H.R. 6551: New BANK Act of 2025
Sponsor
Barry Loudermilk
Republican · GA-11
Bill Progress
Latest Action · Feb 25, 2026
Placed on House floor schedule, Calendar No. 455.
Why it matters
New bank formation has been sluggish for years, and this bill tries to expose where applications are getting stuck across federal and state regulators.
The New BANK Act of 2025 is a transparency bill aimed at the front door of the banking system. It does not change the legal standards for approving a new bank, credit union, holding company, or deposit insurance application. Instead, it tells federal regulators to publish annual scorecards showing how many applications they received, what happened to them, and how long decisions took.
The main idea is simple: if lawmakers, entrepreneurs, and the public can see where applications are slowing down, they can better judge whether regulators are being efficient, consistent, or overly cautious. The bill covers several agencies — the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the National Credit Union Administration, the Federal Reserve, and the FDIC — and it also pushes for a joint report on state-chartered institutions. That would give a broader picture of where new financial institutions are getting approved and where they are struggling.
Supporters are likely to argue that this is basic accountability. If very few new banks are being created, or if approvals take too long, annual reporting could help identify patterns without weakening safety rules. Requiring mean and median approval times is especially useful because it can show whether a few very delayed applications are skewing the system or whether long waits are common.
Still, the bill is mostly about visibility, not reform. Regulators would have to report common reasons for denials, withdrawals, and expired or inactive applications only "to the extent practicable," which gives them flexibility and may limit how specific the reports become. And because the bill does not set deadlines, create appeals, or ease approval standards, its real effect depends on whether public reporting creates enough pressure to change agency behavior.
What does H.R. 6551 do?
Annual report on national bank charters
The Comptroller of the Currency must publish yearly data on national bank and federal savings association charter applications, including how many were received, approved, denied, withdrawn, expired, mooted, or returned, plus average and median processing times.
Annual report on federal credit union charters
The National Credit Union Administration must publish yearly numbers on federal credit union charter applications, including approvals, denials, withdrawals, inactive applications, and those returned for resubmission, along with approval timelines.
Annual report on bank holding company applications
The Federal Reserve must publish annual data on applications to become a top-tier depository institution holding company, including approvals, denials, withdrawals, mooted cases, returned applications, and average and median approval times.
Annual report on FDIC insurance applications
The FDIC must publish yearly information on deposit insurance applications, including how many were approved, denied, withdrawn, mooted, or returned and how long approvals took.
Joint report on state-chartered institutions
The Federal Reserve, FDIC, and NCUA must work together with state regulators to publish annual state-by-state data on state bank, savings association, and credit union charter applications, including approval counts and approval times.
Common reasons applications fail
Each report must, where practical, explain the most common reasons applications were denied, withdrawn, allowed to lapse, marked inactive, or sent back.
Who benefits from H.R. 6551?
Prospective bank founders and investors
They would get clearer information about how often applications succeed, how long reviews usually take, and the common reasons proposals fail.
Community groups seeking new local financial institutions
They could better track whether regulators are allowing new banks and credit unions to open in underserved areas.
Congress and oversight watchdogs
They would gain a regular set of comparable data to evaluate whether bank regulators are moving applications fairly and efficiently.
Researchers and journalists
They would have more public data to analyze trends in new bank creation, charter approvals, and regulatory delays.
Who is affected by H.R. 6551?
Federal banking regulators
The OCC, Federal Reserve, FDIC, and NCUA would need to collect, standardize, and publish more detailed annual application data.
State banking and credit union regulators
They would likely need to coordinate with federal agencies and provide state-level charter data for the joint annual report.
Applicants for new banks, credit unions, and holding companies
Their cases would not face new approval standards, but aggregate outcomes and delays would become more visible to the public.
Existing banks and credit unions
They could face more competition over time if the reporting leads to pressure for faster or more consistent approvals of new entrants.
H.R. 6551 Common Questions
Can state-by-state bank charter approval times be published under the New BANK Act?
Yes. Under the New BANK Act of 2025, regulators must publish annual state-by-state mean and median approval times for state depository institution and state credit union charter applications (Section 6).
What are the reasons a national bank charter application can be reported as failed or closed under HR 6551?
According to H.R. 6551 Section 2, the OCC must report applications denied, withdrawn, expired, mooted, or returned, and common reasons for denial, withdrawal, or expiration of preliminary approval when practicable.
