H.R. 995: No Tax Breaks for Outsourcing Act
Sponsor
Lloyd Doggett
Democrat · TX-37
Bill Progress
Latest Action · Feb 5, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
End the tax discount for offshore profits
Why it matters
Current tax law lets U.S. multinationals pay a lower rate on profits booked through foreign subsidiaries than on the same dollar earned at home. H.R. 995 — the No Tax Breaks for Outsourcing Act — would scrap the special deduction behind that gap, tax more foreign earnings each year, and force companies to do the math country by country. The bill carries 134 House cosponsors, all Democrats.
For most of the last decade, the U.S. tax code has charged a lower rate on profits earned overseas than on profits earned at home. The 2017 tax overhaul created a new category for foreign-subsidiary earnings and layered on a special deduction that effectively cut the rate well below the 21% domestic corporate rate. A similar discount applies to certain foreign-derived income earned by U.S. companies.
H.R. 995, the No Tax Breaks for Outsourcing Act, scraps that deduction outright. It also tightens the math two ways. First, it removes the rule that exempts a 'deemed return' on tangible foreign assets — a carve-out critics say rewards companies for placing plants and equipment overseas. Second, it forces multinationals to calculate offshore taxes country by country, rather than pooling high-tax and low-tax foreign income together to wash out the U.S. bill on the low-tax side.
The bill also tightens three back-end rules. It caps interest deductions for U.S. members of international groups that report more than $100 million in average annual receipts. It hardens the rules on corporate inversions — the maneuver where a U.S. firm reincorporates abroad by merging with a smaller foreign company — by adding a stricter test that catches deals where former U.S. owners keep more than 50% or where the merged firm is still managed from the U.S. And it treats foreign corporations 'managed and controlled' from the United States, with at least $50 million in assets, as domestic for tax purposes — closing a structure common in offshore investment funds.
The sponsor is Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas). The bill carries 134 House cosponsors, all Democrats, and is endorsed by the Congressional Labor Caucus. With Republicans controlling the House Ways and Means Committee, the bill is unlikely to advance on its own — but its provisions are the kind of revenue-raisers Democrats often push to fold into broader tax packages.
H.R. 995 Bill Summary
What H.R. 995 actually does.
Tax more foreign profits each year
Replaces the current carve-out that exempts a deemed return on tangible foreign assets with full annual U.S. taxation of foreign-subsidiary earnings. More overseas income gets counted on U.S. returns each year.
End the special deduction on offshore income
Repeals the deduction that currently lets multinationals exclude part of their foreign-subsidiary earnings and foreign-derived intangible income from U.S. tax. The change pulls the effective rate up toward the 21% domestic corporate rate.
Calculate foreign tax credits country by country
Forces companies to compute foreign tax credits separately for each country a subsidiary operates in, instead of pooling high-tax and low-tax jurisdictions together. Removes the math that lets taxes paid in one country offset profits in another.
Cap interest deductions for international groups
U.S. members of international financial reporting groups with more than $100 million in average annual receipts can only deduct interest up to a percentage of the group's reported net interest expense. Disallowed interest can carry forward up to five years.
Tighten rules on corporate inversions
Treats a foreign-merged company as American for tax purposes if former U.S. owners keep more than 50% of the new entity, or if the merged firm is still managed primarily from the U.S. with at least 25% of jobs, payroll, assets, or income here.
Tax US-managed foreign corporations as domestic
Foreign corporations managed and controlled from the U.S., with at least $50 million in aggregate gross assets or publicly traded stock, get treated as domestic for tax purposes — closing a structure common in offshore hedge funds and investment vehicles.
Who benefits from H.R. 995?
U.S.-only businesses competing with multinationals
Companies that operate only in the United States already pay the full 21% corporate rate on every dollar of profit. Multinationals can pay a lower effective rate on offshore earnings under current rules. The bill levels that field.
Federal taxpayers
The bill is structured as a revenue raiser. The funds collected from multinationals would offset other spending or reduce the deficit, depending on how Congress uses the proceeds.
U.S. workers in industries facing offshoring
By making it more expensive to book profits abroad, supporters argue, the bill removes a tax incentive to relocate operations and jobs overseas. Economists are split on how strong that effect would be in practice.
Tax enforcement
Country-by-country reporting gives the IRS more granular data on how multinationals split income across jurisdictions — and removes the pooling techniques that complicate audits today.
Who is affected by H.R. 995?
Large U.S.-based multinationals
Tech, pharma, and consumer brands with substantial intellectual property booked through foreign subsidiaries face the biggest tax-rate increase. The Apples, Pfizers, and Googles of the world will likely lobby hard against the bill.
Companies using tax-haven subsidiaries
Firms with operations in Ireland, Bermuda, the Cayman Islands, or other low-tax jurisdictions lose the pooling techniques that let them blend foreign tax results. Each country gets its own math.
Offshore investment funds run from the U.S.
Hedge funds and private equity vehicles legally based in the Caymans or Bermuda but managed from New York or Connecticut would be treated as domestic if they hold $50 million or more in assets.
Corporate tax departments and outside counsel
Country-by-country reporting and the new interest-deduction cap require more detailed compliance. Tax positions taken under the 2017 rules would need to be restructured or refiled.
What Congress Is Saying
H.R. 995 hasn't been debated on the floor yet.
This section updates when a legislator speaks about it on the floor or in committee.
HR995 Legislative Journey
House: Committee Action
Feb 5, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
About the Sponsor
Lloyd Doggett
Democrat, Texas's 37th congressional district · 31 years in Congress
Committees: Ways and Means, the Budget, Joint Committee on Taxation
View full profile →
Cosponsors (134)
All 134 cosponsors are Democrats. Cosponsors represent 34 states: Arizona, California, Colorado, and 31 more.
