H.R. 3740: Equal Access to Justice for Victims of Gun Violence Act of 2025
Sponsor
Eric Swalwell
Democrat · CA-14
Bill Progress
Latest Action · Jun 4, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
End the gun industry's 20-year lawsuit shield
Why it matters
Cities, families, and survivors have spent two decades hitting a federal wall when they try to hold gun makers and dealers accountable in court. H.R. 3740 would tear that wall down and open the ATF's gun-tracing database — currently off-limits in civil cases — to subpoena and use as evidence.
H.R. 3740 would unwind the legal protections the gun industry has relied on for two decades. The bill repeals the core of the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, the 2005 law that blocks most civil lawsuits against gun manufacturers and dealers when their products are used in crimes. If it passed, victims, families, and local governments could argue in court that industry practices contributed to shootings, trafficking, or illegal sales.
The second piece is about evidence. The ATF's Firearms Trace System database — built from records of guns recovered at crime scenes — has been off-limits in civil litigation for nearly two decades. H.R. 3740 would open it to subpoenas, admit it as evidence, and let expert witnesses build cases on what trace patterns show. Supporters say the data exposes which dealers keep showing up in crime-gun recoveries. Opponents argue trace data is incomplete and can be misleading without context.
What the bill doesn't do matters too. No new gun regulations, no bans, no licensing changes, no federal grants. The fight is entirely about civil liability and evidence. The mechanism is courts, not Congress.
The political reality: 112 Democratic cosponsors, zero Republicans, and a bill parked in a GOP-controlled Judiciary Committee. The Supreme Court's 2025 ruling in Smith & Wesson v. Mexico — which upheld PLCAA's shield even against a foreign government's lawsuit over cartel violence — is the immediate context. The Court read PLCAA broadly; this bill would remove it altogether.
H.R. 3740 Bill Summary
What H.R. 3740 actually does.
20-year lawsuit shield, gone
The core sections of the 2005 Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act are repealed. Manufacturers and dealers lose the blanket federal protection that has gotten most gun-violence civil suits dismissed before discovery.
Victims, cities, and states back in civil court
Plaintiffs can pursue claims that industry marketing, distribution choices, or dealer practices contributed to harm. Cases that used to die at the motion-to-dismiss stage under PLCAA could move to discovery and trial.
ATF trace database opens to civil discovery
The Firearms Trace System database becomes subpoenable and admissible in any state, federal, or administrative proceeding. Trace data has been law-enforcement-only since the early 2000s; H.R. 3740 puts it on the same footing as any other evidence.
Trace data usable for expert testimony
Expert witnesses can build cases on what trace patterns reveal — like whether specific dealers keep appearing in chains of guns recovered at crime scenes. Plaintiffs can introduce that analysis at trial.
Who benefits from H.R. 3740?
Victims of gun violence and their families
After a shooting, families currently hit a federal wall when they try to hold gun makers and sellers accountable. H.R. 3740 would let them argue in civil court that industry practices — marketing, distribution, dealer oversight — contributed to harm.
Cities, counties, and states with civil claims
Local governments have spent years arguing that the public costs of gun violence — emergency response, hospital care, court time — should fall partly on industry actors with reckless practices. PLCAA has blocked most of those claims. The bill reopens them.
Gun violence prevention organizations
Brady, Everytown, March For Our Lives, and similar groups have been working around PLCAA for two decades through narrow exceptions and state-court strategies. Repeal would give them a direct federal path to civil accountability.
Plaintiffs' lawyers building civil cases
Trial lawyers gain broader discovery rights and access to ATF trace data. Cases that wouldn't survive a motion to dismiss under PLCAA could now go the distance.
Who is affected by H.R. 3740?
Gun manufacturers
Smith & Wesson, Glock, Sig Sauer, Ruger, and others would face the kind of civil exposure auto, pharma, and chemical companies have always lived with. Marketing, distribution, and design choices become fair game in court.
Federally licensed dealers
Dealers whose guns repeatedly turn up at crime scenes — a pattern visible only through ATF trace data — could face lawsuits over their sales practices. Compliance and recordkeeping become higher-stakes.
The ATF and National Tracing Center
The agency would absorb a flood of new subpoenas and discovery requests as plaintiffs build civil cases. Trace data that's currently law-enforcement-only would surface in civil filings and trial exhibits.
Insurance carriers for gun industry businesses
Premiums and coverage terms for firearms manufacturers and dealers would almost certainly shift to reflect the new legal exposure. Some carriers may exit the market entirely.
What Congress Is Saying
H.R. 3740 hasn't been debated on the floor yet.
This section updates when a legislator speaks about it on the floor or in committee.
HR3740 Legislative Journey
House: Committee Action
Jun 4, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
About the Sponsor
Eric Swalwell
Democrat, California's 14th congressional district · 13 years in Congress
Committees: House Select Subcommittee to Investigate the Remaining Questions Surrounding January 6, 2021, Homeland Security, the Judiciary
View full profile →
Cosponsors (112)
All 112 cosponsors are Democrats. Cosponsors represent 32 states: Arizona, California, Colorado, and 29 more.
