H.R. 14: John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2025
Sponsor
Terri Sewell
Democrat · AL-7
Bill Progress
Latest Action · Mar 5, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Election rule changes face federal scrutiny again
Why it matters
48 hours — that's how fast many local governments would have to tell you when voting rules change. H.R. 14 also revives federal review for states and localities with repeated voting-rights violations and gives the Justice Department 60 days to review certain map, polling-place, and voter-ID changes before they take effect.
H.R. 14 would rebuild a federal oversight system for election changes. The biggest piece is preclearance: states and local governments with repeated voting-rights violations over the past 25 years would have to get federal approval before certain voting changes can take effect. For states, the trigger is 15 violations, 10 if at least one came from the state itself, or 3 if the state runs elections for the localities involved. For local jurisdictions, 3 violations in 25 years can be enough. Coverage lasts 10 years.
The bill also creates a second lane for election changes that get federal review even outside broad statewide coverage. That includes switches to at-large or multi-member elections in some communities, district boundary changes that reduce a group's share of the voting-age population by 3 points or more, tougher voter-ID or documentation rules than current law, cuts to multilingual voting materials, polling-place reductions or relocations including Sunday hours, and some voter-roll maintenance changes. The Justice Department would generally get 60 days to review those moves.
You would also get more notice. Counties, parishes, municipalities, and school districts with more than 10,000 people would have to publicly disclose many voting changes within 48 hours, give polling-place resource information at least 30 days before an election, and report district or constituency changes within 10 days.
In court, the bill makes it easier for voters challenging election rules to win temporary relief before an election. It also applies a vote-retrogression standard to actions taken on or after January 1, 2021, meaning some recent election changes could be challenged under the restored rules if they reduced voters' ability to participate or elect their preferred candidates because of race, color, or language minority status.
H.R. 14 Bill Summary
What H.R. 14 actually does.
Repeat violators face pre-approval again
States and local governments with enough voting-rights violations over the past 25 years would have to win federal approval before certain election changes can take effect. State coverage can be triggered by 15 violations, 10 with at least one by the state itself, or 3 tied to localities whose elections the state administers. Local jurisdictions can be covered with 3 violations. Coverage lasts 10 years.
Some election changes get automatic 60-day review
The Justice Department would review certain changes even outside broader preclearance coverage. That includes some shifts to at-large elections, district boundary changes, tougher voter-ID or documentation rules, cuts to multilingual voting materials, polling-place reductions or relocations, and some voter-roll maintenance systems.
You get faster notice when voting rules change
Larger local governments would have to tell the public quickly when election rules change. Many changes would require notice within 48 hours, polling-place resource information would be due at least 30 days before an election, and district or constituency changes would have to be disclosed within 10 days.
Recent voting changes can still be challenged
The bill applies its vote-retrogression rule to actions taken on or after January 1, 2021. That means some election changes already made could face challenge if they reduced voters' ability to participate or elect preferred candidates because of race, color, or language minority status.
Courts would have to move faster before elections
Voters challenging an election rule could get temporary court relief under a more plaintiff-friendly standard. The bill says courts should not deny relief just because an election is approaching unless the other side proves serious harm.
Federal investigators get stronger fact-finding tools
The Attorney General could demand documents or written answers in voting-rights investigations, with at least 20 days to respond. That gives the Justice Department a faster way to gather evidence before suing or reviewing a change.
Who benefits from H.R. 14?
Voters in places where election rules keep changing
If your polling place is moved, your district lines are redrawn, or your county changes voting procedures, you would be more likely to hear about it before Election Day. The bill's 48-hour, 10-day, and 30-day notice rules are meant to create that warning time.
Black, Latino, Asian American, Native American, and language-minority voters
The bill gives these voters stronger tools to challenge rules that make voting harder or weaken their political power. It also targets election changes in communities that meet specific population and growth thresholds.
Tribal communities and voters on Indian lands
H.R. 14 explicitly includes Indian lands in its definition of affected areas, making clear that voting changes affecting those communities are part of the law's coverage and enforcement system.
