Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to H. Res. 1099. While I unambiguously condemn the brutal, repressive Iranian regime, I will vote against this resolution because I fear it will be used as a pretext to support Trump's illegal war of choice. I oppose Trump's illegal war in Iran, which is killing U.S. servicemembers, destabilizing the Middle East, wasting billions of taxpayer dollars, and raising the price of gas, all while Americans are losing their healthcare.
H.Res. 1099: Reaffirming Iran remains the largest state sponsor of terrorism.
Sponsor
Brian Mast
Republican · FL-21
House doubles down on Iran terror label
Why it matters
It signals continued hardline U.S. pressure on Iran at a time of renewed concern over proxy attacks, assassination plots, and Tehran's nuclear activities.
H. Res. 1099 is a statement-of-position measure, not a bill that directly changes sanctions, spending, or criminal law. Its core purpose is simple: the House formally declares that Iran continues to be the largest state sponsor of terrorism. The text ties that conclusion to Iran's support for Hezbollah, Hamas, the Houthis, and other proxy groups, as well as to attacks that have killed Americans.
The resolution builds its case by listing a series of allegations and findings. It points to Pentagon estimates that Iranian-backed militias were responsible for the deaths of at least 603 U.S. service members in Iraq. It also references the January 2024 attack on Tower 22 in Jordan that killed three U.S. soldiers, describing it as an Iranian-backed proxy attack. The measure further accuses Tehran of backing assassination plots on U.S. soil and harboring senior al-Qaeda figures.
It also connects terrorism concerns to Iran's nuclear program. The text says Iran's refusal to abandon its nuclear and missile activities led to the reimposition of six U.N. Security Council resolutions in September 2025, and it cites IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi's concerns about Iran's uranium stockpile and lack of access to undeclared sites. That linkage matters because Congress is framing Iran not just as a regional proxy threat, but as a broader strategic danger.
In practical terms, the resolution is mostly about messaging, oversight, and political positioning. It can strengthen the case for future sanctions, military deterrence, diplomatic isolation, or tighter enforcement of existing Iran policy. It also puts members of Congress on the record, which can shape debate over Middle East policy, U.S. force protection, and any future negotiations with Tehran.
What to watch
Because this is a House resolution, the immediate question is whether it gains broader support and influences future sanctions or defense measures. Watch for follow-up legislation tying this declaration to tougher enforcement, aid restrictions, or new Iran-related penalties.
Bill Progress
Latest Action · Mar 5, 2026
Passed the House, received in Senate
How the House voted
Passed · March 5, 202653 Democrats broke with their party to vote no
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree: H RES 1099 Reaffirming Iran remains the largest state sponsor of terrorism · Roll no. 84 · Official record
H.Res. 1099 Bill Summary
What H.Res. 1099 actually does.
Declares Iran the top state sponsor of terrorism
The resolution states that it is U.S. policy that Iran remains the world's largest state sponsor of terrorism.
Cites support for proxy groups
It points to Iran's financial and military backing for Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis as key reasons for that conclusion.
Links Iran to American deaths
The measure highlights U.S. military casualties in Iraq and the 2024 Tower 22 attack in Jordan to argue that Iran-backed forces have killed Americans.
Calls out alleged plots on U.S. soil
It accuses the Iranian regime of being behind assassination plots targeting American citizens and government officials inside the United States.
Raises al-Qaeda safe haven concerns
The resolution says Tehran has allowed senior al-Qaeda leaders to operate from Iranian territory and raise funds.
Ties terror concerns to nuclear activity
It connects Iran's terrorism role to its nuclear and missile programs, citing U.N. action and IAEA concerns about uranium enrichment and blocked inspections.
Who benefits from H.Res. 1099?
Iran hawks in Congress
They gain a formal House statement supporting a tougher line on Iran and more pressure-based policy.
Families of U.S. service members and victims of attacks
They get public recognition from Congress that Iran and its proxies are being blamed for attacks that killed Americans.
U.S. national security advocates
They can use the resolution to support stronger deterrence, sanctions enforcement, and force-protection policies.
Regional partners opposed to Iran
Countries and governments threatened by Iran-backed groups may see this as a sign of continued U.S. political alignment with their security concerns.
Who is affected by H.Res. 1099?
Iranian government and state-linked entities
They face added political condemnation and a stronger basis for future sanctions or diplomatic isolation.
U.S. diplomats and negotiators
They may have less room politically to pursue engagement with Iran without facing criticism from Congress.
U.S. troops and personnel in the Middle East
The resolution keeps attention on threats from Iranian-backed groups and could shape future force protection decisions.
Humanitarian and business groups dealing with Iran
Even without new legal penalties, tougher political rhetoric can increase uncertainty around trade, aid delivery, and compliance risk.
What Congress Is Saying
H.Res. 1099 has come up 9 times in the Congressional Record so far.
Mr. Speaker, H. Res. 1099 is nothing more than a naked attempt to justify the war with Iran that the President has already started. I refuse to play their game and will vote NO. Last week, President Trump took our country into an illegal war with Iran—a war that the American people do not want and the Congress did not authorize. The President has claimed legal authority to take our country into a war with Iran by pointing to Iran as an imminent threat to the United States.

H.Res. 1099 also appeared in 2 more House floor references and 3 routine cosponsor filings.
HRES1099 Legislative Journey
House: Vote: 372-53
Mar 5, 2026
On motion to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 372 - 53, 2 Present (Roll no. 84).
House: Vote Held
Mar 4, 2026
At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.
About the Sponsor
Brian Mast
Republican, Florida's 21st congressional district · 9 years in Congress
Committees: Foreign Affairs, Transportation and Infrastructure
View full profile →
Cosponsors (2)
All 2 cosponsors are Republicans. Cosponsors represent 2 states: California, Indiana.
Committee Sponsors
27 Republicans across this committee haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents
H.Res. 1099 Quick Facts
- Committee
- Foreign Affairs
- Chamber
- House
- Policy
- International Affairs
- Introduced
- Mar 4, 2026
Passed the House, received in Senate
Mar 5, 2026
H.Res. 1099 Bill Text
“Reaffirming Iran remains the largest state sponsor of terrorism.”
Source: U.S. Government Publishing Office
Get notified when H.Res. 1099 moves
Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.
Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.
International Affairs Bills
9 related bills we're tracking
Enhanced Iran Sanctions Act of 2025
Motion to place bill on Consensus Calendar filed by Mr. Lawler.
Jan 12, 2026
United States-Israel Defense Partnership Act of 2025
Referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Feb 12, 2025
West Bank Violence Prevention Act of 2025
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Apr 28, 2025
Global Respect Act
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Nov 19, 2025
Sanctioning Russia Act of 2025
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committees on the Judiciary, Financial Services, Ways and Means, and Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Apr 1, 2025
International Human Rights Defense Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Nov 17, 2025
Global Health, Empowerment and Rights Act
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Jan 28, 2025
Pakistan Freedom and Accountability Act
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Sep 10, 2025
Baltic Security Assessment Act of 2025
Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 41 - 3.
Apr 22, 2026
Trending Right Now
Bills gaining momentum across Congress
North Platte Canteen Congressional Gold Medal Act
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Feb 21, 2025
Major Richard Star Act
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Nov 12, 2026
Ensuring Lasting Smiles Act
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Education and Workforce, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
May 8, 2025
Tracking International Affairs in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.