H.R. 7871: MVP Act

Introduced Mar 9, 20265 cosponsors

Sponsor

Brett Guthrie

Brett Guthrie

Republican · KY-2

Bill Progress

IntroducedMar 9
Committee 
Pass House 
Pass Senate 
Signed 
Law 

Latest Action · Mar 9, 2026

1/3

Referred to Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. for review

Medicaid drug pricing rules get rewrite

Why it matters

This matters now because H.R. 7871 would force federal health agencies to rewrite key Medicaid and Medicare drug-pricing rules within 180 days of enactment, potentially changing how states pay for high-cost drugs almost immediately.

H.R. 7871, the "Medicaid VBPs for Patients Act" or "MVP Act," is a targeted health bill aimed at one problem: how Medicaid handles value-based purchasing, or deals where the final price of a drug depends on whether a patient hits defined health outcomes. The bill would let manufacturers report multiple Medicaid best prices for the same dosage form and strength of a drug under a value-based purchasing arrangement, as long as the arrangement is offered to all States. That is a significant change because current best-price rules can discourage outcome-based contracts for very expensive drugs, especially one-time therapies like rare disease gene therapies mentioned in the bill's GAO study mandate.

The bill also rewrites technical pricing rules. For Average Manufacturer Price, or AMP, it says calculations for covered outpatient drugs under value-based purchasing arrangements must include refunds, rebates, reimbursements, free goods, or withholding or reduction of payments when a patient fails to achieve defined outcomes. For installment-payment deals, it says the price must be treated as if the full aggregate price were paid in the first installment during the rebate period. On the Medicare side, Section 3 says ASP calculations for drugs or biologicals sold under a value-based purchasing arrangement must exclude any amount that is excluded from AMP when the manufacturer has elected to include multiple best price points.

What does H.R. 7871 do?

1

Multiple Medicaid best prices for one drug

The bill lets a manufacturer report multiple Medicaid best price points for a single dosage form and strength of a drug under a value-based purchasing arrangement, but only if that arrangement is offered to all States. This change is in Section 2(a)(1)(D).

2

180-day HHS rulemaking on AMP changes

The Secretary of Health and Human Services must issue rulemaking within 180 days of enactment to implement new Average Manufacturer Price rules in Section 2(b). Those AMP calculations must include refunds, rebates, reimbursements, free goods, and payment reductions or withheld payments triggered when a patient fails to achieve defined outcomes.

3

Installment deals treated as full upfront price

For a value-based purchasing arrangement that uses installment payments, the bill says the price is calculated as if the full aggregate price were paid in the first installment during the rebate period. That prevents manufacturers from spreading the reported price across multiple payment periods.

4

Medicare ASP exclusion tied to AMP rule

Section 3 says that for drugs or biologicals sold under a value-based purchasing arrangement, a manufacturer's Average Sales Price calculation must exclude any amount excluded from AMP under Section 1927(k)(1)(B)(i)(IX), but only when the manufacturer elected to include multiple best price points.

5

180-day guidance for inpatient drug payments

Within 180 days of enactment, the HHS Secretary must issue guidance to State Medicaid agencies on value-based purchasing arrangements for drugs and biologicals provided during inpatient hospital services when the drug is reimbursed directly rather than folded into the inpatient hospital payment. The guidance must also explain how multiple States can transfer funds so a patient is treated as if they received the drug in their home state.

6

Anti-kickback safe harbor plus 2029 GAO report

The bill creates an Anti-Kickback Statute exception for remuneration paid by a manufacturer, or a third party on the manufacturer's behalf, to a State when a patient fails to achieve defined outcomes under a value-based purchasing arrangement, and the HHS Inspector General must implement it by rulemaking within 180 days. It also orders the Comptroller General to report to Congress by June 30, 2029 on impacts including patient access, rare disease gene therapies, the 340B program, Medicare Part B, State Medicaid expenditures, and prices in non-participating States.

Who benefits from H.R. 7871?

State Medicaid agencies

States could get clearer legal and pricing rules for outcome-based drug contracts, including HHS guidance due within 180 days on inpatient drugs and interstate fund-transfer agreements so patients can be treated as if care occurred in their state of residence.

Patients needing high-cost or rare disease therapies

Patients could gain access to more value-based purchasing arrangements for expensive treatments, including rare disease gene therapies specifically named in the GAO study, because manufacturers would be allowed to use multiple best price points for the same dosage form and strength if offered to all States.

