H.R. 7058: Foreign Adversary AI Risk Assessment and Diplomacy Act
Sponsor
Michael Baumgartner
Republican · WA-5
Bill Progress
Latest Action · Mar 26, 2026
Committee approved bill for floor consideration by the Yeas and Nays: 45 - 0.
Why it matters
As foreign governments rapidly use generative AI for propaganda, cyberattacks, and weapons-related work, this bill would force the State Department to produce its first risk assessment within 180 days of enactment and then update Congress every year for three years.
H.R. 7058, introduced on January 14, 2026, would require the Secretary of State to deliver a formal assessment of risks from foreign adversaries' use of artificial intelligence not later than 180 days after enactment, followed by annual reports for three years. Those reports must be sent to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, and the State Department must post the unclassified portion on a publicly available Department of State website.
The bill is narrowly focused on concrete national security risks. It tells the State Department to review incidents from the preceding calendar year involving generative AI used for anti-U.S. propaganda and malign influence operations through synthetic media, for developing or deploying chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear weapons, for facilitating malicious cyber operations, and for strengthening military, surveillance, or intelligence capabilities. It also requires attribution to specific foreign adversaries and analysis of what those trends mean for U.S. foreign policy, diplomacy, and international norms.
The diplomacy piece matters as much as the reporting piece. Congress says the Department of State should take bilateral and multilateral diplomatic steps to recognize, assess, and address foreign adversary AI use, while promoting responsible state behavior. The Secretary of State must also consult with the heads of other relevant Federal departments and agencies, signaling that this is meant to be a whole-of-government effort rather than a stand-alone State Department paper exercise.
The bill does not create new criminal penalties, civil fines, grant programs, or a funding stream. Instead, it creates a transparency and strategy requirement: public unclassified assessments, optional classified annexes limited to protecting intelligence sources and methods, and recommendations for mitigation and counter-risk strategies. In plain terms, Congress is trying to force faster identification of how foreign adversaries are using generative AI before those uses become normalized or harder to counter.
What does H.R. 7058 do?
First State Department report due in 180 days
The bill requires the Secretary of State to submit an initial assessment not later than 180 days after the date of enactment, then submit updated assessments annually thereafter for three years.
Reports go to 2 specific congressional committees
Each assessment must be sent to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, which the bill defines as the 'appropriate congressional committees.'
Must track 4 categories of AI-related threats
The assessment must cover incidents from the preceding calendar year involving generative AI used for: synthetic media tied to anti-U.S. propaganda or malign influence operations; development or deployment of chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear weapons; facilitation of malicious cyber operations; and development or enhancement of military, surveillance, or intelligence capabilities.
Public posting required, with classified annex allowed
The Secretary of State must submit each assessment in unclassified form and post the unclassified portion on a publicly available Department of State website. A classified annex is allowed, but only to protect intelligence sources and methods.
Diplomatic response must be bilateral and multilateral
Congress says the Department of State should take diplomatic steps through bilateral and multilateral engagement to recognize, assess, and address foreign adversary use of generative AI, and to promote responsible state behavior.
Uses a specific definition of generative AI
The bill defines 'generative artificial intelligence applications' as AI models that emulate the structure and characteristics of input data to generate synthetic content, including images, videos, audio, text, and other digital content. It also incorporates the statutory AI definition from section 5002(3) of the National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Act of 2020 and ties 'foreign adversary' to the 'covered nation' definition in 10 U.S.C. 4872(f).
Who benefits from H.R. 7058?
U.S. diplomats and foreign policy planners
They would get an initial assessment within 180 days of enactment and annual updates for three years, plus required analysis of implications for U.S. foreign policy, diplomatic engagement, and international norms.
Congressional oversight committees
The House Committee on Foreign Affairs and Senate Committee on Foreign Relations would receive regular, directed reporting from the Secretary of State instead of relying on ad hoc briefings.
Researchers, journalists, and the public
They benefit because the State Department must post the unclassified portion of each assessment on a publicly available website, giving outside experts access to official findings on foreign adversary AI use.
National security agencies across the federal government
The bill requires the Secretary of State to consult with heads of other relevant Federal departments and agencies, helping intelligence, defense, cyber, and diplomatic officials align around shared threat assessments and mitigation strategies.
Who is affected by H.R. 7058?
Department of State
The agency takes on the main workload: the Secretary of State must produce the first report within 180 days, issue annual reports for three years, consult with other agencies, and publicly post the unclassified assessments.
Foreign adversary governments covered by 10 U.S.C. 4872(f)
Their use of AI could be publicly assessed and attributed in U.S. government reports, especially if tied to propaganda, cyber operations, chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear activity, or military and surveillance enhancement.
Federal agencies involved in intelligence and security
They would be pulled into consultation with the State Department because the bill requires coordination with heads of other relevant Federal departments and agencies.
Technology and disinformation analysts
Their work could gain prominence because the bill specifically targets synthetic media, anti-U.S. propaganda, malign influence operations, and malicious cyber operations, all of which require technical detection and attribution.
