H.R. 6550: American FIRST Act of 2025
Sponsor
Barry Loudermilk
Republican · GA-11
Bill Progress
Latest Action · Feb 25, 2026
Placed on House floor schedule, Calendar No. 454.
Global banking talks shouldn't happen in the dark
Why it matters
3 U.S. bank regulators would have to publicly spell out their work with 5 major global banking groups. If international talks help shape the rules behind your bank account, mortgage, or business loan, H.R. 6550 would force a clearer public record of who said what and what changed.
H.R. 6550 is a transparency bill focused on the Federal Reserve, the OCC, and the FDIC. It does not stop them from working with international banking groups. It makes them report, every year, on which global forums they joined, what issues were discussed, what positions they took, and what came out of those meetings.
The reporting list is detailed. Agencies would have to disclose forum members and observers, funding sources that provide a material amount of support, the staff structure handling the work, meeting summaries, and the text of final standards or a public source for that text.
If one of those global agreements starts turning into U.S. rules, guidance, or supervisory changes, the agency would also have to explain that. That includes describing the expected domestic changes and providing an economic impact analysis showing why the expected benefits at least offset the expected costs.
The bill defines covered forums broadly but specifically names 5 groups: the Bank for International Settlements, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, the Financial Stability Board, the International Association of Insurance Supervisors, and the Network of Central Banks and Supervisors for Greening the Financial System. It also says the Federal Reserve must discuss these international interactions in its regular twice-a-year testimony to Congress.
H.R. 6550 Bill Summary
What H.R. 6550 actually does.
3 regulators must file annual global-forum reports
The Federal Reserve, OCC, and FDIC would each have to submit yearly reports to Congress on their work with international financial regulatory or supervisory groups.
5 major global banking groups get named
H.R. 6550 specifically covers 5 organizations: the Bank for International Settlements, Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Financial Stability Board, International Association of Insurance Supervisors, and the Network of Central Banks and Supervisors for Greening the Financial System.
Agencies must disclose positions, meetings, and funding
For each covered forum, agencies would have to list members and observers, describe positions taken by U.S. representatives, summarize meetings and outcomes, identify major funding sources, and provide final standards or a public source for them.
Global deals headed for U.S. rules get an economic explanation
If an international agreement leads to proposed or adopted U.S. rules, guidance, or supervisory changes, the agency must describe the expected impact and explain why the expected benefits at least offset the expected costs.
The Federal Reserve must discuss this with Congress twice a year
The bill adds these international interactions to the Federal Reserve's regular semiannual testimony, creating a second public oversight track beyond the annual written reports.
Some international bodies stay outside the bill
The reporting rules would not apply to certain international financial institutions or to organizations where U.S. participation is based on a treaty.
Who benefits from H.R. 6550?
Anyone trying to track who shapes banking rules
If you want to know whether international negotiations are influencing U.S. bank policy, H.R. 6550 would create a yearly paper trail instead of leaving those decisions buried in agency process.
Banks, credit providers, and other regulated firms
Firms would get earlier visibility into whether global standards being discussed abroad might later show up as U.S. rules, guidance, or supervisory expectations.
Congress and oversight staff
Lawmakers would get regular reports from 3 regulators, plus Federal Reserve testimony twice a year, giving them more chances to question how global standards move toward domestic policy.
Journalists, researchers, and watchdog groups
They would gain easier access to meeting summaries, agency positions, forum membership lists, and final standards from 5 named global groups.
Who is affected by H.R. 6550?
Federal Reserve, OCC, and FDIC staff
These agencies would have new compliance work every year: drafting reports, compiling meeting records, identifying staff oversight structures, and documenting how global agreements could affect U.S. policy.
Global forums that work with U.S. regulators
Their dealings with U.S. agencies would become more visible because H.R. 6550 requires public reporting on members, observers, funding sources, meeting outcomes, and adopted standards.
Lawmakers skeptical of global standard-setting
They would get more formal oversight tools, but also a clearer record that could be used either to challenge or defend regulators' participation in these forums.
People using the banking system
You would not get a direct payment or new benefit, but you could get more visibility into how international banking standards may shape the rules behind lending, capital, supervision, and financial stability.
HR6550 Legislative Journey
House: Committee Action
Feb 25, 2026
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 119-529.
House: Vote: 29-23
Dec 17, 2025
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 29 - 23.
