Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 4423, the No New Burma Funds Act. I thank the gentlewoman from Georgia (Ms. Williams) for sponsoring this bipartisan legislation. I am pleased to note that this bill passed the Financial Services Committee unanimously by a vote of 54-0 in July of this year. That kind of agreement underscores the seriousness of the threat posed by Burma's military regime and the broad consensus that the United States must respond firmly.
H.R. 4423: No New Burma Funds Act
Sponsor
Nikema Williams
Democrat · GA-5
Bill Progress
Latest Action · Dec 2, 2025
Passed the House, received in Senate
No new World Bank money for Burma's junta
Why it matters
H.R. 4423 passed the House 385-0 — a rare unanimous vote — to keep the World Bank's funding freeze on Burma's military government in place. The Bank stopped lending to the regime after it seized power in a 2021 coup. This bill requires the U.S. to keep voting to extend that pause, taking the decision out of any single administration's hands unless Treasury decides the freeze runs against the national interest.
In February 2021, Burma's military overthrew the country's elected government and took power by force. In response, the World Bank paused its loans and payments to the new regime.
H.R. 4423 tells the U.S. Treasury to keep that pause going. The United States has its own representative at the World Bank's main lending arm — the bill orders that official to use America's voice and vote to block new loans and disbursements to Burma's government.
There's one way out. Treasury can drop the requirement if it decides keeping the freeze isn't in the national interest. Short of that, the U.S. position stays locked.
The bill doesn't touch humanitarian aid or money that reaches Burmese people directly — it targets official financing to the government. And because the U.S. casts the largest vote at the Bank, where Washington goes, other major donors often follow.
H.R. 4423 Bill Summary
What H.R. 4423 actually does.
The World Bank freeze stays in place
The U.S. must keep voting to continue the Bank's pause on new loans and disbursements to Burma's government, a pause that began after the 2021 coup.
Treasury gives the orders
The Secretary of the Treasury must direct the U.S. Executive Director at the World Bank's main lending arm to cast the U.S. vote accordingly.
An off-ramp for the national interest
Treasury can lift the requirement if it determines that continuing the freeze is not in the U.S. national interest.
Aid to people isn't blocked
The pause targets official financing to Burma's government, not humanitarian programs or assistance that reaches its population directly.
Who benefits from H.R. 4423?
Burma's pro-democracy movement
The military has ruled by force since the 2021 coup. Holding the World Bank freeze keeps a major source of international financing out of the regime's reach.
Burmese-American communities
The sponsor, Rep. Nikema Williams, has highlighted the more than 2,000 Burmese refugees in DeKalb County, Georgia — among the many who fled the military's rule.
U.S. taxpayers
As the World Bank's largest shareholder, the U.S. helps backstop its lending. The bill keeps that institutional weight off the junta's side of the ledger.
Who is affected by H.R. 4423?
Burma's military government
Loses a potential path back to World Bank financing that could help it hold onto power.
Treasury and the U.S. World Bank representative
Now operate under a standing instruction from Congress on how to vote, with the national-interest off-ramp as the only flexibility.
Ordinary Burmese citizens
Government-backed development financing stays frozen, though humanitarian and direct aid can still flow.
Other World Bank donor nations
Often take cues from the U.S. position, so the American vote shapes whether the broader freeze holds.
What Congress Is Saying
12 legislators have weighed in on H.R. 4423 — 6 Democrats, 6 Republicans.
Mr. Speaker, I thank Representative Davidson for yielding time. Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 4423, the No New Funds for Burma Act. This bill would suspend disbursements and financing from the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development to Burma until the Treasury Secretary identifies a meaningful change in regime and restoration of democratic values. In February 2021, the democratically elected members of Burma's Government were deposed by the military junta. As we approach almost 5 years since the military's unlawful seizure of power, chaos has overtaken Burma.

H.R. 4423 also appeared in 4 more House floor references and 3 routine cosponsor filings.
HR4423 Legislative Journey
Committee Action
Dec 2, 2025
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
House: Vote: 385-0
Dec 1, 2025
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 385 - 0 (Roll no. 307). (text: CR H4945)
House: Committee Action
Sep 8, 2025
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 119-245.
House: Vote: 54-0
Jul 22, 2025
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 54 - 0.
House: Committee Action
Jul 15, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
About the Sponsor
Nikema Williams
Democrat, Georgia's 5th congressional district · 5 years in Congress
Committees: Financial Services
View full profile →
Cosponsors (3)
This bill has 3 cosponsors: 1 Democrat, 2 Republicans, reflecting bipartisan support. Cosponsors represent 3 states: California, New York, Texas.
