H.R. 837: To require the Secretary of Agriculture to convey the Pleasant Valley Ranger District Administrative Site to Gila County, Arizona.
Sponsor
Elijah Crane
Republican · AZ-2
Bill Progress
Latest Action · Feb 4, 2026
Passed the House, received in Senate
Why it matters
The bill would quickly move a federal property in Arizona into county hands for veteran services, making the Senate the next key hurdle.
H.R. 837 directs the Agriculture Secretary to transfer about 232.9 acres in the Tonto National Forest, including buildings and other improvements, to Gila County if the county asks for it within 180 days of the bill becoming law. The property is the Pleasant Valley Ranger District Administrative Site, a former Forest Service administrative area that Congress now wants repurposed locally.
The bill is narrow and practical: it is not a broad public lands package, but a one-site transfer with a specific public purpose. Gila County would not have to pay for the land itself, but it would have to cover the transaction costs, including surveys, environmental review, and historic preservation work. That structure lowers the federal government's direct cost while still requiring local officials to invest in making the transfer happen.
A major feature of the bill is the use restriction. The county could use the land only for serving and supporting veterans of the Armed Forces. If the county later uses the property for something else, the federal government could take it back. That means Congress is trying to ensure the transfer stays tied to a public mission rather than becoming a general local real estate giveaway.
The bill also protects the federal government in several ways. The transfer would be by quitclaim deed, subject to existing rights, and without federal promises about environmental condition. In plain terms, Washington would hand over whatever ownership it has, but with limited legal guarantees. Supporters are likely to frame the bill as a way to turn an underused federal site into a veterans resource, while critics could question giving away national forest land and improvements without payment.
What does H.R. 837 do?
Requires transfer if county asks
If Gila County submits a written request within 180 days after enactment, the Agriculture Secretary must transfer the property to the county.
Transfers about 232.9 acres and buildings
The bill covers a specific parcel in the Tonto National Forest, including the land and any improvements on it.
County gets land for free
The federal government cannot charge Gila County for the property itself.
County pays transaction and review costs
Gila County must pay for surveys, environmental analysis, and historic preservation reviews tied to the transfer.
Land limited to veterans-related use
The county may use the property only to serve and support veterans of the Armed Forces.
Land can revert to federal control
If the county uses the land for a different purpose, the Secretary may take ownership back for the United States.
Who benefits from H.R. 837?
Veterans in Gila County and nearby areas
They could gain access to new services, facilities, or support programs built around the transferred property.
Gila County government
The county would gain control of a large site and its improvements without paying for the land itself.
Local veterans organizations
Groups serving former service members could gain a dedicated place for programs, housing support, outreach, or community services.
Federal land managers
The Forest Service could shed responsibility for a site that Congress no longer wants it to manage for federal administrative purposes.
Who is affected by H.R. 837?
Gila County taxpayers
They may benefit from veteran-focused development, but the county would have to pay all transfer-related review and survey costs.
Forest Service
The agency would have to complete the transfer and give up control of the property, while setting any protective conditions it sees as necessary.
Users of Tonto National Forest land nearby
They could see a change in how this parcel is managed and accessed once it moves from federal forest administration to county use.
Environmental and public lands advocates
They may watch closely because the bill gives public land to a local government at no cost and limits federal cleanup assurances.
H.R. 837 Common Questions
How many acres would H.R. 837 transfer to Gila County?
H.R. 837 would transfer about 232.9 acres in the Tonto National Forest, plus improvements shown as the "Gila County Area" on the official map (Section 1(c)).
Can Gila County get the Pleasant Valley Ranger District site for free?
Yes. Under H.R. 837, the conveyance must be made without consideration, so Gila County would not pay the federal government for the land itself (Section 1(d)).
How long would Gila County have to request the land transfer under H.R. 837?
Gila County would have 180 days after enactment to submit a written request to the Secretary of Agriculture under H.R. 837 (Section 1(b)).
What costs would Gila County have to pay for the Pleasant Valley site transfer?
According to H.R. 837, Gila County must pay all conveyance costs, including the survey, environmental analysis or resource surveys, and National Historic Preservation Act compliance work (Section 1(e)).
Does H.R. 837 limit the Pleasant Valley property to veterans use only?
Yes. Under H.R. 837, the land may be used by Gila County only for serving and supporting veterans of the Armed Forces (Section 1(g)).
Can the federal government take back the Pleasant Valley property if it's used for something else?
Yes. If the land is used inconsistently with the veterans-only requirement, all rights in the property revert to the United States at the Secretary's discretion under H.R. 837 (Section 1(h)).
Does H.R. 837 transfer the buildings and improvements with the land?
Yes. H.R. 837 covers all land and improvements generally depicted as the "Gila County Area" on the map (Section 1(c)).
Is the Pleasant Valley Ranger District transfer by quitclaim deed?
Yes. Under H.R. 837, the conveyance to Gila County must be made by quitclaim deed (Section 1(d)).
Does the federal government give environmental warranties when transferring the Pleasant Valley site?
No. H.R. 837 says the Secretary is not required to provide any covenant or warranty for the land and improvements regarding environmental conditions (Section 1(f)).
Which Arizona county would receive the Pleasant Valley Ranger District Administrative Site under H.R. 837?
Under H.R. 837, the recipient county is Gila County, Arizona (Section 1(a)).
Based on H.R. 837 bill text
HR837 Legislative Journey
Passed Committee
Feb 4, 2026
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported with an amendment favorably.
Committee Action
Feb 6, 2025
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
House: Vote Held
Feb 5, 2025
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H480)
House: Committee Action
Jan 31, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
About the Sponsor
Elijah Crane
Republican, Arizona's 2nd congressional district · 3 years in Congress
Committees: Homeland Security, Oversight and Government Reform
View full profile →
Committee Sponsors
Energy and Natural Resources Committee
0 of 20 committee members cosponsored
No committee members have cosponsored this bill
Natural Resources Committee
0 of 43 committee members cosponsored
No committee members have cosponsored this bill
35 Republicans across these committees haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents
H.R. 837 Quick Facts
- Committee
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Chamber
- House
- Policy
- Public Lands and Natural Resources
- Introduced
- Jan 31, 2025
Passed the House, received in Senate
Feb 4, 2026
H.R. 837 Bill Text
“To require the Secretary of Agriculture to convey the Pleasant Valley Ranger District Administrative Site to Gila County, Arizona.”
Source: U.S. Government Publishing Office
Get notified when H.R. 837 moves
Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.
Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public Lands and Natural Resources Bills
9 related bills we're tracking
Arctic Refuge Protection Act
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Apr 29, 2025
Secure Rural Schools Reauthorization Act of 2025
Became Public Law No: 119-58.
Dec 18, 2025
Captain Accursio “Gus” Sanfilippo Young Fishermen’s Development Act
Received in the Senate.
Mar 4, 2026
Wintergreen Emergency Egress Act
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Mar 4, 2026
Marine Fisheries Habitat Protection Act
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Oct 14, 2025
SHARKED Act of 2025
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Jan 22, 2025
America's National Churchill Museum National Historic Landmark Act
Received in the Senate.
Mar 4, 2026
America the Beautiful Motorcycle Fairness Act
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Mar 4, 2026
Modernizing Access to Our Public Oceans Act
Held at the desk.
Sep 11, 2025
Trending Right Now
Bills gaining momentum across Congress
Healthy Families Act
Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committees on House Administration, and Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Feb 12, 2026
Federal Extreme Risk Protection Order Act of 2026
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Feb 17, 2026
ALERT Act
Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Feb 20, 2026
Tracking Public Lands and Natural Resources in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.