H.R. 5388: American Artificial Intelligence Leadership and Uniformity Act
Sponsor
Michael Baumgartner
Republican · WA-5
Bill Progress
Latest Action · Dec 19, 2025
Assigned to Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations. for review
Why it matters
This matters now because the bill would impose a nationwide 5-year block on many state and local AI regulations while requiring the White House to deliver a federal AI action plan within 30 days of enactment.
H.R. 5388, the American Artificial Intelligence Leadership and Uniformity Act, is built around two big ideas: move quickly on a national AI strategy and stop states from creating their own separate AI rulebooks for a while. The bill orders top White House officials to send Congress a National Artificial Intelligence Action Plan not later than 30 days after enactment, then provide annual updates starting 1 year after the initial submission. That is an unusually fast deadline for a government-wide technology strategy, and it signals that the bill's focus is speed, coordination, and national consistency.
The preemption piece is the most politically explosive part. For a 5-year period beginning on the date of enactment, states and local governments could not enforce laws or regulations that limit, restrict, or regulate AI models, AI systems, or automated decision systems engaged in interstate commerce. The bill defines an "artificial intelligence model" as a software component that uses computational, statistical, or machine-learning techniques to produce outputs from a defined set of inputs. It defines an "artificial intelligence system" even more broadly as any data system, hardware, tool, or utility that operates, in whole or in part, using artificial intelligence. And it defines an "automated decision system" as any computational process derived from machine learning, statistical modeling, data analytics, or AI that issues a simplified output, including a score, classification, or recommendation, to materially influence or replace human decision-making.
The bill is not a total wipeout of state power. It allows states to keep enforcing generally applicable laws when AI is treated the same way as comparable non-AI systems. It also preserves reasonable, cost-based fees or bonds if AI is treated in the same manner as comparable non-AI systems, preserves provisions carrying criminal penalties, preserves generally applicable criminal laws, and allows state procurement rules for a state's own use so long as those rules do not become de facto regulation of private companies. States could also pass laws that remove legal barriers or streamline licensing, permitting, routing, zoning, procurement, or reporting for AI deployment.
At the federal level, the bill pushes the executive branch to review all actions taken under Executive Order 14110, issued October 30, 2023, and Executive Order 14179, issued January 23, 2025, and suspend, revise, or rescind actions that conflict with the bill's policy direction. At the same time, it limits new federal overreach by saying nothing in the act gives agencies new authority to impose substantive design, performance, data-handling, documentation, or civil-liability requirements beyond what current law already allows. In plain English: the bill tries to clear out conflicting state rules, pressure the White House to produce a national plan fast, and stop agencies from claiming broad new regulatory powers just because AI is involved.
What does H.R. 5388 do?
White House AI plan due in 30 days
The bill requires a National Artificial Intelligence Action Plan to be submitted to Congress not later than 30 days after enactment. The lead officials are the Assistant to the President for Science and Technology or OSTP Director, the Special Advisor for Artificial Intelligence and Crypto or a designee, and the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, working with the OMB Director and other agency heads.
Annual updates start 1 year later
After the initial plan is delivered, the executive branch must send annual updates beginning 1 year after the initial submission. Those updates must cover implementation, revisions, measurable goals, timelines, agency roles, and progress metrics.
5-year freeze on many state AI rules
For a 5-year period beginning on the date of enactment, states and political subdivisions are barred from enforcing laws or regulations that limit, restrict, or regulate AI models, AI systems, or automated decision systems engaged in interstate commerce. That would block many new state-by-state AI mandates during the moratorium.
Broad AI definitions shape the ban
The bill uses expansive definitions. An 'artificial intelligence model' is a software component that uses computational, statistical, or machine-learning techniques to produce outputs from defined inputs; an 'artificial intelligence system' includes any data system, hardware, tool, or utility operating in whole or in part using AI; and an 'automated decision system' includes outputs such as a score, classification, or recommendation that materially influence or replace human decision-making.
States keep some power over crime and fees
The preemption section has carveouts: states may still enforce generally applicable criminal laws, provisions carrying criminal penalties, and impose reasonable, cost-based fees or bonds if AI is treated the same as comparable non-AI systems. States may also use procurement rules for their own operations as long as those rules do not become de facto regulation of private parties.
