H.R. 5894: RESTRAIN Act
Sponsor
Dina Titus
Democrat · NV-1
Bill Progress
Latest Action · Nov 19, 2025
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H4779-4780)
Why it matters
Introduced on 2025-10-31, H.R. 5894 would lock in a legal ban on U.S. explosive nuclear testing starting with fiscal year 2026 funding and beyond.
H.R. 5894, the “Renewing Efforts to Suspend Testing and Reinforce Arms-control Initiatives Now Act,” or “RESTRAIN Act,” would amend section 4210 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act, codified at 50 U.S.C. 2530. Its core rule is simple and sweeping: “No explosive testing of a nuclear weapon, or any other nuclear explosion, may be conducted by the United States.” That language covers both a nuclear weapons test and any other nuclear explosion, not just a specific weapons program.
The bill goes beyond a policy statement by adding a funding cutoff. It says funds authorized to be appropriated by an Act authorizing funds for fiscal year 2026, or funds otherwise made available for any fiscal year, cannot be used for explosive testing of a nuclear weapon or any other nuclear explosion. That matters because it tries to block both direct approval of testing and later attempts to finance a test through some other yearly funding stream.
At the same time, the bill preserves one important exception. It states that nothing in the new funding limitation restricts the authority of the United States to conduct a “subcritical nuclear test.” The bill defines that term specifically as a test of fissile materials that are not capable of sustaining an explosive nuclear chain reaction. In plain English, the measure bans explosive nuclear tests but still allows certain non-explosive experiments involving fissile material.
Politically, the bill signals a clear arms-control position in the Armed Forces and National Security space. With 26 cosponsors and an introduction date of 2025-10-31, the fight ahead is likely to center on whether Congress wants a permanent statutory ban on explosive testing, or whether future presidents and defense planners should keep that option available. The text itself is narrow and direct: no explosive testing, no federal funds for it beginning with fiscal year 2026, but subcritical tests remain legal.
What does H.R. 5894 do?
Flat ban on explosive nuclear testing
The bill amends section 4210 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act, 50 U.S.C. 2530, to state that “No explosive testing of a nuclear weapon, or any other nuclear explosion, may be conducted by the United States.”
Fiscal year 2026 money cutoff
It bars the use of funds authorized by an Act authorizing funds for fiscal year 2026 for any explosive testing of a nuclear weapon or any other nuclear explosion.
Applies to any fiscal year funding
The funding restriction is broader than a single budget cycle because it also covers funds “otherwise made available for any fiscal year,” aiming to stop explosive nuclear testing even if money comes from another year’s appropriations.
Subcritical tests remain allowed
The bill expressly says it does not limit the authority of the United States to conduct a “subcritical nuclear test,” creating a clear exception to the explosive test ban.
Subcritical test defined in law
It defines a “subcritical nuclear test” as a nuclear test of fissile materials that are not capable of sustaining an explosive nuclear chain reaction, giving a specific technical boundary for what remains permitted.
Targets existing nuclear defense statute
Rather than creating a separate program, H.R. 5894 rewrites existing law by amending section 4210 of division D of the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003, Public Law 107–314.
Who benefits from H.R. 5894?
Arms-control advocates
They benefit because H.R. 5894 would turn a policy preference into a statutory rule at 50 U.S.C. 2530: no explosive testing of a nuclear weapon or any other nuclear explosion by the United States.
Communities near possible U.S. test infrastructure
They benefit from the bill’s direct prohibition on explosive nuclear testing and from the funding cutoff starting in fiscal year 2026, which would make it harder to restart an explosive test program.
Nonproliferation and treaty supporters
They benefit because the bill sends a clear signal, introduced on 2025-10-31 and backed by 26 cosponsors, that Congress wants to reinforce restraints on explosive nuclear testing while still allowing only subcritical tests.
Scientists focused on non-explosive stockpile research
They benefit because the bill preserves authority for “subcritical nuclear test[s],” specifically defined as tests of fissile materials not capable of sustaining an explosive nuclear chain reaction.
Who is affected by H.R. 5894?
Department of Defense nuclear planners
They would be affected because the United States could no longer legally conduct an explosive nuclear weapon test, and fiscal year 2026 and later federal funds could not be used for that purpose.
Department of Energy and National Nuclear Security Administration testing programs
Any program considering explosive nuclear testing would be blocked by both the legal prohibition and the ban on using funds authorized for fiscal year 2026 or otherwise made available for any fiscal year.
Congressional appropriators and authorizers
They would be affected because the bill restricts how future funding bills can be used, specifically prohibiting authorized fiscal year 2026 funds and any other fiscal year funds from paying for explosive nuclear testing.
Future presidents and national security officials
They would face a narrower set of options because H.R. 5894 would preserve only the authority to conduct “subcritical nuclear test[s]” as defined in the bill, while barring explosive nuclear explosions.
H.R. 5894 Common Questions
Can the U.S. still conduct explosive nuclear tests under the RESTRAIN Act?
No. Under the RESTRAIN Act (SEC. 2), the United States may not conduct any explosive testing of a nuclear weapon or any other nuclear explosion.
Does the RESTRAIN Act ban funding for nuclear explosive tests starting in fiscal year 2026?
