 states: Alaska, Alabama, Arizona, and 27 more.
Dan Crenshaw
Republican · TX
Earl Carter
Republican · GA
Derrick Van Orden
Republican · WI
Dale Strong
Republican · AL
Warren Davidson
Republican · OH
Ben Cline
Republican · VA
Troy Nehls
Republican · TX
Andy Biggs
Republican · AZ
Andrew Ogles
Republican · TN
Eric Burlison
Republican · MO
Diana Harshbarger
Republican · TN
Chip Roy
Republican · TX
Committee Sponsors
Judiciary Committee
19 of 44 committee members cosponsored
5 Republicans across this committee haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents
H.R. 569 Quick Facts
- Committee
- Judiciary
- Chamber
- House
- Policy
- Immigration
- Introduced
- Jan 21, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Jan 21, 2025
Official Sources
Official bill page with text, sponsors, cosponsors, and actions for the Birthright Citizenship Act of 2025.
The citizenship-at-birth statute (INA section 301) that H.R. 569 amends to define who is "subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States.
The Library of Congress analysis of the 14th Amendment Citizenship Clause, including the 1898 Wong Kim Ark decision at the center of the constitutional dispute over this bill.
Library of Congress analysis of the Supreme Court case testing the January 2025 birthright citizenship executive order, which takes an approach similar to this bill.
The January 2025 executive order that ties a newborn's citizenship documents to the parents' status, the executive-branch counterpart to H.R. 569.
Defines the "armed forces" and "active service" terms the bill uses for its service-member parent category.
Explains how people become lawful permanent residents, one of the parent categories that would still pass citizenship to a U.S.-born child.
USCIS table mapping Immigration and Nationality Act sections to the U.S. Code, including section 301 amended by this bill.
H.R. 569 Common Questions
Does H.R. 569 end birthright citizenship?
Not entirely. It limits it. A U.S.-born child would still be a citizen at birth if at least one parent is a citizen or national, a green card holder living in the U.S., or a lawfully present service member on active duty. Babies born to parents outside those groups would not be.
Would people already born in the U.S. lose their citizenship?
No. The bill says it does not affect the citizenship or nationality of anyone born before it becomes law. It applies only to future births.
Would a baby born to parents on work or student visas be a citizen?
Not under H.R. 569. Parents on H-1B, student, or tourist visas are lawfully present but are not citizens or green card holders, so their U.S.-born child would not be a citizen at birth unless one parent is serving on active duty.
What if only one parent is a U.S. citizen or has a green card?
One is enough. If either parent is a citizen, national, or a green card holder living in the U.S., the child is a citizen at birth. The other parent's status does not matter.
What status would a U.S.-born child who doesn't qualify have?
The bill does not say. It removes automatic citizenship for these children but creates no alternative status or process for them. That gap would be left to other immigration law, agencies, and likely the courts.
Are children of non-citizen service members covered?
Yes, if the parent is lawfully present and serving on active duty in the U.S. armed forces. A green card is not required for that group.
Can Congress change birthright citizenship without amending the Constitution?
That is the central dispute. Sponsors argue Congress can define who is "subject to the jurisdiction" of the U.S. by statute. Critics cite the Supreme Court's 1898 Wong Kim Ark ruling and say only a constitutional amendment could do this. Courts would decide if it became law.
How is H.R. 569 different from Trump's birthright citizenship order?
Both tie a baby's citizenship to the parents' status. The January 2025 executive order acts through federal agencies. H.R. 569 would write the rule into federal law, which supporters see as putting it on firmer legal footing.
Based on H.R. 569 bill text
H.R. 569 Bill Text
“To amend section 301 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to clarify those classes of individuals born in the United States who are nationals and citizens of the United States at birth.”
Source: U.S. Government Publishing Office
Get notified when H.R. 569 moves
Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.
Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.
Immigration Bills
9 related bills we're tracking
American Dream and Promise Act of 2025
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H884)
Feb 27, 2025
Protecting Sensitive Locations Act
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Feb 6, 2025
Born in the USA Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
May 13, 2025
Dignity for Detained Immigrants Act
Referred to the Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations, and Accountability.
Dec 4, 2025
No Secret Police Act of 2025
Referred to the Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement.
Jun 27, 2025
NO BAN Act
Referred to the Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement.
Feb 4, 2025
Stop Excessive Force in Immigration Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Nov 7, 2025
REMAIN in Mexico Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Jan 9, 2025
Humanitarian Standards for Individuals in ICE and CBP Custody Act
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H2018)
Feb 4, 2026
Trending Right Now
Bills gaining momentum across Congress
ASAP Act
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 40 - 0.
Sep 16, 2026
Federal Firearms Licensee Protection Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Mar 3, 2025
Therapeutic Fraud Prevention Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
May 7, 2025
Tracking Immigration in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.