H.R. 6805: Next Generation Nuclear Deployment Act

Introduced Dec 17, 20250 cosponsors

Sponsor

Tim Moore

Tim Moore

Republican · NC-14

Bill Progress

IntroducedDec 17
Committee 
Pass House 
Pass Senate 
Signed 
Law 

Latest Action · Dec 17, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.

Nuclear reactor testing would spread beyond federal land

4 min readLast updated June 22, 2026

Why it matters

Today the Energy Department tests advanced reactors on a short list of federal sites. H.R. 6805 would set a floor of 10 demonstration sites, reserve at least one for a remote-ready micro-reactor of up to 10 megawatts, and let projects run on private, university, or utility property instead of only DOE land. No money is attached yet — the bill was just referred to committee.

The core idea is scale and access. Right now the federal advanced reactor demonstration program runs at a limited number of sites. H.R. 6805 would direct the Energy Department to prioritize testing across at least 10 different sites, and require that at least one of them be a specialized micro-reactor — a very small reactor built for remote places or specialized jobs.

The bill is specific about what counts as an advanced reactor. It covers fourth-generation designs like sodium-cooled fast reactors, high-temperature gas-cooled reactors, and molten salt reactors. Small modular and factory-produced reactors also qualify, but only if they generate no more than 500 megawatts of electricity. Specialized micro-reactors are capped tighter still: up to 10 megawatts, designed for remote locations or specialized applications.

The biggest practical change is where this work can happen. The bill would let advanced reactors be tested and developed on any site, whether or not the Energy Department owns or operates it. That opens the door to private companies, universities, and utilities hosting demonstrations — which could make it easier to find willing sites and move faster.

It also tells the Secretary of Energy to seek cost-sharing deals with private industry and research institutions, so outside partners help foot the bill and run the tests.

What the bill doesn't do matters too. There's no new funding amount, no deadline for picking the 10 sites, and no penalties. This is a structural bill: it widens the map and sets a minimum number of sites, but leaves the money and the timeline to later decisions.

H.R. 6805 Bill Summary

What H.R. 6805 actually does.

1

Sets a floor of 10 demonstration sites

The bill directs the Energy Department to prioritize testing and development of advanced reactor designs across at least 10 different sites, expanding the scale of the federal demonstration program.

2

Reserves one site for a micro-reactor

At least one of the 10 sites must be a specialized micro-reactor — defined as a reactor that produces up to 10 megawatts of electricity and is built for remote locations or specialized applications.

3

Lets testing happen on non-federal land

Advanced reactors could be tested and developed on any site, whether or not the Energy Department owns or operates it, opening demonstrations to private, university, and utility property.

4

Caps small modular reactors at 500 megawatts

Small modular and factory-produced reactors qualify as advanced reactor designs only if they generate no more than 500 megawatts of electricity, setting a clear upper limit for eligibility.

5

Names the reactor types that qualify

The bill explicitly includes fourth-generation reactors such as sodium-cooled fast reactors, high-temperature gas-cooled reactors, and molten salt reactors under the demonstration program.

6

Pushes DOE toward private cost-sharing

The Secretary of Energy would have to seek cost-sharing arrangements with private industry and research institutions to support testing and development of advanced nuclear designs.

Who benefits from H.R. 6805?

Advanced reactor companies

Firms developing sodium-cooled fast reactors, high-temperature gas-cooled reactors, molten salt reactors, and small modular reactors up to 500 megawatts would have more demonstration slots to compete for, since the bill requires at least 10 sites.

Micro-reactor developers

Companies building specialized micro-reactors get a guaranteed opening, because at least one of the 10 sites must host a reactor of up to 10 megawatts designed for remote or specialized use.

Universities and research institutions

Research institutions could both host demonstrations on their own sites and partner with the Energy Department, since the bill directs the Secretary to seek cost-sharing arrangements with them.

Remote communities and specialized operations

Places that need smaller, standalone power — remote towns, military bases, industrial sites — stand to gain from the bill's focus on micro-reactors built for those exact conditions.

Who is affected by H.R. 6805?

Department of Energy

DOE would have to run the expanded program: prioritize at least 10 sites, include at least one micro-reactor site, and seek cost-sharing deals with private industry and research institutions.

Private industry partners

The bill directs the Secretary of Energy to seek cost-sharing arrangements with private companies, so industry would be expected to help fund and run advanced reactor tests.

Non-DOE site owners

Utilities, private landowners, and industrial campuses could become demonstration hosts, since projects may run on any site even if the Energy Department doesn't own or operate it.

Federal energy regulators

Officials administering the program would apply the new definitions, including the 500-megawatt cap for small modular and factory-produced reactors and the 10-megawatt limit for micro-reactors.

Share this story
Tracking floor activity — no debate on H.R. 6805 yet. Updates when a legislator speaks on the record.

HR6805 Legislative Journey

1 actions

House: Committee Action

Dec 17, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.

