H.R. 2692: No Tax Breaks for Union Busting (NTBUB) Act
Sponsor
Donald Norcross
Democrat · NJ-1
Union busting shouldn't be a tax write-off
Why it matters
Employers spend $340 million a year on outside consultants to steer workers away from unions, according to the bill's findings, and today that spending is an ordinary deductible business expense. H.R. 2692 would put it in the same non-deductible category as political campaign spending, add IRS reporting for both the employer and the consultant, and set penalties for silence that start at $10,000 or $1,000 per employee.
Federal tax law already refuses deductions for lobbying and for spending aimed at influencing the public in elections. H.R. 2692 adds a third category: any attempt by an employer to influence its own employees about unions, union elections, labor disputes, or collective action. Congress says the principle is the same in both cases, and that workers' choices should be made without a taxpayer subsidy behind the employer's side.
If your employer runs a campaign against a union drive, the consultants, the mandatory meetings, and the managers' time spent on it would all stop being tax deductible. The bill spells out three kinds of spending that count. The first is any cost, including wages and overhead, tied to conduct that ends in an unfair labor practice complaint from the National Labor Relations Board, a settlement reached while the board is investigating one, or a court finding of interference under railway and airline labor law. The second is the cost of producing, running, or attending any meeting or training where union topics are discussed and where the audience includes employees who are or could be in a bargaining unit. The third is anything the employer already has to disclose under the federal persuader-reporting law.
The bill draws lines around ordinary labor relations. Bargaining directly with a union that already represents workers stays deductible, and so do grievance procedures, joint labor-management committees under an existing contract, voluntarily recognizing a union, legally required workplace postings, and communications with shareholders that securities law demands. Spending tied to a labor board complaint that a court later throws out in full is also carved out.
The second half of the bill is disclosure. An employer that spends money on covered activity would have to tell the IRS the dates, the type of activity, and the amounts on its tax return, and any consultant doing that work would have to file a separate return naming the client. Leaving it off costs the greater of $10,000 or $1,000 for every full-time-equivalent employee. If the employer still has not filed 90 days after an IRS notice, that same amount is charged again for each additional 30 days, with the added penalties capped at $100,000. A reasonable-cause exception applies.
Treasury would have 240 days after enactment to write rules, and the new treatment would apply to tax years beginning after that window.
Bill Progress
Latest Action · Apr 7, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
H.R. 2692 Bill Summary
What H.R. 2692 actually does.
Anti-union campaign spending stops being deductible
The bill adds employer attempts to influence workers about unions, union elections, labor disputes, or collective action to the list of expenses that cannot be deducted, alongside lobbying and political campaign spending.
Meetings where unions are discussed count as campaign costs
The cost of producing, running, or attending any meeting or training where union topics come up is covered, as long as the audience includes employees who are or could be in a bargaining unit. That includes wages paid for the time and overhead.
Conduct that draws a labor board complaint is covered too
Spending connected to an unfair labor practice complaint, a settlement reached during a labor board investigation, or a court finding of interference under railway and airline labor law is treated as non-deductible campaign spending.
Ordinary bargaining stays deductible
Negotiating with a union that already represents workers, running a grievance procedure, operating a labor-management committee under a contract, voluntarily recognizing a union, posting legally required notices, and required shareholder communications are all carved out.
Employers and consultants both report to the IRS
Employers would list the dates, activity type, and amounts on their tax return, along with any persuader-law disclosures. Consultants doing the work would file their own return naming the client, the dates, and the cost.
Penalties scale with headcount
Failing to report costs the greater of $10,000 or $1,000 per full-time-equivalent employee. If the failure continues 90 days past an IRS notice, that amount repeats every 30 days, with the added penalties capped at $100,000. Reasonable cause is a defense.
Who benefits from H.R. 2692?
Workers in the middle of a union drive
The bill's findings cite unfair labor practice charges in about 4 of every 10 union elections in 2016 and 2017. If your workplace is one of them, the consultant campaign and the required meetings would cost your employer full price instead of a tax-discounted one.
