S. 233: Restoring Confidence in the World Anti-Doping Agency Act of 2025

Introduced Jan 23, 20256 cosponsors

Sponsor

Marsha Blackburn

Marsha Blackburn

Republican · TN

Bill Progress

IntroducedJan 23
Committee 
Pass Senate 
Pass House 
Signed 
Law 

Latest Action · Feb 23, 2026

1/3

Placed on Senate floor schedule under General Orders. Calendar No. 340.

U.S. dues become leverage against WADA

4 min readLast updated May 25, 2026

Why it matters

The bill gives the U.S. 90 days to decide whether the World Anti-Doping Agency meets reform standards — and lets officials withhold up to 100% of American dues if it does not. That would turn WADA funding into direct leverage over governance, conflict rules, and athlete representation.

S. 233 would make the Office of National Drug Control Policy the lead U.S. office for pushing changes at the World Anti-Doping Agency, in consultation with USADA, the U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Committee, and the Team USA Athletes’ Commission.

The bill says that within 90 days of becoming law, ONDCP must decide whether WADA has an independent governance model, has fully implemented governance reforms, and gives independent athletes from the U.S. and other democratic countries real decision-making roles.

S. 233 Bill Summary

What S. 233 actually does.

1

WADA gets a 90-day pass-or-fail review

Within 90 days after enactment, ONDCP must decide whether WADA meets the bill's standards on governance, reforms, and athlete representation.

2

U.S. can withhold up to all dues

If ONDCP finds WADA falls short, it may withhold up to 100% of U.S. membership dues after consulting the relevant congressional committees.

3

Athletes get a push for real decision-making seats

The bill tells ONDCP to push for independent athletes from the United States and other democratic countries to hold decision-making roles across WADA's top bodies and committees.

4

Conflict rules expand across WADA leadership

The bill says WADA should fully implement conflict-of-interest policies for its executive leadership, board members, advisory groups, standing committees, special committees, and working groups.

5

A negative finding triggers a 180-day report

If ONDCP determines WADA does not meet the standards, it must issue a report within 180 days describing barriers to U.S. participation and fair representation.

6

Congress gets 30 days' notice before money goes out

Before any U.S. funds are obligated to WADA, ONDCP must send appropriators a spending plan and explanation at least 30 days in advance.

Who benefits from S. 233?

Independent U.S. Olympic and Paralympic athletes

If the bill works as sponsors intend, athletes who are not tied to the existing Olympic, Paralympic, federation, or WADA power structure could gain real decision-making roles inside the global anti-doping system.

Clean athletes competing internationally

Athletes who depend on credible anti-doping enforcement could benefit if the bill's pressure campaign leads to tighter governance and stronger safeguards against what the bill describes as systemic fraud.

USADA and athlete representatives

USADA and the Team USA Athletes’ Commission would have to be consulted before major U.S. decisions on WADA, giving athlete-facing institutions a formal voice in the process.

Congressional overseers of international sports funding

Lawmakers would get more visibility before WADA payments go out and a clearer trigger for when the U.S. might stop paying dues.

Who is affected by S. 233?

World Anti-Doping Agency

WADA would face direct U.S. pressure on governance, conflict-of-interest rules, and athlete representation, backed by the possibility that some or all American dues could be withheld.

Office of National Drug Control Policy

ONDCP would take on the core job: consulting key sports bodies, making the 90-day determination, preparing any 180-day report, and managing payment decisions and advance notices to Congress.

U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Committee

The committee would be part of the required consultation process, but the bill's definition of an independent athlete also excludes people serving with the U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Committee from that category.

Athletes tied to existing sports governing bodies

Not every athlete voice qualifies here. The bill says athletes serving with the IOC, IPC, recognized international federations, the U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Committee, or WADA are not considered independent athletes.

Share this story
On the Record

What Congress Is Saying

S. 233 hasn't been debated on the floor yet.

This section updates when a legislator speaks about it on the floor or in committee.

