S. 3345: PBM Price Transparency and Accountability Act
Sponsor
Mike Crapo
Republican · ID
Bill Progress
Latest Action · Dec 4, 2025
Read twice and Referred to Finance. for review
Drug middlemen would have to show their math
Why it matters
Pharmacy benefit managers sit between your insurer and your pharmacy, and they help decide what pharmacies get paid and what plans get charged — often pocketing the gap. S. 3345 would ban that markup in Medicaid, force PBMs to report drug-by-drug costs to Medicare, and back it with $336 million in enforcement money for 2026.
S. 3345, the PBM Price Transparency and Accountability Act, targets the middlemen of the drug supply chain in both Medicaid and Medicare.
Start with spread pricing. That's when a PBM charges a health plan one price for a drug, pays the pharmacy a lower price, and keeps the difference. The bill bans it in Medicaid: for state contracts that take effect 18 months after enactment, PBMs would have to use a pass-through pricing model. Payments would be limited to the drug's ingredient cost plus a dispensing fee, and that money would have to flow through to the pharmacy in full.
To make that enforceable, the bill builds a price-tracking system. HHS would run a monthly survey of retail and certain non-retail pharmacies to set national average drug-cost benchmarks. Pharmacies that take Medicaid drug payments would have to respond — and ignoring the survey, or giving false answers, could draw civil penalties of up to $100,000 per violation.
The Medicare half rewrites Part D's pharmacy rules. Starting with 2028 plan years, drug plans would have to admit any pharmacy that meets their standard contract terms, and those terms would have to be "reasonable and relevant" under standards HHS must write. The bill also defines an "essential retail pharmacy" by distance — the last pharmacy within 10 miles in a rural area, 2 miles in a suburban one, or 1 mile in an urban one — and orders federal reports tracking those pharmacies through 2034.
Finally, the bill tightens what PBMs can earn and what they must disclose. In Part D, PBMs could keep only flat-fee "bona fide service fees" — pay not tied to a drug's price or rebates — and would have to return anything collected outside that. Beginning July 1, 2028, they would file annual reports with drug-level detail on claims, costs, rebates, and how much business they steer to their own affiliated pharmacies. Plan sponsors would get the right to audit them every year.
S. 3345 Bill Summary
What S. 3345 actually does.
Medicaid spread pricing gets banned
For state Medicaid contracts that take effect 18 months after enactment, PBMs and managed care entities would have to use a transparent pass-through pricing model. Payments would be limited to ingredient cost plus a professional dispensing fee and would have to be passed through in full to the pharmacy that fills the prescription. Spread pricing would no longer count toward federal matching payments.
A monthly pharmacy price survey with $100,000 penalties
HHS would run a monthly survey of retail and applicable non-retail pharmacies to set national average drug acquisition cost benchmarks. Pharmacies that receive Medicaid drug payments or fees would have to respond. Refusing to answer, giving false information, or otherwise not complying could draw civil penalties of up to $100,000 per violation.
Any willing pharmacy can join a Medicare drug network
For Medicare Part D plan years starting January 1, 2028, drug plans would have to admit any pharmacy that meets their standard contract terms. Those terms would have to be 'reasonable and relevant' under standards HHS must establish, with a request for information due April 1, 2026, and final standards due the first Monday in April 2027.
Pharmacy access measured by 10, 2, and 1 miles
The bill defines an 'essential retail pharmacy' by distance: a pharmacy with no other pharmacy within 10 miles in a rural area, 2 miles in a suburban area, or 1 mile in an urban area. HHS would publish a list of these pharmacies and report on access trends every two years from 2028 through 2034.
PBM pay limited to flat-fee services
In Medicare Part D, PBMs and their affiliates could keep only bona fide service fees — flat dollar amounts at fair market value, not tied to a drug's price or to rebates. Manufacturer rebates would have to be passed through to the plan. Any payment collected outside those rules would have to be disgorged to the plan sponsor.
Annual drug-level PBM reporting begins July 1, 2028
Starting July 1, 2028, PBMs would file annual reports to Medicare drug plan sponsors and HHS with drug-by-drug detail — claims, dosage units, acquisition costs, rebates, and the share of prescriptions filled by their own affiliated pharmacies. Plan sponsors would also get the right to pick an auditor each year to check PBM compliance.
Who benefits from S. 3345?
