H.J.Res. 63: Redesignating the Robert E. Lee Memorial as the "Arlington House National Historic Site".
Sponsor
Donald Beyer
Democrat · VA-8
Bill Progress
Latest Action · Feb 27, 2025
Referred to Veterans' Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. for review
123 Democrats want to rename Arlington's Lee Memorial
Why it matters
The federal title "Robert E. Lee Memorial" has been attached to a hilltop site inside Arlington National Cemetery since 1955. H.J.Res. 63 would remove that designation and rename the National Park Service property the Arlington House National Historic Site. It also repeals the 1955 and 1972 joint resolutions that created the memorial title, and it has 123 House Democrats on board.
H.J.Res. 63 is short — three paragraphs of legal text — but it carries unusual symbolic weight. The resolution does three things at once.
First, it takes the National Park Service property dedicated as the Robert E. Lee Memorial and redesignates it the Arlington House National Historic Site. The land, the building, and the management don't change. Only the federal title comes off.
Second, it cleans up the paper trail. Any reference to the old name in federal law, regulations, maps, or records would automatically be read as a reference to the new one. That keeps agencies from needing fresh legislation every time the old name appears in an existing document.
Third, the bill repeals the 1955 joint resolution and the 1972 amendment that established and reinforced the Lee memorial designation. Without those two laws on the books, the federal memorial to Robert E. Lee at Arlington would no longer exist as a legal designation. The site would remain — under the new name — as a historic property administered by the National Park Service.
The historical context cuts to why this is more than housekeeping. Arlington National Cemetery itself sits on land seized from Lee's wife's family during the Civil War, and the federal government began burying Union dead on the grounds in 1864. Almost a century later, in 1955, Congress designated the house a memorial to Lee. The 1972 amendment expanded that designation.
Politically, the bill is partisan in its current form: all 123 cosponsors are House Democrats, with Rep. Don Beyer (D-VA-8) — whose district includes Arlington — leading. Supporters argue removing the federal honor better reflects how the country talks about Confederate commemoration today. Opponents are likely to frame it as erasing history, though the bill leaves the house standing, the museum operating, and Lee's connection to the property fully open to interpretation.
H.J.Res. 63 Bill Summary
What H.J.Res. 63 actually does.
Robert E. Lee's name comes off the federal title
The site now legally designated as the "Robert E. Lee Memorial" would be redesignated as the "Arlington House National Historic Site." The property remains owned and administered by the National Park Service.
The historic house, museum, and grounds stay open
The bill changes only the federal title. It does not transfer the property, alter its management, or restrict how Lee's connection to the site is interpreted to visitors.
Old federal references update automatically
Any mention of the old memorial name in any federal law, regulation, map, document, or record is treated as a reference to the new name. Agencies don't need separate legislation to fix individual references.
The 1955 and 1972 designation laws are repealed
The joint resolution that established the Robert E. Lee Memorial in 1955 (Public Law 84-107) and the 1972 amendment (Public Law 92-333) are eliminated, removing the legal foundation for the federal memorial title.
Who benefits from H.J.Res. 63?
Visitors who object to a Confederate honor at Arlington
They would see the federal memorial title to Lee removed at the property that overlooks the country's most prominent military cemetery, while the historic site itself stays open.
National Park Service administrators
They get a single, clean legal change to apply across signage, publications, websites, maps, and internal systems — without piecemeal congressional fixes for each existing reference.
Civil rights and Confederate-monument-removal advocates
They would see one of the most visible federal commemorative honors to a Confederate general removed from the federal register.
Visitors interested in the property's full history
Including the enslaved families who lived and labored on the estate. The renamed site would emphasize the location's layered history rather than a single Confederate figure.
Who is affected by H.J.Res. 63?
National Park Service staff
They would update signage, brochures, websites, maps, and internal references at Arlington House to reflect the new name.
Historians, educators, and tour guides
They would interpret the site under a new legal name. The bill does not restrict how Lee's connection to the property is taught.
Defenders of Confederate commemoration on federal property
Including some heritage organizations and lawmakers who have opposed similar renamings. They would view the change as the loss of a long-standing federal honor.
Federal agencies that reference the site
They would use the new name in future laws, contracts, maps, and planning documents. Existing references remain legally valid under the auto-update language.
What Congress Is Saying
H.J.Res. 63 hasn't been debated on the floor yet.
This section updates when a legislator speaks about it on the floor or in committee.
HJRES63 Legislative Journey
House: Committee Action
Feb 27, 2025
Referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
About the Sponsor
Donald Beyer
Democrat, Virginia's 8th congressional district · 11 years in Congress
Committees: Joint Economic Committee, Ways and Means
View full profile →
Cosponsors (123)
All 123 cosponsors are Democrats. Cosponsors represent 36 states: Alabama, Arizona, California, and 33 more.
