H.R. 995: No Tax Breaks for Outsourcing Act

Introduced Feb 5, 2025134 cosponsors

Sponsor

Lloyd Doggett

Lloyd Doggett

Democrat · TX-37

Bill Progress

IntroducedFeb 5
Committee 
Pass House 
Pass Senate 
Signed 
Law 

Latest Action · Feb 5, 2025

1/3

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

End the tax discount for offshore profits

5 min readLast updated April 25, 2026

Why it matters

Current tax law lets U.S. multinationals pay a lower rate on profits booked through foreign subsidiaries than on the same dollar earned at home. H.R. 995 — the No Tax Breaks for Outsourcing Act — would scrap the special deduction behind that gap, tax more foreign earnings each year, and force companies to do the math country by country. The bill carries 134 House cosponsors, all Democrats.

For most of the last decade, the U.S. tax code has charged a lower rate on profits earned overseas than on profits earned at home. The 2017 tax overhaul created a new category for foreign-subsidiary earnings and layered on a special deduction that effectively cut the rate well below the 21% domestic corporate rate. A similar discount applies to certain foreign-derived income earned by U.S. companies.

H.R. 995, the No Tax Breaks for Outsourcing Act, scraps that deduction outright. It also tightens the math two ways. First, it removes the rule that exempts a 'deemed return' on tangible foreign assets — a carve-out critics say rewards companies for placing plants and equipment overseas. Second, it forces multinationals to calculate offshore taxes country by country, rather than pooling high-tax and low-tax foreign income together to wash out the U.S. bill on the low-tax side.

H.R. 995 Bill Summary

What H.R. 995 actually does.

1

Tax more foreign profits each year

Replaces the current carve-out that exempts a deemed return on tangible foreign assets with full annual U.S. taxation of foreign-subsidiary earnings. More overseas income gets counted on U.S. returns each year.

2

End the special deduction on offshore income

Repeals the deduction that currently lets multinationals exclude part of their foreign-subsidiary earnings and foreign-derived intangible income from U.S. tax. The change pulls the effective rate up toward the 21% domestic corporate rate.

3

Calculate foreign tax credits country by country

Forces companies to compute foreign tax credits separately for each country a subsidiary operates in, instead of pooling high-tax and low-tax jurisdictions together. Removes the math that lets taxes paid in one country offset profits in another.

4

Cap interest deductions for international groups

U.S. members of international financial reporting groups with more than $100 million in average annual receipts can only deduct interest up to a percentage of the group's reported net interest expense. Disallowed interest can carry forward up to five years.

5

Tighten rules on corporate inversions

Treats a foreign-merged company as American for tax purposes if former U.S. owners keep more than 50% of the new entity, or if the merged firm is still managed primarily from the U.S. with at least 25% of jobs, payroll, assets, or income here.

6

Tax US-managed foreign corporations as domestic

Foreign corporations managed and controlled from the U.S., with at least $50 million in aggregate gross assets or publicly traded stock, get treated as domestic for tax purposes — closing a structure common in offshore hedge funds and investment vehicles.

Who benefits from H.R. 995?

U.S.-only businesses competing with multinationals

Companies that operate only in the United States already pay the full 21% corporate rate on every dollar of profit. Multinationals can pay a lower effective rate on offshore earnings under current rules. The bill levels that field.

Federal taxpayers

The bill is structured as a revenue raiser. The funds collected from multinationals would offset other spending or reduce the deficit, depending on how Congress uses the proceeds.

U.S. workers in industries facing offshoring

By making it more expensive to book profits abroad, supporters argue, the bill removes a tax incentive to relocate operations and jobs overseas. Economists are split on how strong that effect would be in practice.

Tax enforcement

Country-by-country reporting gives the IRS more granular data on how multinationals split income across jurisdictions — and removes the pooling techniques that complicate audits today.

Who is affected by H.R. 995?

Large U.S.-based multinationals

Tech, pharma, and consumer brands with substantial intellectual property booked through foreign subsidiaries face the biggest tax-rate increase. The Apples, Pfizers, and Googles of the world will likely lobby hard against the bill.

Companies using tax-haven subsidiaries

Firms with operations in Ireland, Bermuda, the Cayman Islands, or other low-tax jurisdictions lose the pooling techniques that let them blend foreign tax results. Each country gets its own math.

Offshore investment funds run from the U.S.

Hedge funds and private equity vehicles legally based in the Caymans or Bermuda but managed from New York or Connecticut would be treated as domestic if they hold $50 million or more in assets.

Corporate tax departments and outside counsel

Country-by-country reporting and the new interest-deduction cap require more detailed compliance. Tax positions taken under the 2017 rules would need to be restructured or refiled.

Share this story
On the Record

What Congress Is Saying

H.R. 995 hasn't been debated on the floor yet.

This section updates when a legislator speaks about it on the floor or in committee.

HR995 Legislative Journey

1 actions

House: Committee Action

Feb 5, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

About the Sponsor

Lloyd Doggett

Lloyd Doggett

Democrat, Texas's 37th congressional district · 31 years in Congress

Committees: Ways and Means, the Budget, Joint Committee on Taxation

View full profile →

Cosponsors (134)

No new cosponsors in 92 days — momentum stalled

All 134 cosponsors are Democrats. Cosponsors represent 34 states: Arizona, California, Colorado, and 31 more.

