H.R. 8094: AI Foundation Model Transparency Act of 2026
Sponsor
Donald Beyer
Democrat · VA-8
Bill Progress
Latest Action · Mar 26, 2026
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why it matters
Congress is moving to force major AI model providers to publicly explain what they built, what data they used, and how dangerous their systems may be, with FTC rules due within 1 year of enactment.
H.R. 8094 would create a new federal transparency regime for large AI foundation models, with the Federal Trade Commission writing the rules not later than 1 year after enactment. The bill is aimed at "covered entities" that provide a foundation model meeting at least one trigger: the model shows high-risk performance; has more than 10,000,000 monthly users; has more than 10,000,000 monthly download instances; or was trained using more than 10^26 integer or floating point operations. The bill defines a "foundation model" as an AI model trained on broad data, generally using self-supervision, with at least 1,000,000,000 parameters, designed for generality of output, and generally usable across many contexts and tasks.
The core idea is disclosure. Covered entities would have to publish information on their own websites in a human-readable, consumer-friendly format, while also providing information for a central FTC website in a machine-readable format. Required disclosures are broad: summaries of training data sources and collection methods; whether data is retained during inference; demographic and language composition of data; intended uses; model limits and risks; version and release date; knowledge cutoff date; supported languages; adverse incident monitoring and response procedures; and how the company aligns the model with the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, government-approved consensus technical standards, or its own internal guardrails.
The bill also pushes companies to disclose testing results for some of the most sensitive use cases. That includes evaluations tied to medical and health risks; biological, chemical, radiological, and nuclear weapons risks; national security; cybersecurity; critical infrastructure; elections; law enforcement; financial and housing decisions; education; employment and hiring; public services; and effects on vulnerable populations, specifically minors under age 18 and seniors age 65 or older. It also requires disclosure of computational power used to train and operate the model, which is notable because compute thresholds are already part of the bill's coverage test.
The measure is not absolute. Fully open-source models are exempt. Companies building downstream models can rely partly on a base model's disclosure by linking to its URL, but they still must comply if they make significant changes, retrain, or adapt the system. Small businesses and new businesses operating for less than 1 year get help: the FTC must provide guidance and machine-readable templates, plus a 3-month grace period from penalties, during which a technically proficient representative must meet with them to assist compliance. Enforcement would run through the FTC Act as an unfair or deceptive practice, but the FTC must give at least 14 days' notice before taking action. The regulations would take effect 90 days after promulgation, and the FTC would have to review and update the requirements every year starting 1 year after the initial rules are issued.
What does H.R. 8094 do?
FTC must write rules within 1 year
The Federal Trade Commission must issue transparency regulations not later than 1 year after enactment, in consultation with NIST, the Secretary of Commerce, the Office of Science and Technology Policy, standards bodies, academia, tech experts, and civil rights and consumer advocates.
Covers models with 1 billion parameters
The bill defines a foundation model as one trained on broad data, generally using self-supervision, with at least 1,000,000,000 parameters, designed for general output across many tasks. A company becomes a covered entity if its model meets one of four triggers, including more than 10,000,000 monthly users, more than 10,000,000 monthly download instances, or training above 10^26 operations.
Public disclosures must be human- and machine-readable
Covered entities must post required information on their own websites in a human-readable, consumer-friendly format and also provide information for a central FTC website in a machine-readable format. Sensitive personally identifiable information and cybersecurity-sensitive material can be submitted to the FTC without being publicly displayed.
Testing disclosures include minors and seniors
Companies must disclose evaluation results on risks involving medical and health uses, weapons, national security, cybersecurity, critical infrastructure, elections, law enforcement, housing and finance, education, employment, and public services, including impacts on vulnerable populations such as minors under 18 and seniors age 65 or older.
Small and new firms get 3-month penalty grace
Small businesses and new businesses in operation for less than 1 year receive FTC guidance, machine-readable templates, and a 3-month grace period from penalties. During that 3-month period, a technically proficient representative must meet with the business to help it comply.
FTC enforcement requires 14 days' notice
Violations are treated as unfair or deceptive acts or practices under section 18(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Trade Commission Act, but the FTC must give a covered entity at least 14 days' notice before taking enforcement action. The rules would apply 90 days after they are promulgated and must be reassessed annually starting 1 year after initial promulgation.
Who benefits from H.R. 8094?
Consumers using major AI tools
They would get clearer public information in a consumer-friendly format about model limits, intended uses, release dates, knowledge cutoff dates, supported languages, and whether data is collected or retained during inference.
Researchers, auditors, and watchdog groups
They would gain centralized, machine-readable disclosures on the FTC website, including benchmark and risk-testing results across areas like elections, cybersecurity, law enforcement, education, and employment.
Civil rights and vulnerable populations
The bill specifically requires performance disclosures related to financial and housing decisions, hiring, education, public services, and effects on minors under 18 and seniors age 65 or older, giving advocates more evidence to identify bias or harm.
Small businesses and startups under 1 year old
Smaller firms get compliance support from the FTC, including templates, guidance, and a 3-month grace period from penalties, plus direct help from a technically proficient representative.
Who is affected by H.R. 8094?
Large AI model developers
Companies operating models with more than 10,000,000 monthly users, more than 10,000,000 monthly downloads, or training runs above 10^26 operations would face new disclosure and documentation duties.
