S. 494: National Plan for Epilepsy Act

Introduced Feb 10, 202527 cosponsors

Sponsor

Eric Schmitt

Eric Schmitt

Republican · MO

Epilepsy families deserve a real federal plan

3 min readLast updated September 3, 2026

Why it matters

2 years — that's how long HHS would have to tell Congress what is missing in epilepsy research, diagnosis, care coordination, surveillance, and death prevention, and how federal programs should change.

S. 494 would require HHS to deliver a national epilepsy review and recommendations to Congress within 2 years.

The bill does not create a new benefit, new treatment, or a new pot of money. Instead, it orders a government-wide review of how federal programs handle epilepsy — from research and early diagnosis to treatment, surveillance, and quality of life.

That review has to look at what research already shows, what federally funded research is underway, where the knowledge gaps are, and which populations face disparities. It also has to examine how well federal programs coordinate with each other, what the government is already investing, and where better collaboration could help.

The bill makes prevention of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy, or SUDEP, an explicit federal priority in that review — not a side issue.

HHS would also have to gather outside input on a regular basis from patient advocates, experts, and other federal agencies. The final report must summarize that feedback, recommend changes to programs or strategic plans, and spell out any legal or logistical barriers standing in the way.

In practical terms, S. 494 is a pressure bill: it makes HHS put its epilepsy strategy, gaps, and next steps on the record for Congress and the public.

Bill Progress

IntroducedFeb 10
Committee 
Pass SenateAug 4
Pass House 
Signed 
Law 

Latest Action · Aug 10, 2026

1/3

Passed the Senate, received in House

S. 494 Bill Summary

What S. 494 actually does.

1

HHS has 2 years to produce a national epilepsy review

S. 494 gives the Department of Health and Human Services 2 years after enactment to review federal epilepsy efforts and send findings and recommendations to Congress.

2

Federal epilepsy gaps have to be spelled out

The review must cover research findings, ongoing federally funded work, knowledge gaps, disparities among people with epilepsy, and current public health strategies.

3

Care coordination and early diagnosis get direct attention

HHS must consider how federal efforts could improve earlier diagnosis and better coordination of care and treatment for people with epilepsy.

4

SUDEP prevention must be part of the plan

The bill specifically requires HHS to consider ways to better prevent sudden unexpected death in epilepsy and other epilepsy-related deaths.

5

Patients and outside experts must be heard

HHS would have to regularly gather input from patient advocates, non-federal subject matter experts, and other federal agencies while preparing the review.

6

Congress gets recommended fixes, not just a status update

The final report must include proposed changes to federal programs or strategic plans, implementation ideas, and any barriers that could block those changes.

Who benefits from S. 494?

People living with epilepsy

If federal gaps in diagnosis, treatment, surveillance, and care coordination are addressed, they could see better-targeted national policy and stronger support from existing programs.

Families and caregivers

The bill specifically tells HHS to examine how epilepsy affects caregivers, which could elevate needs that are often treated as secondary in federal planning.

Patient advocates and epilepsy experts

S. 494 gives them a formal seat in the process by requiring HHS to regularly solicit outside input while building its recommendations.

Researchers and public health officials

A full review of research gaps, disparities, surveillance, and federal investment could help shape future priorities and make it easier to argue for targeted policy changes.

Who is affected by S. 494?

Department of Health and Human Services

HHS would have to lead the review, gather outside input, coordinate with other agencies, and deliver a report to Congress within 2 years.

Other federal health agencies

Agencies involved in epilepsy research, prevention, diagnosis, treatment, or data collection would likely be pulled into a broader review of how their work fits together.

Congress

Lawmakers would receive a formal roadmap of recommended changes and any barriers that HHS says are preventing better epilepsy policy.

People waiting for direct funding or new services

They would not get immediate new benefits from S. 494 alone, because the bill requires a review and recommendations rather than creating a grant program or coverage expansion.

Share this story
Tracking floor activity — no debate on S. 494 yet. Updates when a legislator speaks on the record.

S494 Legislative Journey

5 actions

House: Action Taken

Aug 10, 2026

Held at the desk.

Passed 4426-4427

Aug 4, 2026

4426-4427

Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S4426-4427; text: CR S4426-4427)

+1 more action this day

Committee Action

Jul 28, 2026

Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Reported by Senator Cassidy with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.

Passed Committee

Jul 22, 2026

Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.

Committee Action

Feb 10, 2025

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

About the Sponsor

Eric Schmitt

Eric Schmitt

Republican, MO · 3 years in Congress

Committees: Joint Economic Committee, Commerce, Science, and Transportation, the Judiciary

View full profile →

Cosponsors (27)

No new cosponsors in 42 days

This bill has 27 cosponsors: 19 Democrats, 8 Republicans, reflecting bipartisan support. Cosponsors represent 21 states: Arkansas, California, Colorado, and 18 more.

