H.R. 637: 911 SAVES Act
Sponsor
Norma Torres
Democrat · CA-35
911 dispatchers belong with first responders, not office clerks
Why it matters
The federal system that sorts every American job files 911 dispatchers in the same broad group as office and administrative support workers. H.R. 637, backed by 86 cosponsors from both parties, would give OMB 30 days to move them into protective service occupations, alongside police officers and firefighters.
Federal statistical agencies sort every job in the country using one master list, the Standard Occupational Classification system. Public safety telecommunicators, the people who take 911 calls and dispatch police, fire, and EMS, sit today in the office and administrative support group. Police officers and firefighters sit in protective service occupations.
H.R. 637, the 911 SAVES Act, would require the Office of Management and Budget to move dispatchers into the protective service group within 30 days of becoming law. That is the entire operative text: one sentence, one deadline.
The rest of the bill is its case. The findings describe dispatchers as the first contact for hostage takers and suicidal callers, the voice coaching bystanders through first aid during active shootings, and the line officers call when they are under fire. They cite incidents where a dispatcher recognized the sound of a racked shotgun and warned officers away from a trap.
The findings also point to trauma. According to the bill, research suggests dispatchers face exposure that may lead to post-traumatic stress, and some agencies already include them in the same critical incident debriefing teams used for field responders.
What the bill does not do matters just as much: it creates no raise, no pension change, no grant, and no mental-health funding. The classification system exists for statistics. Supporters argue the label still shapes how the job is counted, studied, and described by the agencies and legislatures that do set pay and benefits.
Bill Progress
Latest Action · Jan 22, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
H.R. 637 Bill Summary
What H.R. 637 actually does.
Dispatchers move into the first-responder job group
OMB must categorize public safety telecommunicators as a protective service occupation in the Standard Occupational Classification system, the same major group that includes police officers and firefighters.
A 30-day deadline instead of the usual revision cycle
The change must happen within 30 days of enactment, rather than waiting for OMB's periodic review of the classification system.
Findings lay out the crisis work on the other end of the line
The bill's findings describe dispatchers handling missing and abducted child reports, negotiating with hostage takers and suicidal callers, coaching first aid during active shootings, and relaying information to officers under fire.
Trauma exposure is part of the record
According to the bill's findings, the job's long hours and round-the-clock shifts add to an emotional and physical toll, and research suggests the trauma exposure may lead to post-traumatic stress.
No money attached
The bill changes a statistical category only. It does not set pay, change retirement eligibility, fund training, or create mental-health benefits.
Who benefits from H.R. 637?
911 dispatchers and call takers
The people who answer emergency calls in every county would be counted in federal data alongside the police officers, firefighters, and EMTs they send to your door.
Dispatch centers and their advocates
Local agencies and associations arguing for better pay, staffing, or retirement status could point to a federal classification that describes the work as emergency response.
Researchers and policymakers
Anyone studying the public safety workforce, from staffing shortages to trauma rates, would find dispatchers in the same data group as the responders they work with every shift.
Who is affected by H.R. 637?
Office of Management and Budget
OMB would have 30 days to recategorize the occupation, outside its normal revision schedule.
Federal statistical agencies
The Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Census Bureau, and other agencies that publish job data would report dispatchers under protective service occupations going forward, which can break year-over-year comparisons.
State and local governments
Employers that map their job titles to federal categories may need to update how they code dispatcher positions. The bill itself imposes no new duties on them.
Dispatchers expecting a raise
The label changes, but nothing in H.R. 637 requires higher pay, new benefits, earlier retirement, or added staffing.
HR637 Legislative Journey
House: Committee Action
Jan 22, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
About the Sponsor
Norma Torres
Democrat, California's 35th congressional district · 11 years in Congress
Committees: House Administration, Appropriations
View full profile →
Cosponsors (86)
This bill has 86 cosponsors: 57 Democrats, 29 Republicans, reflecting bipartisan support. Cosponsors represent 35 states: Alaska, Alabama, Arizona, and 32 more.
Brian Fitzpatrick
Republican · PA
Diana Harshbarger
Republican · TN
David Kustoff
Republican · TN
Pete Stauber
Republican · MN
Andrew Garbarino
Republican · NY
Don Bacon
Republican · NE
Stephen Lynch
Democrat · MA
Marilyn Strickland
Democrat · WA
Jill Tokuda
Democrat · HI
Andrea Salinas
Democrat · OR
Eleanor Norton
Democrat · DC
Glenn Thompson
Republican · PA
Committee Sponsors
Education and Workforce Committee
6 of 37 committee members cosponsored
12 Democrats across this committee haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents
H.R. 637 Quick Facts
- Committee
- Education and Workforce
- Chamber
- House
- Policy
- Government Operations and Politics
- Introduced
- Jan 22, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Jan 22, 2025
Official Sources
Official bill page for the 911 SAVES Act with text, sponsors, cosponsors, and committee actions.
