S. 1367: NO FAKES Act of 2025
Sponsor
Christopher Coons
Democrat · DE
Bill Progress
Latest Action · Apr 9, 2025
Read twice and Referred to the Judiciary. for review
Why it matters
The bill arrives as AI tools can now clone a person's voice or face at scale, and it would create a new federal right with cash damages, takedown rules, and platform liability starting 180 days after enactment.
The NO FAKES Act of 2025 would create a new federal property right over a person's "digital replica," meaning a newly created, computer-generated, highly realistic electronic representation that is readily identifiable as that person's voice or visual likeness. The bill covers "an individual" defined as a human being, living or dead. It applies when a person did not actually perform, or when a real performance was materially altered, but it excludes authorized remixes, mastering, and digital remastering.
For living people, the right cannot be assigned away during life, though it can be licensed. Those licenses have tight limits: for adults, a license can last no more than 10 years and must be in writing, signed, and reasonably specific about intended uses. For minors, the cap is even shorter: no more than 5 years, and the license ends when the person turns 18. Minor licenses also must be in writing, signed, specifically describe the uses, and be court-approved under State law. After death, the right lasts 10 years, with renewable 5-year extensions if the right holder shows "active and authorized public use" during the 2-year period before expiration. Even with renewals, the right ends no later than 70 years after death.
The bill also sets up a notice-and-takedown system for online services. To get safe harbor, a covered online service must adopt a policy for terminating repeat violators and must remove or disable access to unauthorized material as soon as technically and practically feasible after getting notice. A provider is generally liable only after receiving a notification of a violation or a court order and failing to act, or if it willfully avoids receiving notice. The bill defines a "digital fingerprint" as a unique electronic label or identifier created by a cryptographic hash function or another digital method chosen by the service, as long as it is effectively certain not to misidentify one piece of material as another. At the same time, the bill punishes abuse of the takedown process: knowingly false notices, or notices sent without a good-faith review, trigger a penalty of the greater of $25,000 per notification or actual damages and attorney's fees.
Enforcement is built around civil lawsuits with set dollar amounts. A right holder can sue within 3 years of when the violation was discovered or should have been discovered. Damages are pegged to the type of defendant: $5,000 per work for individuals, $25,000 per work for compliant online service providers, $5,000 per instance for non-compliant online service providers up to $750,000 per work, and $25,000 per work for non-service entities. Courts can also award punitive damages for willful conduct involving malice, fraud, or knowledge. Prevailing plaintiffs get attorney's fees, and prevailing defendants must get attorney's fees if the case was not brought in good faith. The bill preempts many state-law likeness claims in expressive works, but it preserves state laws or common-law rules already in existence as of January 2, 2025, plus state laws aimed specifically at sexually explicit digital replicas or election-related digital replicas.
What does S. 1367 do?
New federal likeness right lasts up to 70 years after death
The bill creates a property right in a person's unauthorized digital replica. After death, the right lasts 10 years and can be renewed in 5-year periods if the right holder shows "active and authorized public use" during the 2-year period before expiration, but it ends no later than 70 years after death.
Minor licenses capped at 5 years
A living person's digital replica can be licensed, but not assigned away during life. Adult licenses may last no more than 10 years, while licenses for minors may last no more than 5 years and automatically terminate at age 18; minor licenses also must be in writing, signed, specifically describe the intended uses, and be court-approved under State law.
Platforms must act after notice
An online service is generally liable only if it receives a notification of a violation or a court order and fails to remove or disable access, or if it willfully avoids receiving notice. To qualify for safe harbor, the service must also have a policy to terminate repeat violators and act as soon as technically and practically feasible.
False takedown notices can cost $25,000
Anyone who knowingly misrepresents that material violates the law, or who fails to perform a good-faith review before sending a notice, faces a penalty of the greater of $25,000 per notification or actual damages and attorney's fees.
Civil damages run from $5,000 to $750,000
The bill sets fixed damages by defendant type: $5,000 per work for individuals, $25,000 per work for compliant online service providers, $25,000 per work for non-service entities, and $5,000 per instance for non-compliant online service providers up to $750,000 per work. Lawsuits must be filed within 3 years after the violation was discovered or should have been discovered.
