S. 1367: NO FAKES Act of 2025

Introduced Apr 9, 202513 cosponsors

Sponsor

Christopher Coons

Christopher Coons

Democrat · DE

Bill Progress

IntroducedApr 9
Committee 
Pass Senate 
Pass House 
Signed 
Law 

Latest Action · Apr 9, 2025

1/3

Read twice and Referred to the Judiciary. for review

Senate targets AI voice deepfakes

Why it matters

The bill arrives as AI tools can now clone a person's voice or face at scale, and it would create a new federal right with cash damages, takedown rules, and platform liability starting 180 days after enactment.

The NO FAKES Act of 2025 would create a new federal property right over a person's "digital replica," meaning a newly created, computer-generated, highly realistic electronic representation that is readily identifiable as that person's voice or visual likeness. The bill covers "an individual" defined as a human being, living or dead. It applies when a person did not actually perform, or when a real performance was materially altered, but it excludes authorized remixes, mastering, and digital remastering.

For living people, the right cannot be assigned away during life, though it can be licensed. Those licenses have tight limits: for adults, a license can last no more than 10 years and must be in writing, signed, and reasonably specific about intended uses. For minors, the cap is even shorter: no more than 5 years, and the license ends when the person turns 18. Minor licenses also must be in writing, signed, specifically describe the uses, and be court-approved under State law. After death, the right lasts 10 years, with renewable 5-year extensions if the right holder shows "active and authorized public use" during the 2-year period before expiration. Even with renewals, the right ends no later than 70 years after death.

What does S. 1367 do?

1

New federal likeness right lasts up to 70 years after death

The bill creates a property right in a person's unauthorized digital replica. After death, the right lasts 10 years and can be renewed in 5-year periods if the right holder shows "active and authorized public use" during the 2-year period before expiration, but it ends no later than 70 years after death.

2

Minor licenses capped at 5 years

A living person's digital replica can be licensed, but not assigned away during life. Adult licenses may last no more than 10 years, while licenses for minors may last no more than 5 years and automatically terminate at age 18; minor licenses also must be in writing, signed, specifically describe the intended uses, and be court-approved under State law.

3

Platforms must act after notice

An online service is generally liable only if it receives a notification of a violation or a court order and fails to remove or disable access, or if it willfully avoids receiving notice. To qualify for safe harbor, the service must also have a policy to terminate repeat violators and act as soon as technically and practically feasible.

4

False takedown notices can cost $25,000

Anyone who knowingly misrepresents that material violates the law, or who fails to perform a good-faith review before sending a notice, faces a penalty of the greater of $25,000 per notification or actual damages and attorney's fees.

5

Civil damages run from $5,000 to $750,000

The bill sets fixed damages by defendant type: $5,000 per work for individuals, $25,000 per work for compliant online service providers, $25,000 per work for non-service entities, and $5,000 per instance for non-compliant online service providers up to $750,000 per work. Lawsuits must be filed within 3 years after the violation was discovered or should have been discovered.

6

State-law cutoff tied to January 2, 2025

The measure broadly preempts state laws on voice and visual likeness rights in expressive works, but it preserves state laws and common-law rules that existed as of January 2, 2025. It also leaves intact state laws specifically targeting sexually explicit digital replicas or election-related digital replicas.

Who benefits from S. 1367?

Artists, actors, and other performers

They get a new federal cause of action against unauthorized AI copies of their voice or face, with set damages including $5,000 per work against individuals and $25,000 per work against non-service entities, plus possible punitive damages for willful misconduct.

Families and estates of deceased public figures

They can control post-mortem digital replicas for 10 years after death, renew in 5-year increments by showing active and authorized public use in the prior 2 years, and keep protection for as long as 70 years after death.

Minors and their parents or guardians

The bill gives extra safeguards to children by limiting licenses to 5 years, forcing termination at age 18, and requiring writing, signatures, a specific description of uses, and court approval under State law. A parent or guardian may also sue if the individual is under 18.

