S. 3345: PBM Price Transparency and Accountability Act
Sponsor
Mike Crapo
Republican · ID
Bill Progress
Latest Action · Dec 4, 2025
Read twice and Referred to Finance. for review
Senate targets PBM spreads, secrecy
Why it matters
Congress is moving now to curb pharmacy benefit manager pricing practices in Medicaid and Medicare with new monthly reporting, contract rules, and multimillion-dollar enforcement funding starting in FY 2026.
S. 3345 is a broad transparency and accountability bill aimed at pharmacy benefit managers, or PBMs, in both Medicaid and Medicare. On the Medicaid side, it tells the HHS Secretary to run a monthly survey of retail community pharmacies and certain non-retail pharmacies to build national average drug acquisition cost benchmarks. Pharmacies that receive payments or fees tied to Medicaid covered outpatient drugs would have to answer the surveys, and failure to respond, false information, or other non-compliance could trigger civil money penalties of up to $100,000 per violation. The bill also requires public posting of monthly response rates, sampling methods, and releasable price concession information, while giving the HHS Office of Inspector General $5,000,000 in FY 2026 for studies and $9,000,000 in FY 2026 and each year after for survey administration.
The Medicaid section also takes direct aim at spread pricing. For contracts taking effect on or after 18 months after enactment, states and PBMs or managed care entities would have to use a transparent prescription drug pass-through pricing model. That means payments are limited to ingredient cost plus a professional dispensing fee, those payments must be passed through in full to the pharmacy that fills the prescription, administrative fees must reflect fair market value, and spread pricing would be barred for purposes of federal matching payments. Plans and PBMs would also have to report all costs and payments by drug, including ingredient costs, dispensing fees, and all other remuneration, to both the state and the Secretary.
On the Medicare side, the bill would strengthen pharmacy access rules in Part D. For plan years beginning January 1, 2028, prescription drug plan sponsors would have to let any pharmacy into the network if it meets the plan's standard contract terms, and those terms must be "reasonable and relevant" under standards the Secretary must set. HHS has to issue a request for information by April 1, 2026, then establish those standards by the first Monday in April 2027. The bill also creates a practical definition of an "essential retail pharmacy" using distance cutoffs: no other pharmacy within 10 miles in rural areas, 2 miles in suburban areas, or 1 mile in urban areas. The Secretary must publish biennial reports from 2028 through 2034, and pharmacies get an allegation process plus anti-retaliation protections if they report contract violations.
The bill's other major Medicare change is tighter control of PBM compensation and better access to data. PBMs and their affiliates could not keep remuneration other than bona fide service fees, defined to mean a flat dollar amount at fair market value that is not tied to a drug's price or rebates. If they collect prohibited remuneration, they must disgorge it to the prescription drug plan sponsor. Beginning July 1, 2028, PBMs must file annual reports to plan sponsors and the Secretary with drug-specific information such as claims, dosage units, acquisition costs, rebates, and the percentage dispensed by affiliates. Plan sponsors would get annual audit rights, and Congress backs enforcement with $188,000,000 to the CMS Program Management Account for FY 2026, $113,000,000 to CMS for PBM accountability work in FY 2026, $20,000,000 to OIG in FY 2026, and $1,000,000 to MedPAC in FY 2026. A GAO study on price-related compensation structures would be due 2 years after enactment.
S. 3345 Bill Summary
What S. 3345 actually does.
Monthly pharmacy price survey with $100,000 penalties
The HHS Secretary must run a monthly survey of retail community pharmacies and applicable non-retail pharmacies to calculate national average drug acquisition cost benchmarks. Pharmacies that receive payments or fees tied to Medicaid covered outpatient drugs must respond, and failure to respond, false information, or other non-compliance can draw civil money penalties of up to $100,000 per violation.
Medicaid spread pricing ban after 18 months
For state contracts taking effect on or after 18 months after enactment, PBMs and managed care entities must use a transparent prescription drug pass-through pricing model. Payments are limited to ingredient cost plus a professional dispensing fee, must be passed through in their entirety to the dispensing pharmacy, and spread pricing is prohibited for federal matching payments.
Any willing pharmacy rules start January 1, 2028
For Medicare Part D plan years starting January 1, 2028, prescription drug plan sponsors must allow any pharmacy into the network if it meets standard contract terms. Those terms must be 'reasonable and relevant' under Secretary standards, with an HHS request for information due April 1, 2026, and final standards due the first Monday in April 2027.
Essential pharmacy access measured by 10, 2, and 1 miles
The bill defines an essential retail pharmacy using concrete distance thresholds: no other pharmacy within 10 miles in rural areas, 2 miles in suburban areas, or 1 mile in urban areas. The Secretary must publish biennial reports on access from 2028 through 2034.
