H.R. 7871: MVP Act
Sponsor
Brett Guthrie
Republican · KY-2
Bill Progress
Latest Action · Mar 9, 2026
Referred to Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. for review
Why it matters
This matters now because H.R. 7871 would force federal health agencies to rewrite key Medicaid and Medicare drug-pricing rules within 180 days of enactment, potentially changing how states pay for high-cost drugs almost immediately.
H.R. 7871, the "Medicaid VBPs for Patients Act" or "MVP Act," is a targeted health bill aimed at one problem: how Medicaid handles value-based purchasing, or deals where the final price of a drug depends on whether a patient hits defined health outcomes. The bill would let manufacturers report multiple Medicaid best prices for the same dosage form and strength of a drug under a value-based purchasing arrangement, as long as the arrangement is offered to all States. That is a significant change because current best-price rules can discourage outcome-based contracts for very expensive drugs, especially one-time therapies like rare disease gene therapies mentioned in the bill's GAO study mandate.
The bill also rewrites technical pricing rules. For Average Manufacturer Price, or AMP, it says calculations for covered outpatient drugs under value-based purchasing arrangements must include refunds, rebates, reimbursements, free goods, or withholding or reduction of payments when a patient fails to achieve defined outcomes. For installment-payment deals, it says the price must be treated as if the full aggregate price were paid in the first installment during the rebate period. On the Medicare side, Section 3 says ASP calculations for drugs or biologicals sold under a value-based purchasing arrangement must exclude any amount that is excluded from AMP when the manufacturer has elected to include multiple best price points.
The measure is also a deadlines bill. The Secretary of Health and Human Services must implement the Medicaid pricing amendments in Section 2(b) through rulemaking within 180 days of enactment. The same 180-day deadline applies to HHS guidance for State Medicaid agencies on value-based purchasing for inpatient drugs and to rulemaking by the HHS Office of Inspector General for the anti-kickback exception. That speed matters because it means the practical impact would depend less on future congressional action and more on how quickly HHS and OIG write the rules.
Another important piece is legal protection. The bill creates a statutory exception under the Anti-Kickback Statute for remuneration from a manufacturer, or a third party acting on the manufacturer's behalf, to a State under a value-based purchasing arrangement when a patient fails to achieve defined outcomes. That could reduce legal risk for these contracts. Finally, the Government Accountability Office, through the Comptroller General, would have to study the effects on patient access, socioeconomic disparities, the Medicaid drug rebate program, the 340B program, Medicare Part B, State Medicaid spending, and drug prices in non-participating States, with a report due to Congress by June 30, 2029.
What does H.R. 7871 do?
Multiple Medicaid best prices for one drug
The bill lets a manufacturer report multiple Medicaid best price points for a single dosage form and strength of a drug under a value-based purchasing arrangement, but only if that arrangement is offered to all States. This change is in Section 2(a)(1)(D).
180-day HHS rulemaking on AMP changes
The Secretary of Health and Human Services must issue rulemaking within 180 days of enactment to implement new Average Manufacturer Price rules in Section 2(b). Those AMP calculations must include refunds, rebates, reimbursements, free goods, and payment reductions or withheld payments triggered when a patient fails to achieve defined outcomes.
Installment deals treated as full upfront price
For a value-based purchasing arrangement that uses installment payments, the bill says the price is calculated as if the full aggregate price were paid in the first installment during the rebate period. That prevents manufacturers from spreading the reported price across multiple payment periods.
Medicare ASP exclusion tied to AMP rule
Section 3 says that for drugs or biologicals sold under a value-based purchasing arrangement, a manufacturer's Average Sales Price calculation must exclude any amount excluded from AMP under Section 1927(k)(1)(B)(i)(IX), but only when the manufacturer elected to include multiple best price points.
180-day guidance for inpatient drug payments
Within 180 days of enactment, the HHS Secretary must issue guidance to State Medicaid agencies on value-based purchasing arrangements for drugs and biologicals provided during inpatient hospital services when the drug is reimbursed directly rather than folded into the inpatient hospital payment. The guidance must also explain how multiple States can transfer funds so a patient is treated as if they received the drug in their home state.