Voters and civil-rights groups bringing cases before elections
The bill lowers some practical barriers to getting temporary court orders before an election. That matters when a challenge has to be decided in days or weeks, not months.
Who is affected by H.R. 14?
States with long records of voting-rights violations
If a state meets the bill's 25-year thresholds, it could spend 10 years under federal preclearance. That means some election changes could not take effect until federal officials approve them.
Counties, parishes, municipalities, and school districts over 10,000 people
These jurisdictions would have new compliance work: fast public notices, polling-place disclosures, and reporting for district or constituency changes. Missing those deadlines could invite legal challenges.
Election officials changing maps, ID rules, or polling places
Officials would face extra federal review when they redraw boundaries, tighten documentation requirements, cut multilingual assistance, move or close polling places, or change some voter-roll maintenance practices.
Covered local jurisdictions seeking to exit oversight
Local governments could try to win an exemption from coverage, but only by meeting detailed compliance conditions over time and filing within the bill's deadlines.
What Congress Is Saying
22 legislators have weighed in on H.R. 14 — 12 Democrats, 10 Republicans.
H.R. 14 also appeared in 1 more House floor reference and 2 routine cosponsor filings.
HR14 Legislative Journey
House: Committee Action
Mar 5, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
About the Sponsor
Terri Sewell
Democrat, Alabama's 7th congressional district · 15 years in Congress
Committees: House Administration, Joint Committee on Printing, Ways and Means
View full profile →
Cosponsors (220)
All 220 cosponsors are Democrats. Cosponsors represent 39 states: Alabama, Arizona, California, and 36 more.
Hakeem Jeffries
Democrat · NY
Katherine Clark
Democrat · MA
Pete Aguilar
Democrat · CA
Ted Lieu
Democrat · CA
Joe Neguse
Democrat · CO
Yvette Clarke
Democrat · NY
Adriano Espaillat
Democrat · NY
Grace Meng
Democrat · NY
Jamie Raskin
Democrat · MD
Joseph Morelle
Democrat · NY
Marc Veasey
Democrat · TX
Robert Scott
Democrat · VA
Cosponsor Coverage Map
Committee Sponsors
Judiciary Committee
18 of 42 committee members cosponsored
What laws does H.R. 14 change?
10 changes
Sections Amended
Section 3(c) of Voting Rights Act of 1965 (52 U.S.C. 10302(c))
striking ``violations of the fourteenth or fifteenth amendment'' and inserting ``violations of the 14th or 15th Amendment, violations of this Act, or violations of any Federal law that prohibits discrimination in voting on the basis of race, color, or membership in a language minority group,''
Section 3(a) of such Act (52 U.S.C. 10302(a))
striking ``violations of the fourteenth or fifteenth amendment'' and inserting ``violations of the 14th or 15th Amendment, violations of this Act, or violations of any Federal law that prohibits discrimination in voting on the basis of race, color, or membership in a language minority group,''
Section 4(b) of Voting Rights Act of 1965 (52 U.S.C. 10303(b))
read as follows: ``(b) Determination of States and Political Subdivisions Subject to Requirements
Section 4 of Voting Rights Act of 1965 (52 U.S.C. 10303)
adding at the end the following: ``(g) Administrative Bailout
Section 3 of Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.''. (2) Conforming amendment.--Section 3(a) of such Act (52 U.S.C. 10302(a))
striking ``in accordance with section 6''
Section 3(a) of Voting Rights Act of 1965 (52 U.S.C. 10302(a))
striking ``United States Civil Service Commission in accordance with section 6'' and inserting ``Attorney General in accordance with section 8''
H.R. 14 Quick Facts
- Committee
- Judiciary
- Chamber
- House
- Policy
- Government Operations and Politics
- Introduced
- Mar 5, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Mar 5, 2025
Official Sources
Official bill page with text, actions, cosponsors, and committee status for the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2025.
The Civil Rights Division's Voting Section is the federal office that enforces major voting-rights laws and would handle much of the bill's review and enforcement work.
