H.R. 6170: ADOPT Act of 2025
Sponsor
Robert Aderholt
Republican · AL-4
Unlicensed adoption matchmaking should be a federal crime
Why it matters
Up to 5 years in prison and a $50,000 fine per violation for an individual, $100,000 per violation for an organization. H.R. 6170 would attach those penalties to anyone who charges to match birth parents with adoptive families, or pays for adoption ads, without being a licensed agency, a licensed attorney, or another listed exception. It would also make it a crime to give a placing parent more than $2,500 before they have talked to a licensed agency or attorney in their own state.
Private adoption in the U.S. runs through a patchwork of state rules. Some states let unlicensed facilitators charge fees to connect expectant parents with adoptive families; others ban it. Families and birth parents regularly cross those lines through websites, phone calls, and wire transfers.
H.R. 6170, the ADOPT Act, sets one federal floor. The bill states its purpose as protecting families from "exploitation by unlicensed adoption intermediaries" and preventing "the commodification of children."
If you are paid to connect a birth parent with an adoptive family, you would need to be a licensed agency, a licensed attorney, or another exempt provider — or face federal prosecution. The exempt list covers public child welfare agencies, state-licensed private agencies, nonprofits working under contract with a public agency, attorneys licensed in the state where the work happens, and accredited intercountry adoption providers.
Paid adoption ads get the same treatment. A billboard, search ad, magazine notice, or social post soliciting birth parents or adoptive parents would be off-limits unless placed by an exempt provider licensed where the ad appears. So would ads offering to cover a birth parent's living or medical expenses.
The third rule is about money arriving early. Giving more than $2,500 in cash, housing, services, or medical care to or for a placing parent — before that parent has consulted a licensed agency or attorney in their own state — would be a crime. Payments made by or in cooperation with a licensed agency, a licensed attorney, or a public assistance program are exempt.
The federal hook is broad: travel, phone, internet, electronic payment, or any conduct inside U.S. territory can qualify. States could still pass stricter rules, and the Indian Child Welfare Act is left untouched. The law would take effect 120 days after enactment.
Bill Progress
Latest Action · Nov 20, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
H.R. 6170 Bill Summary
What H.R. 6170 actually does.
Paid matchmaking requires a license
Anyone paid, directly or indirectly, to find birth parents or adoptive parents, or to link them for a placement, commits a federal crime unless they are a public agency, a state-licensed private agency, a nonprofit contracting with a public agency, a licensed attorney in that state, or an accredited intercountry provider.
Adoption ads limited to licensed providers
Paid ads in print, online, on billboards, radio, or TV that solicit birth or adoptive parents, or offer to pay a birth parent's expenses, are banned unless placed by an exempt provider licensed where the ad runs.
$2,500 cap before a birth parent gets licensed advice
Giving a placing parent more than $2,500 in money, property, services, or medical care before they consult a licensed agency or attorney in their own state becomes a crime, unless the payment runs through a licensed agency, a licensed attorney, or a public benefit program.
Prison time and fines per violation
Individuals face a $50,000 fine, up to 5 years in prison, or both, per violation. Organizations face a $100,000 fine per violation.
States keep the power to go further
The bill sets a floor, not a ceiling: states can enforce stricter adoption rules. It does not change the Indian Child Welfare Act or authorized intercountry adoption programs, and takes effect 120 days after enactment.
Who benefits from H.R. 6170?
Expectant parents considering adoption
Before significant money changes hands, you would have to get advice from a licensed agency or attorney in your own state, someone accountable to a licensing board, rather than only the person arranging the match.
Hopeful adoptive families
If you are paying tens of thousands of dollars to adopt, the people matching you with a birth parent would have to be licensed or otherwise regulated, giving you someone to hold accountable if a match falls apart.
Licensed agencies and adoption attorneys
They keep full legal access to matching, advertising, and expense support, while unlicensed competitors would be shut out of the paid market.
Who is affected by H.R. 6170?
Adoption facilitators and consultants
Businesses that charge to match families, including those operating legally in their home states today, would have to become licensed, partner with a licensed agency or attorney, or stop. Their fee-based model would otherwise become a federal offense.
Families who find matches through ads or social media
Paid solicitation outside licensed channels would end. Unpaid personal outreach is not covered by the ad ban, which applies only to paid communications.
Anyone helping a birth parent with expenses
Relatives, adoptive families, or intermediaries covering rent, bills, or medical care above $2,500 would need to route that support through a licensed agency or attorney, or wait until the birth parent has consulted one.
