H.R. 5272: Protect Elections from Deceptive AI Act
Sponsor
Julie Johnson
Democrat · TX-32
Bill Progress
Latest Action · Sep 10, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Why it matters
Introduced on September 10, 2025, the bill responds to growing fears that AI-made fake audio and video could mislead voters or donors in federal campaigns before elections are decided.
Enforcement leans heavily on private lawsuits by the candidate targeted. A covered individual, defined as a candidate for federal office, could seek injunctive or equitable relief to stop distribution, and those injunction cases would get precedence under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The candidate could also sue for general or special damages, and courts could award reasonable attorney’s fees and costs to the prevailing party. The bill sets a relatively demanding proof standard: the plaintiff must prove a violation by clear and convincing evidence. It also says any violation is defamation per se, strengthening the legal position of candidates who claim AI deepfakes damaged them.
What does H.R. 5272 do?
New federal ban in Section 325
The bill amends Title III of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, 52 U.S.C. 30101 et seq., by adding a new Section 325 that bars any person, political committee, or other entity from knowingly distributing materially deceptive AI-generated audio or visual media of a candidate for federal office when the intent is to influence an election or solicit funds.
Applies only to federal candidates
The bill defines a "covered individual" specifically as "a candidate for Federal office," meaning the protections do not extend generally to all voters, officeholders, or private citizens. That narrow definition shapes who can sue and when the ban applies.
Covers AI images, audio, and video
The bill defines deceptive AI-generated media as any image, audio, or video produced by artificial intelligence or machine learning, including deep learning techniques, that either merges, combines, replaces, or superimposes content onto existing media or generates a fully inauthentic clip that appears authentic.
Reasonable-person test for deception
A clip is covered if a reasonable person, considering both the qualities of the media and the distribution channel, would have a fundamentally different understanding of the candidate’s appearance, speech, or expressive conduct than from the unaltered original, or would believe the media accurately shows conduct that never actually happened.
News and parody exemptions with disclosure
Radio, television, cable, satellite, and streaming services are exempt when the media appears in a bona fide newscast, news interview, news documentary, or on-the-spot coverage of bona fide news events, but only if there is a clear disclosure or acknowledgment raising authenticity questions. Newspapers, magazines, and periodicals, including internet or electronic publications, are exempt if they clearly state the AI-generated media does not accurately represent the covered individual’s speech or conduct. Satire and parody are also exempt.
Candidates can sue and seek fast injunctions
A candidate for federal office may seek injunctive or equitable relief to stop distribution, and those injunction actions get precedence under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The candidate may also seek general or special damages, and the court may award reasonable attorney’s fees and costs to the prevailing party, but the plaintiff must prove the violation by clear and convincing evidence.
Who benefits from H.R. 5272?
Candidates for federal office
They gain a new federal cause of action under Section 325, including the ability to seek injunctive relief, equitable relief, general or special damages, and potentially attorney’s fees and costs if they prevail.
Voters in federal elections
They benefit from limits on knowingly distributed AI-generated images, audio, and video meant to influence an election, especially clips that would cause a reasonable person to believe a candidate said or did something that never happened.
Legitimate news outlets
Broadcast and print outlets get explicit exemptions if they use clear disclosure. The bill specifically protects radio, television, cable, satellite, streaming services, and newspapers, magazines, or periodicals, including internet publications, when reporting on deceptive media in news contexts.
Campaigns harmed by fake fundraising appeals
Because the prohibition applies not just to election influence but also to media distributed with intent to "solicit funds," campaigns have a tool against AI fakes used to trick donors or damage fundraising.
Who is affected by H.R. 5272?
Political committees and campaigns
Political committees are expressly covered regulated entities. If they knowingly distribute materially deceptive AI-generated media of a federal candidate with intent to influence an election or solicit funds, they could face lawsuits for injunctions and damages.
Individuals and online content creators
Any "person" is covered by the prohibition, so independent creators, operatives, or activists could be sued if they knowingly share deceptive AI-generated images, audio, or video of a federal candidate for election or fundraising purposes.
Streaming and broadcasting platforms
Radio, television, cable, satellite, and streaming services are partially protected, but only when the content is part of a bona fide news format and includes a clear disclosure or acknowledgment about authenticity concerns.
Publishers and digital news sites
Newspapers, magazines, periodicals, and internet or electronic publications are affected because they must clearly state that the materially deceptive AI-generated media does not accurately represent the covered individual’s speech or conduct to qualify for the exemption.
What Congress Is Saying
H.R. 5272 hasn't been debated on the floor yet.
This section updates when a legislator speaks about it on the floor or in committee.
