H.R. 2556: CORE Act of 2025

Introduced Apr 1, 20251 cosponsors

Sponsor

Wesley Hunt

Wesley Hunt

Republican · TX-38

Bill Progress

IntroducedApr 1
Committee 
Pass House 
Pass Senate 
Signed 
Law 

Latest Action · Jun 25, 2025

1/2

Committee approved bill for floor consideration in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 25 - 18.

Bill orders offshore energy reality check

Why it matters

The bill sets hard deadlines — 1 year, 18 months, 5 years, and 10 years — for the federal government to update offshore resource estimates and compare U.S. policy with foreign competitors at a time of energy security and maritime boundary concerns.

The CORE Act of 2025 is mainly a data-and-reporting bill, but it is built to shape future offshore energy policy. Its core move is to require a transboundary hydrocarbon report not later than 18 months after enactment, sent to five specific congressional committees: the Senate Committees on Energy and Natural Resources and Foreign Relations, and the House Committees on Energy and Commerce, Natural Resources, and Foreign Affairs. That report must identify transboundary hydrocarbon reservoirs, analyze the legal framework around them, assess economic, environmental, and geopolitical implications, recommend cooperation strategies, use data from U.S.-Canada collaborative efforts, examine unresolved U.S.-Canada maritime boundaries, and review activity by Cuba, Mexico, Canada, the Bahamas, and Russia.

The bill also standardizes and expands the government's broader offshore inventory work. It amends 42 U.S.C. 15912 to require an inventory and analysis at least once every 5 years covering the Atlantic region, the Pacific region — specifically California, Oregon, Washington, and Hawaii — the Alaska region, the Gulf of America region, and U.S. territories. That analysis cannot stop at raw resource estimates: it must also look at global market influence, domestic job impacts including direct, indirect, and induced jobs, and how a lack of leasing affects national security and revenue sharing under GOMESA, the Land and Water Conservation Fund, and the National Historic Preservation Act. It also broadens the scope beyond oil and gas to include stone, sand, gravel, and offshore critical minerals.

What does H.R. 2556 do?

1

18-month report on cross-border oil and gas

Not later than 18 months after enactment, the Secretaries — defined as the Secretary of Energy, the Secretary of the Interior, and the Secretary of State — must submit a transboundary hydrocarbon report to 5 committees: Senate Energy and Natural Resources, Senate Foreign Relations, House Energy and Commerce, House Natural Resources, and House Foreign Affairs. The report must identify transboundary reservoirs, analyze legal issues, review economic, environmental, and geopolitical implications, and examine activity by Cuba, Mexico, Canada, the Bahamas, and Russia.

2

Offshore inventory required at least every 5 years

The bill amends 42 U.S.C. 15912 to require an offshore inventory and analysis not less frequently than once every 5 years. It must cover the Atlantic region, Pacific region including California, Oregon, Washington, and Hawaii, the Alaska region, the Gulf of America region, and U.S. territories.

3

First model assessment due within 1 year

The Secretary of the Interior must complete the first assessment not later than 1 year after enactment and then repeat it every 10 years. The Secretary must consult with the National Petroleum Council, the Society of Petroleum Engineers, and the United States Association for Energy Economics, and within 1 year after each assessment must publish an update or explain why one is unnecessary.

4

Broader resource review includes critical minerals

The bill requires federal analysis not only of offshore oil and gas, but also of non-energy minerals including stone, sand, gravel, and offshore critical minerals. It also requires analysis of global market influence, domestic job impacts broken out as direct, indirect, and induced, and the effects of leasing unavailability on national security and revenue sharing tied to GOMESA, the Land and Water Conservation Fund, and the National Historic Preservation Act.

5

Foreign comparison report also due in 1 year

Not later than 1 year after enactment, the Secretary of the Interior, in consultation with the Secretaries of State and Energy, must publish a comparative analysis of offshore oil and gas practices in major offshore producing countries, and then update it not less frequently than once every 10 years. The report must be posted on the Department of the Interior website and sent to the House Natural Resources Committee and the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee.

6

Country comparison must include barrels, cubic feet, acres

The international comparison report must include specific metrics: acres offered for lease, frequency of auctions, lease structures and fiscal terms, oil production measured in barrels, gas production measured in cubic feet, historical trends and forecasts, regional market demand, export capability, and probabilistic estimates of discovered and undiscovered resources prepared with the U.S. Geological Survey.

Who benefits from H.R. 2556?

