H.R. 5457: Strengthening Agency Management and Oversight of Software Assets Act
Sponsor
Shontel Brown
Democrat · OH-11
Bill Progress
Latest Action · Dec 16, 2025
Passed the House, received in Senate
Why it matters
Federal agencies spend billions on software, and this bill responds to growing concern that the government often does not know exactly what it owns, uses, or overpays for.
H.R. 5457 would require federal agencies to do a much deeper review of their software holdings, contracts, licenses, and related cloud costs. The goal is simple: give agency leaders and Congress a clearer picture of what software is being bought, what is actually being used, and where agencies may be paying for duplicate, unused, or overly restrictive products. In practice, the bill is about better management, not flashy new technology.
The legislation expands existing software inventory requirements into something more rigorous. Agencies would have to examine not just what software they have, but also hidden or extra costs, license restrictions, interoperability problems, and whether purchases are being made in a fragmented way across offices. It also pushes agency leaders to think across the whole enterprise instead of letting individual bureaus buy software on their own without central review.
A major feature is the requirement that each agency create a modernization and consolidation plan based on its assessment. That means agencies would be expected to reduce waste, adopt more cost-effective buying strategies like enterprise licensing, and tighten internal approval for future software purchases. If carried out well, that could reduce duplicative spending and improve negotiating leverage with major software vendors.
The bill also builds in oversight. Agencies must send their assessments to OMB, GSA, the Government Accountability Office, and key congressional committees. Contractors can be used to help with the assessments, but the bill tries to avoid conflicts of interest by barring firms that are too entangled with the software they are reviewing. Intelligence agencies are mostly carved out from the regular definition of "agency," but the bill creates a separate, more protected assessment process for them in recognition of national security concerns.
What does H.R. 5457 do?
Agencies must do a full software review
Each agency's chief information officer must complete a comprehensive assessment of software the agency pays for, uses, or deploys within 18 months of enactment.
Reviews must include costs, contracts, and unused licenses
The assessment must identify software licenses, contracts, extra fees, cloud-related costs, duplicate purchases, and software that is paid for but not actually used.
Agencies must examine software restrictions
The bill requires agencies to list contract terms or license rules that limit how software can be used, such as restrictions tied to hardware, cloud providers, or access to agency data.
Modernization and consolidation plans are required
Using the assessment results, agencies must develop plans to combine software purchases, reduce waste, and adopt more cost-effective buying strategies across the whole agency.
Central approval for software buying gets stronger
The bill directs agencies to limit the ability of individual bureaus or components to buy or develop software without approval from the agency's chief information officer.
Congress and watchdogs get the results
Completed assessments must be sent to OMB, GSA, the Comptroller General, and congressional oversight committees, creating a formal pipeline for review and accountability.
Who benefits from H.R. 5457?
Taxpayers
They could benefit if agencies cut spending on duplicate, unused, or overpriced software licenses and negotiate smarter contracts.
Agency chief information officers
The bill gives them stronger authority and better data to manage software across the agency instead of reacting to scattered purchases.
Congressional oversight committees
They get more detailed information about agency software spending and compliance, making it easier to spot waste or weak management.
Agencies trying to modernize IT
They may gain a clearer roadmap for consolidating systems, improving interoperability, and reducing messy contract sprawl.
Who is affected by H.R. 5457?
Federal civilian agencies
They would face new review, reporting, and planning duties and may need to change how they buy, track, and approve software.
Agency bureaus and program offices
Their freedom to buy or build software on their own could be limited if chief information officers gain stronger approval authority.
Software vendors and cloud providers
They may face tougher scrutiny of pricing, license terms, add-on fees, and contract structures as agencies centralize purchasing decisions.
Federal contractors performing assessments
They may see new business opportunities, but the bill restricts firms with conflicts of interest and requires independent operations.
H.R. 5457 Common Questions
How long would federal agencies have to complete a full software inventory review under HR 5457?
Agencies would have 18 months after enactment to complete a comprehensive software assessment under H.R. 5457 Section 3(a).
Does HR 5457 require agencies to report unused or duplicate software licenses?
Yes. Under the Strengthening Agency Management and Oversight of Software Assets Act (Section 3), agencies must identify unused, duplicative, or unnecessary software.
Can federal agencies be required to disclose hidden cloud software costs under HR 5457?
Yes. According to H.R. 5457 Section 3, assessments must include additional fees and costs, including cloud-related costs not included in the initial contract price.
Does HR 5457 let agency bureaus buy software without CIO approval?