Jason Crow
Democrat · CO
Dwight Evans
Democrat · PA
Mike Thompson
Democrat · CA
Henry Johnson
Democrat · GA
Eleanor Norton
Democrat · DC
LaMonica McIver
Democrat · NJ
Madeleine Dean
Democrat · PA
Donald Beyer
Democrat · VA
Danny Davis
Democrat · IL
Betty McCollum
Democrat · MN
Gabe Amo
Democrat · RI
Mary Gay Scanlon
Democrat · PA
Cosponsor Coverage Map
Committee Sponsors
Judiciary Committee
12 of 42 committee members cosponsored
6 Democrats across this committee haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents
H.R. 3740 Quick Facts
- Committee
- Judiciary
- Chamber
- House
- Policy
- Crime and Law Enforcement
- Introduced
- Jun 4, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Jun 4, 2025
Official Sources
Official bill page with full text, actions timeline, 112 cosponsors, and committee referral status for the Equal Access to Justice for Victims of Gun Violence Act of 2025.
The federal statute HR 3740 partially repeals. Sections 7901-7903 (Sections 2-4 of the original act) provide the lawsuit shield for gun manufacturers and dealers that this bill would remove.
The core PLCAA provision that bars bringing qualified civil liability actions against firearms manufacturers and dealers — the primary legal shield HR 3740 Section 2 repeals.
The ATF facility that maintains the Firearms Trace System database. HR 3740 Section 3 would make this trace data subject to subpoena and admissible as evidence in civil and administrative proceedings.
Annual state-by-state firearms trace data published by ATF — the type of data HR 3740 would open to civil litigation discovery and court admission.
Congressional Research Service analysis of PLCAA, including the 2025 Supreme Court ruling in Smith & Wesson v. Mexico that upheld statutory immunity — the legal framework HR 3740 seeks to dismantle.
Full text of the 2005 law as enacted. HR 3740 repeals Sections 2, 3, and 4 of this act while leaving the remaining provisions intact.
Committee of referral for HR 3740. The bill's path forward depends on whether committee leadership schedules hearings or markup on gun industry liability.
H.R. 3740 Common Questions
Can gun violence victims sue gun manufacturers if H.R. 3740 passes?
Yes. The bill repeals the core of the 2005 Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, which has blocked most civil lawsuits against gun makers and sellers when their products are used in crimes.
What is PLCAA and what does H.R. 3740 do to it?
PLCAA is the 2005 federal law that generally shields gun manufacturers and dealers from civil lawsuits over gun crimes. H.R. 3740 repeals its core provisions, leaving only the law's findings and definitions intact.
Does H.R. 3740 apply to gun dealers, not just manufacturers?
Yes. PLCAA's shield protects both manufacturers and dealers, and H.R. 3740 strips both. Dealers whose guns repeatedly turn up in crimes could face lawsuits and discovery they're currently insulated from.
Can cities and states sue the gun industry under H.R. 3740?
Yes. The repeal would let cities, counties, and states pursue claims tied to trafficking, illegal sales, and the public costs of gun violence. PLCAA killed off most of those suits after 2005; H.R. 3740 reopens them.
What does H.R. 3740 do with ATF gun-trace data?
It opens the ATF Firearms Trace System to subpoenas and discovery in civil court, makes trace data admissible as evidence, and lets expert witnesses build cases on what the data shows about specific dealers or trafficking patterns.
Has the Supreme Court already ruled on PLCAA?
Yes. In 2025, the Court ruled in Smith & Wesson v. Mexico that PLCAA shields U.S. gun makers even from a foreign government's lawsuit over cartel violence. H.R. 3740 is Congress's response, removing the shield by statute.
Does H.R. 3740 ban any guns or change ownership rules?
No. The bill doesn't restrict firearms, ammunition, magazines, or who can own a gun. It only changes the legal landscape: gun makers and dealers can be sued in civil court, and federal trace data becomes usable as evidence.
Can H.R. 3740 pass with 112 Democratic cosponsors and a divided Congress?
Almost certainly not in this Congress. With Republican control of the House and zero GOP cosponsors, the bill sits in the Judiciary Committee with no scheduled hearing. It's a position-marker for the next Congress.
Based on H.R. 3740 bill text
H.R. 3740 Bill Text
“To repeal the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, and provide for the discoverability and admissibility of gun trace information in civil proceedings.”
Source: U.S. Government Publishing Office
Get notified when H.R. 3740 moves
Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.
Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.
Crime and Law Enforcement Bills
9 related bills we're tracking
Combating Organized Retail Crime Act of 2025
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 402.
Jan 30, 2026
Assault Weapons Ban of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Apr 30, 2025
Closing the Bump Stock Loophole Act of 2025
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Apr 9, 2025
Office of Gun Violence Prevention Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Feb 13, 2025
Protect and Serve Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Feb 25, 2025
Federal Extreme Risk Protection Order Act of 2026
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Feb 17, 2026
Combating Illicit Xylazine Act
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Feb 12, 2025
Law-Enforcement Innovate to De-Escalate Act
Received in the Senate.
Feb 24, 2026
Federal Firearms Licensee Protection Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Mar 3, 2025
Trending Right Now
Bills gaining momentum across Congress
Baltic Security Assessment Act of 2025
Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 41 - 3.
Apr 22, 2026
RESULTS Act
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Sep 10, 2025
Congressional Tribute to Constance Baker Motley Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Sep 11, 2025
Tracking Crime and Law Enforcement in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.