Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of H.R. 21, the Born- Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act. The radical left's policies have led to an unacceptable reality: abortion on demand, even up to the point of birth in some States. This is a profound injustice to the most vulnerable among us, the innocent lives that cannot speak for themselves. Every life is precious, Mr. Speaker, a divine gift from God. Every baby deserves the same opportunity for life.
H.R. 21: Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act
Sponsor
Ann Wagner
Republican · MO-2
A born-alive care rule enforced by prison and lawsuits
Why it matters
Up to five years in federal prison — and the same maximum reaches the receptionist who knew and did not report it. H.R. 21 would write a newborn-level care standard for any child born alive after an abortion into the federal criminal code, require every employee who learns that standard was not met to call law enforcement, and let the woman sue for three times what the procedure cost. It cleared the House 217-204 and now sits in the Senate Judiciary Committee, carrying 163 cosponsors, all Republicans.
H.R. 21 does not write its own definition of what it means to be born alive. It borrows the one already in federal law, from the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act. What the bill adds is enforcement: federal prison, a mandatory police report, and a private lawsuit.
The core duty falls on the practitioner present when an abortion or attempted abortion results in a live birth. That person must apply the same professional skill, care, and diligence a reasonably diligent practitioner would give any other child born alive at the same gestational age, and then ensure the child is immediately transported to a hospital and admitted.
A second duty reaches much further than the delivery room. Any health care practitioner, and any employee of a hospital, physician's office, or abortion clinic, who knows the care requirement was not met must immediately report it to state or federal law enforcement. Failing to make that call carries the same penalty as failing to provide the care: a fine, up to five years in prison, or both.
Intentional killing is handled on a separate track. The bill says anyone who performs or attempts an overt act that kills a child born alive would be punished under the federal murder statute instead of the five-year provision.
The civil side belongs to the woman. If the care requirement is violated, she can sue anyone who committed the violation and recover money damages for physical and psychological injury, punitive damages, and statutory damages fixed at three times the cost of the abortion or attempted abortion. A prevailing plaintiff also collects attorney's fees. The fee rule runs in both directions — if the defendant wins and the court finds the suit was frivolous, the plaintiff pays the other side's legal bill.
What she cannot be is a defendant. The bill bars prosecuting the mother under this offense, for conspiring to violate it, or as an accessory to it.
Two carve-outs sit inside the bill's definition of abortion: a post-viability procedure intended to produce a live birth and preserve the child's life and health, and the removal of a child who has already died. An attempt counts once someone takes a substantial step toward performing an abortion. Congress rests the whole structure on findings that an infant born alive after an abortion is a legal person for all purposes under U.S. law, entitled to the same protection as any other newborn.
Bill Progress
Latest Action · Jan 24, 2025
Passed the House, received in Senate
H.R. 21 Bill Summary
What H.R. 21 actually does.
Newborn-level care becomes a federal requirement
When an abortion or attempted abortion results in a child born alive, any health care practitioner present must exercise the same professional skill, care, and diligence to preserve the child's life and health that a reasonably diligent practitioner would give any other child born alive at the same gestational age.
The child goes to a hospital immediately
After providing that care, the practitioner must ensure the child born alive is immediately transported to a hospital and admitted.
Every employee in the building becomes a mandatory reporter
Any health care practitioner, and any employee of a hospital, physician's office, or abortion clinic, who has knowledge that the care requirement was not met must immediately report it to a state law enforcement agency, a federal one, or both.
Failing to report carries the same five years as failing to treat
The penalty provision applies to violations of the whole requirement section, which contains both the care duty and the reporting duty. Either one draws a fine, up to 5 years in prison, or both.
Intentional killing is prosecuted as murder
Anyone who performs or attempts to perform an overt act that kills a child born alive would be punished under the federal murder statute for intentionally killing or attempting to kill a human being.
The woman can sue for three times the procedure's cost
If the care requirement is violated, the woman on whom the abortion was performed or attempted may sue anyone who committed the violation for verifiable damages covering psychological and physical injury, statutory damages equal to 3 times the cost of the procedure, and punitive damages. A prevailing plaintiff is awarded attorney's fees.