Anti-kickback safe harbor plus 2029 GAO report
The bill creates an Anti-Kickback Statute exception for remuneration paid by a manufacturer, or a third party on the manufacturer's behalf, to a State when a patient fails to achieve defined outcomes under a value-based purchasing arrangement, and the HHS Inspector General must implement it by rulemaking within 180 days. It also orders the Comptroller General to report to Congress by June 30, 2029 on impacts including patient access, rare disease gene therapies, the 340B program, Medicare Part B, State Medicaid expenditures, and prices in non-participating States.
Who benefits from H.R. 7871?
State Medicaid agencies
States could get clearer legal and pricing rules for outcome-based drug contracts, including HHS guidance due within 180 days on inpatient drugs and interstate fund-transfer agreements so patients can be treated as if care occurred in their state of residence.
Patients needing high-cost or rare disease therapies
Patients could gain access to more value-based purchasing arrangements for expensive treatments, including rare disease gene therapies specifically named in the GAO study, because manufacturers would be allowed to use multiple best price points for the same dosage form and strength if offered to all States.
Drug manufacturers
Manufacturers get more flexibility to structure value-based purchasing arrangements, including the ability to report multiple best prices, treat these arrangements as bundled sales, and rely on a statutory Anti-Kickback Statute exception when payments to States are triggered by patients failing to achieve defined outcomes.
Federal policymakers and oversight bodies
Congress, HHS, and GAO would get a clearer data trail and formal review timeline, including mandatory HHS and OIG rulemaking within 180 days and a Comptroller General report to Congress by June 30, 2029.
Who is affected by H.R. 7871?
Department of Health and Human Services
HHS would face multiple implementation duties, including Section 2(b) rulemaking within 180 days and separate guidance within 180 days for State Medicaid agencies on inpatient drug value-based purchasing arrangements.
HHS Office of Inspector General
The Inspector General would have to write rules within 180 days of enactment to implement the new Anti-Kickback Statute exception covering remuneration paid to a State when a patient misses defined outcomes.
Medicare Part B payment system
Medicare ASP calculations would change because Section 3 requires manufacturers to exclude certain amounts from ASP when those amounts are also excluded from AMP for drugs or biologicals sold under a value-based purchasing arrangement with multiple best price points.
States that do not join these arrangements
Non-participating States could still feel spillover effects, because the GAO study must examine drug prices in non-participating States as part of the report due by June 30, 2029.
HR7871 Legislative Journey
House: Committee Action
Mar 9, 2026
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
About the Sponsor
Brett Guthrie
Republican, Kentucky's 2nd congressional district · 17 years in Congress
Committees: Energy and Commerce
View full profile →
Cosponsors (5)
This bill has 5 cosponsors: 3 Democrats, 2 Republicans, reflecting bipartisan support. Cosponsors represent 5 states: California, Iowa, Massachusetts, and 2 more.
Committee Sponsors
Ways and Means Committee
0 of 45 committee members cosponsored
No committee members have cosponsored this bill
Energy and Commerce Committee
4 of 54 committee members cosponsored
54 Republicans across these committees haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents
What laws does H.R. 7871 change?
1 changes
Sections Amended
Section 1927(k) of Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396r-8(k))
adding at the end the following paragraph: ``(12) Value-based purchasing arrangement
H.R. 7871 Quick Facts
- Committee
- Ways and Means
- Chamber
- House
- Policy
- Health
- Introduced
- Mar 9, 2026
Referred to Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. for review
Mar 9, 2026
Full Bill Text
Get notified when H.R. 7871 moves
Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.
Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.
Health Bills
9 related bills we're tracking
Give Kids a Chance Act of 2025
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Dec 1, 2025
Improving Seniors’ Timely Access to Care Act of 2025
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
May 20, 2025
CONNECT for Health Act of 2025
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Jun 26, 2025
Right to Contraception Act
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Feb 5, 2025
Medicare Patient Access and Practice Stabilization Act of 2025
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Jan 31, 2025
Chiropractic Medicare Coverage Modernization Act of 2025
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Jan 16, 2025
988 LGBTQ+ Youth Access Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Sep 17, 2025
Ensuring Lasting Smiles Act
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Education and Workforce, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
May 8, 2025
Pride In Mental Health Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Jun 5, 2025
Trending Right Now
Bills gaining momentum across Congress
Federal Extreme Risk Protection Order Act of 2026
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Feb 17, 2026
ALERT Act
Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Feb 20, 2026
Fair Housing for Survivors Act of 2026
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Mar 5, 2026
Tracking Health in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.