Drug manufacturers

Manufacturers get more flexibility to structure value-based purchasing arrangements, including the ability to report multiple best prices, treat these arrangements as bundled sales, and rely on a statutory Anti-Kickback Statute exception when payments to States are triggered by patients failing to achieve defined outcomes.

Federal policymakers and oversight bodies

Congress, HHS, and GAO would get a clearer data trail and formal review timeline, including mandatory HHS and OIG rulemaking within 180 days and a Comptroller General report to Congress by June 30, 2029.

Who is affected by H.R. 7871?

Department of Health and Human Services

HHS would face multiple implementation duties, including Section 2(b) rulemaking within 180 days and separate guidance within 180 days for State Medicaid agencies on inpatient drug value-based purchasing arrangements.

HHS Office of Inspector General

The Inspector General would have to write rules within 180 days of enactment to implement the new Anti-Kickback Statute exception covering remuneration paid to a State when a patient misses defined outcomes.

Medicare Part B payment system

Medicare ASP calculations would change because Section 3 requires manufacturers to exclude certain amounts from ASP when those amounts are also excluded from AMP for drugs or biologicals sold under a value-based purchasing arrangement with multiple best price points.

States that do not join these arrangements

Non-participating States could still feel spillover effects, because the GAO study must examine drug prices in non-participating States as part of the report due by June 30, 2029.

HR7871 Legislative Journey

1 actions

House: Committee Action

Mar 9, 2026

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

About the Sponsor

Brett Guthrie

Brett Guthrie

Republican, Kentucky's 2nd congressional district · 17 years in Congress

Committees: Energy and Commerce

View full profile →

Cosponsors (5)

This bill gained 5 cosponsors in the last 30 days

This bill has 5 cosponsors: 3 Democrats, 2 Republicans, reflecting bipartisan support. Cosponsors represent 5 states: California, Iowa, Massachusetts, and 2 more.

3Democrats2Republicans·5 statesBipartisan

Committee Sponsors

Ways and Means Committee

19D26R
|0 signed45 not yet

0 of 45 committee members cosponsored

No committee members have cosponsored this bill

Energy and Commerce Committee

24D30R
|4 signed50 not yet

4 of 54 committee members cosponsored

54 Republicans across these committees haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents

What laws does H.R. 7871 change?

1 changes

Full Text

Sections Amended

Section 1927(k) of Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396r-8(k))

adding at the end the following paragraph: ``(12) Value-based purchasing arrangement

Full Bill Text

Full text available on Congress.gov
Bill Alerts

Get notified when H.R. 7871 moves

Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.

Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.

Health Bills

9 related bills we're tracking

View all
H.R. 1262

Give Kids a Chance Act of 2025

Michael McCaul
Michael McCaulR-TX
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+309
313 cosponsors

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Dec 1, 2025

HouseHealth
H.R. 3514

Improving Seniors’ Timely Access to Care Act of 2025

Mike Kelly
Mike KellyR-PA
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+254
258 cosponsors
+4 this month

Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

May 20, 2025

HouseHealth
H.R. 4206Surging+10

CONNECT for Health Act of 2025

Mike Thompson
Mike ThompsonD-CA
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+223
227 cosponsors
+10 this month

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Jun 26, 2025

HouseHealth
H.R. 999

Right to Contraception Act

Lizzie Fletcher
Lizzie FletcherD-TX
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+202
206 cosponsors
+1 this month

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Feb 5, 2025

HouseHealth
H.R. 879

Medicare Patient Access and Practice Stabilization Act of 2025

Gregory Murphy
Gregory MurphyR-NC
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+191
195 cosponsors
+1 this month

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Jan 31, 2025

HouseHealth
H.R. 539

Chiropractic Medicare Coverage Modernization Act of 2025

W. Steube
W. SteubeR-FL
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+148
152 cosponsors
+2 this month

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Jan 16, 2025

HouseHealth
H.R. 5434Gaining+8

988 LGBTQ+ Youth Access Act of 2025

Raja Krishnamoorthi
Raja KrishnamoorthiD-IL
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+140
144 cosponsors
+8 this month

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Sep 17, 2025

HouseHealth
H.R. 3277Gaining+7

Ensuring Lasting Smiles Act

Neal Dunn
Neal DunnR-FL
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+130
134 cosponsors
+7 this month

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Education and Workforce, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

May 8, 2025

HouseHealth
H.R. 3757Gaining+5

Pride In Mental Health Act of 2025

Sharice Davids
Sharice DavidsD-KS
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+128
132 cosponsors
+5 this month

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Jun 5, 2025

HouseHealth

Trending Right Now

Bills gaining momentum across Congress

Tracking Health in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.