Independent and community pharmacies
The Medicaid pass-through rule guarantees them ingredient cost plus a dispensing fee, instead of whatever a PBM decides to pay after taking its spread. In Medicare Part D, they gain 'any willing pharmacy' access starting in 2028, plus a process to report unfair contract terms and protection from retaliation for using it.
Patients in pharmacy deserts
Roughly 1 in 4 U.S. counties has limited retail pharmacy access, and closures keep climbing. The bill's 'essential retail pharmacy' framework flags the last pharmacy standing in rural, suburban, and urban areas and puts federal reporting behind tracking whether those pharmacies survive through 2034.
State Medicaid programs
States would get drug-by-drug reporting on ingredient costs, dispensing fees, and all other remuneration from PBMs and managed care entities. Paired with the monthly national pricing benchmark, that gives states a way to spot hidden spreads instead of taking a PBM's word for the bill.
Medicare Part D plan sponsors
Plans gain annual audit rights over PBMs and mandatory annual PBM reports starting July 1, 2028. When a PBM or affiliate collects money outside the allowed bona fide service fees, the plan sponsor is the one that gets it back.
Who is affected by S. 3345?
Pharmacy benefit managers and their affiliates
PBMs carry the heaviest new obligations: no spread pricing in covered Medicaid contracts after 18 months, pay limited to bona fide service fees in Medicare Part D, annual drug-level reporting beginning July 1, 2028, disgorgement of any prohibited remuneration, and annual audits chosen by plan sponsors.
Retail community pharmacies
Retail pharmacies that receive Medicaid drug payments or fees would have to respond to the monthly HHS pricing survey. Non-response, false information, or other non-compliance could lead to penalties of up to $100,000 per violation.
Mail-order and specialty pharmacies
Licensed non-retail pharmacies — mostly mail and specialty operations — are brought into the survey system, though the bill excludes nursing home, long-term care, hospital, clinic, charitable, government, and low-dispensing pharmacies. Their survey requirements start later, 18 months after enactment, with HHS issuing identifying guidance by January 1, 2027.
HHS, CMS, OIG, MedPAC, and GAO
Federal agencies take on the implementation and oversight load. CMS receives $188 million and another $113 million for the work, OIG receives $5 million and $20 million, MedPAC receives $1 million, and GAO must report on price-related compensation across the drug supply chain within two years of enactment.
Cost & Funding
Authorization
$336 million in FY 2026 appropriations, plus $9 million for FY 2026 and each fiscal year thereafter
- $188 million to the CMS Program Management Account for FY 2026 to implement the Medicare pharmacy access provisions.
- $113 million to CMS for FY 2026 for Medicare PBM accountability work.
- $20 million to the HHS Office of Inspector General for FY 2026 for Medicare PBM oversight.
- $5 million to the HHS Office of Inspector General for FY 2026 for Medicaid survey-related studies.
- $1 million to MedPAC for FY 2026 for reports on PBM agreements.
- $9 million for FY 2026 and every year after to run the monthly Medicaid pharmacy pricing survey.
- The four CMS and OIG line items account for the bulk of the FY 2026 total — roughly $326 million of the $336 million, almost all of it one-time money tied to standing up the new systems.
S3345 Legislative Journey
Committee Action
Dec 4, 2025
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
About the Sponsor
Mike Crapo
Republican, ID · 33 years in Congress
Committees: Finance, Joint Committee on Taxation, Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs
View full profile →
Cosponsors (26)
This bill has 26 cosponsors: 12 Democrats, 14 Republicans, reflecting bipartisan support. Cosponsors represent 25 states: Colorado, Delaware, Georgia, and 22 more.
Ron Wyden
Democrat · OR
Chuck Grassley
Republican · IA
Michael Bennet
Democrat · CO
John Cornyn
Republican · TX
Mark Warner
Democrat · VA
John Thune
Republican · SD
Sheldon Whitehouse
Democrat · RI
Bill Cassidy
Republican · LA
Maggie Hassan
Democrat · NH
James Lankford
Republican · OK
Catherine Cortez Masto
Democrat · NV
Steve Daines
Republican · MT
Committee Sponsors
Finance Committee
22 of 27 committee members cosponsored
2 Republicans across this committee haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents
S. 3345 Quick Facts
- Committee
- Finance
- Chamber
- Senate
- Policy
- Health
- Introduced
- Dec 4, 2025
Read twice and Referred to Finance. for review
Dec 4, 2025
Official Sources
The official bill page — full text, all 26 cosponsors, and the latest action in the Senate Finance Committee.
