H.R. 6176: Electricity Transmission Scorecard Act
Sponsor
Sean Casten
Democrat · IL-6
Bill Progress
Latest Action · Nov 20, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why it matters
The bill would force the electric transmission sector to publish standardized, verified performance data on a tight timeline, with a final federal rule due within 1 year of enactment and first reports due within 6 months after that rule.
HR6176 would create a federal scorecard system for the transmission grid, aimed at making a notoriously opaque part of the power system more transparent. Covered transmission owners would have to file a biannual TIAPS report, while Independent System Operators, Regional Transmission Organizations, and transmission planning entities would file an annual RIAPS report. Those scorecards would have to be submitted in a machine-readable, open-data format, and the first reports would be due not later than 6 months after the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission issues a final rule.
The bill is detailed about what gets measured. For transmission owners, the scorecard must cover ratepayer affordability, financing costs, investment prudency and cost recovery, investment effectiveness, capital expenditure bias, system reliability and availability, physical system performance, interconnection and access fairness, non-operational cost recovery, and interregional and regional planning integration. Regional entities would have to aggregate those utility-level metrics and add broader measures like market efficiency, regional interconnection performance, regional and interregional development, seams management and resolution, and greenhouse gas emissions intensity.
The measure also tries to prevent self-grading. Scorecards must be verified by independent evaluators approved by the Commission, with strict rotation limits: covered transmission owners could use an evaluator for no more than 5 consecutive periods and no more than 15 times in 10 years, while ISO/RTO/planning entities are capped at 3 consecutive periods and 7 times in 10 years. Verification protocols must be reviewed at least once every 3 years, and independent audits by National Laboratories or other qualified institutions must be made public within 2 months after completion. Violations would be enforced under section 316A of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 825o–1.
The timeline is aggressive. The final rule is due not later than 1 year after enactment. A public transparency portal must be initiated within 12 months and available within 18 months. The Commission must also hold technical conferences not less than once every 3 years, and a 17-member stakeholder advisory group would feed recommendations into the process; the Commission would have to respond in writing within 60 days. The bill reaches a wide set of transmission owners, including entities outside ISO/RTO structures if they own, operate, or control transmission facilities and, for facilities not part of the bulk-power system, have total transmission capacity of 100 megawatts or greater.
What does H.R. 6176 do?
FERC rule due within 1 year
The Commission must issue a final rule not later than 1 year after enactment, setting up the scorecard system for covered transmission owners, ISOs, RTOs, and transmission planning entities.
First scorecards due 6 months later
Initial reporting is required not later than 6 months after the Commission issues its final rule. Covered transmission owners file biannual TIAPS reports, while ISO/RTO/planning entities file annual RIAPS reports.
Public portal live by 18 months
The bill requires a transparency portal to be initiated not later than 12 months after enactment and made available not later than 18 months after enactment, giving the public access to scorecard data in machine-readable, open-data format.
Independent reviewers face 5-period and 3-period caps
Scorecards must be verified by Commission-approved independent evaluators. For covered transmission owners, an evaluator can serve no more than 5 consecutive periods and no more than 15 times in 10 years; for ISO/RTO/planning entities, the limits are 3 consecutive periods and 7 times in 10 years.
Audits public within 2 months
Independent audits must be conducted by National Laboratories or other qualified institutions, and audit results must be made public within 2 months of completion. Verification protocols also must be reviewed not less than once every 3 years.
100-megawatt threshold expands coverage
A 'covered transmission owner' includes an entity other than an ISO, RTO, or planning entity that owns, operates, or controls transmission facilities and provides transmission service; if the facilities are not part of the bulk-power system, the entity is covered when total transmission capacity is 100 megawatts or greater.
Who benefits from H.R. 6176?
Ratepayers and consumer advocates
They would get standardized information on ratepayer affordability, financing costs, investment prudency, cost recovery, and non-operational cost recovery. The 17-member advisory group also reserves 2 seats for ratepayer advocacy organizations.
Independent power producers and interconnection customers
The bill requires reporting on interconnection and access fairness, plus regional interconnection performance. It also defines an 'affiliated entity' as one with a direct or indirect relationship that could reasonably influence interconnection treatment, signaling a focus on discrimination concerns.
Researchers, watchdogs, and journalists
They would gain public access to machine-readable, open-data scorecards through a portal initiated within 12 months and available within 18 months, along with public audit results released within 2 months after completion.
Grid planners and reliability experts
They would get recurring data on system reliability and availability, physical system performance, seams management, regional and interregional development, and greenhouse gas emissions intensity, with technical conferences required at least once every 3 years.
Who is affected by H.R. 6176?
Covered transmission owners
They would face biannual TIAPS reporting, independent verification, possible audits, and enforcement under section 316A of the Federal Power Act. The definition reaches some non-bulk-power operators if they have 100 megawatts or greater of total transmission capacity.
ISOs, RTOs, and transmission planning entities
These entities would have to submit annual RIAPS reports covering aggregated owner metrics, market efficiency, seams management and resolution, regional interconnection performance, and greenhouse gas emissions intensity, with evaluator limits of 3 consecutive periods and 7 times in 10 years.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
The Commission would have to write the final rule within 1 year, manage revisions with at least a 90-day public comment period and a final rule within 180 days after comments close, approve independent evaluators, hold conferences every 3 years, and respond in writing to advisory group recommendations within 60 days.
