H.R. 8283: Deterring American AI Model Theft Act of 2026
Sponsor
Bill Huizenga
Republican · MI-4
Bill Progress
Latest Action · Apr 15, 2026
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why it matters
Lawmakers are moving to respond quickly to suspected theft of U.S. AI systems by foreign actors, with the first government assessment due within 180 days of enactment and sanctions or export blacklist decisions due within 210 days.
H.R. 8283 sets up a federal process to identify foreign actors that try to copy or rebuild American closed-source AI models. The bill defines a "closed-source AI model" as one whose key technical information, such as model weights, is proprietary and not made public, where access is controlled by terms of service or contracts, and where use is typically offered through an API or consumer-facing interface without letting outside users host or modify the model on their own servers unless authorized. That definition matters because the bill is focused on model makers that keep the core system private and only let outsiders use it through controlled access.
The bill gives the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Commerce, and members of the Operating Committee for Export Policy 180 days after enactment to complete an initial assessment of model extraction attacks, and 210 days after enactment to submit a report. After that, reporting continues annually for 3 years following the initial report. The assessment must identify "entities of concern" carrying out attacks or serving as fraudulent account network providers, describe the methods used, including the physical location of provider offices and data centers, and determine how many attempted attacks happened in the previous 2 calendar years. The Secretary of State would also maintain a public AI Model Extraction Attackers List naming people or companies found to have conducted or directed attacks in the past year, and those names could stay on a public State Department website for up to 5 years.
The bill casts a wide net over who could be targeted. A "country of concern" automatically includes the People's Republic of China, including Hong Kong and Macau, and the Russian Federation. It also includes any country in Country Group D:5 in Supplement No. 1 to part 740 of the Export Administration Regulations as of January 1, 2026 if designated by the Secretary of State, plus any other country the Secretary designates through the bill's assessment process. An "entity of concern" can be a foreign person or company located or headquartered in one of those countries, a company with an ultimate parent there, a firm operating under the direction or control of an entity in a country of concern, or a foreign actor that conducts or attempts a model extraction attack against a U.S.-owned model outside authorized training practices.
The enforcement side is the sharpest part of the bill. Within 210 days of enactment, the Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security must determine, by majority vote of the End-User Review Committee, whether identified attackers or their affiliates should be added to the Bureau of Industry and Security's Entity List. The affiliate rule is triggered at 50 percent or more direct or indirect ownership. Separately, the President may block all transactions in property and interests in property of entities of concern when that property is in the United States or under the control of a U.S. person. There are carveouts for the 1947 UN Headquarters Agreement, humanitarian aid such as food, medicine, medical devices, and related financial transactions, and authorized U.S. intelligence, law enforcement, or national security work. Violations would carry the penalties already available under section 206 of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, codified at 50 U.S.C. 1705, giving the bill real legal teeth even though it does not create a brand-new penalty schedule.
What does H.R. 8283 do?
180-day AI theft assessment deadline
The Secretary of State, the Secretary of Commerce, and members of the Operating Committee for Export Policy must complete an initial assessment not later than 180 days after enactment. That assessment must identify entities of concern, fraudulent account network providers, methods used in attacks, the physical location of offices and data centers, and the number of attempted attacks during the previous 2 calendar years.
210-day report and prevention guidance
Not later than 210 days after enactment, the government must deliver its first report, and the Secretary of Commerce must publish public best practices for detecting and preventing model extraction attacks. After the first report, updates must continue annually for 3 years.
Public attacker list for up to 5 years
The Secretary of State must maintain an AI Model Extraction Attackers List naming individuals or entities identified as having conducted or directed attacks in the past year. The list must be published on a public Department of State website, and names can remain posted for up to 5 years.
Entity List review within 210 days
The Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security must decide, by majority vote of the End-User Review Committee, whether identified attackers or their affiliates should be added to the Bureau of Industry and Security's Entity List not later than 210 days after enactment. The affiliate rule applies when ownership is 50 percent or more, directly or indirectly.
Targets China, Russia, and D:5 countries
The bill defines a country of concern to include the People's Republic of China, including Hong Kong and Macau, and the Russian Federation. It also reaches any country listed in Country Group D:5 in Supplement No. 1 to part 740 of the Export Administration Regulations as of January 1, 2026 if designated by the Secretary of State, plus any additional country the Secretary designates through the assessment process.
Property blocking backed by IEEPA penalties
The President may block all transactions in property or interests in property of entities of concern when that property is in the United States or under the control of a U.S. person. Violations are punishable under section 206 of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, 50 U.S.C. 1705, while exceptions protect the 1947 UN Headquarters Agreement, humanitarian aid like food, medicine, and medical devices, and authorized intelligence or law enforcement activity.
Who benefits from H.R. 8283?
U.S. companies that own closed-source AI models
These firms gain a federal process aimed at protecting proprietary systems whose model weights and other key technical details are not public. They also get Commerce Department best-practice guidance within 210 days after enactment and possible action against foreign attackers through sanctions and Entity List placement.
U.S. national security and export-control agencies
The State Department, Commerce Department, and the Operating Committee for Export Policy get a formal mandate to track model extraction attacks, identify foreign entities involved, and monitor attack patterns over the previous 2 calendar years. That gives agencies a structured way to treat AI model theft as an international and trade-security issue.
American AI developers using API-only access models
Developers that provide access through an API or consumer-facing interface, while not allowing third parties to host or modify the model on their own servers unless authorized, are the bill's core protected group. The bill directly targets schemes using multiple accounts, fraudulent credentials, or geographic restriction bypasses to copy those systems.
Humanitarian and protected diplomatic activities
These groups benefit because the bill explicitly preserves exceptions for humanitarian assistance, including food, medicine, medical devices, and financial transactions related to aid, and for U.S. obligations under the 1947 UN Headquarters Agreement.
