H.R. 995: No Tax Breaks for Outsourcing Act
Sponsor
Lloyd Doggett
Democrat · TX-37
Bill Progress
Latest Action · Feb 5, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why it matters
This matters now because Congress is again debating whether the tax code rewards companies for booking profits and jobs overseas instead of in the United States.
H.R. 995, the No Tax Breaks for Outsourcing Act, is a broad rewrite of how the U.S. taxes profits earned by foreign subsidiaries of American multinationals. Its core move is simple: it would tax more of those foreign profits currently, instead of letting companies subtract a deemed return on overseas tangible assets before calculating the tax. In plain English, it tightens the rules so companies cannot as easily lower their U.S. taxes by putting income in low-tax foreign affiliates.
The bill also shifts the system toward a country-by-country approach. That matters because current rules can let companies blend high-tax and low-tax foreign income together, reducing the overall U.S. tax they owe. By requiring separate calculations by country, the bill aims to make it harder to use profits in one place to shield profits in another place with a very low tax rate.
Another major piece repeals section 250, which currently gives special deductions tied to foreign income, including the reduced rate on GILTI and the deduction for foreign-derived intangible income. Removing that deduction would raise the effective tax rate on certain offshore profits and end a tax preference that supporters argue rewards firms for locating valuable intellectual property and reported earnings outside the U.S. The bill text also points to tougher rules on interest deductions, corporate inversions, and foreign corporations managed and controlled from the United States, though the excerpt provided does not include those later sections in full.
Politically, the bill is a clear message bill with serious support inside the Democratic caucus, given its 134 cosponsors. But it would face strong resistance from multinational business groups that argue these changes could make U.S.-based companies less competitive against foreign rivals. The practical effect, if enacted, would likely be higher taxes and more complex compliance for large multinationals with cross-border structures, alongside more revenue and fewer incentives to book profits offshore.
What does H.R. 995 do?
Tax more foreign profits right away
The bill would replace the current GILTI-style approach with current inclusion of net CFC tested income, meaning more foreign subsidiary income would be counted for U.S. tax purposes each year.
End the break tied to offshore assets
It removes the rule that effectively exempts a deemed return on certain overseas tangible investments, a change meant to stop rewarding companies for placing plants, equipment, or other assets abroad.
Calculate foreign income country by country
Instead of letting companies mix results across countries, the bill would require separate calculations for each country, making it harder to use high-tax income in one place to offset low-tax income in another.
Repeal special deduction for offshore income
The bill repeals section 250, ending the reduced tax treatment tied to certain foreign profits and foreign-derived intangible income.
Give Treasury anti-avoidance powers
It directs the Treasury Department to write rules to prevent companies from moving property, shifting income, or restructuring transactions just to get around the new tax rules.
Signal tougher anti-inversion rules
The table of contents shows the bill also targets corporate inversions and some foreign corporations effectively run from the United States, aiming to limit tax-motivated moves on paper.
Who benefits from H.R. 995?
Domestic-only U.S. businesses
Companies that mainly operate in the United States could face a more level playing field if multinationals lose tax advantages from shifting profits overseas.
Federal taxpayers and budget writers
If the bill raises additional revenue, it could reduce pressure for spending cuts elsewhere or help pay for other priorities.
U.S. workers at firms competing with offshoring
Supporters argue the bill would reduce incentives to move investment, profits, and possibly jobs abroad for tax reasons.
Tax enforcement agencies
A country-by-country framework and added anti-avoidance authority could make aggressive offshore tax planning easier to challenge.
Who is affected by H.R. 995?
Large U.S.-based multinational corporations
These firms would likely pay more tax on foreign earnings and face stricter rules for how they calculate offshore income.
Companies with subsidiaries in low-tax jurisdictions
Businesses that rely on tax havens or low-tax countries to reduce their U.S. tax bill would have fewer ways to do so.
Firms claiming FDII or section 250 benefits
Companies that now use the special deduction for certain foreign-related income would lose that tax break.
Corporate tax departments and advisors
They would have to manage more detailed country-level reporting, compliance, and restructuring if the bill became law.
H.R. 995 Common Questions
How much in assets makes a foreign corporation managed in the US taxable as a domestic corporation?
A foreign corporation can be treated as domestic if it is primarily managed and controlled in the U.S. and has aggregate gross assets of $50,000,000 or more, or its stock is regularly traded, under the No Tax Breaks for Outsourcing Act (Section 6).
What companies would face the new interest deduction limit over $100 million in receipts?
Domestic corporations in an international financial reporting group with average annual gross receipts above $100,000,000 over a 3-year period would be subject to the limit, according to H.R. 995 Section 4.