Official DOJ explanation of Section 5 preclearance, directly relevant to the bill's effort to restore federal preapproval for certain election changes.
Official U.S. Code text for the Voting Rights Act provisions that H.R. 14 would amend, including Section 2 and related voting-rights sections.
Official Justice Department resource on protections for language-minority voters, relevant because the bill addresses multilingual voting materials and related protections.
Official federal source for voting and registration data that often informs analysis of voting access, turnout, and demographic impacts discussed in voting-rights policy debates.
Official federal election administration agency with resources on polling places, voter registration practices, and election operations affected by the bill's notice and procedure rules.
H.R. 14 Common Questions
What does H.R. 14 actually do?
It rebuilds federal voting-rights oversight. H.R. 14 would require pre-approval for some jurisdictions with repeated violations, trigger 60-day review for certain election changes, and force faster public notice when voting rules change.
Which states could be put back under federal preclearance?
Under H.R. 14, a state can be covered if it had 15 voting-rights violations in 25 years, 10 with at least one by the state itself, or 3 tied to localities whose elections the state administers.
Can a county or city be covered on its own?
Yes. A local jurisdiction can be put under preclearance if it had 3 or more voting-rights violations in the previous 25 years. If covered, that status lasts 10 years unless it wins an exemption.
What election changes would get automatic federal review?
H.R. 14 flags some at-large election changes, district boundary shifts, tougher voter-ID or documentation rules, cuts to multilingual voting materials, polling-place reductions or relocations, and some voter-roll maintenance systems.
How fast would officials have to tell the public about voting changes?
Often very fast. Larger local governments would have to disclose many voting changes within 48 hours, give polling-place resource information 30 days before an election, and report district changes within 10 days.
Does H.R. 14 apply to voting changes already made since 2021?
Yes. The bill says its vote-retrogression rule applies to actions taken on or after January 1, 2021, so some recent election changes could still be challenged under the restored standard.
Would it be easier to block a voting rule before an election?
Usually yes. H.R. 14 tells courts to grant temporary relief when a voter raises a serious question and the balance of hardships favors the voter, instead of treating a near election as an automatic reason to say no.
Does H.R. 14 give the Justice Department more investigative power?
Yes. The Attorney General could demand documents or written answers in voting-rights investigations, and recipients would generally get at least 20 days to respond.
Based on H.R. 14 bill text
H.R. 14 Bill Text
“To amend the Voting Rights Act of 1965 to revise the criteria for determining which States and political subdivisions are subject to section 4 of the Act, and for other purposes.”
Source: U.S. Government Publishing Office
Get notified when H.R. 14 moves
Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.
Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.
Government Operations and Politics Bills
9 related bills we're tracking
Protect Our Letter Carriers Act of 2025
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Feb 6, 2025
Rights for the TSA Workforce Act
Referred to the Subcommittee on Transportation and Maritime Security.
Mar 11, 2025
Fair Pay for Federal Contractors Act of 2025
Referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Sep 30, 2025
SAVE America Act
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Jan 30, 2026
SAVE Act
Received in the Senate.
Apr 10, 2025
Saving the Civil Service Act
ASSUMING FIRST SPONSORSHIP - Mr. Walkinshaw asked unanimous consent that he may hereafter be considered as the first sponsor of H.R. 492, a bill originally introduced by Representative Connolly, for the purpose of adding cosponsors and requesting reprintings pursuant to clause 7 of rule XII. Agreed to without objection.
Sep 16, 2025
Deceptive Practices and Voter Intimidation Prevention Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Aug 5, 2025
SHARE Act of 2025
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 33 - 0.
Jun 25, 2026
End Crypto Corruption Act of 2025
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 71.
May 8, 2025
Trending Right Now
Bills gaining momentum across Congress
Improving Seniors’ Timely Access to Care Act of 2025
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.
Jun 25, 2026
Combating Illicit Xylazine Act
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.
Jun 25, 2026
GUARD Act
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 119-709, Part I.
Jun 24, 2026
Tracking Government Operations and Politics in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.