Yes. Under the RESTRAIN Act (SEC. 2), no funds authorized for fiscal year 2026 may be used for explosive testing of a nuclear weapon or any other nuclear explosion.
Does H.R. 5894 block nuclear test funding from any fiscal year, not just 2026?
Yes. According to H.R. 5894 SEC. 2, the funding ban covers FY2026 authorizations and funds otherwise made available for any fiscal year.
Can the U.S. still do subcritical nuclear tests under the RESTRAIN Act?
Yes. Under the RESTRAIN Act (SEC. 2), the bill says nothing in the prohibition limits U.S. authority to conduct a subcritical nuclear test.
What is a subcritical nuclear test under H.R. 5894?
According to H.R. 5894 SEC. 2, it is a nuclear test of fissile materials that are not capable of sustaining an explosive nuclear chain reaction.
Does the RESTRAIN Act ban all nuclear explosions, not just weapons tests?
Yes. Under the RESTRAIN Act (SEC. 2), the prohibition covers explosive testing of a nuclear weapon and "any other nuclear explosion."
Which law would the RESTRAIN Act amend to ban U.S. nuclear explosive testing?
According to H.R. 5894 SEC. 2, it amends Section 4210 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act, codified at 50 U.S.C. 2530.
Can Congress or an agency pay for a U.S. nuclear explosive test through another funding stream under the RESTRAIN Act?
No. According to H.R. 5894 SEC. 2, funds otherwise made available for any fiscal year also cannot be used for explosive nuclear testing.
What are the exceptions to the RESTRAIN Act's ban on U.S. nuclear testing?
The main exception is subcritical testing. Under the RESTRAIN Act (SEC. 2), non-explosive subcritical nuclear tests remain authorized.
Does H.R. 5894 create a new nuclear testing program or change existing law?
It changes existing law. Under the RESTRAIN Act (SEC. 2), the bill amends Section 4210 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act rather than creating a new program.
Based on H.R. 5894 bill text
HR5894 Legislative Journey
Introduced
Nov 19, 2025
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H4779-4780)
+1 more action this day
House: Committee Action
Oct 31, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
About the Sponsor
Dina Titus
Democrat, Nevada's 1st congressional district · 17 years in Congress
Committees: Foreign Affairs, Transportation and Infrastructure
View full profile →
Cosponsors (26)
All 26 cosponsors are Democrats. Cosponsors represent 15 states: California, Connecticut, District of Columbia, and 12 more.
John Garamendi
Democrat · CA
James McGovern
Democrat · MA
Ted Lieu
Democrat · CA
Lloyd Doggett
Democrat · TX
Eric Swalwell
Democrat · CA
Jill Tokuda
Democrat · HI
Rashida Tlaib
Democrat · MI
Eleanor Norton
Democrat · DC
Donald Beyer
Democrat · VA
Sylvia Garcia
Democrat · TX
Chris Pappas
Democrat · NH
Ro Khanna
Democrat · CA
Committee Sponsors
Armed Services Committee
8 of 57 committee members cosponsored
19 Democrats across this committee haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents
H.R. 5894 Quick Facts
- Committee
- Armed Services
- Chamber
- House
- Policy
- Armed Forces and National Security
- Introduced
- Oct 31, 2025
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H4779-4780)
Nov 19, 2025
Official Sources
Official bill page for the RESTRAIN Act with text, status, sponsors, and actions.
Official U.S. Code entry for 50 U.S.C. 2530, the section H.R. 5894 would amend.
Official U.S. Code page showing the current statutory text of section 4210 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act.
Official NNSA resource describing the stockpile stewardship framework that includes non-explosive methods used instead of explosive nuclear testing.
Official State Department page providing U.S. government context on nuclear test-ban policy and arms control.
Official GovInfo page for the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003, the public law containing the Atomic Energy Defense Act referenced in the bill.
H.R. 5894 Bill Text
“To amend the Atomic Energy Defense Act to prohibit explosive testing of nuclear weapons conducted by the United States, and for other purposes.”
Source: U.S. Government Publishing Office
Get notified when H.R. 5894 moves
Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.
Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.
Armed Forces and National Security Bills
9 related bills we're tracking
Major Richard Star Act
Referred to the Subcommittee on Disability Assistance and Memorial Affairs.
Apr 4, 2025
Air America Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select).
Mar 18, 2025
Love Lives On Act of 2025
Subcommittee Hearings Held
Feb 3, 2026
GUARD VA Benefits Act
Referred to the Subcommittee on Disability Assistance and Memorial Affairs.
Mar 27, 2025
Veterans’ ACCESS Act of 2025
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.
Jul 23, 2025
Major Richard Star Act
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Mar 13, 2025
SAVES Act
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 264.
Sep 26, 2025
Fallen Servicemembers Religious Heritage Restoration Act
Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 292.
Dec 9, 2025
SAVES Act of 2025
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 342.
Feb 24, 2026
Trending Right Now
Bills gaining momentum across Congress
Congressional Tribute to Constance Baker Motley Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Sep 11, 2025
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 890 East 152nd Street in Cleveland, Ohio, as the "Technical Sergeant Alma Gladys Minter Post Office Building".
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Apr 15, 2026
Protecting Privacy in Purchases Act
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 447.
Feb 25, 2026
Tracking Armed Forces and National Security in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.