134Democrats·34 states

Cosponsor Coverage Map

Committee Sponsors

Ways and Means Committee

19D26R
|10 signed35 not yet

10 of 45 committee members cosponsored

9 Democrats across this committee haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents

H.R. 995 Quick Facts

Cosponsors
134
Alma Adams
Yassamin Ansari
Becca Balint
Nanette Barragán
Joyce Beatty
+129 more
Committee
Ways and Means
Chamber
House
Policy
Taxation
Introduced
Feb 5, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

Feb 5, 2025

Constituent Resources

Get notified when this bill moves

Official Sources

H.R. 995 on Congress.gov

Official Congress.gov page for the No Tax Breaks for Outsourcing Act, including bill text, cosponsors, and committee status.

26 U.S.C. § 951A — Net CFC tested income (GILTI)

Section 2 of H.R. 995 rewrites this statute, renaming GILTI to 'net CFC tested income' and removing the deemed-return carve-out for tangible foreign assets.

26 U.S.C. § 904 — Limitation on foreign tax credit

Section 3 amends this provision to require country-by-country foreign tax credit calculations instead of pooling income across jurisdictions.

26 U.S.C. § 7874 — Rules relating to expatriated entities (inversions)

Section 5 of H.R. 995 tightens this anti-inversion statute, lowering the threshold and adding a management-and-control test.

26 U.S.C. § 7701 — Internal Revenue Code definitions

Section 6 amends Section 7701 to treat foreign corporations managed and controlled in the U.S. with $50M+ in assets as domestic corporations.

IRS Form 8993 — Section 250 Deduction (FDII and GILTI)

The Section 250 deduction this form calculates is the special offshore-income discount that H.R. 995 repeals outright.

IRS Form 8992 — GILTI Calculation

The form U.S. shareholders of controlled foreign corporations use to compute GILTI inclusions under Section 951A — the regime H.R. 995 overhauls.

IRS Form 1118 — Foreign Tax Credit for Corporations

Corporations use this form to compute foreign tax credits — H.R. 995 forces this calculation to be done separately for each country.

H.R. 995 Common Questions

What does H.R. 995, the No Tax Breaks for Outsourcing Act, do?

It rewrites the corporate tax code to raise the U.S. tax bill on profits booked through foreign subsidiaries, end a deduction that lowers that bill, force country-by-country foreign tax credit calculations, and tighten rules on corporate inversions. The goal, sponsors say, is to remove tax incentives for shifting profits and operations overseas.

Does H.R. 995 repeal GILTI?

Not exactly. It renames Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income (GILTI) to 'net CFC tested income' and eliminates the carve-out that exempts a deemed return on tangible foreign assets. It also repeals the special deduction that lowered the effective tax rate on this income — pulling the rate up toward the 21% domestic corporate rate.

How does country-by-country tax reporting work under this bill?

Right now, multinationals can pool foreign income from high-tax and low-tax countries when calculating the U.S. tax bill — letting taxes paid in one country offset profits in another. H.R. 995 forces a separate calculation for each country, so a low-tax jurisdiction can't be cushioned by taxes paid elsewhere.

Will H.R. 995 raise corporate taxes?

Yes, for multinationals with foreign subsidiaries. The bill ends preferential treatment for offshore earnings and removes deductions tied to certain foreign income. Domestic-only U.S. companies wouldn't see a tax change. Sponsors describe it as a revenue raiser, though no Congressional Budget Office score has been published for this version.

What is a corporate inversion, and how does H.R. 995 change the rules?

An inversion is when a U.S. company merges with a smaller foreign firm and reincorporates abroad to lower its U.S. tax bill — Burger King's 2014 Tim Hortons deal is a famous example. H.R. 995 expands the rules: a foreign-merged company is treated as American if former U.S. owners keep more than 50% of the new entity, or if it's still managed primarily from the U.S. with at least 25% of jobs, payroll, assets, or income here.

When would these tax changes take effect?

Most of the bill applies to tax years beginning after December 31, 2024 — meaning if it became law, the changes would be retroactive to 2025 returns. The provision treating foreign corporations 'managed and controlled' in the U.S. as domestic kicks in two years after enactment.

Does H.R. 995 affect Puerto Rico and other U.S. territories?

Yes. For the country-by-country foreign tax credit math, the bill treats Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Northern Mariana Islands as separate jurisdictions — each with its own foreign tax credit math. That can change how multinationals book operations in the territories.

Does H.R. 995 have any Republican support?

No. All 134 cosponsors are Democrats. Sponsor Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas) has introduced versions of this bill for years. With Republicans controlling the House Ways and Means Committee — where the bill was referred in February 2025 — it has no scheduled hearing or markup in this Congress.

Based on H.R. 995 bill text

H.R. 995 Bill Text

PDF

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for current year inclusion of net CFC tested income, and for other purposes.

Source: U.S. Government Publishing Office

Bill Alerts

Get notified when H.R. 995 moves

Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.

Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.

Trending Right Now

Bills gaining momentum across Congress

Tracking Taxation in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.