Employees in larger workplaces
According to the bill's findings, more than 54% of elections in bargaining units of 61 or more employees draw an unfair labor practice charge. The per-employee penalty structure and the wage-and-overhead rule weigh most heavily on exactly these larger employers.
Unions and organizing committees
Organizers already have to disclose their own spending. Under the bill, the employer's side of the campaign would be reported to the IRS as well, and the consultant would have to name the client.
Taxpayers
Congress says the tax code should not subsidize employer efforts to influence workers' choices about representation. On the bill's own $340 million figure for consultants, ending the deduction at the 21% corporate rate is worth roughly $71 million a year to the Treasury.
Who is affected by H.R. 2692?
Employers that hire union-avoidance consultants
Consultant fees would lose their deduction, and the engagement would be reported to the IRS by both parties. A company spending $1 million on covered activity at the 21% corporate rate would give up about $210,000 in tax savings.
Any employer that holds meetings about unions
The meeting provision is not limited to formal captive-audience sessions. A training where union topics are discussed in front of bargaining-unit-eligible employees would pull the wages and overhead for that time into the non-deductible column.
HR, legal, and finance departments
Someone would have to track covered meetings, consultant work, and any labor board proceedings closely enough to report dates and amounts on the tax return. The base penalty for getting it wrong is $1,000 per full-time-equivalent employee, with a floor of $10,000.
Labor-relations consultants and law firms
Anyone conducting covered activity for an employer would file a separate IRS return identifying the client, the dates, the type of activity, and the amounts paid, on top of existing Labor Department persuader filings.
HR2692 Legislative Journey
House: Committee Action
Apr 7, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
About the Sponsor
Donald Norcross
Democrat, New Jersey's 1st congressional district · 12 years in Congress
Committees: Armed Services, Education and Workforce
View full profile →
Cosponsors (136)
All 136 cosponsors are Democrats. Cosponsors represent 34 states: Arizona, California, Colorado, and 31 more.
Brendan Boyle
Democrat · PA
Judy Chu
Democrat · CA
Adam Smith
Democrat · WA
Al Green
Democrat · TX
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
Democrat · NY
Alma Adams
Democrat · NC
Angie Craig
Democrat · MN
April McClain Delaney
Democrat · MD
Becca Balint
Democrat · VT
Betty McCollum
Democrat · MN
Bill Foster
Democrat · IL
Brad Sherman
Democrat · CA
Cosponsor Coverage Map
Committee Sponsors
Ways and Means Committee
13 of 45 committee members cosponsored
6 Democrats across this committee haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents
What laws does H.R. 2692 change?
3 changes
Sections Amended
Section 162(e) of Internal Revenue Code of 1986
redesignating paragraph (6) as paragraph (7) and by inserting after paragraph (5) the following new paragraph: ``(6) Labor organizations and labor organization activity defined
Section 7 of National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 157) or any action that is a right of employees or labor organizations under the Railway Labor Act (45 U.S.C. 151 et seq.). ``(II) Labor dispute.--The term `labor dispute' has the meaning given such term under section 3 of the Labor- Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959 (29 U.S.C. 402). ``(III) Labor organization election.--The term `labor organization election' means any election described in section 9 of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 159) or section 2 of the Railway Labor Act (45 U.S.C. 152).''. (c) Special Rules.-- (1) In general.--Section 162(e)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986
adding at the end the following new subparagraph: ``(D) Expenses relating to labor organizations or labor organization activities
Section 162 of Internal Revenue Code of 1986
striking ``and Political Expenditures'' and inserting ``, Political Expenditures, and Labor Organization Expenditures''
H.R. 2692 Quick Facts
- Committee
- Ways and Means
- Chamber
- House
- Policy
- Taxation
- Introduced
- Apr 7, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Apr 7, 2025
Official Sources
Official bill page with full text, sponsors, cosponsors, and committee status for the No Tax Breaks for Union Busting Act.