Does the bill require regulators to publish average and median bank application approval times?
Yes. Under the New BANK Act of 2025, the OCC, NCUA, Federal Reserve, FDIC, and joint state-charter report must include mean and median approval times, depending on the application type (Sections 2-6).
Can the public see how many FDIC deposit insurance applications were denied or returned?
Yes. Under the New BANK Act of 2025, the FDIC must annually publish how many deposit insurance applications were approved, denied, withdrawn, mooted, or returned, plus approval times (Section 5).
Does HR 6551 cover applications to become a bank holding company?
Yes. According to H.R. 6551 Section 4, the Federal Reserve must report annually on applications to become a top-tier depository institution holding company, including approvals, denials, withdrawals, mootings, returns, and timing.
Can federal credit union charter applications be listed as inactive or returned for resubmission?
Yes. Under the New BANK Act of 2025, the NCUA must report federal credit union applications that were denied, withdrawn, inactive, or returned pending resubmission, along with approval timing (Section 3).
Which agencies have to work with state regulators on charter application reports?
Under the New BANK Act of 2025, the Federal Reserve, FDIC, and NCUA must jointly consult with state banking and state credit union regulators for the annual state-charter report (Section 6).
Does the bill include Washington DC and US territories in the state charter report?
Yes. According to H.R. 6551 Section 6, 'State' includes any U.S. state, the District of Columbia, and any U.S. territory for the annual charter application report.
Can cooperative banks and industrial banks count as state depository institutions under the New BANK Act?
Yes. Under the New BANK Act of 2025, Section 6 defines a state bank to include industrial banks, and a state savings association can include a cooperative bank that is not a state bank.
Does the OCC have to report both preliminary and final national bank charter approvals?
Yes. According to H.R. 6551 Section 2, the Comptroller must report annual counts for preliminary and final approvals of national bank and federal savings association charter applications, plus mean and median timing for each.
Based on H.R. 6551 bill text
HR6551 Legislative Journey
House: Committee Action
Feb 25, 2026
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 119-530.
House: Vote: 53-0
Dec 17, 2025
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 53 - 0.
House: Committee Action
Dec 16, 2025
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
House: Committee Action
Dec 10, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
About the Sponsor
Barry Loudermilk
Republican, Georgia's 11th congressional district · 11 years in Congress
Committees: House Select Subcommittee to Investigate the Remaining Questions Surrounding January 6, 2021, House Administration, Financial Services
View full profile →
Cosponsors (2)
This bill has 2 cosponsors: 1 Democrat, 1 Republican, reflecting bipartisan support. Cosponsors represent 2 states: New Jersey, New York.
Committee Sponsors
Financial Services Committee
2 of 54 committee members cosponsored
29 Republicans across this committee haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents
H.R. 6551 Quick Facts
- Committee
- Financial Services
- Chamber
- House
- Policy
- Finance and Financial Sector
- Introduced
- Dec 10, 2025
Placed on House floor schedule, Calendar No. 455.
Feb 25, 2026
Who is lobbying on H.R. 6551?
1 organization lobbying on this bill
AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION | 1 |
Showing 1-1 of 1 organizations
H.R. 6551 Bill Text
“To require annual reports on national bank and Federal savings association charter applications, depository institution holding company applications, Federal deposit insurance applications, and State depository institution charter applications, and for other purposes.”
Source: U.S. Government Publishing Office
Get notified when H.R. 6551 moves
Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.
Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.
Finance and Financial Sector Bills
9 related bills we're tracking
Repealing Big Brother Overreach Act
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Jan 15, 2025
761st Tank Battalion Congressional Gold Medal Act
Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Feb 26, 2025
Protecting Privacy in Purchases Act
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 447.
Feb 25, 2026
HELPER Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Mar 14, 2025
$2.50 for America’s 250th Act
Received in the Senate.
Feb 12, 2026
Main Street Capital Access Act
Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 26 - 16.
Mar 4, 2026
Credit Union Board Modernization Act
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Feb 11, 2025
Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Sep 18, 2025
Insurance Data Protection Act
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Apr 30, 2025
Trending Right Now
Bills gaining momentum across Congress
Healthy Families Act
Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committees on House Administration, and Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Feb 12, 2026
Federal Extreme Risk Protection Order Act of 2026
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Feb 17, 2026
ALERT Act
Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Feb 20, 2026
Tracking Finance and Financial Sector in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.