S. 4199: Youth AI Privacy Act
Sponsor
Edward Markey
Democrat · MA
Bill Progress
Latest Action · Mar 25, 2026
Read twice and Referred to Commerce, Science, and Transportation. for review
Why it matters
The bill arrives as AI chatbots are spreading quickly among users under age 18 and would force the FTC to write rules within 1 year of enactment, with some data limits kicking in just 30 days after those rules are issued.
S. 4199, the Youth AI Privacy Act, is built around a simple idea: if an AI chatbot is talking to a minor, the company should not be able to make that experience feel human, addictive, or commercially manipulative. The bill defines a minor as anyone under age 18 and requires deployers to clearly tell users they are not interacting with a human and that the content is AI-generated at the start of every session and at least once every 30 minutes. Those disclosures must be in clear, plain language suited to the minor's age.
The proposal also goes after product design. Within 1 year of enactment, the Federal Trade Commission would have to issue rules banning rewards tied to frequency or time spent, push notifications and alerts except required disclosures, badges or visual awards based on usage, outputs generated without user-initiated input, and even social cues like typing bubbles that mimic human interaction. That is a direct attempt to stop AI chatbots from being designed like sticky social apps for children and teens.
On privacy, the bill is unusually strict. It would bar deployers and developers from processing a minor's personal data for profiling, and from processing or transferring a minor's personal data to train a covered algorithm, with a narrow exception for testing, identifying, or addressing risks of harm to users. It also tells the FTC to write regulations within 1 year of enactment that prohibit using personal data to generate or personalize outputs unless the data was collected during the current session and used within a "maximum permitted period of use" defined by the FTC. Then, beginning 30 days after those FTC regulations are issued, processing of input data would be prohibited except for generating or personalizing outputs during that permitted period or for safety testing.
The bill does more than regulate companies. It creates multiple enforcement paths: FTC enforcement, lawsuits by State Attorneys General, and a private right of action for parents or legal guardians seeking actual damages, punitive damages, attorney's fees, and injunctive or declaratory relief. It also authorizes $50,000,000 for each fiscal year from 2027 through 2030 for research on AI chatbots and requires HHS, through CDC and NIH, to add AI chatbot questions to national surveys covering frequency and duration of use, types of chatbots, age of first use, emotional and psychological effects, and exposure to harmful or inappropriate content. In short, the bill tries to set national guardrails for youth AI use while building the evidence base for what these systems are doing to kids.
What does S. 4199 do?
Under-18 users get repeated AI warnings
The bill protects any minor, defined as an individual under age 18, and requires deployers to say the user is not interacting with a human and that the content is AI-generated at the beginning of every session and at least once every 30 minutes, using clear language suited to the minor's age.
FTC gets 1 year to ban addictive design
Within 1 year of enactment, the FTC must issue rules prohibiting rewards or incentives based on frequency or time spent, notifications or push alerts except required disclosures, badges or visual awards based on usage, outputs sent without user-initiated input, and usage traces like typing bubbles that mimic human social interaction.
Minor data can't train AI models
The bill prohibits processing or transferring a minor's personal data to train a covered algorithm, with a narrow exception for testing, identifying, or addressing risks of harm to users. It also bans using personal data to profile minors.
Input-data limits start 30 days later
Beginning 30 days after the FTC issues regulations under Section 4(b)(1), processing of input data is prohibited except to generate or personalize outputs within the FTC-defined 'maximum permitted period of use' or to test, identify, or address risks of harm to users.
Parents and states can sue violators
Violations are treated as unfair or deceptive acts under the FTC Act, but enforcement does not stop there: State Attorneys General can bring civil actions for damages, restitution, or injunctions, and parents or legal guardians can sue for actual damages, punitive damages, attorney's fees, and injunctive or declaratory relief.
$50 million yearly for 2027-2030 research
The bill authorizes $50,000,000 for each fiscal year from 2027 through 2030 for research involving AI chatbots and requires HHS, through the CDC and NIH, to add AI chatbot questions to national surveys, including frequency and duration of use, age of first use, emotional and psychological impacts, and exposure to harmful or inappropriate content.
Who benefits from S. 4199?
Minors under age 18
They would get clearer warning labels at the start of every session and at least once every 30 minutes, plus protections against profiling, product promotion, push alerts, usage rewards, and human-like design cues such as typing bubbles.
Parents and legal guardians
They would gain a private right of action to seek actual damages, punitive damages, attorney's fees, and injunctive or declaratory relief if a company violates the Act in connection with their child.
Whistleblowers inside AI companies
Employees and others who raise concerns, report violations, or cooperate with investigations would be protected against retaliation, including discharge, demotion, suspension, and harassment.
Public health and child-safety researchers
They would benefit from $50,000,000 per year in authorized funding from fiscal years 2027 through 2030 and from new national survey data collected by HHS, CDC, and NIH on chatbot frequency, duration, age of first use, and emotional or psychological effects.
Who is affected by S. 4199?
AI chatbot deployers
Any person owning, operating, or making an AI chatbot available in or affecting interstate commerce would have to add disclosures every 30 minutes, stop certain engagement features within the FTC's 1-year rulemaking window, and face FTC, state, and private enforcement.
