H.R. 1674: Keep Americans Safe Act
Sponsor
Diana DeGette
Democrat · CO-1
You could keep the magazine. You could never sell it.
Why it matters
Fifteen rounds is the line. H.R. 1674 would make it a federal crime to import, sell, manufacture, transfer, or possess a magazine, drum, belt, or feed strip that holds more than that — or that can be readily converted to. Anything you lawfully own on the day it takes effect is carved out of the possession ban, but that carve-out covers keeping it and nothing else. The bill has 145 cosponsors, all Democrats, and has sat in the House Judiciary Committee since February 2025.
H.R. 1674 would write a new federal crime into the firearms code: importing, selling, manufacturing, transferring, or possessing a large capacity ammunition feeding device in or affecting interstate commerce. The definition is broad — magazines, drums, belts, feed strips, helical devices, and any two of them coupled together — set at an overall capacity above 15 rounds. A device that can be readily restored, changed, or converted to take more than 15 rounds counts the same as one that already does.
One product type is written out of the definition entirely: an attached tubular device built to work only with .22 caliber rimfire ammunition. That keeps most rimfire rifles clear of the ban regardless of round count.
The grandfather clause is narrower than it first reads. It lifts the ban for devices lawfully possessed on or before the date of enactment, and it lifts it only as to possession. The bill lets you keep what you already own, and nothing in it lets you sell, trade, or hand that magazine to anyone else.
The exemption list past that is institutional rather than personal. Federal, state, and local agencies are covered, as are qualified law enforcement officers on or off duty, campus police at private colleges that meet a set of federal criteria, officers retired in good standing who keep a device issued or bought for official use, security operations at licensed nuclear facilities, and licensed manufacturers or importers running tests the Attorney General has authorized.
Three enforcement pieces ride along. Devices manufactured after enactment would have to carry an engraved or cast serial number and manufacture date. Covered devices involved in a violation would be added to existing federal seizure and forfeiture rules. And violations would fall under the federal firearms penalty provision carrying a fine, up to five years in prison, or both.
The last section is money that already exists. States and localities could spend Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant funds compensating people who turn devices in under a buy-back program. The bill adds no new appropriation and sets no price per magazine.
Bill Progress
Latest Action · Feb 27, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
H.R. 1674 Bill Summary
What H.R. 1674 actually does.
Anything over 15 rounds becomes a federal crime to buy, build, or move
The bill makes it unlawful to import, sell, manufacture, transfer, or possess a covered device in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce. Capacity is measured overall, and includes devices that can be readily restored, changed, or converted to accept more than 15 rounds.
You keep what you own — but only by keeping it
Devices lawfully possessed on or before the date of enactment are exempt from the ban. The exemption is written against possession only, so selling, trading, gifting, or bequeathing a grandfathered device is not covered by it.
Coupled magazines count as one device
Two or more devices joined or coupled together in any manner are read as a single device for the capacity test, so pairing two legal magazines would not put them outside the definition.
.22 rimfire tube magazines are written out of the definition
An attached tubular device designed to accept, and capable of operating only with, .22 caliber rimfire ammunition is excluded from the definition of a large capacity ammunition feeding device.
Police, campus officers, retirees, and nuclear security keep access
Exemptions cover government agencies, qualified law enforcement officers on or off duty, campus law enforcement officers at private colleges meeting federal criteria, officers retired in good standing holding a device issued or bought for official use, licensed nuclear facility protection, and authorized testing by licensed manufacturers or importers.
New devices carry a serial number; violations bring seizure and prison time
Devices manufactured after enactment must be marked with a serial number and manufacture date, engraved or cast legibly. Covered devices involved in a violation are added to federal seizure and forfeiture rules, and violations fall under the federal firearms penalty provision carrying a fine, up to five years in prison, or both.
Buy-backs can be paid for out of an existing grant pot
Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant funds become an allowable source of compensation for people who surrender covered devices under a buy-back program. No new money is appropriated and no per-device amount is set.
Who benefits from H.R. 1674?
People pushing for one national magazine limit
Magazine capacity is currently a patchwork — roughly a dozen states cap it, most of the rest do not, and a magazine legal in one state can be a crime an hour's drive away. This bill would replace that map with a single 15-round federal number.
Cities and states running gun buy-back programs
Byrne JAG money is a pot local agencies already draw on. The bill makes compensating someone for a surrendered magazine an allowable use, so a program would no longer need to find separate funding for it.
Law enforcement, on duty and off
Qualified officers are exempt whether or not they are working, and the exemption reaches campus police at private colleges that qualify for federal student aid and whose officers are commissioned to carry firearms and make arrests.
Officers who have already retired
An officer retired in good standing keeps a covered device the agency sold or transferred to them at retirement, or one they bought for official use beforehand, as long as they are not otherwise barred from receiving ammunition.
Nuclear facility security and licensed test operations
On-site physical protection at Atomic Energy Act licensees is exempt, including employees and contractors off-site for authorized training or moving nuclear materials, as is testing or experimentation the Attorney General authorizes.
Who is affected by H.R. 1674?
Anyone who owns a magazine over 15 rounds today
You could keep it. You could not sell it, trade it in, or transfer it to another person, because the grandfather clause reaches possession and stops there. Standard AR-15 and many handgun magazines ship at 17 to 30 rounds.
Families dealing with an estate
The bill writes no inheritance exception. A covered device passing from an estate to an heir would be a transfer, which the grandfather clause does not exempt.