Exclusive labels and talent-contract holders for recording artists

Entities with an exclusive personal service contract or an exclusive distribution license for a sound recording artist are allowed to bring civil actions, giving business partners a direct enforcement tool when an artist's voice is cloned without permission.

Who is affected by S. 1367?

Online platforms hosting user uploads

Websites, apps, VR environments, digital music providers under 17 U.S.C. 115, and other registered interactive services would need notice-and-takedown systems, repeat-infringer termination policies, and designated agents. If non-compliant, they could face $5,000 per instance up to $750,000 per work.

AI deepfake tool makers and replica-generation services

The bill targets not just the fake content itself but also products or services primarily designed to produce unauthorized digital replicas of specific individuals, exposing non-service entities to $25,000 per work and possible punitive damages.

People sending legal notices

Right holders gain a powerful takedown process, but anyone abusing it risks steep penalties: the greater of $25,000 per notification or actual damages and attorney's fees for knowingly false claims or lack of a good-faith review.

News, documentary, parody, and research creators

They get important exclusions for bona fide news, public affairs, sports broadcasts, documentaries, historical or biographical works, commentary, criticism, scholarship, satire, parody, and fleeting or negligible use. But those exclusions do not apply to depictions of sexually explicit conduct as defined in 18 U.S.C. 2256(2)(A).

On the Record

What Congress Is Saying

S. 1367 hasn't been debated on the floor yet.

This section updates when a legislator speaks about it on the floor or in committee.

S1367 Legislative Journey

1 actions

Committee Action

Apr 9, 2025

Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

About the Sponsor

Christopher Coons

Christopher Coons

Democrat, DE · 16 years in Congress

Committees: Senate Select Committee on Ethics, Foreign Relations, the Judiciary

View full profile →

Cosponsors (13)

This bill gained 2 cosponsors in the last 30 days

This bill has 13 cosponsors: 6 Democrats, 7 Republicans, reflecting bipartisan support. Cosponsors represent 12 states: Alabama, California, Florida, and 9 more.

6Democrats7Republicans·12 statesBipartisan

Committee Sponsors

Judiciary Committee

10D12R
|9 signed13 not yet

9 of 22 committee members cosponsored

5 Democrats across this committee haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents

S. 1367 Quick Facts

Cosponsors
13+2
Marsha Blackburn
Amy Klobuchar
Thomas Tillis
Bill Cassidy
Adam Schiff
+8 more
Committee
Judiciary
Chamber
Senate
Policy
Commerce
Introduced
Apr 9, 2025

Read twice and Referred to the Judiciary. for review

Apr 9, 2025

Constituent Resources

Get notified when this bill moves

Who is lobbying on S. 1367?

3 organizations lobbying on this bill

Total filings: 38
RECORDING ACADEMY
20
SESAC RIGHTS MANAGEMENT INC
12
ACADEMY OF TELEVISION ART & SCIENCES
6

Showing 1-3 of 3 organizations

S. 1367 Common Questions

How much can a false AI deepfake takedown notice cost under the NO FAKES Act?

Under the NO FAKES Act of 2025, a knowingly false notice or one sent without good-faith review can trigger the greater of $25,000 per notice or actual damages plus attorney's fees (Section 2(d)).

How much are damages for AI voice or likeness deepfakes under the NO FAKES Act?

According to S. 1367 Section 2(e), damages are $5,000 per work for individuals, $25,000 per work for good-faith online services, up to $750,000 per work for non-compliant online services, and $25,000 per work for other entities.

Can someone own rights to an AI-generated voice or face after death under the NO FAKES Act?

Yes. Under the NO FAKES Act of 2025, post-mortem rights last 10 years after death, can be renewed in 5-year periods with active authorized public use, and end no later than 70 years after death (Section 2(b)).

Can a minor license their AI voice or likeness under the NO FAKES Act?

Yes, but only on tight terms. Under the NO FAKES Act of 2025, a minor's license can last no more than 5 years, ends at 18, must be written, signed, specific, and court-approved under State law (Section 2(b)).

