S. 3557: States' Right to Regulate AI Act

Introduced Dec 17, 202510 cosponsors

Sponsor

Edward Markey

Edward Markey

Democrat · MA

Bill Progress

IntroducedDec 17
Committee 
Pass Senate 
Pass House 
Signed 
Law 

Latest Action · Dec 17, 2025

1/2

Read twice and Referred to Commerce, Science, and Transportation. for review

Markey bill blocks AI order funds

Why it matters

Introduced on December 17, 2025, S. 3557 would immediately stop any federal money from being used to carry out President Trump's December 11, 2025 artificial intelligence order on state regulation.

Politically, the bill is also a direct challenge to presidential power. Congress often argues with administrations over policy, but this measure uses the spending power in a very targeted way: it singles out one named executive order, gives its exact title, and bars federal money from being used on it. With 10 cosponsors in addition to Markey, the bill signals organized Senate resistance to federal efforts that could limit state AI regulation.

What does S. 3557 do?

1

Blocks all federal funds tied to 1 executive order

The bill says no federal funds may be used to implement, administer, or enforce one specific executive order: "Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence," issued on December 11, 2025.

2

Targets implementation, administration, and enforcement

The prohibition is not limited to enforcement actions. It explicitly covers three functions — implementation, administration, and enforcement — meaning agencies could not spend money on rollout, management, or policing of the December 11, 2025 AI order.

3

Applies government-wide to federal spending

Because the bill uses the phrase "No Federal funds," it reaches across federal money streams rather than naming a single agency or program. Any federal agency using appropriated funds would be barred from spending on the executive order dated December 11, 2025.

4

Creates no new AI standards or deadlines

The bill is narrow: it does not set new artificial intelligence safety rules, age limits, penalty amounts, or compliance deadlines. Its operative action is the funding cutoff tied to the executive order issued 6 days before the bill's introduction on December 17, 2025.

5

Signals Senate pushback with 10 cosponsors

S. 3557 was introduced by Sen. Markey on December 17, 2025, with 10 listed cosponsors: Van Hollen, Welch, Wyden, Sanders, Schiff, Booker, Lujan, Klobuchar, Padilla, and Durbin. That backing shows a coordinated effort to stop funding for the December 11, 2025 AI order.

Who benefits from S. 3557?

State governments writing AI laws

States would benefit if they want to regulate artificial intelligence without federal pressure from the December 11, 2025 executive order. By cutting off federal funds for that order's implementation, the bill gives states more room to keep or adopt their own rules.

State attorneys general and state regulators

Officials enforcing state consumer protection, privacy, or civil rights laws could benefit because S. 3557 would prevent federal funds from being used to administer or enforce a national AI framework that might undercut state-level action.

Consumers in states pursuing stronger AI protections

Residents in states considering tougher artificial intelligence rules may benefit indirectly because the bill would block federal spending on the December 11, 2025 order, potentially preserving stricter local protections instead of a single national framework.

Lawmakers skeptical of executive branch overreach

Members of Congress who want to limit unilateral presidential action benefit politically from a bill that uses Congress's spending power to stop implementation of one named executive order issued on December 11, 2025.

Who is affected by S. 3557?

Federal agencies tasked with AI policy

Agencies would be directly affected because they could not use any federal funds to implement, administer, or enforce the executive order titled "Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence" if S. 3557 becomes law.

The White House and executive branch policy staff

The administration would lose the ability to rely on federal appropriations to carry out the December 11, 2025 AI order, making it harder to turn that policy framework into agency action.

AI companies seeking one national rulebook

Some developers and tech firms could be affected because blocking funds for the December 11, 2025 executive order may preserve a 50-state patchwork rather than a federally coordinated approach to artificial intelligence policy.

Congressional committees handling commerce and technology

The Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee is affected first because the bill was referred there after introduction on December 17, 2025, putting the committee at the center of the next policy fight.

On the Record

What Congress Is Saying

S. 3557 hasn't been debated on the floor yet.

This section updates when a legislator speaks about it on the floor or in committee.

S3557 Legislative Journey

1 actions

Committee Action

Dec 17, 2025

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

About the Sponsor

Edward Markey

Edward Markey

Democrat, MA · 49 years in Congress

Committees: Small Business and Entrepreneurship, Commerce, Science, and Transportation, Environment and Public Works

View full profile →

Cosponsors (10)

No new cosponsors in 126 days — momentum stalled

This bill has 10 cosponsors: 9 Democrats, 1 Independent. Cosponsors represent 8 states: California, Illinois, Maryland, and 5 more.