Alma Adams
Democrat · NC
Yassamin Ansari
Democrat · AZ
Becca Balint
Democrat · VT
Nanette Barragán
Democrat · CA
Joyce Beatty
Democrat · OH
Sanford Bishop
Democrat · GA
Suzanne Bonamici
Democrat · OR
Brendan Boyle
Democrat · PA
Shontel Brown
Democrat · OH
Julia Brownley
Democrat · CA
Nikki Budzinski
Democrat · IL
André Carson
Democrat · IN
Cosponsor Coverage Map
Committee Sponsors
Ways and Means Committee
10 of 45 committee members cosponsored
9 Democrats across this committee haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents
H.R. 995 Quick Facts
- Committee
- Ways and Means
- Chamber
- House
- Policy
- Taxation
- Introduced
- Feb 5, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Feb 5, 2025
Official Sources
Official Congress.gov page for the No Tax Breaks for Outsourcing Act, including bill text, cosponsors, and committee status.
Section 2 of H.R. 995 rewrites this statute, renaming GILTI to 'net CFC tested income' and removing the deemed-return carve-out for tangible foreign assets.
Section 3 amends this provision to require country-by-country foreign tax credit calculations instead of pooling income across jurisdictions.
Section 5 of H.R. 995 tightens this anti-inversion statute, lowering the threshold and adding a management-and-control test.
Section 6 amends Section 7701 to treat foreign corporations managed and controlled in the U.S. with $50M+ in assets as domestic corporations.
The Section 250 deduction this form calculates is the special offshore-income discount that H.R. 995 repeals outright.
The form U.S. shareholders of controlled foreign corporations use to compute GILTI inclusions under Section 951A — the regime H.R. 995 overhauls.
Corporations use this form to compute foreign tax credits — H.R. 995 forces this calculation to be done separately for each country.
H.R. 995 Common Questions
What does H.R. 995, the No Tax Breaks for Outsourcing Act, do?
It rewrites the corporate tax code to raise the U.S. tax bill on profits booked through foreign subsidiaries, end a deduction that lowers that bill, force country-by-country foreign tax credit calculations, and tighten rules on corporate inversions. The goal, sponsors say, is to remove tax incentives for shifting profits and operations overseas.
Does H.R. 995 repeal GILTI?
Not exactly. It renames Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income (GILTI) to 'net CFC tested income' and eliminates the carve-out that exempts a deemed return on tangible foreign assets. It also repeals the special deduction that lowered the effective tax rate on this income — pulling the rate up toward the 21% domestic corporate rate.
How does country-by-country tax reporting work under this bill?
Right now, multinationals can pool foreign income from high-tax and low-tax countries when calculating the U.S. tax bill — letting taxes paid in one country offset profits in another. H.R. 995 forces a separate calculation for each country, so a low-tax jurisdiction can't be cushioned by taxes paid elsewhere.
Will H.R. 995 raise corporate taxes?
Yes, for multinationals with foreign subsidiaries. The bill ends preferential treatment for offshore earnings and removes deductions tied to certain foreign income. Domestic-only U.S. companies wouldn't see a tax change. Sponsors describe it as a revenue raiser, though no Congressional Budget Office score has been published for this version.
What is a corporate inversion, and how does H.R. 995 change the rules?
An inversion is when a U.S. company merges with a smaller foreign firm and reincorporates abroad to lower its U.S. tax bill — Burger King's 2014 Tim Hortons deal is a famous example. H.R. 995 expands the rules: a foreign-merged company is treated as American if former U.S. owners keep more than 50% of the new entity, or if it's still managed primarily from the U.S. with at least 25% of jobs, payroll, assets, or income here.
When would these tax changes take effect?
Most of the bill applies to tax years beginning after December 31, 2024 — meaning if it became law, the changes would be retroactive to 2025 returns. The provision treating foreign corporations 'managed and controlled' in the U.S. as domestic kicks in two years after enactment.
Does H.R. 995 affect Puerto Rico and other U.S. territories?
Yes. For the country-by-country foreign tax credit math, the bill treats Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Northern Mariana Islands as separate jurisdictions — each with its own foreign tax credit math. That can change how multinationals book operations in the territories.
Does H.R. 995 have any Republican support?
No. All 134 cosponsors are Democrats. Sponsor Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas) has introduced versions of this bill for years. With Republicans controlling the House Ways and Means Committee — where the bill was referred in February 2025 — it has no scheduled hearing or markup in this Congress.
Based on H.R. 995 bill text
H.R. 995 Bill Text
“To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for current year inclusion of net CFC tested income, and for other purposes.”
Source: U.S. Government Publishing Office
Get notified when H.R. 995 moves
Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.
Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.
Taxation Bills
9 related bills we're tracking
Affordable Housing Credit Improvement Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Apr 8, 2025
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the railroad track maintenance credit.
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Jan 16, 2025
Military Spouse Hiring Act
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Mar 11, 2025
More Homes on the Market Act
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Feb 13, 2025
American Innovation and R&D Competitiveness Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Mar 10, 2025
Credit for Caring Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Mar 11, 2025
Revitalizing Downtowns and Main Streets Act
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Mar 27, 2025
Billionaires Income Tax Act
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Sep 17, 2025
Educators Expense Deduction Modernization Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Feb 6, 2025
Trending Right Now
Bills gaining momentum across Congress
Congressional Tribute to Constance Baker Motley Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Sep 11, 2025
RESULTS Act
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Sep 10, 2025
Protecting Privacy in Purchases Act
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 447.
Feb 25, 2026
Tracking Taxation in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.