Jennifer McClellan
Democrat · VA
Suhas Subramanyam
Democrat · VA
Robert Scott
Democrat · VA
Gerald Connolly
Democrat · VA
Eugene Vindman
Democrat · VA
Eleanor Norton
Democrat · DC
Emanuel Cleaver
Democrat · MO
Mike Quigley
Democrat · IL
Al Green
Democrat · TX
Valerie Foushee
Democrat · NC
Lloyd Doggett
Democrat · TX
Jonathan Jackson
Democrat · IL
Cosponsor Coverage Map
Committee Sponsors
Armed Services Committee
13 of 57 committee members cosponsored
Veterans' Affairs Committee
5 of 24 committee members cosponsored
18 Democrats across these committees haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents
H.J.Res. 63 Quick Facts
- Committee
- Armed Services
- Chamber
- House
- Policy
- Armed Forces and National Security
- Introduced
- Feb 27, 2025
Referred to Veterans' Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. for review
Feb 27, 2025
Official Sources
The official NPS site for Arlington House, The Robert E. Lee Memorial — the property this bill would redesignate.
NPS page covering the full history of Arlington House, including the enslaved families who lived and labored on the estate.
The official Arlington National Cemetery page on the history of Arlington House and how the estate became the cemetery.
The 1955 joint resolution that first designated the site as the Robert E. Lee Memorial — one of the two laws this bill would repeal.
The 1972 joint resolution that amended the Lee memorial designation — the second law this bill would repeal.
One of two House committees to which this resolution has been referred for consideration.
The second House committee to which this resolution has been referred for consideration.
H.J.Res. 63 Common Questions
Does H.J.Res. 63 remove or demolish Arlington House?
No. The bill changes only the federal title. The historic house, the museum inside it, and the grounds all remain open and operating, owned and managed by the National Park Service.
What would Arlington House be officially called under H.J.Res. 63?
The site would be redesignated the "Arlington House National Historic Site." The federal title "Robert E. Lee Memorial" would no longer apply.
Why was Arlington House dedicated as a Lee memorial in the first place?
The site sits on what was Robert E. Lee's family estate before the Civil War. In 1955, Congress passed a joint resolution designating the National Park Service property a memorial to Lee. A 1972 joint resolution amended that designation. H.J.Res. 63 would repeal both.
Does the bill change Arlington National Cemetery itself?
No. The cemetery is administered separately by the U.S. Army. H.J.Res. 63 only affects the National Park Service-managed Arlington House property at the top of the cemetery hill.
How many cosponsors does H.J.Res. 63 have?
The bill has 123 cosponsors — all House Democrats. Rep. Don Beyer (D-VA-8), whose district includes Arlington, is the lead sponsor.
When would the renaming take effect?
The redesignation would take effect on the date of enactment if the joint resolution becomes law. It is currently sitting in the House Veterans' Affairs and Armed Services committees.
Will old federal documents still refer to the Robert E. Lee Memorial?
Yes — and the bill addresses that. Any existing reference to the old name in federal law, regulations, maps, or records would be legally treated as a reference to the Arlington House National Historic Site. Agencies don't need to amend each document individually.
Which laws would H.J.Res. 63 repeal?
The bill repeals two laws: Public Law 84-107 (the 1955 joint resolution that designated the site as the Lee Memorial) and Public Law 92-333 (the 1972 joint resolution that amended the designation).
Based on H.J.Res. 63 bill text
H.J.Res. 63 Bill Text
“Redesignating the Robert E. Lee Memorial as the “Arlington House National Historic Site”.”
Source: U.S. Government Publishing Office
Get notified when H.J.Res. 63 moves
Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.
Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.
Armed Forces and National Security Bills
9 related bills we're tracking
Major Richard Star Act
Referred to the Subcommittee on Disability Assistance and Memorial Affairs.
Apr 4, 2025
Air America Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select).
Mar 18, 2025
Love Lives On Act of 2025
Subcommittee Hearings Held
Feb 3, 2026
GUARD VA Benefits Act
Referred to the Subcommittee on Disability Assistance and Memorial Affairs.
Mar 27, 2025
Veterans’ ACCESS Act of 2025
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.
Jul 23, 2025
Major Richard Star Act
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Mar 13, 2025
SAVES Act
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 264.
Sep 26, 2025
Fallen Servicemembers Religious Heritage Restoration Act
Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 292.
Dec 9, 2025
RESTRAIN Act
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H4779-4780)
Nov 19, 2025
Trending Right Now
Bills gaining momentum across Congress
Generating Retirement Ownership through Long-Term Holding
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Mar 11, 2025
National Plan for Epilepsy Act
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Feb 11, 2025
Access Technology Affordability Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Feb 24, 2025
Tracking Armed Forces and National Security in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.