H.R. 4796: Restoring Essential Healthcare Act

Introduced Jul 29, 2025155 cosponsors

Sponsor

Laura Friedman

Laura Friedman

Democrat · CA-30

The Medicaid ban expired. The unpaid year did not.

5 min readLast updated August 30, 2026

Why it matters

For one year, federal Medicaid stopped paying a narrow set of reproductive health providers for everything they did — contraception, cancer screening, STI testing, wellness visits. KFF found that in 2023, nearly one in five female Medicaid enrollees got their contraceptive care at a Planned Parenthood clinic. That restriction ran out on its own in July 2026, so the live question in H.R. 4796 is no longer whether the cutoff continues. It is whether the year of blocked claims behind it gets paid.

H.R. 4796 is seventeen lines long and does two things. It repeals section 71113 of Public Law 119-21 — the 2025 reconciliation law — and it says that any Medicaid care furnished by an entity that section blocked, between the day that law was enacted and the day this one would be, must be paid for as if the block had never been written.

Section 71113 named no organization. It defined a "prohibited entity" by four traits, measured as of October 1, 2025: a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, an essential community provider primarily delivering family planning and reproductive health care, one that provides abortions beyond the exceptions federal law already allows, and one that took in more than $800,000 in combined federal and state Medicaid reimbursement in fiscal 2023. Affiliates, subsidiaries, successors and clinics were swept in alongside it. KFF's tracking of the resulting litigation identifies the providers actually blocked as Planned Parenthood affiliates, Maine Family Planning and Health Imperatives.

The cutoff reached every service those providers billed Medicaid for, not only abortion. KFF found that in 2023, nearly one in five female Medicaid enrollees got their contraceptive care at a Planned Parenthood clinic.

The restriction ran for exactly one year from enactment and then lapsed in early July 2026 without Congress having to do anything. The courts did not shorten it. A district court enjoined the provision in July 2025, the First Circuit paused that injunction in September and blocked it outright that December, and the cutoff was in force for most of its life.

That calendar is what H.R. 4796 now turns on. The half of the bill that repeals the restriction has been overtaken by events — the restriction is already gone. What is left is the retroactive half: about a year of Medicaid claims that were never paid, which this bill would order paid.

The bill attaches no appropriation, no payment rate, no cap and no penalty. It covers care furnished under a state Medicaid plan and under a waiver of that plan, so managed care and demonstration arrangements are inside it. It offers no estimate of what reopening those claims would cost, and no CBO score has been published for it.

Bill Progress

IntroducedJul 29
Committee 
Pass House 
Pass Senate 
Signed 
Law 

Latest Action · Jul 29, 2025

1/3

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

H.R. 4796 Bill Summary

What H.R. 4796 actually does.

1

The one-year Medicaid cutoff comes off the books

H.R. 4796 repeals section 71113 of Public Law 119-21, the provision that barred federal Medicaid payments to providers meeting its four-part definition. The provision had already reached its own one-year expiration in July 2026; the repeal removes it from the statute rather than leaving it lapsed.

2

A year of blocked claims would be paid

For items and services those providers furnished between the enactment of Public Law 119-21 and the enactment of this bill, payment must be made as if the restriction had never been enacted. This is the operative half of the bill.

3

Waiver care counts, not just standard state plan care

The payment requirement reaches services furnished under a state Medicaid plan and under a waiver of that plan, which covers managed care and demonstration arrangements rather than fee-for-service alone.

4

The definition of who was blocked stays as written

The bill does not create or narrow a category of affected providers. It points back to the definition in the repealed provision to identify whose claims are covered by the retroactive payment.

5

No money, no rate and no penalty are attached

H.R. 4796 carries no appropriation, no funding cap, no reimbursement formula and no fine. Claims would be processed under the Medicaid payment rules that already apply.

Who benefits from H.R. 4796?

Patients at the clinics that were cut off

Planned Parenthood operates more than 600 health centers serving over 2 million patients a year, more than half of them covered by Medicaid, according to KFF. Restoring payment affects whether those centers can keep taking Medicaid patients at that scale.