House: Committee Action
Dec 16, 2025
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
House: Committee Action
Dec 10, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
About the Sponsor
Barry Loudermilk
Republican, Georgia's 11th congressional district · 11 years in Congress
Committees: House Select Subcommittee to Investigate the Remaining Questions Surrounding January 6, 2021, House Administration, Financial Services
View full profile →
Cosponsors (6)
All 6 cosponsors are Republicans. Cosponsors represent 6 states: Kentucky, North Carolina, Nebraska, and 3 more.
Committee Sponsors
Financial Services Committee
6 of 53 committee members cosponsored
24 Republicans across this committee haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents
What laws does H.R. 6550 change?
3 changes
Sections Amended
Section 333 of Revised Statutes of the United States (12 U.S.C. 14; relating to an annual report)
read as follows: ``SEC
Section 17(a) of Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1827(a))
striking paragraph (3) and inserting the following: ``(3) Interactions with global financial regulatory or supervisory forums
Section 10 of Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 247b)
inserting before the period at the end the following: ``and with respect to the conduct of interactions at global financial regulatory or supervisory forums (as defined in paragraph (7)(C))''
H.R. 6550 Quick Facts
- Committee
- Financial Services
- Chamber
- House
- Policy
- Finance and Financial Sector
- Introduced
- Dec 10, 2025
Placed on House floor schedule, Calendar No. 454.
Feb 25, 2026
Official Sources
Official bill status, text, actions, and committee information for H.R. 6550.
This is the U.S. Code section H.R. 6550 would amend to require the Federal Reserve to report on global forum interactions.
The FDIC is one of the three regulators covered by the bill's annual reporting requirements.
The Federal Reserve is a primary agency affected by H.R. 6550 and would also discuss these interactions in semiannual testimony.
The bill ties international-forum disclosures to the Federal Reserve's regular semiannual reporting and testimony to Congress.
H.R. 6550 Common Questions
Did H.R. 6550 pass yet?
No. H.R. 6550 has been placed on the Union Calendar, which means it cleared committee in the House but has not passed Congress.
What does H.R. 6550 actually do?
It makes the Federal Reserve, OCC, and FDIC file annual reports on their work with global financial regulatory groups, including meetings, positions taken, funding sources, and possible U.S. rule changes.
Which global banking groups are covered?
H.R. 6550 specifically names 5: the Bank for International Settlements, Basel Committee, Financial Stability Board, International Association of Insurance Supervisors, and NGFS.
Which U.S. regulators would have to report?
3 regulators: the Federal Reserve, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and the FDIC.
Would regulators have to reveal what positions they took in those meetings?
Yes. H.R. 6550 says the annual reports must describe the positions taken by agency representatives, along with their rationale, objectives, and potential impacts.
Does H.R. 6550 require an economic impact analysis?
Yes. If a global agreement leads to proposed or adopted U.S. rules, guidance, or supervisory changes, the agency must include an economic impact analysis and explain the expected benefits and costs.
How often would the Federal Reserve have to discuss this with Congress?
Twice a year. H.R. 6550 adds the Fed's global-forum interactions to its regular semiannual testimony before Congress.
Are any international organizations exempt?
Yes. The bill excludes certain international financial institutions and organizations where U.S. participation is based on a treaty.
Based on H.R. 6550 bill text
H.R. 6550 Bill Text
“To require annual reporting on interactions between Federal banking supervisory agencies and global financial regulatory or supervisory forums, and for other purposes.”
Source: U.S. Government Publishing Office
Get notified when H.R. 6550 moves
Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.
Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.
Finance and Financial Sector Bills
9 related bills we're tracking
Repealing Big Brother Overreach Act
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Jan 15, 2025
761st Tank Battalion Congressional Gold Medal Act
Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Feb 26, 2025
Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Jul 17, 2025
Protecting Privacy in Purchases Act
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 447.
Feb 25, 2026
HELPER Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Mar 14, 2025
Veterans Member Business Loan Act
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Jan 16, 2025
Credit Union Board Modernization Act
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Feb 11, 2025
$2.50 for America’s 250th Act
Received in the Senate.
Feb 12, 2026
Main Street Capital Access Act
Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 26 - 16.
Mar 4, 2026
Trending Right Now
Bills gaining momentum across Congress
AADAPT Act
Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 48 - 0.
May 21, 2026
Life at Conception Act
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Jan 24, 2025
West Bank Violence Prevention Act of 2025
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Apr 28, 2025
Tracking Finance and Financial Sector in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.