Who is affected by H.R. 8283?
Foreign AI firms and intermediaries in China and Russia
Companies located or headquartered in the People's Republic of China, including Hong Kong and Macau, or in the Russian Federation could face investigation, public naming, Entity List review, and blocked property transactions if they are found to be entities of concern.
Fraudulent account sellers and brokers
Foreign entities that knowingly create, maintain, sell, or broker access to accounts that let entities of concern bypass location restrictions in terms of service are specifically targeted as fraudulent account network providers. The one clear exception is for entities transmitting location information to enable internet access for freedom of expression.
Affiliates of accused attackers
Related companies can be pulled in even if they were not the direct attacker. If an affiliate is owned 50 percent or more, directly or indirectly, it can be considered for addition to the Bureau of Industry and Security's Entity List through a majority vote of the End-User Review Committee.
U.S. persons holding property tied to sanctioned entities
If the President blocks transactions involving an entity of concern, U.S. persons that control affected property or interests in property would have to stop those transactions. Violations would be handled under section 206 of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, 50 U.S.C. 1705.
What Congress Is Saying
H.R. 8283 hasn't been debated on the floor yet.
This section updates when a legislator speaks about it on the floor or in committee.
HR8283 Legislative Journey
House: Committee Action
Apr 15, 2026
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
About the Sponsor
Bill Huizenga
Republican, Michigan's 4th congressional district · 15 years in Congress
Committees: Financial Services, Foreign Affairs
View full profile →
Cosponsors (2)
All 2 cosponsors are Republicans. Cosponsors represent 2 states: Michigan, New York.
Committee Sponsors
27 Republicans across this committee haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents
H.R. 8283 Quick Facts
- Committee
- Foreign Affairs
- Chamber
- House
- Policy
- International Affairs
- Introduced
- Apr 15, 2026
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Apr 15, 2026
H.R. 8283 Common Questions
How long can the State Department keep names on the AI Model Extraction Attackers List?
Under the Deterring American AI Model Theft Act of 2026, names can stay on the public State Department website for up to 5 years (SEC. 4).
How soon would the government have to assess foreign AI model theft under HR 8283?
According to H.R. 8283, the initial assessment is due within 180 days of enactment, with the first report due within 210 days (SEC. 4).
Which countries are automatically treated as countries of concern in the AI model theft bill?
Under the Deterring American AI Model Theft Act of 2026, the People's Republic of China, including Hong Kong and Macau, and the Russian Federation are automatically covered (SEC. 3).
Can affiliates be added to the BIS Entity List if they own 50% of an AI theft attacker?
Yes. Under H.R. 8283, affiliates with 50% or more direct or indirect ownership can be considered for the BIS Entity List (SEC. 5).
Does the AI model theft bill allow the President to block property in the United States?
Yes. Under the Deterring American AI Model Theft Act of 2026, the President may block transactions in property or interests in property of entities of concern in the U.S. or controlled by a U.S. person (SEC. 5).
What penalties apply for violating sanctions under the Deterring American AI Model Theft Act of 2026?
Violations are punishable under section 206 of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, 50 U.S.C. 1705, according to H.R. 8283 (SEC. 5).
What counts as a closed-source AI model under HR 8283?
Under H.R. 8283, it is a model with proprietary technical information like weights, access controlled by contracts or terms, and use generally limited to an API or consumer interface without outside hosting or modification (SEC. 3).
Can high-volume or coordinated API queries be used as evidence of AI model extraction?
Yes. Under the Deterring American AI Model Theft Act of 2026, intent may be inferred from query volume, patterns, timing, coordination, multiple accounts, and focus on specific capabilities (SEC. 3).
Does HR 8283 exempt humanitarian aid like food and medicine from AI theft sanctions?
Yes. H.R. 8283 exempts humanitarian assistance, including food, medicine, medical devices, and related financial transactions, from blocking actions (SEC. 5).
Can companies that provide fake or fraudulent accounts for foreign AI access be targeted under the bill?
Yes. Under the Deterring American AI Model Theft Act of 2026, a fraudulent account network provider that knowingly gives entities of concern access in violation of terms of service can be identified and targeted (SEC. 3, SEC. 4).
Based on H.R. 8283 bill text
H.R. 8283 Bill Text
“To prevent foreign adversaries from threatening the national security of the United States by extracting key technical features of closed-source, American-owned artificial intelligence models, and for other purposes.”
Source: U.S. Government Publishing Office
Get notified when H.R. 8283 moves
Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.
Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.
International Affairs Bills
9 related bills we're tracking
Enhanced Iran Sanctions Act of 2025
Motion to place bill on Consensus Calendar filed by Mr. Lawler.
Jan 12, 2026
United States-Israel Defense Partnership Act of 2025
Referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Feb 12, 2025
Global Respect Act
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Nov 19, 2025
United States-Israel FUTURES Act of 2026
Referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Feb 12, 2026
To abolish the United States Agency for International Development, and for other purposes.
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Appropriations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Feb 7, 2025
Food for Palestinian Children and Families in Gaza Act of 2026
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Feb 12, 2026
IRAN Act
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Feb 4, 2026
SHADOW Fleet Sanctions Act of 2026
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 326.
Feb 10, 2026
Foreign Adversary AI Risk Assessment and Diplomacy Act
Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 45 - 0.
Mar 26, 2026
Trending Right Now
Bills gaining momentum across Congress
Congressional Tribute to Constance Baker Motley Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Sep 11, 2025
GUARDRAILS Act
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Mar 26, 2026
AI Foundation Model Transparency Act of 2026
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Mar 26, 2026
Tracking International Affairs in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.