HR5272 Legislative Journey
House: Committee Action
Sep 10, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
About the Sponsor
Julie Johnson
Democrat, Texas' 32nd congressional district · 1 years in Congress
Committees: House Administration, Joint Committee of Congress on the Library, Homeland Security
View full profile →
Cosponsors (4)
This bill has 4 cosponsors: 1 Democrat, 3 Republicans, reflecting bipartisan support. Cosponsors represent 3 states: Missouri, Pennsylvania, Texas.
Committee Sponsors
Committee on House Administration
0 of 12 committee members cosponsored
No committee members have cosponsored this bill
4 Democrats across this committee haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents
H.R. 5272 Quick Facts
- Committee
- House Administration
- Chamber
- House
- Policy
- Government Operations and Politics
- Introduced
- Sep 10, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Sep 10, 2025
H.R. 5272 Common Questions
Can a federal candidate get a court order fast to stop an AI deepfake ad?
Yes. Under the Protect Elections from Deceptive AI Act, a federal candidate can seek injunctive or other equitable relief, and those injunction cases get precedence under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Section 325(d)).
Does HR5272 let candidates recover damages and attorney's fees for AI deepfakes?
Yes. According to HR5272 Section 325(d), a covered candidate may sue for general or special damages, and a court may award reasonable attorney's fees and costs to the prevailing party.
What proof standard would a candidate need to win an AI deepfake lawsuit under HR5272?
The candidate must prove the violation by clear and convincing evidence under the Protect Elections from Deceptive AI Act (Section 325(d)).
Is an AI election deepfake automatically defamation per se under HR5272?
Yes. Under HR5272, a violation of new Section 325 constitutes defamation per se for purposes of a defamation action (Section 2(b)).
Which people are protected by the Protect Elections from Deceptive AI Act?
Only candidates for Federal office are covered. The bill defines a 'covered individual' as a candidate for Federal office in Section 325(a).
Does the bill ban AI-generated fake audio, images, and video of federal candidates?
Yes. Under the Protect Elections from Deceptive AI Act, deceptive AI-generated image, audio, or video is covered if it appears authentic and misrepresents a federal candidate (Section 325(a), 325(b)).
Can a political committee violate HR5272 by sharing a deepfake of a federal candidate?
Yes. Section 325(b) applies to any person, political committee, or other entity that knowingly distributes deceptive AI media with intent to influence an election or solicit funds.
What counts as deceptive AI media under the Protect Elections from Deceptive AI Act?
It includes AI-made or AI-altered image, audio, or video that seems authentic and would cause a reasonable person to believe the candidate said or did something different or fictitious (Section 325(a)).
Does HR5272 exempt news reports that show AI deepfakes with a disclosure?
Yes. Broadcast, streaming, print, and electronic news content is exempt if it is bona fide news coverage and clearly discloses authenticity concerns or states the media is inaccurate (Section 325(c)).
Is AI satire or parody of a federal candidate allowed under HR5272?
Yes. The Protect Elections from Deceptive AI Act expressly exempts materially deceptive AI-generated media that constitutes satire or parody (Section 325(c)).
Based on H.R. 5272 bill text
H.R. 5272 Bill Text
“To prohibit the distribution of materially deceptive AI-generated audio or visual media relating to candidates for Federal office, and for other purposes.”
Source: U.S. Government Publishing Office
Get notified when H.R. 5272 moves
Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.
Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.
Government Operations and Politics Bills
9 related bills we're tracking
Protect Our Letter Carriers Act of 2025
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Feb 6, 2025
Rights for the TSA Workforce Act
Referred to the Subcommittee on Transportation and Maritime Security.
Mar 11, 2025
Fair Pay for Federal Contractors Act of 2025
Referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Sep 30, 2025
SAVE Act
Received in the Senate.
Apr 10, 2025
Saving the Civil Service Act
ASSUMING FIRST SPONSORSHIP - Mr. Walkinshaw asked unanimous consent that he may hereafter be considered as the first sponsor of H.R. 492, a bill originally introduced by Representative Connolly, for the purpose of adding cosponsors and requesting reprintings pursuant to clause 7 of rule XII. Agreed to without objection.
Sep 16, 2025
Deceptive Practices and Voter Intimidation Prevention Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Aug 5, 2025
SHARE Act of 2025
Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Mar 25, 2025
End Crypto Corruption Act of 2025
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 71.
May 8, 2025
Designation of English as the Official Language of the United States Act of 2025
Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Mar 3, 2025
Trending Right Now
Bills gaining momentum across Congress
Congressional Tribute to Constance Baker Motley Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Sep 11, 2025
Deterring American AI Model Theft Act of 2026
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Apr 15, 2026
GUARDRAILS Act
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Mar 26, 2026
Tracking Government Operations and Politics in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.