PBM pay limited to flat-fee services
PBMs and their affiliates may not keep remuneration except bona fide service fees, which the bill defines as a flat dollar amount at fair market value and not contingent on drug price or rebates. Any prohibited remuneration must be disgorged to the prescription drug plan sponsor.
Annual PBM drug-level reporting begins July 1, 2028
Starting July 1, 2028, PBMs must submit annual reports to Medicare prescription drug plan sponsors and the Secretary with drug-specific data, including claims, dosage units, acquisition costs, rebates, and the percentage dispensed by affiliates. Plan sponsors also get the right to choose an auditor each year to review PBM compliance.
Who benefits from S. 3345?
Independent and community pharmacies
They could benefit from the Medicaid pass-through rule requiring payment of ingredient cost plus a professional dispensing fee and from the ban on spread pricing for federal matching payments. In Medicare Part D, they also gain any willing pharmacy protections beginning January 1, 2028, plus an allegation process and anti-retaliation protections.
State Medicaid programs
States would get detailed drug-by-drug reporting on ingredient costs, dispensing fees, and all remuneration from PBMs and managed care entities. That could make it easier to spot hidden spreads and compare payments against the monthly NADAC benchmark survey.
Medicare Part D plan sponsors
Plans gain stronger oversight tools over PBMs, including annual audit rights and mandatory annual PBM reports starting July 1, 2028. They also receive disgorged prohibited remuneration when PBMs or affiliates take money outside allowed bona fide service fees.
Patients in pharmacy deserts
People in areas with limited pharmacy access could benefit from the essential retail pharmacy framework, which flags locations where no other pharmacy exists within 10 miles in rural areas, 2 miles in suburban areas, or 1 mile in urban areas, with federal reporting from 2028 to 2034.
Who is affected by S. 3345?
Pharmacy benefit managers and their affiliates
They face the bill's toughest new rules: no spread pricing in covered Medicaid contracts after 18 months, limits to bona fide service fees only in Medicare Part D, annual reporting beginning July 1, 2028, possible disgorgement of prohibited remuneration, and annual audits chosen by plan sponsors.
Retail community pharmacies
These pharmacies would have to respond to the HHS monthly Medicaid price surveys if they receive payments or fees related to Medicaid covered outpatient drugs. Non-response, false information, or other non-compliance can lead to penalties of up to $100,000 per violation.
Applicable non-retail pharmacies
Licensed non-retail pharmacies such as mail or specialty pharmacies are brought into the monthly survey system, although the bill excludes nursing home, long-term care, hospital, clinic, charitable or not-for-profit, government, and low-dispensing pharmacies. Their survey requirements start later, on the first day of the first quarter beginning 18 months after enactment, and HHS must issue identifying guidance by January 1, 2027.
HHS, CMS, OIG, MedPAC, and GAO
Federal agencies would take on major implementation and oversight work. CMS gets $188,000,000 for the Program Management Account in FY 2026 and another $113,000,000 in FY 2026, OIG gets $5,000,000 in FY 2026 for studies plus $20,000,000 in FY 2026 for Medicare oversight, MedPAC gets $1,000,000 in FY 2026, and GAO must report on price-related compensation structures 2 years after enactment.
Cost & Funding
Authorization
$336,000,000 in specified FY 2026 funding, plus $9,000,000 for FY 2026 and each fiscal year thereafter
- $5,000,000 for FY 2026 to the HHS Office of Inspector General for Medicaid survey-related studies.
- $9,000,000 for FY 2026 and each fiscal year thereafter for administration of the monthly pharmacy survey.
- $188,000,000 to the CMS Program Management Account for FY 2026 for Medicare pharmacy access implementation.
- $113,000,000 to CMS for FY 2026 for PBM accountability work.
- $20,000,000 to OIG for FY 2026 for Medicare PBM oversight.
- $1,000,000 to MedPAC for FY 2026.
What Congress Is Saying
S. 3345 hasn't been debated on the floor yet.
This section updates when a legislator speaks about it on the floor or in committee.
S3345 Legislative Journey
Committee Action
Dec 4, 2025
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
About the Sponsor
Mike Crapo
Republican, ID · 33 years in Congress
Committees: Finance, Joint Committee on Taxation, Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs
View full profile →
Cosponsors (26)
This bill has 26 cosponsors: 12 Democrats, 14 Republicans, reflecting bipartisan support. Cosponsors represent 25 states: Colorado, Delaware, Georgia, and 22 more.