Can disallowed interest be carried forward under the No Tax Breaks for Outsourcing Act?
Yes. Disallowed interest may be carried forward for up to 5 taxable years on a first-in, first-out basis under the No Tax Breaks for Outsourcing Act (Section 4).
What percentage of US business activity triggers the inversion rule in HR 995?
The bill uses a 25% threshold: significant domestic business activities exist if at least 25% of employees, compensation, assets, or income are in the U.S., under H.R. 995 Section 5.
Can a foreign company be treated as an inverted domestic corporation if former owners keep more than 50%?
Yes. A foreign corporation is treated as an inverted domestic corporation if former shareholders or partners hold more than 50% after the acquisition, according to H.R. 995 Section 5.
Does HR 995 repeal the section 250 deduction for GILTI and FDII?
Yes. The bill repeals Section 250, ending the deduction tied to net CFC tested income and foreign-derived intangible income under the No Tax Breaks for Outsourcing Act (Section 2).
Does the No Tax Breaks for Outsourcing Act eliminate the 80 percent foreign tax credit limit on tested income?
Yes. H.R. 995 repeals the 80% limitation on deemed paid foreign tax credits for taxes attributable to tested income, under Section 2.
Can companies still carry back foreign tax credits under HR 995?
No. The bill eliminates the carryback of foreign tax credits for credits arising in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2024, according to H.R. 995 Section 2.
Which US territories are treated as possessions for the country-by-country foreign tax credit rules?
American Samoa, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Virgin Islands are included as U.S. possessions under the No Tax Breaks for Outsourcing Act (Section 3).
When would the new offshore tax rules in HR 995 take effect?
Most major tax changes apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2024, while the managed-and-controlled foreign corporation rule starts for years beginning on or after 2 years after enactment, under Sections 2, 3, 4, and 6.
Based on H.R. 995 bill text
HR995 Legislative Journey
House: Committee Action
Feb 5, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
About the Sponsor
Lloyd Doggett
Democrat, Texas's 37th congressional district · 31 years in Congress
Committees: Ways and Means, the Budget, Joint Committee on Taxation
View full profile →
Cosponsors (134)
All 134 cosponsors are Democrats. Cosponsors represent 34 states: Arizona, California, Colorado, and 31 more.
Alma Adams
Democrat · NC
Yassamin Ansari
Democrat · AZ
Becca Balint
Democrat · VT
Nanette Barragán
Democrat · CA
Joyce Beatty
Democrat · OH
Sanford Bishop
Democrat · GA
Suzanne Bonamici
Democrat · OR
Brendan Boyle
Democrat · PA
Shontel Brown
Democrat · OH
Julia Brownley
Democrat · CA
Nikki Budzinski
Democrat · IL
André Carson
Democrat · IN
Cosponsor Coverage Map
Committee Sponsors
Ways and Means Committee
10 of 45 committee members cosponsored
9 Democrats across this committee haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents
H.R. 995 Quick Facts
- Committee
- Ways and Means
- Chamber
- House
- Policy
- Taxation
- Introduced
- Feb 5, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Feb 5, 2025
Who is lobbying on H.R. 995?
4 organizations lobbying on this bill
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES | 5 |
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS | 4 |
NEW VENTURE FUND | 4 |
NUCLEAR ENERGY INSTITUTE, INC | 2 |
Showing 1-4 of 4 organizations
H.R. 995 Bill Text
“To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for current year inclusion of net CFC tested income, and for other purposes.”
Source: U.S. Government Publishing Office
Get notified when H.R. 995 moves
Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.
Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.
Taxation Bills
9 related bills we're tracking
Affordable Housing Credit Improvement Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Apr 8, 2025
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the railroad track maintenance credit.
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Jan 16, 2025
Military Spouse Hiring Act
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Mar 11, 2025
More Homes on the Market Act
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Feb 13, 2025
American Innovation and R&D Competitiveness Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Mar 10, 2025
Credit for Caring Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Mar 11, 2025
Improve and Enhance the Work Opportunity Tax Credit Act
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Feb 10, 2025
Travel Trailer and Camper Tax Parity Act
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Jan 13, 2025
Stop Subsidizing Multimillion Dollar Corporate Bonuses Act
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S2738-2739: 3)
May 1, 2025
Trending Right Now
Bills gaining momentum across Congress
Federal Extreme Risk Protection Order Act of 2026
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Feb 17, 2026
ALERT Act
Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Feb 20, 2026
Fair Housing for Survivors Act of 2026
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Mar 5, 2026
Tracking Taxation in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.