AI developers
Any person designing, coding, producing, or substantially modifying a covered algorithm would be barred from helping process or transfer a minor's personal data to train a covered algorithm, except for limited safety-related purposes.
Companies using youth-targeted commercialization
They could not configure chatbots to advertise to minors or generate outputs promoting products or services when the deployer or developer has a financial connection with the seller.
State regulators and the FTC
The FTC must issue guidance within 180 days of enactment and regulations within 1 year of enactment, while State Attorneys General can sue as parens patriae after notifying the FTC, unless the FTC has already acted against the same defendant for the same violation.
Cost & Funding
Authorization
$50,000,000 for each fiscal year 2027 through 2030
- Research funding is authorized through an amendment to 42 U.S.C. 285g-11 to include AI chatbots in research.
- The authorization runs for 4 fiscal years: 2027, 2028, 2029, and 2030.
- The bill also requires HHS, via CDC and NIH, to incorporate AI chatbot questions into national health and behavioral surveys, but no separate survey funding amount is specified.
What Congress Is Saying
S. 4199 hasn't been debated on the floor yet.
This section updates when a legislator speaks about it on the floor or in committee.
S4199 Legislative Journey
Committee Action
Mar 25, 2026
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
About the Sponsor
Edward Markey
Democrat, MA · 49 years in Congress
Committees: Small Business and Entrepreneurship, Commerce, Science, and Transportation, Environment and Public Works
View full profile →
Committee Sponsors
Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee
0 of 28 committee members cosponsored
No committee members have cosponsored this bill
13 Democrats across this committee haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents
S. 4199 Quick Facts
- Committee
- Commerce, Science, and Transportation
- Chamber
- Senate
- Policy
- Science, Technology, Communications
- Introduced
- Mar 25, 2026
Read twice and Referred to Commerce, Science, and Transportation. for review
Mar 25, 2026
S. 4199 Common Questions
How much funding would the Youth AI Privacy Act provide for AI chatbot research?
The Youth AI Privacy Act authorizes $50,000,000 per year for fiscal years 2027 through 2030 for research on AI chatbot health and developmental effects on minors (Section 7).
Can parents sue an AI chatbot company if it harms their child under the Youth AI Privacy Act?
Yes. Under the Youth AI Privacy Act, parents or legal guardians may sue for violations of Sections 4 or 5 and seek actual damages, punitive damages, attorney’s fees, and injunctive or declaratory relief (Section 9).
How often would AI chatbots have to tell minors they are not human under S4199?
According to S4199 Section 4, deployers that know a user is a minor must disclose at the start of every session and at least once every 30 minutes that the user is not interacting with a human and the content is AI-generated.
Can AI companies use a minor's data to train chatbots under the Youth AI Privacy Act?
No. Under the Youth AI Privacy Act, deployers and developers generally cannot process or transfer a minor’s personal data to train a covered algorithm, except for testing or addressing risks of harm to users (Section 5).
Does the Youth AI Privacy Act ban push notifications and typing bubbles for kids' chatbots?
Yes. The bill directs the FTC to ban push alerts, usage-based rewards or badges, unprompted outputs, and social-mimicking cues like typing bubbles for minor users within 1 year of enactment (Section 4).
What age counts as a minor under the Youth AI Privacy Act?
Under the Youth AI Privacy Act, a minor is any individual under age 18 (Section 3).
Does S4199 ban advertising to minors through AI chatbots?
Yes. According to S4199 Section 5, deployers and developers may not advertise to minors or promote products when they have a financial connection to the seller.
Can states sue AI chatbot companies for violations affecting minors under S4199?
Yes. Under S4199 Section 9, State Attorneys General may bring civil actions for damages, restitution, or injunctions, though they generally must notify the FTC first.
Does the Youth AI Privacy Act require age verification for AI chatbots?
No. The Youth AI Privacy Act says deployers do not have to collect age-related personal information or implement age-gating or age verification to determine knowledge (Section 10).
Based on S. 4199 bill text
S. 4199 Bill Text
“To require entities that make artificial intelligence chatbots available to minors to implement certain safe design features, and for other purposes.”
Source: U.S. Government Publishing Office
Get notified when S. 4199 moves
Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.
Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.
Science, Technology, Communications Bills
9 related bills we're tracking
GUARDRAILS Act
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Mar 20, 2026
Artificial Intelligence Civil Rights Act of 2025
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Dec 2, 2025
TAKE IT DOWN Act
Became Public Law No: 119-12.
May 19, 2025
States' Right to Regulate AI Act
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Dec 17, 2025
ACERO Act
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Feb 24, 2026
ASCEND Act
Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 344.
Feb 24, 2026
GUARDRAILS Act
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Mar 26, 2026
Small Business Artificial Intelligence Advancement Act
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Feb 24, 2026
Research Integrity and Foreign Influence Prevention Act
Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
Jun 5, 2025
Trending Right Now
Bills gaining momentum across Congress
Congressional Tribute to Constance Baker Motley Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Sep 11, 2025
Deterring American AI Model Theft Act of 2026
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Apr 15, 2026
AI Foundation Model Transparency Act of 2026
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Mar 26, 2026
Tracking Science, Technology, Communications in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.