Ron Wyden
Democrat · OR
Chuck Grassley
Republican · IA
Michael Bennet
Democrat · CO
John Cornyn
Republican · TX
Mark Warner
Democrat · VA
John Thune
Republican · SD
Sheldon Whitehouse
Democrat · RI
Bill Cassidy
Republican · LA
Maggie Hassan
Democrat · NH
James Lankford
Republican · OK
Catherine Cortez Masto
Democrat · NV
Steve Daines
Republican · MT
Committee Sponsors
Finance Committee
22 of 27 committee members cosponsored
2 Republicans across this committee haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents
S. 3345 Quick Facts
- Committee
- Finance
- Chamber
- Senate
- Policy
- Health
- Introduced
- Dec 4, 2025
Read twice and Referred to Finance. for review
Dec 4, 2025
S. 3345 Common Questions
How much is the penalty if a pharmacy does not respond to the Medicaid drug price survey?
Under the PBM Price Transparency and Accountability Act, pharmacies can face civil money penalties of up to $100,000 per violation for not responding, giving false information, or other non-compliance (Section 2(a)(1)(H)).
Does the bill ban Medicaid PBM spread pricing?
Yes. Under the PBM Price Transparency and Accountability Act, spread pricing is barred for federal matching payments in Medicaid contracts that take effect on or after 18 months after enactment (Section 2(b)(3)).
What are the mileage rules for an essential retail pharmacy under Medicare Part D?
According to S. 3345 Section 3(a)(2), an essential retail pharmacy has no other pharmacy within 10 miles in rural areas, 2 miles in suburban areas, or 1 mile in urban areas.
Can any pharmacy join a Medicare Part D network under this bill?
Yes. Under the PBM Price Transparency and Accountability Act, for plan years starting January 1, 2028, Part D sponsors must allow any pharmacy in if it meets the plan's standard contract terms (Section 3(a)(1)).
How much CMS funding does the PBM Price Transparency and Accountability Act provide for enforcement in 2026?
According to S. 3345, CMS would receive $188,000,000 for Part D pharmacy access work and $113,000,000 for PBM accountability work in FY 2026 (Sections 3(a)(6) and 3(b)(1)(D)).
Does the bill require PBMs to report drug-level rebate and acquisition cost data to Medicare?
Yes. Starting July 1, 2028, PBMs must file annual reports with plan sponsors and HHS that include drug-specific claims, dosage units, acquisition costs, rebates, and affiliate dispensing percentages (Section 3(b)).
Can PBMs keep rebates or other price-linked compensation under the bill?
No. Under the PBM Price Transparency and Accountability Act, PBMs and affiliates may keep only bona fide service fees that are flat-dollar, fair-market-value payments not tied to drug price or rebates (Section 3(b)).
Can a Medicare Part D plan retaliate against a pharmacy for reporting unfair contract terms?
No. Under the PBM Price Transparency and Accountability Act, pharmacies may submit allegations starting January 1, 2028, and PDP sponsors cannot retaliate against or coerce them for doing so (Section 3(a)(3)).
Which non-retail pharmacies are included in the Medicaid drug price survey?
According to S. 3345 Section 2(a)(2), applicable non-retail pharmacies include state-licensed non-retail pharmacies such as mail or specialty pharmacies, but exclude nursing home, long-term care, hospital, clinic, charitable, government, and low-dispensing pharmacies.
Does the bill require HHS to publish Medicaid pharmacy survey response rates and pricing methodology every month?
Yes. Under the PBM Price Transparency and Accountability Act, HHS must publicly post monthly survey response rates, sampling methodology, and releasable price concession information (Section 2(a)(1)).
Based on S. 3345 bill text
S. 3345 Bill Text
“To amend titles XVIII and XIX of the Social Security Act to ensure accurate payments to pharmacies under Medicaid and prevent the use of abusive spread pricing in Medicaid, and to assure pharmacy access and choice for Medicare beneficiaries and modernize and ensure PBM accountability under Medicare. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1.”
Source: U.S. Government Publishing Office
Get notified when S. 3345 moves
Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.
Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.
Health Bills
9 related bills we're tracking
Give Kids a Chance Act of 2025
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Dec 1, 2025
Improving Seniors’ Timely Access to Care Act of 2025
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
May 20, 2025
CONNECT for Health Act of 2025
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Jun 26, 2025
Right to Contraception Act
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Feb 5, 2025
Medicare Patient Access and Practice Stabilization Act of 2025
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Jan 31, 2025
Chiropractic Medicare Coverage Modernization Act of 2025
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Jan 16, 2025
988 LGBTQ+ Youth Access Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Sep 17, 2025
Ensuring Lasting Smiles Act
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Education and Workforce, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
May 8, 2025
Pride In Mental Health Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Jun 5, 2025
Trending Right Now
Bills gaining momentum across Congress
Baltic Security Assessment Act of 2025
Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 41 - 3.
Apr 22, 2026
RESULTS Act
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Sep 10, 2025
Congressional Tribute to Constance Baker Motley Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Sep 11, 2025
Tracking Health in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.