Review of Biden- and Trump-era AI orders
The bill requires review of all actions taken under Executive Order 14110 dated October 30, 2023, and Executive Order 14179 dated January 23, 2025. Actions found inconsistent with the bill's policy must be suspended, revised, or rescinded.
Who benefits from H.R. 5388?
AI developers and model companies
They would benefit from a 5-year moratorium on many state and local AI regulations affecting interstate commerce, reducing the risk of having to comply with different rules in 50 states and countless local jurisdictions.
Small businesses using AI tools
The required national action plan must include measures to reduce compliance burdens on small businesses and expand access to resources, which could make adoption cheaper and simpler once the plan is issued within 30 days of enactment.
Federal executive agencies seeking coordination
The bill forces a centralized process led by the White House, OSTP, national security staff, OMB, and other agencies, with annual updates starting 1 year after the initial plan. That could reduce overlapping federal efforts and set shared timelines and metrics.
Infrastructure and national security operators
The action plan must address critical-infrastructure security, national-security applications, supply-chain resilience, and incident reporting, giving these sectors a clearer federal roadmap instead of a scattered state-by-state approach.
Who is affected by H.R. 5388?
State legislatures and governors
They would lose power for 5 years to enforce many AI-specific laws or regulations on AI models, AI systems, and automated decision systems engaged in interstate commerce, except in carveout areas like generally applicable criminal law and certain procurement rules.
City and county governments
Political subdivisions are covered too, so local governments could not enforce local AI restrictions during the 5-year moratorium if those rules regulate covered AI technologies in interstate commerce.
Federal regulators
Agencies are pushed to rethink earlier AI actions tied to Executive Order 14110 from October 30, 2023, and Executive Order 14179 from January 23, 2025, but they are also told they do not gain any new power to impose substantive design, performance, data-handling, documentation, or civil-liability requirements beyond existing law.
People subject to automated decisions
Consumers, workers, students, and others could be indirectly affected because the bill covers 'automated decision systems' that produce a score, classification, or recommendation to materially influence or replace human decision-making, while temporarily limiting many state-level attempts to regulate those tools.
What Congress Is Saying
H.R. 5388 hasn't been debated on the floor yet.
This section updates when a legislator speaks about it on the floor or in committee.
HR5388 Legislative Journey
House: Committee Action
Dec 19, 2025
Referred to the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations.
House: Committee Action
Sep 16, 2025
Referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, and in addition to the Committees on Foreign Affairs, Armed Services, Homeland Security, Oversight and Government Reform, the Judiciary, Energy and Commerce, Small Business, Education and Workforce, Financial Services, Veterans' Affairs, and Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
About the Sponsor
Michael Baumgartner
Republican, Washington's 5th congressional district · 1 years in Congress
Committees: Education and Workforce, the Judiciary, Foreign Affairs
View full profile →
Committee Sponsors
Veterans' Affairs Committee
0 of 25 committee members cosponsored
No committee members have cosponsored this bill
Transportation and Infrastructure Committee
0 of 65 committee members cosponsored
No committee members have cosponsored this bill
Financial Services Committee
0 of 54 committee members cosponsored
No committee members have cosponsored this bill
Education and Workforce Committee
0 of 35 committee members cosponsored
No committee members have cosponsored this bill
Small Business Committee
0 of 26 committee members cosponsored
No committee members have cosponsored this bill
Energy and Commerce Committee
0 of 54 committee members cosponsored
No committee members have cosponsored this bill
Judiciary Committee
0 of 42 committee members cosponsored
No committee members have cosponsored this bill
Oversight and Government Reform Committee
0 of 46 committee members cosponsored
No committee members have cosponsored this bill
Homeland Security Committee
0 of 29 committee members cosponsored
No committee members have cosponsored this bill
Armed Services Committee
0 of 57 committee members cosponsored
No committee members have cosponsored this bill
Foreign Affairs Committee
0 of 51 committee members cosponsored
No committee members have cosponsored this bill
Science, Space, and Technology Committee
0 of 38 committee members cosponsored
No committee members have cosponsored this bill
171 Republicans across these committees haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents
H.R. 5388 Quick Facts
- Committee
- Veterans' Affairs
- Chamber
- House
- Policy
- Government Operations and Politics
- Introduced
- Sep 16, 2025
Assigned to Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations. for review
Dec 19, 2025
H.R. 5388 Common Questions
Can states regulate AI for 5 years under HR 5388?
