H.R. 2598: IDEA Full Funding Act
Sponsor
Jared Huffman
Democrat · CA-2
Bill Progress
Latest Action · Apr 2, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Why it matters
In 1975, Congress passed IDEA and promised to cover 40% of the extra cost of educating students with disabilities. Fifty years later, the federal share sits around 13%. School districts cover the gap — roughly $40 billion a year — by pulling money from general education budgets, raising local taxes, or cutting services. H.R. 2598 would phase federal funding up to $69.6 billion by 2035, finally reaching the 40% benchmark. With 155 cosponsors, including 8 Republicans, the political support is broad. The price tag is the obstacle.
When Congress created IDEA in 1975, it set a target: the federal government would cover 40% of the average per-pupil expenditure for each student with a disability. That number was supposed to represent the "excess cost" of special education over general education. It was never a ceiling — it was a floor.
The federal share has never come close. Current appropriations cover roughly 13%. The remaining 87% falls on states and local school districts, which are legally required to provide services regardless of whether the money shows up.
H.R. 2598 puts the funding on a mandatory schedule. It both authorizes and directly appropriates money — meaning the bill itself provides the funding rather than leaving it to annual budget fights. The ramp-up runs from $6.4 billion appropriated in FY2026 (4.5% of the formula) to $69.6 billion in FY2035 (40% of the formula), with specific dollar amounts locked in for each year between.
The formula is straightforward: take the number of children with disabilities served nationwide (ages 3-21), multiply by the average per-pupil spending in U.S. public schools, then apply the target percentage. If 40% of that formula amount ever exceeds $69.6 billion, the higher number controls.
One important detail: the bill covers IDEA Part B — the main special education grant program — but excludes preschool grants under Section 619. Those are funded separately.
The spending must comply with cut-as-you-go rules, which means Congress would need to find offsets elsewhere in the budget. That requirement is where the political fight lives.
What does H.R. 2598 do?
Federal funding reaches the 40% promise by 2035
The bill increases IDEA Part B funding every year from FY2026 through FY2035 until the federal share reaches 40% of the national average excess cost formula — the benchmark Congress set in 1975 and has never met.
Money is written directly into the bill
H.R. 2598 doesn't just authorize future funding — it appropriates specific dollar amounts. That means the funding is locked in by the statute itself, not dependent on annual appropriations battles.
Permanent floor after 2035
Starting in FY2035 and every year after, funding continues at $69.6 billion or 40% of the formula amount, whichever is greater. If per-pupil spending rises, the funding rises with it.
Funding formula tied to real student counts
The appropriation is based on the actual number of children with disabilities receiving services (ages 3-21) multiplied by the average per-pupil expenditure in U.S. public schools. The number adjusts automatically as enrollment and spending change.
Budget offsets required
The bill requires all spending to comply with cut-as-you-go rules. Congress would need to identify savings or revenue elsewhere to cover the cost — a signal that sponsors expect a budget fight.
Who benefits from H.R. 2598?
Students with disabilities
Roughly 7.5 million children receive special education services under IDEA. More federal funding could mean shorter waitlists for evaluations, more therapists and aides, and fewer situations where districts cut services due to budget pressure.
Local school districts and property taxpayers
Districts are legally required to fund every service on every IEP, regardless of federal support. Right now, that means pulling from general education budgets or raising local taxes to fill the gap. Full federal funding shifts that burden off local balance sheets.
Parents navigating the IEP process
When districts are underfunded, the IEP meeting becomes a negotiation over scarce resources. Parents push for services; administrators push back on cost. More funding reduces the financial pressure that makes those meetings adversarial.
Special education teachers, therapists, and aides
Chronic underfunding has driven shortages across every special education role. Districts that can't afford competitive salaries lose staff. More federal money could help hire, retain, and reduce the caseloads that burn out the people who stay.
Who is affected by H.R. 2598?
State education agencies
States would receive and distribute significantly larger IDEA grants, requiring expanded oversight, reporting, and planning capacity.
General education programs
If districts no longer have to subsidize special education from general funds, those budgets could recover — potentially benefiting class sizes, electives, and instructional materials across the board.
Federal budget writers
A mandatory spending increase from roughly $14 billion to $69.6 billion over 10 years requires substantial offsets. Appropriators and budget committee members face the question of what gets cut to pay for it.
Preschool special education programs
The bill explicitly excludes Section 619 preschool grants. Programs serving children with disabilities ages 3-5 under that section would not see increased funding from this bill.
H.R. 2598 Common Questions
How much would full IDEA funding cost by 2035?
Under H.R. 2598, FY2035 and every year after would provide $69.6 billion for IDEA Part B, or 40% of the formula amount, whichever is greater. Current federal funding is roughly $14 billion — so this is nearly a 5x increase over a decade.
What is the 40% IDEA funding promise and why hasn't it been met?
When Congress created IDEA in 1975, it committed to covering 40% of the extra cost of educating students with disabilities. The federal share has never exceeded roughly 16% and currently sits around 13%. H.R. 2598 would reach the 40% target by FY2035.
Does H.R. 2598 actually appropriate money or just authorize it?
Both. The bill authorizes funding levels and separately says money is "hereby appropriated" on a yearly schedule from FY2026 forward. That means the funding is mandatory, not dependent on future appropriations votes.
How much would schools get in the first year under H.R. 2598?