A frivolous suit costs the plaintiff the defendant's fees
If the defendant prevails and the court finds the plaintiff's suit was frivolous, the court awards the defendant a reasonable attorney's fee against the plaintiff.
The mother cannot be prosecuted
The bill bars prosecuting the mother of a child born alive under this offense, for conspiracy to violate it, or for accessory liability based on the same violation.
Who benefits from H.R. 21?
Children born alive after an abortion or attempted abortion
A specific federal care standard and an immediate hospital-admission requirement would attach to their care, rather than the question resting on state law, facility policy, or professional norms alone.
Women who say the care rule was violated
They get a direct federal cause of action against anyone who committed the violation, with statutory damages set at three times the procedure's cost stacked on top of injury and punitive damages, plus attorney's fees if they win.
Federal and state prosecutors
A new federal offense carrying up to 5 years, fed by a reporting duty that obligates clinic, hospital, and physician's-office staff to route these cases to law enforcement rather than to a medical board.
Who is affected by H.R. 21?
Doctors and abortion providers
They carry the care and transport duties personally, and face federal criminal exposure if the government contends the required care or the immediate hospital admission did not happen.
Nurses, clinic staff, and front-office employees
The reporting duty is written to cover any employee of a hospital, physician's office, or abortion clinic — not only clinicians. Knowing of a violation and not reporting it is itself punishable by up to 5 years.
Women who underwent the procedure
They cannot be charged under this offense, but they may be witnesses in a criminal investigation, or plaintiffs in the civil action the bill creates.
Hospitals, clinics, and courts
Facilities would need reporting procedures and staff training keyed to a criminal statute. Courts would handle the resulting prosecutions, the civil suits, and the fee disputes on both sides.
What Congress Is Saying
46 legislators have weighed in on H.R. 21 — 29 Democrats, 17 Republicans.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time. Mr. RASKIN. Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentlewoman from California (Ms. Chu). Ms. CHU. Mr. Speaker, H.R. 21 would rob families of the ability to make difficult, complicated medical decisions in some of the most heartbreaking circumstances imaginable. It is a mean-spirited solution in search of a problem. Infanticide is already illegal in every State of the Union, and Congress unanimously affirmed this with a law in 2002, but this bill is not about saving lives.

Mr. Speaker, I had to return to California unexpectedly this week for medical treatment and missed votes. Had I been present, I would have voted NO on Roll Call No. 23 on passage of S. 5; YES on Roll Call No. 25 on passage of H.R. 471; and NO on Roll Call No. 27 on passage of H.R. 21.
H.R. 21 also appeared in 2 more House floor references and 13 routine cosponsor filings.
HR21 Legislative Journey
Committee Action
Jan 24, 2025
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
House: Passed 217-204
Jan 23, 2025
On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 217 - 204, 1 Present (Roll no. 27). (text: CR H335-336)
+10 more actions this day
House: Committee Action
Jan 3, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
About the Sponsor
Ann Wagner
Republican, Missouri's 2nd congressional district · 13 years in Congress
Committees: Financial Services, House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence
View full profile →
Cosponsors (163)
All 163 cosponsors are Republicans. Cosponsors represent 41 states: Alaska, Alabama, Arkansas, and 38 more.
Steve Scalise
Republican · LA
Kat Cammack
Republican · FL
Andrew Clyde
Republican · GA
David Kustoff
Republican · TN
Glenn Thompson
Republican · PA
Ron Estes
Republican · KS
Erin Houchin
Republican · IN
Brad Finstad
Republican · MN
Dale Strong
Republican · AL
Randy Feenstra
Republican · IA
Pete Stauber
Republican · MN
Mike Bost
Republican · IL
Cosponsor Coverage Map
Committee Sponsors
Judiciary Committee
0 of 21 committee members cosponsored
No committee members have cosponsored this bill
Judiciary Committee
18 of 44 committee members cosponsored
17 Republicans across these committees haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents
H.R. 21 Quick Facts
- Committee
- Judiciary
- Chamber
- House
- Policy
- Crime and Law Enforcement
- Introduced
- Jan 3, 2025
Passed the House, received in Senate
Jan 24, 2025
Official Sources
Official status, text, actions, and the full cosponsor list for the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act.
