H.R. 3258: Parity in Engineering Act
Sponsor
Pete Stauber
Republican · MN-8
Minnesota loses federal engineering carveout
Why it matters
Introduced on May 7, 2025, H.R. 3258 would immediately change how Minnesota handles federally governed engineering and design service contracts under title 23 by removing a state-specific exemption that West Virginia would keep.
H.R. 3258, the Parity in Engineering Act, is a short targeted bill in the 119th Congress, 1st Session, introduced on May 7, 2025, by Mr. Stauber for himself and Ms. Craig, with 3 cosponsors. It was referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. Despite the broad-sounding title, the bill does one narrow thing: it amends section 112(b)(2)(F) of title 23, United States Code.
The exact legal change is simple but important. The bill strikes the phrase "the States of West Virginia or Minnesota" and replaces it with "the State of West Virginia." In plain English, Minnesota would no longer be listed in the existing exclusion tied to contracting requirements for engineering and design services under title 23, while West Virginia would remain in that exclusion.
That means Minnesota would lose a special status it currently shares with West Virginia. The practical effect is not the creation of a new program, grant, age rule, deadline, or penalty. Instead, it changes which state is carved out from existing federal contracting rules. For agencies, contractors, and engineers working on title 23 transportation work in Minnesota, that could alter procurement expectations and compliance obligations on future engineering and design contracts.
The politics are also notable. The bill was introduced by a Minnesota member, Mr. Stauber, and also names Ms. Craig, another Minnesota lawmaker, suggesting bipartisan in-state interest in changing Minnesota's treatment under federal law. But because the text provided contains no funding authorization, no dollar amount, and no implementation deadline, the bill's real impact will depend on whether Congress advances it and how transportation agencies interpret the revised title 23 language.
Bill Progress
Latest Action · May 7, 2025
Assigned to Subcommittee on Highways and Transit. for review
H.R. 3258 Bill Summary
What H.R. 3258 actually does.
Removes Minnesota from title 23 exception
H.R. 3258 amends section 112(b)(2)(F) of title 23, United States Code, by striking the phrase "the States of West Virginia or Minnesota" and inserting "the State of West Virginia," which means Minnesota is removed from the existing exclusion for engineering and design services contracting.
West Virginia remains the only named state
After the amendment, only "the State of West Virginia" would remain in the statutory text of section 112(b)(2)(F), preserving West Virginia's current special treatment while ending Minnesota's parallel status.
Targets engineering and design services only
The bill is limited to contracting for engineering and design services under title 23 and does not, based on the full-text fact sheet, change unrelated transportation programs, benefit levels, age requirements, penalties, or deadlines.
Introduced May 7, 2025 in 119th Congress
The bill was introduced on May 7, 2025, in the 119th Congress, 1st Session, by Mr. Stauber for himself and Ms. Craig, and it has 3 cosponsors, giving a timeline and political context for this proposed contracting change.
Sent to Transportation and Infrastructure Committee
H.R. 3258 was referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, the committee that would decide whether this title 23 amendment moves forward in the legislative process.
Who benefits from H.R. 3258?
State of West Virginia
West Virginia benefits because H.R. 3258 keeps it explicitly named in section 112(b)(2)(F) of title 23 as "the State of West Virginia," preserving the exclusion that Minnesota would lose.
Supporters of uniform federal contracting rules
Anyone who wants fewer state-specific carveouts benefits because the bill reduces the listed states in the exclusion from 2 states—West Virginia and Minnesota—to 1 state—West Virginia only.
Federal transportation oversight officials
Officials administering title 23 may benefit from a simpler statutory setup, since the amendment removes Minnesota from the phrase "the States of West Virginia or Minnesota" and leaves only one named state in the exception.
Who is affected by H.R. 3258?
State of Minnesota
Minnesota is the directly affected state because the bill removes it from the existing exclusion in section 112(b)(2)(F) of title 23, changing its legal status for engineering and design services contracting.
Minnesota Department of Transportation and related state agencies
Minnesota transportation agencies handling title 23 projects would likely need to follow the federal engineering and design services contracting requirements without the prior Minnesota-specific exclusion if H.R. 3258 becomes law.
Engineering and design firms working on Minnesota title 23 projects
Firms pursuing federally governed transportation work in Minnesota could face different procurement and compliance conditions because Minnesota would no longer be named alongside West Virginia in section 112(b)(2)(F).