Companies adapting base models
Downstream developers cannot simply point to a base model forever; they must provide a URL to the base model disclosure and comply themselves if they make significant changes, retrain, or adapt the model.
FTC and technical regulators
The FTC would take the lead on writing rules within 1 year, creating a resources page within 1 year, maintaining a central disclosure site, enforcing violations, and updating requirements every year after the initial rulemaking.
Open-source AI projects
Fully open-source models are exempt, which shields some developers from the bill's disclosure regime while also potentially sharpening debate over what counts as truly fully open-source.
What Congress Is Saying
H.R. 8094 hasn't been debated on the floor yet.
This section updates when a legislator speaks about it on the floor or in committee.
HR8094 Legislative Journey
House: Committee Action
Mar 26, 2026
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
About the Sponsor
Donald Beyer
Democrat, Virginia's 8th congressional district · 11 years in Congress
Committees: Joint Economic Committee, Ways and Means
View full profile →
Cosponsors (3)
This bill has 3 cosponsors: 1 Democrat, 2 Republicans, reflecting bipartisan support. Cosponsors represent 3 states: California, New York, Pennsylvania.
Committee Sponsors
Energy and Commerce Committee
0 of 54 committee members cosponsored
No committee members have cosponsored this bill
24 Democrats across this committee haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents
H.R. 8094 Quick Facts
- Committee
- Energy and Commerce
- Chamber
- House
- Policy
- Commerce
- Introduced
- Mar 26, 2026
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Mar 26, 2026
H.R. 8094 Common Questions
How many monthly users would make an AI model covered under the AI Foundation Model Transparency Act?
A provider can become a covered entity if its foundation model has more than 10,000,000 monthly users in the aggregate, according to the AI Foundation Model Transparency Act of 2026 (SEC. 12).
How many monthly downloads trigger AI disclosure requirements in HR 8094?
HR 8094 says a model provider is covered if the foundation model has more than 10,000,000 monthly download instances in the aggregate, under the AI Foundation Model Transparency Act of 2026 (SEC. 12).
What is the compute threshold for AI models under the AI Foundation Model Transparency Act?
Under the AI Foundation Model Transparency Act of 2026, a provider is covered if the model was trained using more than 10^26 integer or floating point operations (SEC. 12).
Does HR 8094 apply to AI models with 1 billion parameters?
Yes. HR 8094 defines a foundation model as one with at least 1,000,000,000 parameters, broad training data, self-supervision, and general-purpose use, under the AI Foundation Model Transparency Act of 2026 (SEC. 12).
Are open-source AI models exempt from the AI Foundation Model Transparency Act?
Yes. Fully open-source models are exempt from the transparency regulations under the AI Foundation Model Transparency Act of 2026 (SEC. 2).
Can AI companies redact sensitive information from public transparency disclosures?
Yes. Companies may redact information for cybersecurity, public safety, national security, or to comply with federal law, but the redactions must be identified and justified under HR 8094 (SEC. 2).
What AI risk tests would companies have to disclose under HR 8094?
HR 8094 requires disclosures on testing for medical risks, weapons, national security, cybersecurity, critical infrastructure, elections, law enforcement, housing, finance, education, employment, public services, and vulnerable groups (SEC. 2).
Does the AI Foundation Model Transparency Act require disclosures about minors and seniors?
Yes. The bill requires risk evaluation disclosures for vulnerable populations, specifically minors under 18 and seniors age 65 or older, under the AI Foundation Model Transparency Act of 2026 (SEC. 2; SEC. 12).
Can small AI startups get a grace period before FTC penalties under HR 8094?
Yes. Small businesses and businesses operating less than 1 year get one 3-month grace period from penalties starting when they become covered entities, according to HR 8094 (SEC. 2).
How much notice must the FTC give before enforcing the AI Foundation Model Transparency Act?
The FTC must give a covered entity at least 14 days' notice before taking enforcement action under the AI Foundation Model Transparency Act of 2026 (SEC. 2).
Based on H.R. 8094 bill text
H.R. 8094 Bill Text
“To direct the Federal Trade Commission to establish requirements for making information available to the public about the training data and algorithms used in artificial intelligence foundation models, and for other purposes.”
Source: U.S. Government Publishing Office
Get notified when H.R. 8094 moves
Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.
Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commerce Bills
9 related bills we're tracking
Algorithmic Accountability Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Sep 19, 2025
Children and Teens’ Online Privacy Protection Act
Passed Senate with amendments by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S860-869; text: CR S861-868)
Mar 5, 2026
NO FAKES Act of 2025
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Apr 9, 2025
Made in America Manufacturing Finance Act
Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 283.
Dec 4, 2025
Protecting Circuit Boards and Substrates Act
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committees on Energy and Commerce, and Science, Space, and Technology, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
May 23, 2025
Algorithmic Accountability Act of 2025
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Jun 25, 2025
App Store Accountability Act
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee (Amended) by Voice Vote.
Dec 11, 2025
SBA Fraud Enforcement Extension Act
Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 281.
Dec 2, 2025
Trump Tariff Transparency Act
Referred to the House Committee on Small Business.
Dec 18, 2025
Trending Right Now
Bills gaining momentum across Congress
Congressional Tribute to Constance Baker Motley Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Sep 11, 2025
Deterring American AI Model Theft Act of 2026
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Apr 15, 2026
GUARDRAILS Act
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Mar 26, 2026
Tracking Commerce in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.