The tax code section the bill amends, adding employer anti-union spending to the lobbying and political expenses that cannot be deducted.
Explains the unfair labor practices under Section 8(a) that, if they draw an NLRB complaint or settlement, make the related spending non-deductible under the bill.
How the National Labor Relations Board runs union representation elections, the labor organization elections the bill defines as covered activity.
The existing persuader-reporting regime (Forms LM-10, LM-20, LM-21) whose disclosures the bill would also require employers to attach to their tax returns.
Full text of the LMRDA, which the bill uses to define labor organization and labor dispute and whose reporting requirements it cross-references.
Representation elections for airline and railroad workers under the Railway Labor Act, which the bill covers alongside NLRB elections.
IRS guidance on which business expenses are deductible, the general rule the bill carves anti-union campaign spending out of.
H.R. 2692 Common Questions
What does H.R. 2692 actually do?
It stops employers from deducting what they spend trying to influence their own workers about unions, the same way they already cannot deduct political campaign spending. It does not ban anything. The campaign can still happen, it just costs full price, and both the employer and any consultant report it to the IRS.
Would captive-audience meetings still be tax deductible?
No. The cost of producing, running, or attending any meeting or training where unions are discussed, including wages for the time, becomes non-deductible if the audience includes employees who are or could be in a bargaining unit. The bill does not require the meeting to be mandatory.
Does H.R. 2692 only apply when an employer breaks labor law?
No. Spending tied to a labor board complaint or settlement is covered, but so is lawful activity: consultant campaigns, meetings where unions are discussed, and anything already reported under the federal persuader law.
What labor spending would still be deductible?
Bargaining directly with a union that already represents workers, grievance procedures, labor-management committees under an existing contract, voluntarily recognizing a union, legally required workplace postings, and communications with shareholders that securities law requires.
How much are the penalties for not reporting?
The greater of $10,000 or $1,000 per full-time-equivalent employee, so a 500-person company faces $500,000. If the failure continues 90 days after an IRS notice, that amount repeats every 30 days, with those added penalties capped at $100,000. Reasonable cause is a defense.
Do anti-union consultants have to file with the IRS too?
Yes. Anyone conducting covered activity for an employer would file a separate return naming the client, the dates, the type of activity, and the amounts paid. That is on top of the persuader filings consultants already make with the Labor Department.
Will H.R. 2692 pass?
It has 135 cosponsors, all Democrats, and sits in the House Ways and Means Committee. In a Republican-controlled House it is unlikely to move on its own. Its most likely route is as part of a larger tax package or a return if the majority changes.
When would H.R. 2692 take effect?
Not right away. Treasury would have 240 days after enactment to write rules, and the new tax treatment would apply to tax years beginning after that 240-day window.
Based on H.R. 2692 bill text
H.R. 2692 Bill Text
“To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to end the tax subsidy for employer efforts to influence their workers’ exercise of their rights around labor organizations and engaging in collective action.”
Source: U.S. Government Publishing Office
Get notified when H.R. 2692 moves
Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.
Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.
Taxation Bills
9 related bills we're tracking
American Family Act
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Apr 9, 2025
Freedom to Invest in Tomorrow’s Workforce Act
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Feb 7, 2025
Main Street Tax Certainty Act
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Jan 23, 2025
Death Tax Repeal Act
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Feb 13, 2025
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the railroad track maintenance credit.
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Jan 16, 2025
Tax Fairness for Workers Act
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Apr 7, 2025
Health Care Affordability Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Jan 9, 2025
Affordable Housing Credit Improvement Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Apr 8, 2025
More Homes on the Market Act
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Feb 13, 2025
Trending Right Now
Bills gaining momentum across Congress
761st Tank Battalion Congressional Gold Medal Act
Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Feb 26, 2025
America’s Olympic and Paralympic Games Commemorative Coins Act
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Jul 14, 2025
Ensuring Lasting Smiles Act
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Education and Workforce, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
May 8, 2025
Tracking Taxation in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.