No. Under the Strengthening Agency Management and Oversight of Software Assets Act (Section 4), agencies must restrict sub-agency or bureau software acquisition without CIO and CAO approval.
What contract restrictions on software must agencies identify under HR 5457?
H.R. 5457 Section 3 requires agencies to list restrictive terms tied to hardware, cloud providers, or agency data ownership and access.
Can contractors that sell or manage software also audit an agency's software inventory under HR 5457?
Only if they avoid conflicts. Under H.R. 5457 Section 3, support contractors cannot have organizational conflicts of interest and must remain operationally independent from software inventory management.
Which federal offices would receive agency software assessment reports under HR 5457?
According to H.R. 5457 Section 3, completed assessments go to OMB, GSA, the Comptroller General, and congressional oversight committees within 30 days after the agency head receives them.
Are intelligence agencies exempt from the software assessment requirements in HR 5457?
Mostly yes from the standard agency definition, but they still face a separate assessment process that protects national security information under H.R. 5457 Section 3.
Does HR 5457 require agencies to train employees on software contract negotiation and license scaling?
Yes. Under the Strengthening Agency Management and Oversight of Software Assets Act (Section 4), agency plans must include employee training on contract negotiation, custom vs. commercial software, and license scaling.
Does HR 5457 authorize new funding for federal software oversight?
No. According to H.R. 5457 Section 6, no additional funds are authorized to be appropriated to carry out the Act.
Based on H.R. 5457 bill text
HR5457 Legislative Journey
Committee Action
Dec 16, 2025
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
House: Vote: 5862-5864
Dec 15, 2025
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H5862-5864)
House: Vote: 43-0
Dec 2, 2025
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 43 - 0.
House: Committee Action
Sep 18, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
About the Sponsor
Shontel Brown
Democrat, Ohio's 11th congressional district · 5 years in Congress
Committees: Agriculture, Oversight and Government Reform, House Select Committee on the Strategic Competition Between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party
View full profile →
Cosponsors (3)
This bill has 3 cosponsors: 1 Democrat, 2 Republicans, reflecting bipartisan support. Cosponsors represent 3 states: Maryland, South Carolina, Texas.
Committee Sponsors
Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee
0 of 15 committee members cosponsored
No committee members have cosponsored this bill
Oversight and Government Reform Committee
2 of 46 committee members cosponsored
28 Democrats across these committees haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents
H.R. 5457 Quick Facts
- Committee
- Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
- Chamber
- House
- Policy
- Government Operations and Politics
- Introduced
- Sep 18, 2025
Passed the House, received in Senate
Dec 16, 2025
Who is lobbying on H.R. 5457?
2 organizations lobbying on this bill
COUNCIL FOR CITIZENS AGAINST GOVERNMENT WASTE | 2 |
AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC | 1 |
Showing 1-2 of 2 organizations
H.R. 5457 Bill Text
“To improve the visibility, accountability, and oversight of agency software asset management practices, and for other purposes.”
Source: U.S. Government Publishing Office
Get notified when H.R. 5457 moves
Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.
Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.
Government Operations and Politics Bills
9 related bills we're tracking
Protect Our Letter Carriers Act of 2025
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Feb 6, 2025
Rights for the TSA Workforce Act
Referred to the Subcommittee on Transportation and Maritime Security.
Mar 11, 2025
Fair Pay for Federal Contractors Act of 2025
Referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Sep 30, 2025
SAVE Act
Received in the Senate.
Apr 10, 2025
Saving the Civil Service Act
ASSUMING FIRST SPONSORSHIP - Mr. Walkinshaw asked unanimous consent that he may hereafter be considered as the first sponsor of H.R. 492, a bill originally introduced by Representative Connolly, for the purpose of adding cosponsors and requesting reprintings pursuant to clause 7 of rule XII. Agreed to without objection.
Sep 16, 2025
Deceptive Practices and Voter Intimidation Prevention Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Aug 5, 2025
Designation of English as the Official Language of the United States Act of 2025
Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Mar 3, 2025
Deliver for Democracy Act
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Mar 14, 2025
Veterans Accessibility Advisory Committee Act of 2025
Message on House action received in Senate and at desk: House amendment to Senate bill.
Feb 12, 2026
Trending Right Now
Bills gaining momentum across Congress
Federal Extreme Risk Protection Order Act of 2026
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Feb 17, 2026
ALERT Act
Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Feb 20, 2026
Fair Housing for Survivors Act of 2026
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Mar 5, 2026
Tracking Government Operations and Politics in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.