Federal energy and resource planners

They get a fixed schedule for better data: inventories at least once every 5 years, model assessments within 1 year and then every 10 years, and an international comparison within 1 year. The bill also directs use of advanced geophysical, geological, and geotechnical data plus quantum computing, AI, and GIS.

Offshore oil, gas, and mineral industries

Companies gain from more frequent federal resource assessments across the Atlantic, Pacific, Alaska, Gulf of America, and U.S. territories, and from analyses that specifically measure lease availability, fiscal terms abroad, production in barrels and cubic feet, and export capacity.

Congress

Lawmakers receive multiple directed reports on hard deadlines, including the 18-month transboundary report to 5 committees and the comparative practices report to the House Natural Resources Committee and Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, giving them a more detailed basis for future leasing or diplomatic decisions.

Coastal states and revenue-sharing stakeholders

States and programs tied to offshore revenue may benefit because the required analysis must examine how leasing unavailability affects revenue sharing under GOMESA, the Land and Water Conservation Fund, and the National Historic Preservation Act.

Who is affected by H.R. 2556?

Department of the Interior

This department carries the biggest workload. It must lead the comparative analysis within 1 year, conduct model assessments starting within 1 year and then every 10 years, publish updates within 1 year of each assessment, and maintain broader offshore inventory work at least every 5 years.

Department of Energy and Department of State

Both departments are formally included in the definition of 'Secretaries' and must participate in the transboundary report due within 18 months, as well as the comparative offshore practices analysis.

Neighboring and competing offshore countries

The bill specifically calls for review of offshore activities by Cuba, Mexico, Canada, the Bahamas, and Russia, plus analysis of unresolved U.S.-Canada maritime boundaries and use of data from U.S.-Canada collaborative efforts.

Environmental and coastal stakeholders

They are affected because the required reports must evaluate environmental implications of transboundary development and the national security and economic effects of leasing decisions across multiple regions, including California, Oregon, Washington, Hawaii, Alaska, the Gulf of America, and U.S. territories.

H.R. 2556 Common Questions

How often would offshore resource estimates be updated under the CORE Act of 2025?

Under the CORE Act of 2025, the offshore inventory and analysis must be updated at least once every 5 years (SEC. 2).

What states are included in the Pacific offshore region under HR2556?

According to HR2556 SEC. 2, the Pacific region specifically includes California, Oregon, Washington, and Hawaii.

Does the CORE Act require a transboundary oil and gas report within 18 months?

Yes. Under the CORE Act of 2025 (SEC. 2), the Secretaries must submit a transboundary hydrocarbon reservoir report no later than 18 months after enactment.

Which countries must be reviewed in the CORE Act transboundary hydrocarbon report?

Under the CORE Act of 2025 (SEC. 2), the report must review offshore activity by Cuba, Mexico, Canada, the Bahamas, and Russia.

Can the federal offshore inventory under HR2556 include critical minerals, sand, and gravel?

Yes. According to HR2556 SEC. 2, the analysis must cover non-energy mineral resources including stone, sand, gravel, and offshore critical minerals.

What are the job impact categories required in the CORE Act offshore analysis?

Under the CORE Act of 2025 (SEC. 2), the economic analysis must assess domestic job impacts as direct, indirect, and induced jobs.

Does HR2556 require AI or quantum computing for offshore resource analysis?

Yes. Under HR2556 SEC. 2, the transboundary report must use emerging technologies such as quantum computing, artificial intelligence, and GIS.

How soon would the Interior Department have to assess and update offshore resource models under the CORE Act?

Under the CORE Act of 2025 (SEC. 2), the first model assessment is due within 1 year, repeated at least every 10 years, and an update or explanation must be published within 1 year after each assessment.

What data must be included in the CORE Act foreign offshore comparison report?

Under the CORE Act of 2025 (SEC. 3), the report must include acres offered for lease, auction frequency, lease terms, oil in barrels, gas in cubic feet, trends, forecasts, demand, export capacity, and USGS-based resource estimates.

Which agencies must the government partner with for the CORE Act offshore report?

According to the CORE Act of 2025 (SEC. 2), the report must involve partnerships with the National Science Foundation, NOAA, and the Office of Naval Research.

Based on H.R. 2556 bill text

HR2556 Legislative Journey

4 actions

House: Vote: 25-18

Jun 25, 2025

25-18

Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 25 - 18.

House: Committee Action

May 20, 2025

Subcommittee Hearings Held

House: Committee Action

May 13, 2025

Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources.