Department of Energy and the Secretary
The Secretary would have to publish an annual report ranking performance by market type and governance structure and conduct a comprehensive review of the Act's implementation every 3 years.
H.R. 6176 Common Questions
How soon would FERC have to finalize the power grid scorecard rule?
Under the Electricity Transmission Scorecard Act, FERC must issue the final rule within 1 year of enactment (SEC. 3).
When would the first transmission scorecard reports be due?
According to HR6176 Section 3, the first scorecards are due no later than 6 months after FERC issues its final rule.
When would the federal transmission transparency portal go live?
Under the Electricity Transmission Scorecard Act, the portal must be started within 12 months and made available within 18 months after enactment (SEC. 4).
Does HR6176 cover utilities outside ISO and RTO regions?
Yes. Under HR6176 Section 6, an entity outside an ISO, RTO, or planning entity is covered if it owns, operates, or controls transmission facilities, provides transmission service, and has at least 100 megawatts of capacity for non-bulk-power facilities.
How many times can the same independent evaluator verify a transmission owner's scorecard?
Under the Electricity Transmission Scorecard Act (SEC. 3), a covered transmission owner may use the same evaluator for no more than 5 consecutive periods and no more than 15 times in 10 years.
What are the verifier rotation limits for ISO and RTO scorecards under HR6176?
According to HR6176 Section 3, an ISO, RTO, or transmission planning entity may use the same evaluator for no more than 3 consecutive periods and 7 times in 10 years.
Can the public see transmission scorecard audit results?
Yes. Under the Electricity Transmission Scorecard Act (SEC. 3), audits by National Laboratories or other qualified institutions must be made public within 2 months after completion.
What metrics would transmission owners have to report under HR6176?
Under HR6176 Section 3, TIAPS must cover affordability, financing costs, investment prudency and effectiveness, capex bias, reliability, physical performance, interconnection fairness, non-operational cost recovery, and planning integration.
Does the bill require transmission scorecards to be in open-data format?
Yes. According to HR6176 Section 3, scorecards must be submitted in a machine-readable, open-data format.
Which interconnections are specifically mentioned in the bill's interregional transmission definition?
Under the Electricity Transmission Scorecard Act (SEC. 6), interregional interconnection specifically mentions the Western Interconnection, Eastern Interconnection, and ERCOT.
Based on H.R. 6176 bill text
HR6176 Legislative Journey
House: Committee Action
Nov 20, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
About the Sponsor
Sean Casten
Democrat, Illinois's 6th congressional district · 7 years in Congress
Committees: Joint Economic Committee, Financial Services
View full profile →
Cosponsors (15)
All 15 cosponsors are Democrats. Cosponsors represent 10 states: California, Florida, Illinois, and 7 more.
Kevin Mullin
Democrat · CA
Jared Huffman
Democrat · CA
Suhas Subramanyam
Democrat · VA
Mike Quigley
Democrat · IL
John Garamendi
Democrat · CA
Kathy Castor
Democrat · FL
Seth Moulton
Democrat · MA
Bill Foster
Democrat · IL
Mike Levin
Democrat · CA
André Carson
Democrat · IN
Madeleine Dean
Democrat · PA
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
Democrat · NY
Committee Sponsors
Energy and Commerce Committee
3 of 54 committee members cosponsored
21 Democrats across this committee haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents
H.R. 6176 Quick Facts
- Committee
- Energy and Commerce
- Chamber
- House
- Policy
- Energy
- Introduced
- Nov 20, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Nov 20, 2025
Official Sources
Official Congress.gov page for the Electricity Transmission Scorecard Act with bill text, actions, and status.
FERC is the Commission responsible for issuing the bill's final rule and overseeing the transmission scorecard system.
FERC's official docket and document system would likely host rulemakings, technical conference materials, and related filings if the bill is implemented.
The bill assigns the Secretary reporting duties, and DOE's Grid Deployment Office is directly relevant to transmission planning and grid performance policy.
The bill allows independent audits by National Laboratories or other qualified institutions, making DOE's lab network an official reference point.
The bill cites section 316A of the Federal Power Act, so the U.S. Code portal is an official source for the underlying statutory enforcement framework.
H.R. 6176 Bill Text
“To require standardized performance reporting for entities engaged in electricity transmission to improve transparency, accountability, and grid outcomes, and for other purposes.”
Source: U.S. Government Publishing Office
Get notified when H.R. 6176 moves
Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.
Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.
Energy Bills
9 related bills we're tracking
Energy Choice Act
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 412.
Feb 4, 2026
Heating and Cooling Relief Act
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Mar 31, 2025
SHIELD Act
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Jan 14, 2026
Critical Mineral Consistency Act of 2025
Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 348.
Mar 4, 2026
Homeowner Energy Freedom Act
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Feb 25, 2026
CORE Act of 2025
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 25 - 18.
Jun 25, 2025
Home Appliance Protection and Affordability Act
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Feb 25, 2026
Net Metering Protection Act
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Sep 18, 2025
GRID Act
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Oct 31, 2025
Trending Right Now
Bills gaining momentum across Congress
Congressional Tribute to Constance Baker Motley Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Sep 11, 2025
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 890 East 152nd Street in Cleveland, Ohio, as the "Technical Sergeant Alma Gladys Minter Post Office Building".
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Apr 15, 2026
Love Lives On Act of 2025
Subcommittee Hearings Held
Feb 3, 2026
Tracking Energy in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.