FY2026 would appropriate $6.4 billion for IDEA Part B, or 4.5% of the formula amount, whichever is greater. That's on top of existing appropriations, starting a 10-year ramp to the full 40%.
Does the IDEA Full Funding Act cover preschool special education?
No. H.R. 2598 covers IDEA Part B (ages 3-21) but explicitly excludes Section 619 preschool grants. Those programs are funded through a separate authorization.
How is the IDEA funding formula calculated?
The formula multiplies the total number of children with disabilities receiving services (ages 3-21) by the average per-pupil expenditure in U.S. public schools. The target percentage of that product determines each year's funding level.
Can IDEA funding increase beyond $69.6 billion after 2035?
Yes. Starting in FY2035, funding is $69.6 billion or 40% of the formula amount, whichever is greater. If per-pupil spending or the number of students served grows, the formula amount could exceed $69.6 billion — and the higher figure would apply.
How would Congress pay for full IDEA funding?
The bill requires all spending to comply with cut-as-you-go rules, meaning Congress must find offsets elsewhere in the budget. The bill itself does not specify what would be cut — that fight is left to the budget process.
Based on H.R. 2598 bill text
Cost & Funding
Authorization: $16.7 billion authorized in FY2026, rising to $69.6 billion in FY2035 and every year after (or 40% of the formula, whichever is greater)
- —Direct appropriations in the bill start at $6.4 billion in FY2026 and ramp to $69.6 billion by FY2035.
- —Current federal IDEA Part B funding is roughly $14 billion — so the bill represents a nearly 5x increase over a decade.
- —The 40% target has existed since 1975. The federal share has hovered between 13-16% for most of that time.
- —Cut-as-you-go rules mean Congress must find offsets — likely the hardest part of getting this bill enacted.
- —The authorization amounts exceed the appropriation amounts in each year, leaving room for additional discretionary funding on top of the mandatory floor.
HR2598 Legislative Journey
House: Committee Action
Apr 2, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
About the Sponsor
Jared Huffman
Democrat, California's 2nd congressional district · 13 years in Congress
Committees: Natural Resources, Transportation and Infrastructure
View full profile →
Cosponsors (155)
This bill has 155 cosponsors: 145 Democrats, 10 Republicans. Cosponsors represent 35 states: Arizona, California, Colorado, and 32 more.
Don Bacon
Republican · NE
Mike Bost
Republican · IL
Janelle Bynum
Democrat · OR
Angie Craig
Democrat · MN
Brian Fitzpatrick
Republican · PA
Joe Neguse
Democrat · CO
Pete Stauber
Republican · MN
Eric Swalwell
Democrat · CA
Glenn Thompson
Republican · PA
Becca Balint
Democrat · VT
Suzanne Bonamici
Democrat · OR
Julia Brownley
Democrat · CA
Cosponsor Coverage Map
Committee Sponsors
Education and Workforce Committee
15 of 36 committee members cosponsored
3 Democrats across this committee haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents
What laws does H.R. 2598 change?
1 changes
Sections Amended
Section 611(i) of Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1411(i))
read as follows: ``(i) Funding
H.R. 2598 Quick Facts
- Committee
- Education and Workforce
- Chamber
- House
- Policy
- Education
- Introduced
- Apr 2, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Apr 2, 2025
Official Sources
Full text of H.R. 2598 with the year-by-year funding schedule from FY2026 to FY2035
Bicameral companion bill in the Senate with cosponsor list and committee referral status
Official overview of IDEA including its four parts, who it covers, and the federal role in special education
Timeline from the 1975 law through modern reauthorizations — context for the 40% promise this bill aims to fulfill
Current Part B and Section 619 grant allocations by state — shows the baseline this bill would increase
Nonpartisan CRS analysis of IDEA funding history, formula mechanics, and the gap between authorization and appropriation
Average per-pupil spending ($16,280 in 2020-21) — the multiplier in the bill's funding formula
Child count data and Section 618 state-level statistics — the other variable in the funding formula
Who is lobbying on H.R. 2598?
3 organizations lobbying on this bill
LINCOLN NATIONAL CORPORATION | 2 |
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL NURSES | 2 |
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR MUSIC EDUCATION | 1 |
Showing 1-3 of 3 organizations
H.R. 2598 Bill Text
“To amend part B of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act to provide full Federal funding of such part.”
Source: U.S. Government Publishing Office
Get notified when H.R. 2598 moves
Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.
Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.
Education Bills
8 related bills we're tracking
Safe Schools Improvement Act
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Mar 3, 2025
Tyler Clementi Higher Education Anti-Harassment Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Sep 18, 2025
American Teacher Act
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Mar 10, 2025
Rebuild America’s Schools Act of 2026
Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Feb 4, 2026
REDI Act
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Mar 11, 2025
Improving Mental Health Access for Students Act
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
May 29, 2025
Supporting Trauma-Informed Education Practices Act of 2026
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Feb 11, 2026
To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to provide for additional uses of funds for grants to strengthen historically Black colleges and universities, and for other purposes.
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Apr 7, 2025
Trending Right Now
Bills gaining momentum across Congress
Federal Extreme Risk Protection Order Act of 2026
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Feb 17, 2026
ALERT Act
Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Feb 20, 2026
Fair Housing for Survivors Act of 2026
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Mar 5, 2026
Tracking Education in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.