House: Committee Action

Apr 1, 2025

Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committees on Energy and Commerce, and Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

About the Sponsor

Wesley Hunt

Wesley Hunt

Republican, Texas's 38th congressional district · 3 years in Congress

Committees: Natural Resources, the Judiciary

View full profile →

Cosponsors (1)

This bill has 1 cosponsor: 1 Republican. Cosponsors represent 1 state: Alaska.

1Republican·1 state

Committee Sponsors

Natural Resources Committee

19D24R
|1 signed42 not yet

1 of 43 committee members cosponsored

Foreign Affairs Committee

23D28R
|0 signed51 not yet

0 of 51 committee members cosponsored

No committee members have cosponsored this bill

Energy and Commerce Committee

24D30R
|0 signed54 not yet

0 of 54 committee members cosponsored

No committee members have cosponsored this bill

77 Republicans across these committees haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents

H.R. 2556 Quick Facts

Cosponsors
1
Nicholas Begich
Committee
Natural Resources
Chamber
House
Policy
Energy
Introduced
Apr 1, 2025

Committee approved bill for floor consideration in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 25 - 18.

Jun 25, 2025

Constituent Resources

Get notified when this bill moves

Official Sources

H.R. 2556 on Congress.gov

Official bill page with text, actions, sponsors, and committee referrals for the CORE Act of 2025.

42 U.S.C. 15912 at U.S. House Office of the Law Revision Counsel

This is the U.S. Code section the bill amends to require offshore inventory and analysis updates at least every 5 years.

Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Resource Evaluation Program

BOEM is the Interior Department office responsible for assessing offshore oil, gas, and other seabed resources central to the bill’s reporting requirements.

U.S. Geological Survey Energy and Minerals Science Strategy

USGS is specifically referenced in the bill for probabilistic estimates of discovered and undiscovered offshore resources used in the foreign comparison report.

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Office of Ocean Exploration and Research

NOAA is named in the bill as a partner agency for offshore mapping, data collection, and maritime capabilities supporting the required reports.

Office of Naval Research

The bill specifically names the Office of Naval Research as a federal partner for maritime vessels, deployed capability, and related mapping technologies.

Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act at GovInfo

The bill references section 12 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act regarding withdrawn offshore lands and leasing availability.

Land and Water Conservation Fund

The bill requires analysis of how offshore leasing affects revenue sharing tied to the Land and Water Conservation Fund.

National Marine Sanctuaries Act at GovInfo

The bill references the National Marine Sanctuaries Act when discussing offshore areas unavailable for leasing.

H.R. 2556 Bill Text

PDF

To enhance national security and energy independence through comprehensive offshore energy resource assessment and mapping, to establish a framework for the regular review and standardization of offshore resource exploration methodologies, and for related purposes.

Source: U.S. Government Publishing Office

Bill Alerts

Get notified when H.R. 2556 moves

Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.

Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.

Energy Bills

9 related bills we're tracking

View all
H.R. 3699

Energy Choice Act

Nicholas Langworthy
Nicholas LangworthyR-NY
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+153
157 cosponsors

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 412.

Feb 4, 2026

HouseEnergy
H.R. 2486

Heating and Cooling Relief Act

Yassamin Ansari
Yassamin AnsariD-AZ
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+43
47 cosponsors

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Mar 31, 2025

HouseEnergy
H.R. 6176

Electricity Transmission Scorecard Act

Sean Casten
Sean CastenD-IL
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+11
15 cosponsors

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Nov 20, 2025

HouseEnergy
H.R. 7066

SHIELD Act

Mike Levin
Mike LevinD-CA
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+9
13 cosponsors
+2 this month

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Jan 14, 2026

HouseEnergy
H.R. 755

Critical Mineral Consistency Act of 2025

Juan Ciscomani
Juan CiscomaniR-AZ
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+9
13 cosponsors

Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 348.

Mar 4, 2026

HouseEnergy
H.R. 4758

Homeowner Energy Freedom Act

Craig Goldman
Craig GoldmanR-TX
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
2 cosponsors

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

Feb 25, 2026

HouseEnergy
H.R. 4626

Home Appliance Protection and Affordability Act

Rick Allen
Rick AllenR-GA
0 cosponsors

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

Feb 25, 2026

HouseEnergy
H.R. 5464

Net Metering Protection Act

Pablo Hernández
Pablo HernándezD-PR
0 cosponsors

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Sep 18, 2025

HouseEnergy
H.R. 5896

GRID Act

Jefferson Van Drew
Jefferson Van DrewR-NJ
0 cosponsors

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Oct 31, 2025

HouseEnergy

Trending Right Now

Bills gaining momentum across Congress

Tracking Energy in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.