State-law cutoff tied to January 2, 2025
The measure broadly preempts state laws on voice and visual likeness rights in expressive works, but it preserves state laws and common-law rules that existed as of January 2, 2025. It also leaves intact state laws specifically targeting sexually explicit digital replicas or election-related digital replicas.
Who benefits from S. 1367?
Artists, actors, and other performers
They get a new federal cause of action against unauthorized AI copies of their voice or face, with set damages including $5,000 per work against individuals and $25,000 per work against non-service entities, plus possible punitive damages for willful misconduct.
Families and estates of deceased public figures
They can control post-mortem digital replicas for 10 years after death, renew in 5-year increments by showing active and authorized public use in the prior 2 years, and keep protection for as long as 70 years after death.
Minors and their parents or guardians
The bill gives extra safeguards to children by limiting licenses to 5 years, forcing termination at age 18, and requiring writing, signatures, a specific description of uses, and court approval under State law. A parent or guardian may also sue if the individual is under 18.
Exclusive labels and talent-contract holders for recording artists
Entities with an exclusive personal service contract or an exclusive distribution license for a sound recording artist are allowed to bring civil actions, giving business partners a direct enforcement tool when an artist's voice is cloned without permission.
Who is affected by S. 1367?
Online platforms hosting user uploads
Websites, apps, VR environments, digital music providers under 17 U.S.C. 115, and other registered interactive services would need notice-and-takedown systems, repeat-infringer termination policies, and designated agents. If non-compliant, they could face $5,000 per instance up to $750,000 per work.
AI deepfake tool makers and replica-generation services
The bill targets not just the fake content itself but also products or services primarily designed to produce unauthorized digital replicas of specific individuals, exposing non-service entities to $25,000 per work and possible punitive damages.
People sending legal notices
Right holders gain a powerful takedown process, but anyone abusing it risks steep penalties: the greater of $25,000 per notification or actual damages and attorney's fees for knowingly false claims or lack of a good-faith review.
News, documentary, parody, and research creators
They get important exclusions for bona fide news, public affairs, sports broadcasts, documentaries, historical or biographical works, commentary, criticism, scholarship, satire, parody, and fleeting or negligible use. But those exclusions do not apply to depictions of sexually explicit conduct as defined in 18 U.S.C. 2256(2)(A).
What Congress Is Saying
S. 1367 hasn't been debated on the floor yet.
This section updates when a legislator speaks about it on the floor or in committee.
S1367 Legislative Journey
Committee Action
Apr 9, 2025
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
About the Sponsor
Christopher Coons
Democrat, DE · 16 years in Congress
Committees: Senate Select Committee on Ethics, Foreign Relations, the Judiciary
View full profile →
Cosponsors (13)
This bill has 13 cosponsors: 6 Democrats, 7 Republicans, reflecting bipartisan support. Cosponsors represent 12 states: Alabama, California, Florida, and 9 more.
Marsha Blackburn
Republican · TN
Amy Klobuchar
Democrat · MN
Thomas Tillis
Republican · NC
Bill Cassidy
Republican · LA
Adam Schiff
Democrat · CA
Bill Hagerty
Republican · TN
Richard Durbin
Democrat · IL
Mazie Hirono
Democrat · HI
Ashley Moody
Republican · FL
Elissa Slotkin
Democrat · MI
James Lankford
Republican · OK
Peter Welch
Democrat · VT
Committee Sponsors
Judiciary Committee
9 of 22 committee members cosponsored
5 Democrats across this committee haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents
S. 1367 Quick Facts
- Committee
- Judiciary
- Chamber
- Senate
- Policy
- Commerce
- Introduced
- Apr 9, 2025
Read twice and Referred to the Judiciary. for review
Apr 9, 2025
Who is lobbying on S. 1367?
3 organizations lobbying on this bill
RECORDING ACADEMY | 20 |
SESAC RIGHTS MANAGEMENT INC | 12 |
ACADEMY OF TELEVISION ART & SCIENCES | 6 |
Showing 1-3 of 3 organizations
S. 1367 Common Questions
How much can a false AI deepfake takedown notice cost under the NO FAKES Act?