The committee's announcement of the bill from Chairman Mike Crapo and lead cosponsor Ron Wyden.
Section 1927 of the Social Security Act — the Medicaid pharmacy payment statute S. 3345 amends to ban spread pricing and expand the price survey.
Section 1860D-4 of the Social Security Act — the Part D statute S. 3345 rewrites to strengthen 'any willing pharmacy' network rules.
The OIG office that would receive $25 million under S. 3345 to study PBM pricing and Medicaid survey data.
The advisory commission that would receive $1 million under S. 3345 to report to Congress on PBM agreements.
S. 3345 Common Questions
What is spread pricing, and does S. 3345 ban it?
Spread pricing is when a PBM charges a health plan more for a drug than it pays the pharmacy, and keeps the difference. S. 3345 bans it in Medicaid: contracts taking effect 18 months after the bill becomes law would have to pass payments through to pharmacies in full.
What's the penalty if a pharmacy ignores the Medicaid drug price survey?
Up to $100,000 per violation. S. 3345 requires retail and certain non-retail pharmacies that take Medicaid drug payments to answer a monthly federal pricing survey. Refusing to respond, giving false information, or otherwise not complying can trigger that civil penalty.
Can any pharmacy join a Medicare Part D network under S. 3345?
Starting with 2028 plan years, yes — if it meets the plan's standard contract terms. Those terms would also have to be 'reasonable and relevant' under standards HHS must set, with a public request for information due April 1, 2026.
What makes a pharmacy an 'essential retail pharmacy' under the bill?
Distance. Under S. 3345, a pharmacy counts as essential if no other pharmacy sits within 10 miles in a rural area, 2 miles in a suburban area, or 1 mile in an urban area. HHS would publish a list and track these pharmacies in reports through 2034.
Can PBMs still keep rebates and price-based fees under the bill?
In Medicare Part D, PBMs could keep only 'bona fide service fees' — flat dollar amounts at fair market value, not tied to a drug's price or rebates. Manufacturer rebates would have to be passed through to the plan, and anything kept improperly would have to be returned.
What new data would PBMs have to report to Medicare?
Beginning July 1, 2028, PBMs would file annual reports to plan sponsors and HHS with drug-by-drug detail: claims, dosage units, acquisition costs, rebates, and the share of prescriptions filled by their own affiliated pharmacies.
Can a Medicare Part D plan retaliate against a pharmacy that complains?
No. S. 3345 sets up a process for pharmacies to report contract violations starting January 1, 2028, and bars plan sponsors from retaliating against, coercing, or intimidating a pharmacy for filing one.
Is S. 3345 bipartisan, and what are its chances?
It's notably bipartisan. Senate Finance Committee Chair Mike Crapo introduced it with the committee's top Democrat, Ron Wyden, and 26 senators from both parties signed on. It sits in Senate Finance — the committee Crapo chairs — which gives it a real path to a markup.
Based on S. 3345 bill text
S. 3345 Bill Text
“To amend titles XVIII and XIX of the Social Security Act to ensure accurate payments to pharmacies under Medicaid and prevent the use of abusive spread pricing in Medicaid, and to assure pharmacy access and choice for Medicare beneficiaries and modernize and ensure PBM accountability under Medicare. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1.”
Source: U.S. Government Publishing Office
Get notified when S. 3345 moves
Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.
Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.
Health Bills
9 related bills we're tracking
Give Kids a Chance Act of 2025
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Dec 1, 2025
Improving Seniors’ Timely Access to Care Act of 2025
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
May 20, 2025
CONNECT for Health Act of 2025
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Jun 26, 2025
Right to Contraception Act
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Feb 5, 2025
Medicare Patient Access and Practice Stabilization Act of 2025
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Jan 31, 2025
Chiropractic Medicare Coverage Modernization Act of 2025
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Jan 16, 2025
988 LGBTQ+ Youth Access Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Sep 17, 2025
Ensuring Lasting Smiles Act
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Education and Workforce, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
May 8, 2025
Pride In Mental Health Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Jun 5, 2025
Trending Right Now
Bills gaining momentum across Congress
Generating Retirement Ownership through Long-Term Holding
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Mar 11, 2025
Pakistan Freedom and Accountability Act
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Sep 10, 2025
National Plan for Epilepsy Act
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Feb 11, 2025
Tracking Health in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.