Law-Enforcement Innovate to De-Escalate Act
Sponsor
Scott Fitzgerald
Republican · WI-5
Latest Action · Feb 24, 2026
Received in the Senate.
Bill Progress
Bill modernizes police gear, limits lethal force
Why it matters
Policymakers want police to rely less on deadly weapons and adapt to new technology.
The big picture: The Law-Enforcement Innovate to De-Escalate Act (HR 2189) would overhaul how federal law treats new policing tools — like less-than-lethal projectile devices — aiming to reduce officers’ reliance on guns in high-stress encounters. The bipartisan bill wants to remove federal restrictions on certain non-lethal weapons, hoping this encourages police departments nationwide to adopt them.
Zoom in: Supporters say giving police more effective, modern non-lethal gear can lower fatal encounters and improve community trust. The bill also updates definitions in federal law, clarifying what types of weapons count as 'firearms' vs. 'less-than-lethal.' Lawmakers from both parties see an opportunity to reduce injury for both police and the people they interact with.
Between the lines: The push comes amid public demand for more accountability and safer policing, especially after recent high-profile incidents involving use of force. Law enforcement groups are divided: Some welcome easier adoption of new tools, while others worry about unclear legal and training standards. The bill is moving with wide bipartisan support, suggesting Congress wants progress on police reform even if bigger changes stall.
What This Bill Does
Removes restrictions on less-lethal projectile devices
Takes certain non-lethal weapons (like modern beanbag launchers or stun rounds) out of federal firearm regulations, making them easier for police to acquire and use.
Updates definition of 'firearm'
Clarifies which police gear is legally considered a gun versus a non-lethal device, so new technology is treated properly under the law.
Promotes adoption of safer policing tools
Encourages law enforcement agencies nationwide to invest in and use cutting-edge tools that reduce the need for deadly force.
Reduces liability barriers for less-lethal tools
Limits the legal risk for agencies that use approved non-lethal devices according to best practices.
Calls for periodic review
Requires the federal government to revisit which devices are classified as less-lethal, to keep up with new technology.
Who Benefits
Local police departments
Gain easier access to modern, less-lethal equipment without jumping through as many legal hoops.
Civilians interacting with police
Face a lower risk of being shot with a deadly weapon during tense law enforcement encounters.
Cities and municipalities
Could see fewer legal settlements from police shootings and foster safer community relations.
Tech companies making policing gear
Benefit from clearer rules that could boost sales of approved non-lethal technologies.
Who's Affected
Law enforcement officers
Might need new training on using less-lethal devices and face guidelines on when to use deadly force.
Police oversight boards
Will need to monitor adoption and use of these new tools, potentially updating use-of-force policies.
Advocacy groups focused on police accountability
Gain a foothold to push for more transparency around when and how force is used.
State and local lawmakers
May update their own definitions and policies to match new federal standards.
Cosponsors (95)
J. Correa
Democrat · CA
Pete Stauber
Republican · MN
Jasmine Crockett
Democrat · TX
Troy Nehls
Republican · TX
Marc Veasey
Democrat · TX
Donald Davis
Democrat · NC
Ben Cline
Republican · VA
Andy Biggs
Republican · AZ
John Rutherford
Republican · FL
Marie Perez
Democrat · WA
Lauren Boebert
Republican · CO
Wesley Hunt
Republican · TX
Recent Actions
Received in the Senate.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 233 - 185 (Roll no. 70). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H2190-2191)
Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 233 - 185 (Roll no. 70). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H2190-2191)
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 2189.
Rule provides for consideration of S. 1383, H.R. 2189, H.R. 261 and H.R. 3617. The resolution provides for consideration of S. 1383, H.R. 2189, H.R. 261, and H.R. 3617 under a closed rule and provides for one motion to recommit H.R. 2189, H.R. 261, and H.R. 3617, and one motion to commit S. 1383.
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 1057. (consideration: CR H2190-2204)
What Changes in the Law
1 changes
Sections Amended
Section 5845(a) of Internal Revenue Code of 1986
striking ``an antique firearm or'' and inserting ``any antique firearm, any less-than-lethal projectile device (as defined in section 4182(d)(2)), any device referred to in section 4182(d)(1)(B), or''
Committees (1)
Contact Your Representatives
Find your legislators and make your voice heard on Law-Enforcement Innovate to De-Escalate Act.
Find Your LegislatorsFor Advocacy Organizations
Launch grassroots campaigns that mobilize supporters and move legislators to action.
Get a DemoNews Coverage
4 articles about this bill

HR 2189 - Law-Enforcement Innovate to De-Escalate Act Summary

Rep. Simpson Supports the Law-Enforcement Innovate to De-Escalate Act | U.S. Congressman Mike Simpson - 2nd District of Idaho
BGOV Bill Analysis: H.R. 2189, Taser Weapon Reclassification

Fitzgerald Introduces Legislation to Give Law-Enforcement ...
Full Bill Text
Open in New TabFull Bill Text
View the complete legislative text on Congress.gov
Source: Congress.gov