Under the NO FAKES Act of 2025, a knowingly false notice or one sent without good-faith review can trigger the greater of $25,000 per notice or actual damages plus attorney's fees (Section 2(d)).
How much are damages for AI voice or likeness deepfakes under the NO FAKES Act?
According to S. 1367 Section 2(e), damages are $5,000 per work for individuals, $25,000 per work for good-faith online services, up to $750,000 per work for non-compliant online services, and $25,000 per work for other entities.
Can someone own rights to an AI-generated voice or face after death under the NO FAKES Act?
Yes. Under the NO FAKES Act of 2025, post-mortem rights last 10 years after death, can be renewed in 5-year periods with active authorized public use, and end no later than 70 years after death (Section 2(b)).
Can a minor license their AI voice or likeness under the NO FAKES Act?
Yes, but only on tight terms. Under the NO FAKES Act of 2025, a minor's license can last no more than 5 years, ends at 18, must be written, signed, specific, and court-approved under State law (Section 2(b)).
Can a living person permanently sign away their voice or likeness rights under the NO FAKES Act?
No. Under the NO FAKES Act of 2025, the digital replication right cannot be assigned during life, though it can be licensed; adult licenses are capped at 10 years and must be written, signed, and specific (Section 2(b)).
Does the NO FAKES Act require platforms to remove AI deepfakes after notice?
Yes. Under the NO FAKES Act of 2025, an online service seeking safe harbor must remove or disable access to the material, and matching digital-fingerprint copies when applicable, as soon as technically feasible after valid notice (Section 2(d)).
Can a platform be sued for AI deepfakes only after it gets notice under the NO FAKES Act?
Generally yes. According to S. 1367 Section 2(c), an online service is usually liable only after receiving a notice or court order and failing to act, or if it willfully avoids receiving notice.
Is saying a deepfake is AI-generated a defense under the NO FAKES Act?
No. Under the NO FAKES Act of 2025, a disclaimer that a replica is unauthorized or AI-generated is not a valid defense in a civil action (Section 2(e)).
Which kinds of content are excluded from liability for digital replicas under the NO FAKES Act?
According to S. 1367 Section 2(c), exclusions cover bona fide news, public affairs, sports, documentaries, historical or biographical works, satire, parody, and fleeting or negligible uses—except sexually explicit digital replicas.
Does the NO FAKES Act override state deepfake and likeness laws after January 2 2025?
Partly. Under the NO FAKES Act of 2025, federal law preempts many state likeness claims in expressive works, but preserves state laws and common-law rules existing on January 2, 2025, plus election and sexually explicit replica laws (Section 2(g)).
Based on S. 1367 bill text
S. 1367 Bill Text
“To protect intellectual property rights in the voice and visual likeness of individuals, and for other purposes.”
Source: U.S. Government Publishing Office
Get notified when S. 1367 moves
Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.
Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commerce Bills
9 related bills we're tracking
Algorithmic Accountability Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Sep 19, 2025
Children and Teens’ Online Privacy Protection Act
Passed Senate with amendments by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S860-869; text: CR S861-868)
Mar 5, 2026
Made in America Manufacturing Finance Act
Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 283.
Dec 4, 2025
Protecting Circuit Boards and Substrates Act
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committees on Energy and Commerce, and Science, Space, and Technology, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
May 23, 2025
Algorithmic Accountability Act of 2025
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Jun 25, 2025
AI Foundation Model Transparency Act of 2026
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Mar 26, 2026
App Store Accountability Act
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee (Amended) by Voice Vote.
Dec 11, 2025
SBA Fraud Enforcement Extension Act
Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 281.
Dec 2, 2025
Trump Tariff Transparency Act
Referred to the House Committee on Small Business.
Dec 18, 2025
Trending Right Now
Bills gaining momentum across Congress
Congressional Tribute to Constance Baker Motley Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Sep 11, 2025
Deterring American AI Model Theft Act of 2026
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Apr 15, 2026
GUARDRAILS Act
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Mar 26, 2026
Tracking Commerce in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.