S233 Legislative Journey

3 actions

Committee Action

Feb 23, 2026

119-111

Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Reported by Senator Cruz with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. With written report No. 119-111.

Passed Committee

Jun 25, 2025

Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.

Committee Action

Jan 23, 2025

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

About the Sponsor

Marsha Blackburn

Marsha Blackburn

Republican, TN · 23 years in Congress

Committees: Joint Economic Committee, Veterans' Affairs, Commerce, Science, and Transportation

View full profile →

Cosponsors (6)

No new cosponsors in 347 days — momentum stalled

This bill has 6 cosponsors: 4 Democrats, 2 Republicans, reflecting bipartisan support. Cosponsors represent 6 states: Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, and 3 more.

4Democrats2Republicans·6 statesBipartisan

Committee Sponsors

Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee

13D15R
|4 signed24 not yet

4 of 28 committee members cosponsored

13 Republicans across this committee haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents

S. 233 Quick Facts

Cosponsors
6
Chris Van Hollen
Shelley Capito
Richard Blumenthal
Roger Wicker
Lisa Blunt Rochester
+1 more
Committee
Commerce, Science, and Transportation
Chamber
Senate
Policy
Sports and Recreation
Introduced
Jan 23, 2025

Placed on Senate floor schedule under General Orders. Calendar No. 340.

Feb 23, 2026

Constituent Resources

Get notified when this bill moves

Official Sources

S. 233 on Congress.gov

Official Congress.gov page for the bill, including status, text, sponsors, and actions.

Office of National Drug Control Policy

ONDCP is the federal office this bill tasks with reviewing WADA, consulting stakeholders, reporting to Congress, and deciding whether to withhold dues.

United States Code, Title 21, Section 2001

The bill amends Section 701 of the ONDCP Reauthorization Act, codified at 21 U.S.C. 2001, making this the core statutory backdrop for the measure.

United States Code, Title 36, Chapter 2205

This chapter establishes the United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee, which the bill references when defining consultation roles and independent athletes.

United States Code, Title 36, Section 220501

The bill specifically cites 36 U.S.C. 220501 regarding the U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Committee’s legal status.

S. 233 Common Questions

Can S. 233 stop U.S. payments to WADA entirely?

Yes. If ONDCP decides WADA fails the bill's standards, it may withhold up to 100% of U.S. membership dues after consulting the relevant congressional committees.

How fast would WADA have to pass the U.S. review?

Fast. S. 233 gives ONDCP 90 days after enactment to decide whether WADA meets the bill's governance, reform, and athlete-representation standards.

What happens if ONDCP says WADA falls short?

Two things can happen: ONDCP may withhold dues, and it must issue a report within 180 days explaining barriers to U.S. participation and representation at WADA.

Would U.S. athletes get more power inside WADA?

That is the goal. The bill says ONDCP should push for independent athletes from the U.S. and other democratic countries to hold decision-making roles at WADA.

Who counts as an independent athlete under S. 233?

An Olympic or Paralympic athlete who does not serve with the IOC, IPC, a recognized international federation, the U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Committee, or WADA.

Which U.S. groups have to be consulted before major WADA decisions?

ONDCP must consult USADA, the U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Committee, and the Team USA Athletes’ Commission.

Does S. 233 require Congress to get advance notice before money goes to WADA?

Yes. ONDCP would have to send House and Senate appropriators a spending plan at least 30 days before obligating funds to WADA.

Is this bill about doping rules or about who runs the system?

Mostly governance. S. 233 focuses on WADA leadership, conflict rules, athlete representation, and whether the U.S. should keep paying dues if those changes do not happen.

Based on S. 233 bill text

S. 233 Bill Text

To amend the Office of National Drug Control Policy Reauthorization Act of 2006 to modify the authority of the Office of National Drug Control Policy with respect to the World Anti-Doping Agency, and for other purposes.

Source: U.S. Government Publishing Office

Bill Alerts

Get notified when S. 233 moves

Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.

Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.

Tracking Sports and Recreation in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.