S. 2750: SANDBOX Act

Introduced Sep 10, 20250 cosponsors

Sponsor

Ted Cruz

Ted Cruz

Republican · TX

Bill Progress

IntroducedSep 10
Committee 
Pass Senate 
Pass House 
Signed 
Law 

Latest Action · Sep 10, 2025

Read twice and Referred to Commerce, Science, and Transportation. for review

AI sandbox would fast-track waivers

Why it matters

Congress is weighing a 2025 proposal that would let AI companies seek temporary exemptions from federal rules through a new White House-run program, with deadlines as short as 90 days and waivers lasting up to 10 years total.

S. 2750, the SANDBOX Act, would set up an "Artificial Intelligence Regulatory Sandbox Program" inside the Office of Science and Technology Policy, or OSTP. The OSTP Director would have to launch it within 1 year of enactment, and the program would automatically end 12 years after it is established. Companies could apply if they are under U.S. jurisdiction and already have — or promise to create within 180 days of a written agreement — a business incorporated in the United States or with a principal place of business here.

The bill is designed to move fast. The head of the relevant federal agency would have 90 days to approve or deny an application, with one possible 30-day extension. If the agency misses the deadline and does not file a decision, the OSTP Director must presume there is no objection. If the agency suggests changes to reduce risks, the applicant gets 60 days to revise the application, and then the agency gets up to another 60 days to review it. Even after approval, the waiver does not take effect until the Director provides a written agreement, which must happen within 45 days after the application is granted.

What does S. 2750 do?

1

OSTP must launch program within 1 year

The bill creates an "Artificial Intelligence Regulatory Sandbox Program" in the Office of Science and Technology Policy, and the OSTP Director must establish it not later than 1 year after enactment. The entire program then sunsets 12 years after the date it is established.

2

Companies can qualify if U.S.-based within 180 days

Applicants must be subject to U.S. jurisdiction and must already have, or agree to establish within 180 days of a written agreement, a business incorporated in the United States or with a principal place of business in the United States.

3

Agencies get 90 days, plus 1 extra 30 days

The head of the applicable agency must approve or deny an application within 90 days of receipt, and may ask for one 30-day extension. If the agency still fails to submit a record of decision by the deadline, the OSTP Director must presume the agency has no objection.

4

Mitigation track adds 60 days plus 60 days

If an agency recommends changes to reduce risk, the applicant has 60 days to modify the application. After that, the agency gets a further review period of not more than 60 days to decide whether the revised application should go forward.

5

Waivers last 2 years, renewable up to 4 times

A sandbox waiver starts with an initial term of 2 years and can be renewed for a maximum of 4 additional 2-year periods. That means one participant could receive up to 10 years of total waiver time if renewals are granted.

6

Incident reports due in 72 hours

Participants must report incidents within 72 hours if they result in health and safety harm, economic damage, or unfair or deceptive trade practices. The bill defines health and safety risk to include bodily harm, loss of life, or substantial adverse effects on health, and defines economic damage as likely tangible, physical harm to a consumer's property or assets.

Who benefits from S. 2750?

AI startups and developers

They could seek temporary relief from federal rules through a process with a 90-day agency deadline, one possible 30-day extension, and a presumption of non-objection if the agency misses the deadline.

Larger tech firms with compliance teams

Big companies are better positioned to navigate the application process, mitigation revisions within 60 days, and recurring reporting deadlines at 40 days after launch, 30 days after the halfway point, and 30 days before expiration.

OSTP and White House technology policymakers

The Office of Science and Technology Policy would gain a central role in AI oversight and reform, including authority to run the program, issue written agreements within 45 days after approval, and send Congress an annual special message after May 1 recommending repeal or amendment of rules.

Businesses seeking regulatory changes beyond one product

The bill covers both an "artificial intelligence product or service" and an "artificial intelligence development method," meaning firms could pursue waivers not only for a specific tool but also for an AI-based business model or production method.

Who is affected by S. 2750?

Federal regulatory agencies

Agencies with jurisdiction over a covered provision would face strict review clocks: 90 days to act, one 30-day extension, and possible loss of leverage if they fail to issue a decision on time and are treated as having no objection.

Consumers using sandboxed AI products

Consumers could interact with AI products or services operating under temporary waivers for 2-year terms, even though participants must only disclose through a public website that the demonstration is temporary and does not provide immunity from civil or criminal liability.

People exposed to harmful AI failures

If a sandbox participant causes bodily harm, loss of life, substantial health effects, tangible physical harm to property or assets, or unfair or deceptive trade practices, the company must report the incident within 72 hours, but the bill still allows operation under a waiver unless the Director revokes it.

Congress

Lawmakers would receive an annual special message on the first day both Houses are in session after May 1, then face an expedited timetable to act on a joint resolution of approval within the first 60 legislative days, with committees discharged after 10 legislative days or 2 legislative days in the House for Senate-received measures.

On the Record

What Congress Is Saying

S. 2750 hasn't been debated on the floor yet.

This section updates when a legislator speaks about it on the floor or in committee.

