S. 2750: SANDBOX Act
Sponsor
Ted Cruz
Republican · TX
Bill Progress
Latest Action · Sep 10, 2025
Read twice and Referred to Commerce, Science, and Transportation. for review
Why it matters
Congress is weighing a 2025 proposal that would let AI companies seek temporary exemptions from federal rules through a new White House-run program, with deadlines as short as 90 days and waivers lasting up to 10 years total.
S. 2750, the SANDBOX Act, would set up an "Artificial Intelligence Regulatory Sandbox Program" inside the Office of Science and Technology Policy, or OSTP. The OSTP Director would have to launch it within 1 year of enactment, and the program would automatically end 12 years after it is established. Companies could apply if they are under U.S. jurisdiction and already have — or promise to create within 180 days of a written agreement — a business incorporated in the United States or with a principal place of business here.
The bill is designed to move fast. The head of the relevant federal agency would have 90 days to approve or deny an application, with one possible 30-day extension. If the agency misses the deadline and does not file a decision, the OSTP Director must presume there is no objection. If the agency suggests changes to reduce risks, the applicant gets 60 days to revise the application, and then the agency gets up to another 60 days to review it. Even after approval, the waiver does not take effect until the Director provides a written agreement, which must happen within 45 days after the application is granted.
The temporary relief can last a long time. An initial waiver runs for 2 years and can be renewed for up to 4 more 2-year periods, meaning a company could operate under sandbox relief for as long as 10 years. Participants would have to report incidents within 72 hours if they lead to health and safety harm, economic damage, or an unfair or deceptive trade practice. The bill defines health and safety risk broadly enough to include bodily harm, loss of life, or substantial adverse effects on health, including life before birth or unborn humans. "Risk of economic damage" is narrower: likely tangible, physical harm to a consumer's property or assets.
The bill also tries to turn these experiments into a pipeline for deregulation. After May 1 each year, on the first day both chambers are in session, the OSTP Director must send Congress a special message naming covered provisions that should be amended or repealed based on sandbox results. Congress would then get an expedited process for a joint resolution of approval, with action supposed to finish within the first 60 legislative days after receiving the message. Committees that sit on a resolution too long would be discharged after 10 legislative days, or after 2 legislative days in the House for a Senate-passed resolution. Supporters will see that as a way to modernize outdated rules for AI. Critics will see it as a mechanism for bypassing normal safeguards and accelerating rollbacks across a wide range of agency rules, guidance, FAQs, bulletins, and even rules expressly required by statute.
What does S. 2750 do?
OSTP must launch program within 1 year
The bill creates an "Artificial Intelligence Regulatory Sandbox Program" in the Office of Science and Technology Policy, and the OSTP Director must establish it not later than 1 year after enactment. The entire program then sunsets 12 years after the date it is established.
Companies can qualify if U.S.-based within 180 days
Applicants must be subject to U.S. jurisdiction and must already have, or agree to establish within 180 days of a written agreement, a business incorporated in the United States or with a principal place of business in the United States.
Agencies get 90 days, plus 1 extra 30 days
The head of the applicable agency must approve or deny an application within 90 days of receipt, and may ask for one 30-day extension. If the agency still fails to submit a record of decision by the deadline, the OSTP Director must presume the agency has no objection.
Mitigation track adds 60 days plus 60 days
If an agency recommends changes to reduce risk, the applicant has 60 days to modify the application. After that, the agency gets a further review period of not more than 60 days to decide whether the revised application should go forward.
Waivers last 2 years, renewable up to 4 times
A sandbox waiver starts with an initial term of 2 years and can be renewed for a maximum of 4 additional 2-year periods. That means one participant could receive up to 10 years of total waiver time if renewals are granted.
Incident reports due in 72 hours
Participants must report incidents within 72 hours if they result in health and safety harm, economic damage, or unfair or deceptive trade practices. The bill defines health and safety risk to include bodily harm, loss of life, or substantial adverse effects on health, and defines economic damage as likely tangible, physical harm to a consumer's property or assets.
Who benefits from S. 2750?
AI startups and developers
They could seek temporary relief from federal rules through a process with a 90-day agency deadline, one possible 30-day extension, and a presumption of non-objection if the agency misses the deadline.
Larger tech firms with compliance teams
Big companies are better positioned to navigate the application process, mitigation revisions within 60 days, and recurring reporting deadlines at 40 days after launch, 30 days after the halfway point, and 30 days before expiration.
OSTP and White House technology policymakers
The Office of Science and Technology Policy would gain a central role in AI oversight and reform, including authority to run the program, issue written agreements within 45 days after approval, and send Congress an annual special message after May 1 recommending repeal or amendment of rules.
Businesses seeking regulatory changes beyond one product
The bill covers both an "artificial intelligence product or service" and an "artificial intelligence development method," meaning firms could pursue waivers not only for a specific tool but also for an AI-based business model or production method.
Who is affected by S. 2750?
Federal regulatory agencies
Agencies with jurisdiction over a covered provision would face strict review clocks: 90 days to act, one 30-day extension, and possible loss of leverage if they fail to issue a decision on time and are treated as having no objection.
Consumers using sandboxed AI products
Consumers could interact with AI products or services operating under temporary waivers for 2-year terms, even though participants must only disclose through a public website that the demonstration is temporary and does not provide immunity from civil or criminal liability.