The blocked providers themselves

KFF reports that more than a third of Planned Parenthood affiliates’ aggregate revenue came from federal Medicaid reimbursement in 2023. Maine Family Planning and Health Imperatives were also blocked. A year of that revenue is what the retroactive payment clause addresses.

The eleven states that covered the gap themselves

California, Colorado, Connecticut, Illinois, Massachusetts, Maine, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon and Washington spent state-only dollars to keep affected providers operating through the cutoff, according to KFF. The bill directs payment for that window as though the restriction had never existed.

Who is affected by H.R. 4796?

State Medicaid agencies

States would need to identify roughly a year of denied or unbilled claims from the affected providers, reopen them, and pay them under normal Medicaid rules.

Managed care plans and billing operations

Plans, clearinghouses and provider billing staff would have to reconcile and resubmit claims that were denied or never filed because of the restriction, including claims furnished under waivers.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

CMS issued guidance to states on implementing the restriction and would need to issue guidance on unwinding it and handling retroactive payment.

Members who backed the restriction

The provision expired on its own without a vote. Repealing it and paying the withheld claims would reverse both the policy and its financial effect, which is a different outcome than letting it lapse.

Share this story
Tracking floor activity — no debate on H.R. 4796 yet. Updates when a legislator speaks on the record.

HR4796 Legislative Journey

1 actions

House: Committee Action

Jul 29, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

About the Sponsor

Laura Friedman

Laura Friedman

Democrat, California's 30th congressional district · 1 years in Congress

Committees: Science, Space, and Technology, Transportation and Infrastructure

View full profile →

Cosponsors (155)

No new cosponsors in 75 days — momentum stalled

All 155 cosponsors are Democrats. Cosponsors represent 37 states: Alabama, Arizona, California, and 34 more.

155Democrats·37 states

Cosponsor Coverage Map

Committee Sponsors

4 Democrats across this committee haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents

What laws does H.R. 4796 change?

1 changes

Full Text

Sections Repealed

71113 of Public Law 119-21

H.R. 4796 Quick Facts

Cosponsors
155
Nikema Williams
Chris Pappas
Julia Brownley
Gilbert Cisneros
Ted Lieu
+150 more
Committee
Energy and Commerce
Chamber
House
Policy
Health
Introduced
Jul 29, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Jul 29, 2025

Constituent Resources

Get notified when this bill moves

Official Sources

H.R. 4796 on Congress.gov

Official status, actions, cosponsor list and committee referral for the Restoring Essential Healthcare Act.

H.R. 4796 as introduced (GovInfo)

The full seventeen-line text of the bill as introduced on July 29, 2025, published by the Government Publishing Office.

Public Law 119-21 full text (GovInfo)

The 2025 reconciliation law containing section 71113, the one-year Medicaid payment prohibition this bill would repeal and its four-part definition of a prohibited entity.

42 U.S.C. 1396d — definition of medical assistance

Subsection (a)(4)(C) is what makes family planning services and supplies a Medicaid benefit, which is the category of care the payment cutoff reached.

42 U.S.C. 1396a — Medicaid state plan requirements

The state plan the bill points to; subsection (a)(23) is the free-choice-of-provider requirement that governs which providers a Medicaid enrollee may use.

42 U.S.C. 1315 — demonstration project and waiver authority

Section 1115 of the Social Security Act, the waiver authority behind the demonstration and managed care arrangements the bill explicitly covers.

House Committee on Energy and Commerce

The committee H.R. 4796 was referred to on July 29, 2025, where it has had no hearing or markup.

Office of Rep. Laura Friedman

Official House site of the bill sponsor, Rep. Laura Friedman of California.

H.R. 4796 Common Questions

Which providers did the Medicaid payment ban actually apply to?

The 2025 reconciliation law did not name anyone. It blocked 501(c)(3) nonprofits that are essential community providers primarily delivering family planning and reproductive health care, that provide abortions beyond the exceptions federal law allows, and that took in over $800,000 in Medicaid reimbursement in fiscal 2023. KFF identifies the providers actually blocked as Planned Parenthood affiliates, Maine Family Planning and Health Imperatives.

Didn’t the Medicaid ban already expire on its own?

