H.R. 2126: FOCA Act of 2025

Introduced Mar 14, 2025107 cosponsors

Sponsor

Clay Higgins

Clay Higgins

Republican · LA-3

Bill Progress

IntroducedMar 14
Committee 
Pass House 
Pass Senate 
Signed 
Law 

Latest Action · Mar 14, 2025

1/3

Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

Federal construction bids stay neutral on union deals

3 min readLast updated July 24, 2026

Why it matters

Within 60 days, federal contracting rules would have to change. H.R. 2126 would stop agencies from telling construction bidders they must sign a union agreement—or that they cannot—and extends that neutrality to many federally funded projects too.

H.R. 2126 covers federal construction contracts, subcontracts, and many construction projects paid for with federal grants or other assistance. For awards made after the bill becomes law, agencies and project managers acting for them could not write bid documents or project terms that force contractors to enter union agreements or keep them from doing so.

The bill also says agencies cannot favor one bidder over another because it already has—or does not have—a union agreement in place. Contractors could still make those agreements voluntarily; the change is that the federal government could not use them as a condition of getting the work.

There are two main exceptions. An agency head could waive the rule for an imminent threat to public health or safety or for national security, and the bill says a possible labor dispute alone does not qualify. Older projects already locked into these terms could also be grandfathered in if key project documents were already in place and at least one covered contract had already been awarded.

H.R. 2126 Bill Summary

What H.R. 2126 actually does.

1

Agencies cannot force union agreements

For covered construction awards after enactment, executive agencies and project managers acting for them could not require a bidder, contractor, or subcontractor to enter into an agreement with a labor organization.

2

Agencies cannot ban union agreements either

The same project documents also could not forbid a bidder, contractor, or subcontractor from entering into a labor agreement. The bill's approach is neutrality, not a one-sided ban.

3

Bids cannot be favored based on union status

Agencies could not give preference to—or discriminate against—a company because it is or is not already signatory to a labor agreement.

4

Grant-funded construction projects are covered too

The rule would extend beyond direct federal contracts to many construction projects funded through grants, financial assistance, and cooperative agreements made after enactment.

5

Voluntary labor agreements stay legal

Contractors and subcontractors could still choose to sign labor agreements on their own. H.R. 2126 only blocks the government from making that choice for them.

6

Emergency and existing-project exceptions remain

An agency head could grant an exemption for an imminent public health or safety threat or for national security. Some existing projects could also continue under older terms if their governing documents were already in place and at least one covered contract had already been awarded.

Who benefits from H.R. 2126?

Contractors trying to bid without changing their labor model

If your company wants a federal construction job, H.R. 2126 would keep the government from telling you to sign a union agreement first—or to drop one you already use.

Subcontractors pulled into larger federal projects

The bill explicitly covers subcontractors, not just prime contractors. That matters for smaller firms that often get swept into labor terms set higher up the chain.

Small and disadvantaged businesses seeking more access

The bill says one purpose is to expand job opportunities for small and disadvantaged businesses. The theory behind it is that more neutral bidding rules could widen the pool of firms willing to compete.

Grant recipients that want one federal rule

States, local governments, and other entities running federally assisted construction projects would get a uniform federal standard on labor-agreement terms in project documents.

Who is affected by H.R. 2126?

Executive agencies that write construction bid terms

Federal agencies would have to change how they structure bid specifications, project agreements, and related contracting documents for covered construction work.

Construction managers acting for the government

Managers handling projects on an agency's behalf would be subject to the same neutrality rule and could not insert terms requiring or prohibiting labor agreements.

Unions and contractors that rely on government-required project labor agreements

They could still negotiate agreements voluntarily, but they could no longer rely on agencies to make those agreements a condition of winning covered work.

Recipients of federal construction aid

Organizations using federal grants, financial assistance, or cooperative agreements for construction would need to make sure their project documents follow the new rule.

Share this story
Tracking floor activity — no debate on H.R. 2126 yet. Updates when a legislator speaks on the record.

HR2126 Legislative Journey

1 actions

House: Committee Action

Mar 14, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

About the Sponsor

Clay Higgins

Clay Higgins

Republican, Louisiana's 3rd congressional district · 9 years in Congress

Committees: House Select Subcommittee to Investigate the Remaining Questions Surrounding January 6, 2021, Oversight and Government Reform, Armed Services

View full profile →

Cosponsors (107)

No new cosponsors in 191 days — momentum stalled

All 107 cosponsors are Republicans. Cosponsors represent 31 states: Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, and 28 more.

107Republicans·31 states

Cosponsor Coverage Map

Committee Sponsors

Oversight and Government Reform Committee

21D26R
|19 signed28 not yet

19 of 47 committee members cosponsored

7 Republicans across this committee haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents

H.R. 2126 Quick Facts

Cosponsors
107
Daniel Meuser
Mike Collins
Andrew Ogles
Keith Self
Glenn Thompson
+102 more
Committee
Oversight and Government Reform
Chamber
House
Policy
Government Operations and Politics
Introduced
Mar 14, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

Mar 14, 2025

Constituent Resources

Get notified when this bill moves

Official Sources

H.R. 2126 on Congress.gov

Official bill page with status, text, actions, cosponsors, and committee information for H.R. 2126.

