H.R. 3177: To require the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency to ensure that cost estimates, acquisition of proper materials, and any other activity related to certain projects under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act are performed by professionals licensed in the relevant State, and for other purposes.

Introduced May 5, 20253 cosponsors

Sponsor

Mike Ezell

Republican · MS-4

Licensed local experts, not FEMA, would steer disaster rebuilds

5 min readLast updated September 28, 2026

Why it matters

After a hurricane or flood, a single FEMA reviewer's objection can hold up the rebuild of a school, a road, or a water plant. H.R. 3177 would hand those calls to engineers, architects, and tradespeople licensed in the disaster state, and let FEMA stop their plans or purchases only when fraud is evident and traceable.

When a disaster wrecks public property, FEMA's Public Assistance program helps pay to repair or replace it: town halls, bridges, utilities, schools. Today FEMA reviews the cost estimates and rebuilding plans for that work and can push back on them. H.R. 3177 changes who has the final word.

Under the bill, the cost estimates and materials purchasing for those projects would have to be done by an "appropriately licensed professional": an engineer, architect, builder, tradesperson, or similar professional licensed in the state where the rebuild happens. That person can work for FEMA directly or be hired by FEMA, the state, or a local government.

Once a licensed professional signs off on a plan or a purchase, FEMA could not reject, rescind, or stall it unless fraud is evident and traceable. The agency would also have to approve any purchase a licensed professional suggests, and could not disapprove a plan or material choice without that professional's direct consent. The bill sets no dollar limit on those purchases and does not define what makes fraud "evident and traceable."

The bill also reshapes who does the work. States would be responsible for hiring a licensed professional to write the scope of work for each project. FEMA could not block or slow a contract with a licensed professional that a state or local government proposes. And any FEMA employee who directly helps manage one of these rebuilds would need a license in that state, so an engineer licensed in Texas and deployed to Florida would need Florida credentials to take that role.

Supporters see a faster recovery driven by people who know local building codes and conditions. The tradeoff is that FEMA would have far fewer tools to question costs or apply national standards on federally funded work, short of proving fraud.

Bill Progress

IntroducedMay 5

Committee

Pass House

Pass Senate

Signed

Law

Latest Action · May 5, 2025

1/3

Assigned to Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management. for review

H.R. 3177 Bill Summary

What H.R. 3177 actually does.

Rebuild estimates and purchases go to licensed pros

For projects funded through FEMA's Public Assistance repair program and its alternative-procedures track, FEMA must use professionals licensed in the disaster state to prepare cost estimates and buy materials, equipment, vehicles, and other necessary items.

FEMA can stop a licensed pro's plan only for traceable fraud

Plans, projects, and materials requested or purchased by a licensed professional may not be rejected, rescinded, or stalled by FEMA unless fraud is evident and traceable. The bill does not define that standard.

Suggested purchases must be approved

FEMA must approve any purchase a licensed professional suggests for a covered project, and may not disapprove a plan, rebuilding proposal, material suggestion, or direct purchase without that professional's direct consent. No dollar cap is set.

States hire the person who writes the scope of work

Each state becomes responsible for hiring a licensed professional to define the scope of work for a covered project, a step that sets what the rebuild includes.

Local contract choices can't be blocked

If a state or local government proposes contracting with a licensed professional, FEMA may not reject or hinder that contracting process.

FEMA project managers need a license in that state

Any FEMA employee who directly helps manage one of these rebuilds must be licensed in the state where the project is located, in a relevant field. FEMA must update its regulations and policies to carry out the bill.

Who benefits from H.R. 3177?

Towns and counties rebuilding after a disaster

Local governments waiting on FEMA to sign off on a new fire station, water line, or road could move forward once their licensed engineer or architect approves the plan, without a federal reviewer able to send it back.

In-state engineers, architects, builders, and tradespeople

Licensed professionals in the disaster state would become the required hands on cost estimates and materials purchasing, and their decisions would carry near-final weight on federally funded work.

State emergency management offices

States would control who writes the scope of work for each project and could steer contracting without FEMA blocking the process.

Residents who rely on damaged public facilities

If disputes over estimates and materials shrink, the schools, clinics, and utilities people depend on could reopen sooner after a disaster.

Who is affected by H.R. 3177?

FEMA reviewers and the Administrator

FEMA would lose most of its ability to question or delay a licensed professional's plans, estimates, and purchases on these projects. Its main remaining check would be showing fraud that is evident and traceable.

FEMA's deployed recovery staff

Employees who directly help manage these rebuilds would need a professional license in the state where each project sits. Staff without that state's license, including those rotating in from elsewhere, could not fill those roles.