Committee Sponsors
Foreign Relations Committee
0 of 22 committee members cosponsored
No committee members have cosponsored this bill
Financial Services Committee
2 of 53 committee members cosponsored
33 Democrats across these committees haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents
H.R. 4423 Quick Facts
- Committee
- Foreign Relations
- Chamber
- House
- Policy
- International Affairs
- Introduced
- Jul 15, 2025
Passed the House, received in Senate
Dec 2, 2025
Official Sources
Official bill tracker with full text, 3 cosponsors, all actions, and committee referral history for the No New Burma Funds Act. Passed the House 385-0 on December 1, 2025; referred to Senate Foreign Relations Committee on December 2, 2025.
House Financial Services Committee report filed September 8, 2025 by Chairman Hill. The committee ordered the bill reported (amended) by a vote of 54-0 on July 22, 2025.
Roll call vote on December 1, 2025, under suspension of the rules. The bill passed unanimously 385-0, reflecting strong bipartisan consensus on maintaining financial pressure on Burma's military junta.
Congressional Record transcript of the House floor debate on HR 4423. The bill was considered under suspension of the rules with forty minutes of debate before passing unanimously.
The February 2021 executive order that established the U.S. sanctions framework after the military coup. It is the legal backdrop for the financial pressure H.R. 4423 reinforces at the World Bank by directing the U.S. vote against new lending to Burma's government.
H.R. 4423 Common Questions
What does the No New Burma Funds Act do?
It keeps the World Bank from lending to Burma's military government. H.R. 4423 orders the U.S. Treasury to direct America's representative at the Bank to keep voting against new loans and payments to the regime that seized power in the 2021 coup.
Why did the World Bank stop funding Burma?
After Burma's military overthrew the elected government in a 2021 coup, the World Bank paused its loans and disbursements to the new regime. H.R. 4423 would require the U.S. to keep voting to extend that pause.
Does H.R. 4423 cut off humanitarian aid to Burma?
No. The freeze targets official financing to Burma's government. Humanitarian programs and aid that reaches Burmese people directly are not blocked by the bill.
Could a future administration restart World Bank funding to Burma?
There's a built-in exit. The bill lets the Treasury Secretary lift the requirement if Treasury decides that keeping the freeze isn't in the U.S. national interest. Short of that, the U.S. is locked into voting to continue the pause.
How did the House vote on H.R. 4423?
Unanimously. The House passed it 385-0 on December 1, 2025, under a fast-track process for non-controversial bills. The Financial Services Committee had earlier advanced it 54-0.
Is the No New Burma Funds Act law yet?
Not yet. It passed the House and was referred to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on December 2, 2025. It needs to pass the Senate and be signed by the president before it takes effect.
Who introduced the No New Burma Funds Act?
Rep. Nikema Williams (D-GA), whose district is home to thousands of Burmese refugees, introduced it with bipartisan cosponsors including Rep. Young Kim (R-CA), Rep. Monica De La Cruz (R-TX), and Rep. Timothy Kennedy (D-NY).
Based on H.R. 4423 bill text
H.R. 4423 Bill Text
“To continue the pause on disbursements and new financing commitments to the Government of Burma.”
Source: U.S. Government Publishing Office
Get notified when H.R. 4423 moves
Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.
Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.
International Affairs Bills
9 related bills we're tracking
Enhanced Iran Sanctions Act of 2025
Motion to place bill on Consensus Calendar filed by Mr. Lawler.
Jan 12, 2026
United States-Israel Defense Partnership Act of 2025
Referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Feb 12, 2025
West Bank Violence Prevention Act of 2025
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Apr 28, 2025
Global Respect Act
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Nov 19, 2025
Pakistan Freedom and Accountability Act
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Sep 10, 2025
Baltic Security Assessment Act of 2025
Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 41 - 3.
Apr 22, 2026
United States-Israel FUTURES Act of 2026
Referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Feb 12, 2026
To abolish the United States Agency for International Development, and for other purposes.
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Appropriations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Feb 7, 2025
Food for Palestinian Children and Families in Gaza Act of 2026
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Feb 12, 2026
Trending Right Now
Bills gaining momentum across Congress
AADAPT Act
Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 48 - 0.
May 21, 2026
Life at Conception Act
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Jan 24, 2025
Protecting Americans’ Social Security Data Act
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Mar 5, 2025
Tracking International Affairs in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.