Anyone planning to buy one
New civilian purchases would end at enactment. Existing stock could not legally be sold to you, and manufacturers could not make more for the civilian market.
Manufacturers, importers, and retailers
The civilian side of the business would close outside the exemptions, and devices made after enactment for exempt buyers would need serial numbers and manufacture dates engraved or cast on them.
Federal prosecutors and ATF
A new offense to charge, covered devices folded into existing seizure and forfeiture authority, and a rulemaking assignment for the Attorney General on what else the markings must show.
HR1674 Legislative Journey
House: Committee Action
Feb 27, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
About the Sponsor
Diana DeGette
Democrat, Colorado's 1st congressional district · 29 years in Congress
Committees: Energy and Commerce
View full profile →
Cosponsors (145)
All 145 cosponsors are Democrats. Cosponsors represent 36 states: Alabama, Arizona, California, and 33 more.
Dina Titus
Democrat · NV
Bradley Schneider
Democrat · IL
Emanuel Cleaver
Democrat · MO
Jonathan Jackson
Democrat · IL
Mike Quigley
Democrat · IL
Nanette Barragán
Democrat · CA
Henry Johnson
Democrat · GA
Mary Scanlon
Democrat · PA
Brad Sherman
Democrat · CA
Jennifer McClellan
Democrat · VA
Kevin Mullin
Democrat · CA
Morgan McGarvey
Democrat · KY
Cosponsor Coverage Map
Committee Sponsors
Judiciary Committee
15 of 44 committee members cosponsored
4 Democrats across this committee haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents
H.R. 1674 Quick Facts
- Committee
- Judiciary
- Chamber
- House
- Policy
- Crime and Law Enforcement
- Introduced
- Feb 27, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Feb 27, 2025
Official Sources
Official bill page with the full text, cosponsor list, and every action taken since introduction.
The Government Publishing Office copy of the bill as introduced, downloadable as PDF, text, or XML.
Section 2 of the bill adds the definition of a large capacity ammunition feeding device here, along with the .22 rimfire tube exclusion.
Section 3 inserts the new subsection (v) ban and the possession-only grandfather clause into this list of federal firearms prohibitions.
The serial number and manufacture date requirement for devices made after enactment is added to the marking rules in subsection (i) here.
Covered devices are folded into the seizure and forfeiture rules in this section, and violations draw its fine and up to five years in prison.
The bill borrows the term qualified law enforcement officer straight from this section to set who the police exemption covers.
The grant program whose existing funds Section 5 would let states and localities spend compensating people who surrender a covered device.
H.R. 1674 Common Questions
Can you keep a magazine over 15 rounds if you already own it?
Yes. H.R. 1674 exempts any covered device you lawfully possessed on or before the day the bill takes effect. Nothing in it requires you to turn one in or register it.
Could you sell or hand down a magazine you already own?
No. The grandfather clause is written against possession only. Selling, trading, gifting, or leaving a covered device to an heir is a transfer, and transfers stay banned no matter when the device was bought.
What counts as a large capacity magazine under H.R. 1674?
Magazines, belts, drums, feed strips, helical feeding devices, and similar equipment with an overall capacity above 15 rounds, or that can be readily restored, changed, or converted to hold more. Two devices coupled together count as one.
Are .22 rifles affected by the 15-round limit?
Generally no. The bill writes an exclusion for an attached tubular device designed to accept, and capable of operating only with, .22 caliber rimfire ammunition, which covers most tube-fed rimfire rifles regardless of how many rounds they hold.
Who is exempt from the ban?
Government agencies at every level, qualified law enforcement officers on or off duty, campus police at qualifying private colleges, officers retired in good standing with a device tied to their service, licensed nuclear facility security, and authorized testing by licensed manufacturers or importers.
What is the penalty for violating H.R. 1674?
Violations fall under the federal firearms penalty provision carrying a fine, up to five years in prison, or both. The bill also adds covered devices to existing federal seizure and forfeiture rules, so a device involved in a violation could be taken.
Does H.R. 1674 create a federal magazine buy-back?
Not a national program. It makes compensating people who surrender covered devices an allowable use of Byrne JAG grants that states and localities already receive. No new money is appropriated and no payment amount is set.
Has H.R. 1674 passed, and is it likely to?
No. Rep. Diana DeGette introduced it on February 27, 2025, and it was referred to the House Judiciary Committee the same day with no action since. All 145 cosponsors are Democrats, so it has no path to a committee vote in the current House.
Based on H.R. 1674 bill text
H.R. 1674 Bill Text
“To regulate large capacity ammunition feeding devices.”
Source: U.S. Government Publishing Office
Get notified when H.R. 1674 moves
Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.
Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.
Crime and Law Enforcement Bills
9 related bills we're tracking
Crime Victims Fund Stabilization Act of 2025
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Jan 13, 2026
Bipartisan Background Checks Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Jun 10, 2025
Combating Organized Retail Crime Act of 2025
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
May 13, 2026
Ethan's Law
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Feb 25, 2025
Assault Weapons Ban of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Apr 30, 2025
Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2025
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 289.
Oct 3, 2025
Honoring Our Fallen Heroes Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Feb 12, 2025
Raise the Age Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Mar 26, 2025
Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Jan 24, 2025
Trending Right Now
Bills gaining momentum across Congress
761st Tank Battalion Congressional Gold Medal Act
Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Feb 26, 2025
Fit to Serve Act
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
May 21, 2025
America’s Olympic and Paralympic Games Commemorative Coins Act
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Jul 14, 2025
Tracking Crime and Law Enforcement in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.