People exposed to harmful AI failures
If a sandbox participant causes bodily harm, loss of life, substantial health effects, tangible physical harm to property or assets, or unfair or deceptive trade practices, the company must report the incident within 72 hours, but the bill still allows operation under a waiver unless the Director revokes it.
Congress
Lawmakers would receive an annual special message on the first day both Houses are in session after May 1, then face an expedited timetable to act on a joint resolution of approval within the first 60 legislative days, with committees discharged after 10 legislative days or 2 legislative days in the House for Senate-received measures.
What Congress Is Saying
S. 2750 hasn't been debated on the floor yet.
This section updates when a legislator speaks about it on the floor or in committee.
S2750 Legislative Journey
Committee Action
Sep 10, 2025
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
About the Sponsor
Ted Cruz
Republican, TX · 13 years in Congress
Committees: Commerce, Science, and Transportation, Rules and Administration, the Judiciary
View full profile →
Committee Sponsors
Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee
0 of 28 committee members cosponsored
No committee members have cosponsored this bill
15 Republicans across this committee haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents
S. 2750 Quick Facts
- Committee
- Commerce, Science, and Transportation
- Chamber
- Senate
- Policy
- Science, Technology, Communications
- Introduced
- Sep 10, 2025
Read twice and Referred to Commerce, Science, and Transportation. for review
Sep 10, 2025
Who is lobbying on S. 2750?
5 organizations lobbying on this bill
AI INTEGRATORS COUNCIL | 12 |
AT&T SERVICES INC AND ITS AFFILIATES | 6 |
BSA THE SOFTWARE ALLIANCE (FORMERLY BSA BUSINESS SOFTWARE ALLIANCE INC) | 6 |
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY COUNCIL | 2 |
DEMAND PROGRESS ACTION | 2 |
Showing 1-5 of 5 organizations
S. 2750 Common Questions
Does the SANDBOX Act create a federal AI regulatory sandbox program?
Yes. The SANDBOX Act creates a federal regulatory sandbox program for artificial intelligence under the Office of Science and Technology Policy, according to S. 2750 Section 2.
Which agency would run the AI sandbox under S. 2750?
The Office of Science and Technology Policy would run it. Under the SANDBOX Act, the OSTP Director must establish the federal AI regulatory sandbox program (Section 2).
Can AI companies apply to an OSTP sandbox under the SANDBOX Act?
The bill text provided says OSTP must establish a federal AI regulatory sandbox program for artificial intelligence, but it does not include application rules in the supplied text of S. 2750 Section 2.
Is the SANDBOX Act an amendment to an existing federal technology law?
Yes. According to S. 2750 Section 2, the bill amends the National Science and Technology Policy, Organization, and Priorities Act of 1976.
What does SANDBOX stand for in the SANDBOX Act?
SANDBOX stands for the "Strengthening Artificial intelligence Normalization and Diffusion By Oversight and eXperimentation Act" under the SANDBOX Act (Section 1).
Is the SANDBOX Act focused specifically on artificial intelligence regulation?
Yes. Under the SANDBOX Act, the new federal sandbox program is specifically for artificial intelligence, according to S. 2750 Section 2.
Does S. 2750 put the AI sandbox in the White House OSTP?
Yes. Under the SANDBOX Act, the federal AI regulatory sandbox program is assigned to the Office of Science and Technology Policy, according to Section 2.
What are the main legal changes in Section 2 of the SANDBOX Act?
Section 2 of S. 2750 amends the National Science and Technology Policy, Organization, and Priorities Act of 1976 and requires the OSTP Director to establish a federal AI regulatory sandbox program.
Can the OSTP Director be required by law to set up an AI sandbox?
Yes. According to the SANDBOX Act, the OSTP Director is required to establish a federal regulatory sandbox program for artificial intelligence under Section 2.
Which federal law would the SANDBOX Act change to create an AI sandbox?
The SANDBOX Act would amend the National Science and Technology Policy, Organization, and Priorities Act of 1976, according to S. 2750 Section 2.
Based on S. 2750 bill text
S. 2750 Bill Text
“To require the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy to establish a Federal regulatory sandbox program for artificial intelligence, and for other purposes.”
Source: U.S. Government Publishing Office
Get notified when S. 2750 moves
Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.
Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.
Science, Technology, Communications Bills
9 related bills we're tracking
GUARDRAILS Act
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Mar 20, 2026
Artificial Intelligence Civil Rights Act of 2025
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Dec 2, 2025
TAKE IT DOWN Act
Became Public Law No: 119-12.
May 19, 2025
States' Right to Regulate AI Act
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Dec 17, 2025
ACERO Act
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Feb 24, 2026
ASCEND Act
Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 344.
Feb 24, 2026
GUARDRAILS Act
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Mar 26, 2026
Small Business Artificial Intelligence Advancement Act
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Feb 24, 2026
Research Integrity and Foreign Influence Prevention Act
Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
Jun 5, 2025
Trending Right Now
Bills gaining momentum across Congress
Congressional Tribute to Constance Baker Motley Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Sep 11, 2025
Deterring American AI Model Theft Act of 2026
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Apr 15, 2026
AI Foundation Model Transparency Act of 2026
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Mar 26, 2026
Tracking Science, Technology, Communications in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.