HR6170 Legislative Journey
House: Committee Action
Nov 20, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
About the Sponsor
Robert Aderholt
Republican, Alabama's 4th congressional district · 29 years in Congress
Committees: Appropriations
View full profile →
Cosponsors (19)
This bill has 19 cosponsors: 10 Democrats, 9 Republicans, reflecting bipartisan support. Cosponsors represent 14 states: Arizona, California, Florida, and 11 more.
Danny Davis
Democrat · IL
Laurel Lee
Republican · FL
Sydney Kamlager-Dove
Democrat · CA
Eugene Vindman
Democrat · VA
Mike Kelly
Republican · PA
Diana Harshbarger
Republican · TN
Jefferson Shreve
Republican · IN
David Schweikert
Republican · AZ
Adam Smith
Democrat · WA
Angie Craig
Democrat · MN
Don Bacon
Republican · NE
Wesley Hunt
Republican · TX
Committee Sponsors
Judiciary Committee
3 of 44 committee members cosponsored
22 Republicans across this committee haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents
H.R. 6170 Quick Facts
- Committee
- Judiciary
- Chamber
- House
- Policy
- Crime and Law Enforcement
- Introduced
- Nov 20, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Nov 20, 2025
Official Sources
Official bill text, cosponsors, and action history for the ADOPT Act of 2025.
Child Welfare Information Gateway summary of how each state permits, regulates, or bans the adoption facilitators and advertising this bill would restrict nationwide.
How states currently limit the birth-parent living and medical expenses that the bill would cap at $2,500 before licensed counsel.
The chapter of the federal criminal code the bill amends, adding a new section 228A on unlawful adoption practices.
The bill states that it does not affect the application of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978.
Full statutory text of the Indian Child Welfare Act that the bill leaves unchanged.
Accredited or approved intercountry adoption providers under this law are exempt from the bill’s matching and advertising bans.
H.R. 6170 Common Questions
What is the ADOPT Act?
H.R. 6170, the ADOPT Act of 2025, would make it a federal crime to charge for matching birth parents with adoptive families, or to run paid adoption ads, unless you are a licensed agency, a licensed attorney, or another listed exception.
Are adoption facilitators legal?
Right now it depends on the state. Some allow unlicensed facilitators to charge fees; others ban them. H.R. 6170 would ban paid facilitation nationwide for anyone outside the exempt list, which covers licensed agencies, licensed attorneys, and a few others.
Could I still post that we're hoping to adopt on social media?
The ad ban covers paid advertisements and paid communications. A free personal post isn't a paid ad, but paying to boost one, or paying a consultant to find a match, could fall under the bill.
Can adoptive parents pay a birth mother's expenses?
Yes, but anything over $2,500 before she has consulted a licensed agency or attorney in her state would be a crime, unless the payment runs through a licensed agency, a licensed attorney, or a public assistance program.
What are the penalties under H.R. 6170?
Individuals face a $50,000 fine, up to 5 years in prison, or both, for each violation. Organizations face a $100,000 fine per violation.
Does H.R. 6170 affect international or tribal adoptions?
Accredited intercountry adoption providers are exempt, and the bill says it does not limit intercountry adoption programs. It also leaves the Indian Child Welfare Act unchanged.
Would this override stricter state adoption laws?
No. States could keep or pass rules tougher than H.R. 6170. The bill sets a national minimum.
Who supports H.R. 6170, and when would it take effect?
Rep. Robert Aderholt (R-AL) introduced it with a bipartisan group of 17 cosponsors, 9 Republicans and 8 Democrats. If enacted, it takes effect 120 days later. It is awaiting action in House Judiciary.
Based on H.R. 6170 bill text
H.R. 6170 Bill Text
“To amend title 18, United States Code, to criminalize unlawful adoption practices.”
Source: U.S. Government Publishing Office
Get notified when H.R. 6170 moves
Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.
Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.
Crime and Law Enforcement Bills
9 related bills we're tracking
Crime Victims Fund Stabilization Act of 2025
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Jan 13, 2026
Bipartisan Background Checks Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Jun 10, 2025
Combating Organized Retail Crime Act of 2025
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
May 13, 2026
Ethan's Law
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Feb 25, 2025
Assault Weapons Ban of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Apr 30, 2025
Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2025
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 289.
Oct 3, 2025
Honoring Our Fallen Heroes Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Feb 12, 2025
Raise the Age Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Mar 26, 2025
Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Jan 24, 2025
Trending Right Now
Bills gaining momentum across Congress
America’s Olympic and Paralympic Games Commemorative Coins Act
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Jul 14, 2025
Fit to Serve Act
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
May 21, 2025
ASAP Act
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 40 - 0.
Sep 16, 2026
Tracking Crime and Law Enforcement in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.