9Democrats1Independent·8 states

Committee Sponsors

Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee

13D15R
|2 signed26 not yet

2 of 28 committee members cosponsored

11 Democrats across this committee haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents

S. 3557 Quick Facts

Cosponsors
10
Chris Van Hollen
Peter Welch
Ron Wyden
Bernie Sanders
Adam Schiff
+5 more
Committee
Commerce, Science, and Transportation
Chamber
Senate
Policy
Science, Technology, Communications
Introduced
Dec 17, 2025

Read twice and Referred to Commerce, Science, and Transportation. for review

Dec 17, 2025

Constituent Resources

Get notified when this bill moves

S. 3557 Common Questions

Can federal agencies spend any money to enforce Trump's December 11, 2025 AI executive order?

No. Under the States' Right to Regulate AI Act (SEC. 2), no Federal funds may be used to implement, administer, or enforce the December 11, 2025 order.

Which executive order does S3557 block funding for?

According to S3557 SEC. 2, it blocks Federal funds for the executive order titled "Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence," issued December 11, 2025.

Does the States' Right to Regulate AI Act stop federal money for implementing the AI order, not just enforcing it?

Yes. Under the States' Right to Regulate AI Act (SEC. 2), the funding ban covers implementation, administration, and enforcement of the named AI executive order.

Is the funding ban in S3557 government-wide or limited to one agency?

It is government-wide. According to S3557 SEC. 2, "No Federal funds" may be used, so the restriction is not limited to a single agency or program.

Can any federal funds be used to administer the executive order Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence?

No. Under the States' Right to Regulate AI Act (SEC. 2), no Federal funds may be used to administer that executive order.

What are federal agencies banned from doing under S3557?

According to S3557 SEC. 2, they cannot use Federal funds to implement, administer, or enforce the December 11, 2025 AI executive order.

Does S3557 create new AI safety rules or compliance standards?

No. Under the States' Right to Regulate AI Act, the operative provision in SEC. 2 only cuts off Federal funding for the specified executive order; it does not create new AI standards.

How much federal funding does S3557 allow for the December 11, 2025 AI order?

None. Under the States' Right to Regulate AI Act (SEC. 2), no Federal funds may be used for that order's implementation, administration, or enforcement.

Does the States' Right to Regulate AI Act set any penalties or fines for AI companies?

No. According to the States' Right to Regulate AI Act, SEC. 2 only bars Federal funds from being used on the named executive order and does not set fines or penalties.

Is the executive order targeted by S3557 the one issued on December 11, 2025?

Yes. According to S3557 SEC. 2, the bill targets the executive order issued on December 11, 2025, titled "Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence."

Based on S. 3557 bill text

S. 3557 Bill Text

PDF

To prohibit the use of Federal funds to implement the Executive order entitled “Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence”.

Source: U.S. Government Publishing Office

Bill Alerts

Get notified when S. 3557 moves

Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.

Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.

Science, Technology, Communications Bills

9 related bills we're tracking

View all
H.R. 8031

GUARDRAILS Act

Donald Beyer
Donald BeyerD-VA
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+31
35 cosponsors
+2 this month

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Mar 20, 2026

HouseScience, Technology, Communications
H.R. 6356

Artificial Intelligence Civil Rights Act of 2025

Yvette Clarke
Yvette ClarkeD-NY
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+22
26 cosponsors
+1 this month

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Dec 2, 2025

HouseScience, Technology, Communications
S. 146

TAKE IT DOWN Act

Ted Cruz
Ted CruzR-TX
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+17
21 cosponsors

Became Public Law No: 119-12.

May 19, 2025

SenateScience, Technology, Communications
H.R. 390

ACERO Act

Vince Fong
Vince FongR-CA
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+3
7 cosponsors

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

Feb 24, 2026

HouseScience, Technology, Communications
H.R. 2600

ASCEND Act

Jeff Hurd
Jeff HurdR-CO
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+2
6 cosponsors

Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 344.

Feb 24, 2026

HouseScience, Technology, Communications
S. 4216Gaining+5

GUARDRAILS Act

Brian Schatz
Brian SchatzD-HI
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+1
5 cosponsors
+5 this month

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

Mar 26, 2026

SenateScience, Technology, Communications
H.R. 3679

Small Business Artificial Intelligence Advancement Act

Mike Collins
Mike CollinsR-GA
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
4 cosponsors

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

Feb 24, 2026

HouseScience, Technology, Communications
H.R. 3744

Research Integrity and Foreign Influence Prevention Act

Daniel Webster
Daniel WebsterR-FL
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
4 cosponsors

Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.

Jun 5, 2025

HouseScience, Technology, Communications
H.R. 1368

DOE and NASA Interagency Research Coordination Act

Nicholas Begich
Nicholas BegichR-AK
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
3 cosponsors

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

Mar 25, 2025

HouseScience, Technology, Communications

Tracking Science, Technology, Communications in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.