Local governments and project sponsors in Minnesota
Cities, counties, and other Minnesota project sponsors using title 23 transportation funds could be affected if contracting procedures for engineering and design services change after Minnesota's removal from the exclusion.
HR3258 Legislative Journey
House: Committee Action
May 7, 2025
Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.
About the Sponsor
Pete Stauber
Republican, Minnesota's 8th congressional district · 7 years in Congress
Committees: Small Business, Natural Resources, Transportation and Infrastructure
View full profile →
Cosponsors (3)
This bill has 3 cosponsors: 1 Democrat, 2 Republicans, reflecting bipartisan support. Cosponsors represent 1 state: Minnesota.
Committee Sponsors
Transportation and Infrastructure Committee
0 of 67 committee members cosponsored
No committee members have cosponsored this bill
35 Republicans across this committee haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents
H.R. 3258 Quick Facts
- Committee
- Transportation and Infrastructure
- Chamber
- House
- Policy
- Transportation and Public Works
- Introduced
- May 7, 2025
Assigned to Subcommittee on Highways and Transit. for review
May 7, 2025
H.R. 3258 Common Questions
Which state would still keep the federal engineering carveout under H.R. 3258?
West Virginia would remain the only named state in the title 23 carveout under the Parity in Engineering Act (Section 2). The bill removes Minnesota from the existing exclusion.
Does H.R. 3258 remove Minnesota from the title 23 engineering services exception?
Yes. According to H.R. 3258 Section 2, the bill strikes "the States of West Virginia or Minnesota" and replaces it with "the State of West Virginia," removing Minnesota from the exception.
What exact wording does the Parity in Engineering Act change in federal law?
Under the Parity in Engineering Act (Section 2), the phrase "the States of West Virginia or Minnesota" is replaced with "the State of West Virginia" in 23 U.S.C. 112(b)(2)(F).
Can Minnesota still use the same federal engineering contracting exemption as West Virginia under H.R. 3258?
No. Under the Parity in Engineering Act (Section 2), Minnesota would no longer share West Virginia's carveout for engineering and design services contracting under title 23.
What are the affected contracts in the Parity in Engineering Act?
The bill targets engineering and design services contracts under title 23 only. According to H.R. 3258 Section 2, it does not amend unrelated transportation programs.
Does the Parity in Engineering Act change federal highway contracting rules nationwide?
No. Under the Parity in Engineering Act (Section 2), the change is narrow: it only alters the state-specific exclusion in 23 U.S.C. 112(b)(2)(F) for engineering and design services.
Which federal statute does H.R. 3258 amend?
According to H.R. 3258 Section 2, the bill amends section 112(b)(2)(F) of title 23, United States Code, covering contracting for engineering and design services.
Is West Virginia removed from the title 23 engineering exception by the Parity in Engineering Act?
No. Under the Parity in Engineering Act (Section 2), West Virginia stays in the statute; only Minnesota is removed from the listed exclusion.
Does H.R. 3258 create new penalties or deadlines for engineering contracts?
No. According to H.R. 3258 Section 2, the bill only changes which state is named in the title 23 exclusion and does not add new penalties or deadlines.
What is the short title of H.R. 3258?
H.R. 3258 is officially titled the Parity in Engineering Act under Section 1.
Based on H.R. 3258 bill text
Full Bill Text
Get notified when H.R. 3258 moves
Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.
Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.
Transportation and Public Works Bills
9 related bills we're tracking
Stronger Communities through Better Transit Act
Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.
May 16, 2025
SHIPS for America Act of 2025
Referred to the Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation.
May 1, 2025
ALERT Act
Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Feb 20, 2026
PART Act
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.
Feb 10, 2026
ROTOR Act
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Failed by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 264 - 133 (Roll no. 72).
Feb 24, 2026
SELF DRIVE Act of 2026
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by the Yeas and Nays: 12 - 11.
Feb 10, 2026
She DRIVES Act
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 141.
Jul 31, 2025
To amend title 23, United States Code, and the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act with respect to vehicle roadside crashes, work zone safety, and for other purposes.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.
Apr 24, 2025
Air Carrier Access Amendments Act of 2026
Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
Jun 18, 2026
Trending Right Now
Bills gaining momentum across Congress
Great American Outdoors Act 250
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by Voice Vote.
Jun 24, 2026
Humane Cosmetics Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Feb 27, 2025
Therapeutic Fraud Prevention Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
May 7, 2025
Tracking Transportation and Public Works in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.