Federal taxpayers

With purchases approved on a licensed professional's word and no cost cap in the bill, FEMA's ability to hold down project costs on federally funded rebuilds would narrow.

Disaster recovery contractors and suppliers

Vendors whose materials or equipment are requested by a licensed professional would face a more direct path to approval, since FEMA must approve those purchases.

Share this story

Tracking floor activity — no debate on H.R. 3177 yet. Updates when a legislator speaks on the record.

HR3177 Legislative Journey

1 actions

House: Committee Action

May 5, 2025

Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management.

About the Sponsor

Mike Ezell

Republican, Mississippi's 4th congressional district · 3 years in Congress

Committees: Natural Resources, Transportation and Infrastructure

View full profile →

Cosponsors (3)

No new cosponsors in 516 days — momentum stalled

This bill has 3 cosponsors: 1 Democrat, 2 Republicans, reflecting bipartisan support. Cosponsors represent 2 states: California, Florida.

1Democrat2Republicans·2 statesBipartisan

Salud Carbajal

Democrat · CA

Vern Buchanan

Republican · FL

W. Steube

Republican · FL

Committee Sponsors

Transportation and Infrastructure Committee

31D35R1I

|1 signed66 not yet

1 of 67 committee members cosponsored

Salud Carbajal

35 Republicans across this committee haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents

H.R. 3177 Quick Facts

Cosponsors

Committee: Transportation and Infrastructure
Chamber: House
Policy: Emergency Management
Introduced: May 5, 2025

Assigned to Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management. for review

May 5, 2025

Constituent Resources

Find your legislators on H.R. 3177

Get notified when this bill moves

Official Sources

H.R. 3177 on Congress.gov

Official bill record with the full text, sponsor and cosponsors, and committee referral history.

FEMA Public Assistance Program

FEMA's grant program that pays to repair or replace disaster-damaged public facilities, the work H.R. 3177 would hand to state-licensed professionals.

FEMA Public Assistance Program and Policy Guide (Version 5)

FEMA's current rulebook for cost estimates, reasonable-cost reviews, and procurement on Public Assistance projects, which the bill directs FEMA to rewrite.

42 U.S.C. 5172: Repair and Replacement of Damaged Facilities (Stafford Act Section 406)

The permanent-work repair authority whose projects the bill places under licensed-professional control.

42 U.S.C. 5189f: Public Assistance Alternative Procedures (Stafford Act Section 428)

The fixed-estimate alternative procedures track, the second category of projects the bill covers.

The Stafford Act (FEMA)

FEMA's overview of the federal disaster law the bill amends in practice, with a link to the full statute.

House Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management

The Transportation and Infrastructure subcommittee with jurisdiction over FEMA and the Stafford Act, where H.R. 3177 is pending.

Take Action

Mobilize constituents on H.R. 3177

See how Legisletter works

H.R. 3177 Common Questions

Can FEMA reject a disaster rebuilding plan approved by a licensed engineer?

Under H.R. 3177, almost never. FEMA could not reject, rescind, or stall plans, projects, or materials from a state-licensed professional unless fraud is evident and traceable. The bill does not define what meets that bar.

Would FEMA have to pay for whatever materials a licensed professional orders?

FEMA would have to approve any purchase a licensed professional suggests for a covered rebuild, and could not disapprove materials without that professional's consent. The bill sets no dollar cap on those purchases.

Which FEMA disaster projects does H.R. 3177 cover?

It covers FEMA Public Assistance projects that repair or replace damaged public facilities like roads, schools, and utilities, including those run under the program's fixed-estimate alternative procedures. It does not change aid paid directly to individual households.

Who counts as a licensed professional under H.R. 3177?

An engineer, architect, builder, tradesperson, or other relevant professional licensed in the state where the project is located. They can be a FEMA employee or be hired by FEMA, the state, or a local government.

Would FEMA staff sent in from other states need a new license?

If they directly help manage one of these rebuilds, yes. Any FEMA employee in that role would need a license in the state where the project is located, so an engineer licensed only in Texas could not manage a Florida rebuild.

What would states have to do differently under H.R. 3177?

Each state would be responsible for hiring a licensed professional to write the scope of work for covered rebuild projects. In return, FEMA could not block or slow contracts with licensed professionals that state or local governments propose.

Who is sponsoring H.R. 3177, and has it moved?

Rep. Mike Ezell (R-MS) introduced it in May 2025 with Reps. Salud Carbajal (D-CA), Vern Buchanan (R-FL), and Greg Steube (R-FL). It was referred to the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee and has not had a hearing or markup.

Based on H.R. 3177 bill text