Can a living person permanently sign away their voice or likeness rights under the NO FAKES Act?

No. Under the NO FAKES Act of 2025, the digital replication right cannot be assigned during life, though it can be licensed; adult licenses are capped at 10 years and must be written, signed, and specific (Section 2(b)).

Does the NO FAKES Act require platforms to remove AI deepfakes after notice?

Yes. Under the NO FAKES Act of 2025, an online service seeking safe harbor must remove or disable access to the material, and matching digital-fingerprint copies when applicable, as soon as technically feasible after valid notice (Section 2(d)).

Can a platform be sued for AI deepfakes only after it gets notice under the NO FAKES Act?

Generally yes. According to S. 1367 Section 2(c), an online service is usually liable only after receiving a notice or court order and failing to act, or if it willfully avoids receiving notice.

Is saying a deepfake is AI-generated a defense under the NO FAKES Act?

No. Under the NO FAKES Act of 2025, a disclaimer that a replica is unauthorized or AI-generated is not a valid defense in a civil action (Section 2(e)).

Which kinds of content are excluded from liability for digital replicas under the NO FAKES Act?

According to S. 1367 Section 2(c), exclusions cover bona fide news, public affairs, sports, documentaries, historical or biographical works, satire, parody, and fleeting or negligible uses—except sexually explicit digital replicas.

Does the NO FAKES Act override state deepfake and likeness laws after January 2 2025?

Partly. Under the NO FAKES Act of 2025, federal law preempts many state likeness claims in expressive works, but preserves state laws and common-law rules existing on January 2, 2025, plus election and sexually explicit replica laws (Section 2(g)).

Based on S. 1367 bill text

S. 1367 Bill Text

PDF

To protect intellectual property rights in the voice and visual likeness of individuals, and for other purposes.

Source: U.S. Government Publishing Office

Bill Alerts

Get notified when S. 1367 moves

Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.

Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commerce Bills

9 related bills we're tracking

View all
H.R. 5511

Algorithmic Accountability Act of 2025

Yvette Clarke
Yvette ClarkeD-NY
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+24
28 cosponsors
+1 this month

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Sep 19, 2025

HouseCommerce
S. 836

Children and Teens’ Online Privacy Protection Act

Edward Markey
Edward MarkeyD-MA
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+17
21 cosponsors

Passed Senate with amendments by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S860-869; text: CR S861-868)

Mar 5, 2026

SenateCommerce
H.R. 3174

Made in America Manufacturing Finance Act

Roger Williams
Roger WilliamsR-TX
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+8
12 cosponsors

Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 283.

Dec 4, 2025

HouseCommerce
H.R. 3597

Protecting Circuit Boards and Substrates Act

Blake Moore
Blake MooreR-UT
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+5
9 cosponsors

Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committees on Energy and Commerce, and Science, Space, and Technology, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

May 23, 2025

HouseCommerce
S. 2164

Algorithmic Accountability Act of 2025

Ron Wyden
Ron WydenD-OR
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+3
7 cosponsors

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

Jun 25, 2025

SenateCommerce
H.R. 8094

AI Foundation Model Transparency Act of 2026

Donald Beyer
Donald BeyerD-VA
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
3 cosponsors
+3 this month

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Mar 26, 2026

HouseCommerce
H.R. 3149

App Store Accountability Act

John James
John JamesR-MI
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
2 cosponsors

Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee (Amended) by Voice Vote.

Dec 11, 2025

HouseCommerce
H.R. 4495

SBA Fraud Enforcement Extension Act

Troy Downing
Troy DowningR-MT
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
2 cosponsors

Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 281.

Dec 2, 2025

HouseCommerce
H.R. 6888

Trump Tariff Transparency Act

Brittany Pettersen
Brittany PettersenD-CO
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
2 cosponsors

Referred to the House Committee on Small Business.

Dec 18, 2025

HouseCommerce

Tracking Commerce in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.