What Congress Is Saying
H.R. 7058 hasn't been debated on the floor yet.
This section updates when a legislator speaks about it on the floor or in committee.
HR7058 Legislative Journey
House: Vote: 45-0
Mar 26, 2026
Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 45 - 0.
House: Committee Action
Jan 14, 2026
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
About the Sponsor
Michael Baumgartner
Republican, Washington's 5th congressional district · 1 years in Congress
Committees: Education and Workforce, the Judiciary, Foreign Affairs
View full profile →
Cosponsors (10)
All 10 cosponsors are Republicans. Cosponsors represent 7 states: Arizona, Florida, Indiana, and 4 more.
Committee Sponsors
Foreign Affairs Committee
4 of 51 committee members cosponsored
24 Republicans across this committee haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents
H.R. 7058 Quick Facts
- Committee
- Foreign Affairs
- Chamber
- House
- Policy
- International Affairs
- Introduced
- Jan 14, 2026
Committee approved bill for floor consideration by the Yeas and Nays: 45 - 0.
Mar 26, 2026
H.R. 7058 Common Questions
How soon would the State Department have to release its first foreign adversary AI risk report?
Under the Foreign Adversary AI Risk Assessment and Diplomacy Act, the first State Department assessment is due within 180 days of enactment, with annual updates for the next 3 years (SEC. 3).
Can the State Department keep the foreign adversary AI report classified?
No. Under the Foreign Adversary AI Risk Assessment and Diplomacy Act, each assessment must be unclassified and posted on a public State Department website, though a classified annex is allowed to protect sources and methods (SEC. 3).
What AI threats would the State Department have to track under HR 7058?
According to H.R. 7058 SEC. 3, the reports must cover 4 areas: anti-U.S. propaganda using synthetic media, CBRN weapons uses, malicious cyber operations, and military, surveillance, or intelligence enhancement.
Which congressional committees would receive the foreign adversary AI assessments?
Under H.R. 7058, the reports go to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, defined as the appropriate congressional committees (SEC. 4).
Does HR 7058 require the State Department to name which foreign adversaries used AI?
Yes. According to H.R. 7058 SEC. 3, the assessment must attribute the covered AI activities to specific foreign adversaries and analyze the implications for U.S. foreign policy and diplomacy.
Can foreign adversary AI use in cyberattacks be included in the State Department report?
Yes. Under the Foreign Adversary AI Risk Assessment and Diplomacy Act, the assessment must analyze incidents where generative AI facilitated malicious cyber operations (SEC. 3).
Does the bill cover AI used to develop chemical or biological weapons?
Yes. Under H.R. 7058 SEC. 3, the State Department must assess generative AI incidents tied to the development or deployment of chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear weapons.
What counts as generative AI under the Foreign Adversary AI Risk Assessment and Diplomacy Act?
The bill defines generative AI as models that emulate input data to create synthetic content, including images, videos, audio, text, and other digital content (SEC. 4).
Does HR 7058 require diplomacy with allies and other countries on foreign adversary AI risks?
Yes. Under the Foreign Adversary AI Risk Assessment and Diplomacy Act, Congress says State should use bilateral and multilateral engagement to address foreign adversary generative AI use and promote responsible state behavior (SEC. 2).
Does the State Department have to consult other federal agencies before submitting the AI risk assessment?
Yes. According to H.R. 7058 SEC. 3, the Secretary of State must consult with the heads of other relevant federal departments and agencies when preparing the assessment.
Based on H.R. 7058 bill text
H.R. 7058 Bill Text
“To require the Secretary of State to conduct assessments of the risks posed to the United States by foreign adversaries who utilize generative artificial intelligence for malicious activities, and for other purposes.”
Source: U.S. Government Publishing Office
Get notified when H.R. 7058 moves
Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.
Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.
International Affairs Bills
9 related bills we're tracking
Enhanced Iran Sanctions Act of 2025
Motion to place bill on Consensus Calendar filed by Mr. Lawler.
Jan 12, 2026
United States-Israel Defense Partnership Act of 2025
Referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Feb 12, 2025
Global Respect Act
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Nov 19, 2025
United States-Israel FUTURES Act of 2026
Referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Feb 12, 2026
To abolish the United States Agency for International Development, and for other purposes.
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Appropriations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Feb 7, 2025
Food for Palestinian Children and Families in Gaza Act of 2026
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Feb 12, 2026
IRAN Act
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Feb 4, 2026
SHADOW Fleet Sanctions Act of 2026
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 326.
Feb 10, 2026
FADS Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Jun 27, 2025
Trending Right Now
Bills gaining momentum across Congress
Congressional Tribute to Constance Baker Motley Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Sep 11, 2025
Deterring American AI Model Theft Act of 2026
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Apr 15, 2026
GUARDRAILS Act
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Mar 26, 2026
Tracking International Affairs in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.