Yes. It ran for exactly one year from July 4, 2025 and lapsed in early July 2026 with no vote required. That is why the forward-looking half of H.R. 4796 no longer changes anything. What still matters is the retroactive half, which would pay for care delivered during that year.

Would H.R. 4796 pay for care that already happened?

That is its main effect. For items and services those providers furnished between the reconciliation law’s enactment and this bill’s enactment, payment would be made as if the restriction had never been enacted.

Did the ban block abortion coverage, or all care?

All of it. Federal Medicaid already limits abortion coverage under longstanding law. The 2025 restriction went further and blocked federal Medicaid payment to the covered providers for every service they billed — contraception, cancer screening, STI testing, wellness visits.

Did courts stop the Medicaid cutoff from taking effect?

Not for long. A district court enjoined the provision in July 2025. The First Circuit paused that injunction on September 11, 2025 and blocked it outright on December 12, 2025, and a separate suit brought by 22 states and D.C. was also cleared for enforcement that December. The cutoff was in force for most of its one-year life.

What did states do while federal payments were blocked?

Eleven states — California, Colorado, Connecticut, Illinois, Massachusetts, Maine, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon and Washington — used state-only dollars to keep affected providers operating for their Medicaid enrollees, according to KFF. Other states did not backfill.

Are Medicaid waiver services covered by the payment fix?

Yes. The bill reaches care furnished under a state Medicaid plan and under a waiver of that plan, so managed care and demonstration arrangements are included rather than fee-for-service alone.

Does H.R. 4796 have a realistic chance of passing?

It has 155 cosponsors and all of them are Democrats. It was referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce on July 29, 2025 and has had no hearing or markup since. In a Republican-controlled House, attachment to a larger health package is a more likely route than a standalone vote.

Based on H.R. 4796 bill text

H.R. 4796 Bill Text

PDF

To amend Public Law 119–21 to repeal the prohibition on making payments under the Medicaid program to certain entities.

Source: U.S. Government Publishing Office

Bill Alerts

Get notified when H.R. 4796 moves

Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.

Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.

Health Bills

9 related bills we're tracking

View all
H.R. 842

Nancy Gardner Sewell Medicare Multi-Cancer Early Detection Screening Coverage Act

Jodey Arrington
Jodey ArringtonR-TX
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+334
338 cosponsors

Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Ways and Means. H. Rept. 119-333, Part I.

Oct 3, 2025

HouseHealth
H.R. 1262

Mikaela Naylon Give Kids a Chance Act

Michael McCaul
Michael McCaulR-TX
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+309
313 cosponsors

Received in the Senate.

Dec 2, 2025

HouseHealth
H.R. 3514

Improving Seniors’ Timely Access to Care Act of 2025

Mike Kelly
Mike KellyR-PA
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+297
301 cosponsors
+3 this month

Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 42 - 0.

Jul 15, 2026

HouseHealth
H.R. 4206

CONNECT for Health Act of 2025

Mike Thompson
Mike ThompsonD-CA
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+239
243 cosponsors
+2 this month

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Jun 26, 2025

HouseHealth
H.R. 7973

Momnibus Act

Lauren Underwood
Lauren UnderwoodD-IL
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+209
213 cosponsors
+1 this month

Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.

Apr 20, 2026

HouseHealth
H.R. 999

Right to Contraception Act

Lizzie Fletcher
Lizzie FletcherD-TX
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+206
210 cosponsors

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Feb 5, 2025

HouseHealth
H.R. 12

Women’s Health Protection Act of 2025

Judy Chu
Judy ChuD-CA
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+205
209 cosponsors
+1 this month

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Jun 24, 2025

HouseHealth
H.R. 6130Surging+26

ASAP Act

Vern Buchanan
Vern BuchananR-FL
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+202
206 cosponsors
+26 this month

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Nov 19, 2025

HouseHealth
H.R. 3277Surging+24

Ensuring Lasting Smiles Act

Neal Dunn
Neal DunnR-FL
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+191
195 cosponsors
+24 this month

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Education and Workforce, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

May 8, 2025

HouseHealth

Trending Right Now

Bills gaining momentum across Congress

Tracking Health in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.