S2750 Legislative Journey

1 actions

Committee Action

Sep 10, 2025

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

About the Sponsor

Ted Cruz

Ted Cruz

Republican, TX · 13 years in Congress

Committees: Commerce, Science, and Transportation, Rules and Administration, the Judiciary

View full profile →

Committee Sponsors

Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee

13D15R
|0 signed28 not yet

0 of 28 committee members cosponsored

No committee members have cosponsored this bill

15 Republicans across this committee haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents

S. 2750 Quick Facts

Cosponsors
0
Committee
Commerce, Science, and Transportation
Chamber
Senate
Policy
Science, Technology, Communications
Introduced
Sep 10, 2025

Read twice and Referred to Commerce, Science, and Transportation. for review

Sep 10, 2025

Constituent Resources

Get notified when this bill moves

Who is lobbying on S. 2750?

5 organizations lobbying on this bill

Total filings: 28
AI INTEGRATORS COUNCIL
12
AT&T SERVICES INC AND ITS AFFILIATES
6
BSA THE SOFTWARE ALLIANCE (FORMERLY BSA BUSINESS SOFTWARE ALLIANCE INC)
6
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY COUNCIL
2
DEMAND PROGRESS ACTION
2

Showing 1-5 of 5 organizations

S. 2750 Common Questions

Does the SANDBOX Act create a federal AI regulatory sandbox program?

Yes. The SANDBOX Act creates a federal regulatory sandbox program for artificial intelligence under the Office of Science and Technology Policy, according to S. 2750 Section 2.

Which agency would run the AI sandbox under S. 2750?

The Office of Science and Technology Policy would run it. Under the SANDBOX Act, the OSTP Director must establish the federal AI regulatory sandbox program (Section 2).

Can AI companies apply to an OSTP sandbox under the SANDBOX Act?

The bill text provided says OSTP must establish a federal AI regulatory sandbox program for artificial intelligence, but it does not include application rules in the supplied text of S. 2750 Section 2.

Is the SANDBOX Act an amendment to an existing federal technology law?

Yes. According to S. 2750 Section 2, the bill amends the National Science and Technology Policy, Organization, and Priorities Act of 1976.

What does SANDBOX stand for in the SANDBOX Act?

SANDBOX stands for the "Strengthening Artificial intelligence Normalization and Diffusion By Oversight and eXperimentation Act" under the SANDBOX Act (Section 1).

Is the SANDBOX Act focused specifically on artificial intelligence regulation?

Yes. Under the SANDBOX Act, the new federal sandbox program is specifically for artificial intelligence, according to S. 2750 Section 2.

Does S. 2750 put the AI sandbox in the White House OSTP?

Yes. Under the SANDBOX Act, the federal AI regulatory sandbox program is assigned to the Office of Science and Technology Policy, according to Section 2.

What are the main legal changes in Section 2 of the SANDBOX Act?

Section 2 of S. 2750 amends the National Science and Technology Policy, Organization, and Priorities Act of 1976 and requires the OSTP Director to establish a federal AI regulatory sandbox program.

Can the OSTP Director be required by law to set up an AI sandbox?

Yes. According to the SANDBOX Act, the OSTP Director is required to establish a federal regulatory sandbox program for artificial intelligence under Section 2.

Which federal law would the SANDBOX Act change to create an AI sandbox?

The SANDBOX Act would amend the National Science and Technology Policy, Organization, and Priorities Act of 1976, according to S. 2750 Section 2.

Based on S. 2750 bill text

S. 2750 Bill Text

PDF

To require the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy to establish a Federal regulatory sandbox program for artificial intelligence, and for other purposes.

Source: U.S. Government Publishing Office

Bill Alerts

Get notified when S. 2750 moves

Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.

Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.

Science, Technology, Communications Bills

9 related bills we're tracking

View all
H.R. 8031

GUARDRAILS Act

Donald Beyer
Donald BeyerD-VA
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+31
35 cosponsors
+2 this month

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Mar 20, 2026

HouseScience, Technology, Communications
H.R. 6356

Artificial Intelligence Civil Rights Act of 2025

Yvette Clarke
Yvette ClarkeD-NY
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+22
26 cosponsors
+1 this month

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Dec 2, 2025

HouseScience, Technology, Communications
S. 146

TAKE IT DOWN Act

Ted Cruz
Ted CruzR-TX
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+17
21 cosponsors

Became Public Law No: 119-12.

May 19, 2025

SenateScience, Technology, Communications
S. 3557

States' Right to Regulate AI Act

Edward Markey
Edward MarkeyD-MA
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+6
10 cosponsors

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

Dec 17, 2025

SenateScience, Technology, Communications
H.R. 390

ACERO Act

Vince Fong
Vince FongR-CA
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+3
7 cosponsors

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

Feb 24, 2026

HouseScience, Technology, Communications
H.R. 2600

ASCEND Act

Jeff Hurd
Jeff HurdR-CO
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+2
6 cosponsors

Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 344.

Feb 24, 2026

HouseScience, Technology, Communications
S. 4216Gaining+5

GUARDRAILS Act

Brian Schatz
Brian SchatzD-HI
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+1
5 cosponsors
+5 this month

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

Mar 26, 2026

SenateScience, Technology, Communications
H.R. 3679

Small Business Artificial Intelligence Advancement Act

Mike Collins
Mike CollinsR-GA
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
4 cosponsors

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

Feb 24, 2026

HouseScience, Technology, Communications
H.R. 3744

Research Integrity and Foreign Influence Prevention Act

Daniel Webster
Daniel WebsterR-FL
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
4 cosponsors

Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.

Jun 5, 2025

HouseScience, Technology, Communications

Tracking Science, Technology, Communications in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.