Federal Acquisition Regulation

The bill requires revisions to the Federal Acquisition Regulation within 60 days, making the FAR the core rule set affected by H.R. 2126.

Project Labor Agreements and Community Workforce Agreements

This FAR subpart covers labor-related requirements in federal contracting and is relevant to how agencies handle project labor agreement policies.

Acquisition.gov FAR Part 22—Application of Labor Laws to Government Acquisitions

FAR Part 22 contains labor-law provisions for federal acquisitions, which is directly relevant to a bill governing neutrality toward contractor labor agreements.

U.S. Department of Labor

The Department of Labor is a primary federal agency for labor-policy context, including collective bargaining and construction-labor issues touched by the bill.

Government Accountability Office Bid Protests and Appropriations Law Resources

GAO legal resources can provide official background on federal procurement disputes and contracting rules relevant to open competition claims.

Code of Federal Regulations via GovInfo

GovInfo provides the official CFR collection, useful for locating procurement and labor regulations that could be updated if the bill becomes law.

H.R. 2126 Common Questions

What does H.R. 2126 actually do?

It says federal agencies must stay neutral on union agreements in covered construction projects. They could not require a contractor to sign one, and they could not forbid one either.

Would this ban project labor agreements entirely?

No. Contractors could still enter those agreements voluntarily. H.R. 2126 only blocks the government from making them mandatory or prohibited in covered projects.

Does H.R. 2126 apply to grant-funded construction too?

Yes. It covers not just direct federal contracts but also many construction projects paid for through federal grants, financial assistance, and cooperative agreements.

Would older federal construction contracts be reopened?

No. The bill applies to covered contracts and subcontracts awarded on or after it becomes law, so existing awards would generally stay under the old rules.

Can agencies still favor bidders that already work with unions?

No. H.R. 2126 says agencies cannot give preference to—or discriminate against—a bidder because it is or is not signatory to a labor agreement.

Are there any exceptions in H.R. 2126?

Yes. An agency head could exempt a project for an imminent public health or safety threat or for national security. Some existing projects could also be grandfathered in.

Can an agency use a possible strike as the reason for an exemption?

Not by itself. The bill says a current or possible labor dispute involving non-signatory contractors or non-union employees is not enough to claim special circumstances.

How fast would the government have to update the rules?

Fast. H.R. 2126 gives the government 60 days after enactment to revise the Federal Acquisition Regulation so the new neutrality rule is reflected in federal contracting policy.

Based on H.R. 2126 bill text

H.R. 2126 Bill Text

To preserve open competition and Federal Government neutrality towards the labor relations of Federal Government contractors on Federal and federally funded construction projects, and for other purposes.

Source: U.S. Government Publishing Office

Bill Alerts

Get notified when H.R. 2126 moves

Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.

Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.

Government Operations and Politics Bills

9 related bills we're tracking

View all
H.R. 1065Gaining+7

Protect Our Letter Carriers Act of 2025

Brian Fitzpatrick
Brian FitzpatrickR-PA
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+219
223 cosponsors
+7 this month

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Feb 6, 2025

HouseGovernment Operations and Politics
H.R. 14

John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2025

Terri Sewell
Terri SewellD-AL
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+216
220 cosponsors

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Mar 5, 2025

HouseGovernment Operations and Politics
H.R. 51

Washington, D.C. Admission Act

Eleanor Norton
Eleanor NortonD-DC
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+203
207 cosponsors

Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committees on Rules, Armed Services, the Judiciary, and Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Jan 3, 2025

HouseGovernment Operations and Politics
H.R. 2086

Rights for the TSA Workforce Act

Bennie Thompson
Bennie ThompsonD-MS
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+185
189 cosponsors
+2 this month

Referred to the Subcommittee on Transportation and Maritime Security.

Mar 11, 2025

HouseGovernment Operations and Politics
H.R. 7802Surging+12

DISCLOSE Act of 2026

Chris Pappas
Chris PappasD-NH
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+164
168 cosponsors
+12 this month

Referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, and the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Mar 4, 2026

HouseGovernment Operations and Politics
H.R. 1522

Federal Retirement Fairness Act

Gerald Connolly
Gerald ConnollyD-VA
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+151
155 cosponsors
+4 this month

ASSUMING FIRST SPONSORSHIP - Ms. Randall asked unanimous consent that she may hereafter be considered as the first sponsor of H.R. 1522, a bill originally introduced by Representative Connolly, for the purpose of adding cosponsors and requesting reprintings pursuant to clause 7 of rule XII. Agreed to without objection.

Jul 22, 2025

HouseGovernment Operations and Politics
H.R. 5657

Fair Pay for Federal Contractors Act of 2025

Ayanna Pressley
Ayanna PressleyD-MA
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+131
135 cosponsors

Referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Sep 30, 2025

HouseGovernment Operations and Politics
H.R. 45

FIND Act

Jack Bergman
Jack BergmanR-MI
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+116
120 cosponsors
+1 this month

Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

Jan 3, 2025

HouseGovernment Operations and Politics
H.R. 7296

SAVE America Act

Chip Roy
Chip RoyR-TX
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+107
111 cosponsors

Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.

Jan 30, 2026

HouseGovernment Operations and Politics

Tracking Government Operations and Politics in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.