Status of the federal review now underway for the 2028 job classification update, which specifically asked for comment on how to classify public safety telecommunicators.
The June 2024 OMB notice opening the 2028 revision, the regular process H.R. 637 would bypass with a 30-day deadline.
Home of the Standard Occupational Classification system that H.R. 637 would require OMB to change.
The federal job profile for 911 dispatchers, currently filed under office and administrative support occupations.
The protective service group, including police officers and firefighters, where the bill would place 911 dispatchers.
Federal employment and wage estimates for occupation code 43-5031, the category dispatchers are counted under today.
OMB is the office the bill directs to make the reclassification.
H.R. 637 Common Questions
What does the 911 SAVES Act do?
It requires OMB to classify 911 dispatchers, officially public safety telecommunicators, as a protective service occupation within 30 days. That puts them in the same federal job group as police officers and firefighters instead of office and administrative support.
Are 911 dispatchers considered first responders?
Not in the federal job classification system. Dispatchers are grouped with office and administrative support work today. Some states and agencies treat them as first responders under their own laws, but H.R. 637 would change the federal category.
Would H.R. 637 give 911 dispatchers a raise?
No. The bill changes a statistical job category only. It sets no pay, bonus, or benefit. Supporters argue the label can still influence how states and local agencies value the job when they set pay and retirement rules.
Would dispatchers get first-responder retirement benefits?
Not from this bill. Retirement and pension rules are set by federal, state, and local employers, and H.R. 637 does not touch them. It only changes how the federal government classifies the job for data purposes.
Does H.R. 637 help dispatchers with PTSD?
Not directly. The bill's findings say research suggests dispatchers face trauma that may lead to PTSD, and note some agencies already offer critical incident debriefing. But the bill creates no counseling benefit or mental-health funding.
Why does a job classification matter if it's just statistics?
Federal job categories shape how agencies count, study, and describe a workforce. The bill's findings argue the current placement is an inaccurate representation of dispatch work and out of step with related classification systems.
Has the 911 SAVES Act passed?
No. Rep. Norma Torres (D-CA) introduced H.R. 637 on January 22, 2025, and it was referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce. It has 86 cosponsors, 57 Democrats and 29 Republicans.
Based on H.R. 637 bill text
H.R. 637 Bill Text
“To require the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to review and make certain revisions to the Standard Occupational Classification System, and for other purposes.”
Source: U.S. Government Publishing Office
Get notified when H.R. 637 moves
Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.
Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.
Government Operations and Politics Bills
9 related bills we're tracking
Protect Our Letter Carriers Act of 2025
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Feb 6, 2025
John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Mar 5, 2025
Washington, D.C. Admission Act
Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committees on Rules, Armed Services, the Judiciary, and Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Jan 3, 2025
Rights for the TSA Workforce Act
Referred to the Subcommittee on Transportation and Maritime Security.
Mar 11, 2025
DISCLOSE Act of 2026
Referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, and the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Mar 4, 2026
Federal Retirement Fairness Act
ASSUMING FIRST SPONSORSHIP - Ms. Randall asked unanimous consent that she may hereafter be considered as the first sponsor of H.R. 1522, a bill originally introduced by Representative Connolly, for the purpose of adding cosponsors and requesting reprintings pursuant to clause 7 of rule XII. Agreed to without objection.
Jul 22, 2025
FIND Act
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Jan 3, 2025
Fair Pay for Federal Contractors Act of 2025
Referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Sep 30, 2025
Saving the Civil Service Act
ASSUMING FIRST SPONSORSHIP - Mr. Walkinshaw asked unanimous consent that he may hereafter be considered as the first sponsor of H.R. 492, a bill originally introduced by Representative Connolly, for the purpose of adding cosponsors and requesting reprintings pursuant to clause 7 of rule XII. Agreed to without objection.
Sep 16, 2025
Trending Right Now
Bills gaining momentum across Congress
ASAP Act
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 40 - 0.
Sep 16, 2026
Federal Firearms Licensee Protection Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Mar 3, 2025
Therapeutic Fraud Prevention Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
May 7, 2025
Tracking Government Operations and Politics in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.