The version the Senate Judiciary Committee holds, printed by GPO — the care requirement, the reporting duty, the penalties, and the definitions in full.
H.R. 21 writes no definition of its own; it borrows this one, which sets when an infant counts as born alive at any stage of development.
The 2002 law that created the definition H.R. 21 relies on, and that carries no criminal penalty or reporting duty of its own.
The new section 1532, with the five-year penalty for failing to treat or failing to report, would be inserted here after the partial-birth abortion ban at section 1531.
The bill routes an intentional overt act that kills a child born alive to this statute rather than to its own five-year provision.
The official House Clerk record of the 217-204 passage vote, with one member answering present and the party breakdown of every vote cast.
The committee H.R. 21 was referred to on January 24, 2025, and where it has sat without action since.
H.R. 21 Common Questions
What does H.R. 21 require if a child is born alive after an abortion?
The practitioner present must give that child the same professional skill and care a reasonably diligent practitioner would give any other child born alive at the same gestational age, then ensure the child is immediately transported to a hospital and admitted.
Could a nurse or clinic receptionist be charged under H.R. 21?
The reporting duty covers any health care practitioner and any employee of a hospital, physician's office, or abortion clinic who knows the care requirement was not met. Failing to report it to law enforcement carries the same maximum as failing to provide the care: a fine, up to 5 years in prison, or both.
Does H.R. 21 ban abortion?
No. It governs what happens after an abortion or attempted abortion results in a live birth. The bill's own definition of abortion also excludes a post-viability procedure intended to produce a live birth and preserve the child's health, and the removal of a child who has already died.
Can the woman who had the abortion be prosecuted under H.R. 21?
No. The bill bars prosecuting the mother under this offense, for conspiring to violate it, or as an accessory. She is instead the person the bill allows to bring a civil suit.
How much could a lawsuit under H.R. 21 be worth?
She could recover damages for physical and psychological injury, punitive damages, and statutory damages set at three times the cost of the procedure. On an $800 procedure the statutory piece alone is $2,400. A winning plaintiff is also awarded attorney's fees.
What happens if the provider wins the lawsuit?
Winning alone is not enough to recover costs. The court awards the defendant a reasonable attorney's fee only if it also finds the plaintiff's suit was frivolous.
Does H.R. 21 apply to attempted abortions?
Yes. It covers an attempt, which the bill defines as conduct that amounts to a substantial step in a course of conduct planned to end in performing an abortion.
Has H.R. 21 passed?
It passed the House on January 23, 2025 by 217-204, with one member voting present. It was received in the Senate the next day and referred to the Judiciary Committee, where it has not advanced. All 163 cosponsors are Republicans.
Based on H.R. 21 bill text
H.R. 21 Bill Text
“To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit a health care practitioner from failing to exercise the proper degree of care in the case of a child who survives an abortion or attempted abortion.”
Source: U.S. Government Publishing Office
Get notified when H.R. 21 moves
Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.
Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.
Crime and Law Enforcement Bills
9 related bills we're tracking
Crime Victims Fund Stabilization Act of 2025
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Jan 13, 2026
Bipartisan Background Checks Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Jun 10, 2025
Combating Organized Retail Crime Act of 2025
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
May 13, 2026
Ethan's Law
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Feb 25, 2025
Assault Weapons Ban of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Apr 30, 2025
Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2025
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 289.
Oct 3, 2025
Honoring Our Fallen Heroes Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Feb 12, 2025
Raise the Age Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Mar 26, 2025
Closing the Bump Stock Loophole Act of 2025
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Apr 9, 2025
Trending Right Now
Bills gaining momentum across Congress
761st Tank Battalion Congressional Gold Medal Act
Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Feb 26, 2025
Fit to Serve Act
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
May 21, 2025
America’s Olympic and Paralympic Games Commemorative Coins Act
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Jul 14, 2025
Tracking Crime and Law Enforcement in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.