Mostly no. Under H.R. 5388, states and local governments could not enforce many laws regulating AI models, AI systems, or automated decision systems in interstate commerce for 5 years from enactment (SEC. 6).
How soon would the White House have to submit a national AI plan under HR 5388?
The White House must submit a National Artificial Intelligence Action Plan to Congress within 30 days after enactment under H.R. 5388 (SEC. 5).
Does the AI moratorium in HR 5388 apply to city and county governments too?
Yes. According to H.R. 5388, the 5-year moratorium applies to states and political subdivisions, which includes local governments enforcing covered AI rules (SEC. 6).
Can states still enforce criminal laws against AI companies under HR 5388?
Yes. Under the American Artificial Intelligence Leadership and Uniformity Act, states may still enforce generally applicable criminal laws and laws carrying criminal penalties (SEC. 6; SEC. 7).
What counts as an automated decision system in HR 5388?
H.R. 5388 defines it as a computational process using machine learning, statistical modeling, data analytics, or AI that gives a score, classification, or recommendation influencing or replacing human decisions (SEC. 2).
Can states charge AI companies fees or bonds under HR 5388?
Yes, if they are reasonable and cost-based, and if AI systems are treated the same as comparable non-AI systems under H.R. 5388 (SEC. 6).
Does HR 5388 stop states from setting AI rules in their own government contracts?
No. States can use procurement requirements for their own operations, as long as those rules do not become de facto regulation of private parties under H.R. 5388 (SEC. 6).
Which executive orders on AI would be reviewed under HR 5388?
Under H.R. 5388, the executive branch must review actions taken under Executive Order 14110 from Oct. 30, 2023, and Executive Order 14179 from Jan. 23, 2025 (SEC. 5).
Can federal agencies create new AI design or data-handling mandates under HR 5388?
No new authority is created. Under H.R. 5388, agencies cannot use the act to impose new substantive design, performance, data-handling, documentation, or civil-liability requirements beyond existing law (SEC. 7).
Does HR 5388 require annual updates to the national AI plan?
Yes. After the initial plan, annual updates must begin 1 year later and continue each year under the American Artificial Intelligence Leadership and Uniformity Act (SEC. 5).
Based on H.R. 5388 bill text
H.R. 5388 Bill Text
“To provide a national framework to sustain American leadership in artificial intelligence, to require an actionable Federal plan aligned to that policy, and to establish a temporary moratorium preempting certain State laws that restrict artificial intelligence models and systems engaged in interstate commerce.”
Source: U.S. Government Publishing Office
Get notified when H.R. 5388 moves
Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.
Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.
Government Operations and Politics Bills
9 related bills we're tracking
Protect Our Letter Carriers Act of 2025
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Feb 6, 2025
Rights for the TSA Workforce Act
Referred to the Subcommittee on Transportation and Maritime Security.
Mar 11, 2025
Fair Pay for Federal Contractors Act of 2025
Referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Sep 30, 2025
SAVE Act
Received in the Senate.
Apr 10, 2025
Saving the Civil Service Act
ASSUMING FIRST SPONSORSHIP - Mr. Walkinshaw asked unanimous consent that he may hereafter be considered as the first sponsor of H.R. 492, a bill originally introduced by Representative Connolly, for the purpose of adding cosponsors and requesting reprintings pursuant to clause 7 of rule XII. Agreed to without objection.
Sep 16, 2025
Deceptive Practices and Voter Intimidation Prevention Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Aug 5, 2025
SHARE Act of 2025
Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Mar 25, 2025
End Crypto Corruption Act of 2025
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 71.
May 8, 2025
Designation of English as the Official Language of the United States Act of 2025
Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Mar 3, 2025
Trending Right Now
Bills gaining momentum across Congress
Congressional Tribute to Constance Baker Motley Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Sep 11, 2025
Deterring American AI Model Theft Act of 2026
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Apr 15, 2026
GUARDRAILS Act
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Mar 26, 2026
Tracking Government Operations and Politics in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.