19Democrats8Republicans·21 statesBipartisan

Committee Sponsors

Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee

10D12R1I
|8 signed15 not yet

8 of 23 committee members cosponsored

9 Republicans across this committee haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents

S. 494 Quick Facts

Cosponsors
27
Amy Klobuchar
John Boozman
Maggie Hassan
Jon Husted
Edward Markey
+22 more
Committee
Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
Chamber
Senate
Policy
Health
Introduced
Feb 10, 2025

Passed the Senate, received in House

Aug 10, 2026

Constituent Resources

Get notified when this bill moves

Official Sources

S. 494 on Congress.gov

The official Congress.gov page provides the bill text, status, sponsors, and legislative actions for S. 494.

HHS Office of the Secretary

The bill assigns the Secretary of Health and Human Services to lead the epilepsy review and submit the final report to Congress.

CDC Epilepsy

CDC's epilepsy program is directly relevant to the bill's focus on public health strategies, surveillance, diagnosis, and quality-of-life issues.

CDC Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP)

The bill explicitly requires HHS to consider better prevention of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy and other epilepsy-related mortalities.

S. 494 Common Questions

What would S. 494 actually do?

It would require HHS to review federal epilepsy research, care, prevention, and data efforts, then send Congress a report with recommended changes within 2 years.

Does S. 494 create new epilepsy funding or benefits?

No. S. 494 does not create a new grant program, treatment benefit, or direct payment. It requires a federal review and recommendations.

How fast would HHS have to act under S. 494?

HHS would have 2 years after enactment to submit its epilepsy review and recommendations to Congress.

Does the bill address SUDEP?

Yes. S. 494 specifically tells HHS to consider how to better prevent sudden unexpected death in epilepsy and other epilepsy-related deaths.

Would patients and caregivers get a voice in the review?

Yes. The bill requires HHS to regularly gather input from patient advocates and outside experts, and it also says the review should examine impacts on caregivers.

Does S. 494 cover early diagnosis and care coordination?

Yes. The review must consider ways to improve early diagnosis and coordination of care and treatment for people with epilepsy.

Would the bill look at how much the federal government already spends on epilepsy?

Yes. S. 494 requires HHS to review the current level of federal investment in preventing, diagnosing, treating, and curing epilepsy.

Could S. 494 lead to bigger policy changes later?

Potentially, yes. The bill itself is a planning measure, but the final report must recommend program or strategy changes and identify barriers Congress may need to fix.

Based on S. 494 bill text

S. 494 Bill Text

To establish a national plan to coordinate research on epilepsy, and for other purposes.

Source: U.S. Government Publishing Office

Bill Alerts

Get notified when S. 494 moves

Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.

Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.

Health Bills

9 related bills we're tracking

View all
H.R. 842

Nancy Gardner Sewell Medicare Multi-Cancer Early Detection Screening Coverage Act

Jodey Arrington
Jodey ArringtonR-TX
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+334
338 cosponsors

Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Ways and Means. H. Rept. 119-333, Part I.

Oct 3, 2025

HouseHealth
H.R. 1262

Mikaela Naylon Give Kids a Chance Act

Michael McCaul
Michael McCaulR-TX
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+309
313 cosponsors

Received in the Senate.

Dec 2, 2025

HouseHealth
H.R. 3514

Improving Seniors’ Timely Access to Care Act of 2025

Mike Kelly
Mike KellyR-PA
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+297
301 cosponsors
+3 this month

Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 42 - 0.

Jul 15, 2026

HouseHealth
H.R. 4206

CONNECT for Health Act of 2025

Mike Thompson
Mike ThompsonD-CA
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+237
241 cosponsors

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Jun 26, 2025

HouseHealth
H.R. 7973

Momnibus Act

Lauren Underwood
Lauren UnderwoodD-IL
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+209
213 cosponsors
+1 this month

Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.

Apr 20, 2026

HouseHealth
H.R. 999

Right to Contraception Act

Lizzie Fletcher
Lizzie FletcherD-TX
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+206
210 cosponsors

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Feb 5, 2025

HouseHealth
H.R. 12

Women’s Health Protection Act of 2025

Judy Chu
Judy ChuD-CA
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+204
208 cosponsors

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Jun 24, 2025

HouseHealth
H.R. 6130Surging+18

ASAP Act

Vern Buchanan
Vern BuchananR-FL
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+194
198 cosponsors
+18 this month

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Nov 19, 2025

HouseHealth
H.R. 879

Medicare Patient Access and Practice Stabilization Act of 2025

Gregory Murphy
Gregory MurphyR-NC
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+191
195 cosponsors

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Jan 31, 2025

HouseHealth

Tracking Health in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.