About the Sponsor

Tim Moore

Tim Moore

Republican, North Carolina's 14th congressional district · 1 years in Congress

Committees: the Budget, Financial Services

View full profile →

Committee Sponsors

Science, Space, and Technology Committee

18D21R
|0 signed39 not yet

0 of 39 committee members cosponsored

No committee members have cosponsored this bill

21 Republicans across this committee haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents

H.R. 6805 Quick Facts

Cosponsors
0
Committee
Science, Space, and Technology
Chamber
House
Policy
Energy
Introduced
Dec 17, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.

Dec 17, 2025

Constituent Resources

Get notified when this bill moves

Official Sources

H.R. 6805 on Congress.gov

Official bill page with text, actions, sponsors, and status for the Next Generation Nuclear Deployment Act.

DOE Office of Nuclear Energy

The Department of Energy's nuclear office would be central to implementing the expanded advanced reactor demonstration program in the bill.

DOE Advanced Reactor Demonstration Program

The core DOE program most directly related to H.R. 6805's expansion of advanced reactor testing and development sites.

DOE Advanced Reactor Technologies

Covers the fourth-generation reactor types H.R. 6805 names, including Generation IV designs and advanced small modular reactors.

DOE Demonstration of Microreactor Experiments (DOME)

DOE's microreactor test bed at Idaho National Laboratory, directly relevant to the bill's requirement that one site host a specialized micro-reactor.

U.S. Code 42 § 16279a

H.R. 6805 amends 42 U.S.C. 16279a, so the U.S. Code page is the official statutory reference for the section being changed.

Energy Policy Act of 2005 on GovInfo

The bill amends provisions in the Energy Policy Act of 2005, making the original public law useful for statutory context.

H.R. 6805 Common Questions

How many demonstration sites would H.R. 6805 require?

At least 10. The bill directs the Energy Department to prioritize testing and development of advanced reactors across at least 10 different sites.

Could advanced reactors be tested on private or university land?

Yes. H.R. 6805 lets these projects run on any site, whether or not the Energy Department owns or operates it, so private companies, universities, and utilities could host demonstrations.

Does H.R. 6805 require a micro-reactor site, and how small?

Yes. At least one of the 10 sites must host a specialized micro-reactor — capable of producing up to 10 megawatts of electricity and built for remote locations or specialized applications.

What's the size limit for small modular reactors in H.R. 6805?

Small modular and factory-produced reactors qualify only if they generate no more than 500 megawatts of electricity.

Which reactor types does H.R. 6805 cover?

It includes fourth-generation reactors such as sodium-cooled fast reactors, high-temperature gas-cooled reactors, and molten salt reactors, plus small modular, factory-produced, and micro-reactors.

Does H.R. 6805 require DOE to partner with private companies?

Yes. The Secretary of Energy would have to seek cost-sharing arrangements with private industry and research institutions to help fund and run advanced reactor testing.

Does H.R. 6805 provide any funding?

No. The bill sets no new funding amount, no grant size, and no deadline for picking sites. It changes the program's rules and asks DOE to seek private cost-sharing, but leaves the money to a future bill.

Based on H.R. 6805 bill text

H.R. 6805 Bill Text

PDF

To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to expand the scope of the advanced reactor demonstration program to test and develop fourth-generation nuclear reactors, small modular reactors, and micro-reactors, and for other purposes.

Source: U.S. Government Publishing Office

Bill Alerts

Get notified when H.R. 6805 moves

Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.

Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.

Energy Bills

9 related bills we're tracking

View all
H.R. 3699

Energy Choice Act

Nicholas Langworthy
Nicholas LangworthyR-NY
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+153
157 cosponsors

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 412.

Feb 4, 2026

HouseEnergy
H.R. 2486

Heating and Cooling Relief Act

Yassamin Ansari
Yassamin AnsariD-AZ
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+43
47 cosponsors

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Mar 31, 2025

HouseEnergy
H.R. 1355

Weatherization Enhancement and Readiness Act of 2025

Paul Tonko
Paul TonkoD-NY
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+17
21 cosponsors

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 410.

Feb 4, 2026

HouseEnergy
H.R. 6529

Protecting Families from AI Data Center Energy Costs Act

Greg Landsman
Greg LandsmanD-OH
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+13
17 cosponsors

Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee (Amended) by Voice Vote.

Jun 24, 2026

HouseEnergy
H.R. 6176

Electricity Transmission Scorecard Act

Sean Casten
Sean CastenD-IL
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+11
15 cosponsors

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Nov 20, 2025

HouseEnergy
H.R. 7066

SHIELD Act

Mike Levin
Mike LevinD-CA
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+9
13 cosponsors

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Jan 14, 2026

HouseEnergy
H.R. 755

Critical Mineral Consistency Act of 2025

Juan Ciscomani
Juan CiscomaniR-AZ
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+9
13 cosponsors

Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 348.

Mar 4, 2026

HouseEnergy
S. 714

Critical Mineral Consistency Act of 2025

Mike Lee
Mike LeeR-UT
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+1
5 cosponsors

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 335.

Feb 11, 2026

SenateEnergy
H.R. 4758

Homeowner Energy Freedom Act

Craig Goldman
Craig GoldmanR-TX
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
2 cosponsors

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

Feb 25, 2026

HouseEnergy

Tracking Energy in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.