H.R. 837: To require the Secretary of Agriculture to convey the Pleasant Valley Ranger District Administrative Site to Gila County, Arizona.

Introduced Jan 31, 20250 cosponsors

Sponsor

Elijah Crane

Elijah Crane

Republican · AZ-2

Bill Progress

IntroducedJan 31
Committee 
Pass HouseFeb 5
Pass Senate 
Signed 
Law 

Latest Action · Feb 4, 2026

Passed the House, received in Senate

Forest site transfer targets veterans use

Why it matters

The bill would quickly move a federal property in Arizona into county hands for veteran services, making the Senate the next key hurdle.

H.R. 837 directs the Agriculture Secretary to transfer about 232.9 acres in the Tonto National Forest, including buildings and other improvements, to Gila County if the county asks for it within 180 days of the bill becoming law. The property is the Pleasant Valley Ranger District Administrative Site, a former Forest Service administrative area that Congress now wants repurposed locally.

The bill is narrow and practical: it is not a broad public lands package, but a one-site transfer with a specific public purpose. Gila County would not have to pay for the land itself, but it would have to cover the transaction costs, including surveys, environmental review, and historic preservation work. That structure lowers the federal government's direct cost while still requiring local officials to invest in making the transfer happen.

What does H.R. 837 do?

1

Requires transfer if county asks

If Gila County submits a written request within 180 days after enactment, the Agriculture Secretary must transfer the property to the county.

2

Transfers about 232.9 acres and buildings

The bill covers a specific parcel in the Tonto National Forest, including the land and any improvements on it.

3

County gets land for free

The federal government cannot charge Gila County for the property itself.

4

County pays transaction and review costs

Gila County must pay for surveys, environmental analysis, and historic preservation reviews tied to the transfer.

5

Land limited to veterans-related use

The county may use the property only to serve and support veterans of the Armed Forces.

6

Land can revert to federal control

If the county uses the land for a different purpose, the Secretary may take ownership back for the United States.

Who benefits from H.R. 837?

Veterans in Gila County and nearby areas

They could gain access to new services, facilities, or support programs built around the transferred property.

Gila County government

The county would gain control of a large site and its improvements without paying for the land itself.

Local veterans organizations

Groups serving former service members could gain a dedicated place for programs, housing support, outreach, or community services.

Federal land managers

The Forest Service could shed responsibility for a site that Congress no longer wants it to manage for federal administrative purposes.

Who is affected by H.R. 837?

Gila County taxpayers

They may benefit from veteran-focused development, but the county would have to pay all transfer-related review and survey costs.

Forest Service

The agency would have to complete the transfer and give up control of the property, while setting any protective conditions it sees as necessary.

Users of Tonto National Forest land nearby

They could see a change in how this parcel is managed and accessed once it moves from federal forest administration to county use.

Environmental and public lands advocates

They may watch closely because the bill gives public land to a local government at no cost and limits federal cleanup assurances.

H.R. 837 Common Questions

How many acres would H.R. 837 transfer to Gila County?

H.R. 837 would transfer about 232.9 acres in the Tonto National Forest, plus improvements shown as the "Gila County Area" on the official map (Section 1(c)).

Can Gila County get the Pleasant Valley Ranger District site for free?

Yes. Under H.R. 837, the conveyance must be made without consideration, so Gila County would not pay the federal government for the land itself (Section 1(d)).

How long would Gila County have to request the land transfer under H.R. 837?

Gila County would have 180 days after enactment to submit a written request to the Secretary of Agriculture under H.R. 837 (Section 1(b)).

What costs would Gila County have to pay for the Pleasant Valley site transfer?

According to H.R. 837, Gila County must pay all conveyance costs, including the survey, environmental analysis or resource surveys, and National Historic Preservation Act compliance work (Section 1(e)).

Does H.R. 837 limit the Pleasant Valley property to veterans use only?

Yes. Under H.R. 837, the land may be used by Gila County only for serving and supporting veterans of the Armed Forces (Section 1(g)).

Can the federal government take back the Pleasant Valley property if it's used for something else?

Yes. If the land is used inconsistently with the veterans-only requirement, all rights in the property revert to the United States at the Secretary's discretion under H.R. 837 (Section 1(h)).

Does H.R. 837 transfer the buildings and improvements with the land?

Yes. H.R. 837 covers all land and improvements generally depicted as the "Gila County Area" on the map (Section 1(c)).

Is the Pleasant Valley Ranger District transfer by quitclaim deed?

Yes. Under H.R. 837, the conveyance to Gila County must be made by quitclaim deed (Section 1(d)).

Does the federal government give environmental warranties when transferring the Pleasant Valley site?

No. H.R. 837 says the Secretary is not required to provide any covenant or warranty for the land and improvements regarding environmental conditions (Section 1(f)).

Which Arizona county would receive the Pleasant Valley Ranger District Administrative Site under H.R. 837?

Under H.R. 837, the recipient county is Gila County, Arizona (Section 1(a)).

Based on H.R. 837 bill text

HR837 Legislative Journey

4 actions

Passed Committee

Feb 4, 2026

Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported with an amendment favorably.

Committee Action

Feb 6, 2025

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

House: Vote Held

Feb 5, 2025

On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H480)

House: Committee Action

Jan 31, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

About the Sponsor

Elijah Crane

Elijah Crane

Republican, Arizona's 2nd congressional district · 3 years in Congress

Committees: Homeland Security, Oversight and Government Reform

View full profile →

Committee Sponsors

Energy and Natural Resources Committee

8D11R1I
|0 signed20 not yet

0 of 20 committee members cosponsored

No committee members have cosponsored this bill

Natural Resources Committee

19D24R
|0 signed43 not yet

0 of 43 committee members cosponsored

No committee members have cosponsored this bill

35 Republicans across these committees haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents

H.R. 837 Quick Facts

Cosponsors
0
Committee
Energy and Natural Resources
Chamber
House
Policy
Public Lands and Natural Resources
Introduced
Jan 31, 2025

Passed the House, received in Senate

Feb 4, 2026

Constituent Resources

Get notified when this bill moves

H.R. 837 Bill Text

PDF

To require the Secretary of Agriculture to convey the Pleasant Valley Ranger District Administrative Site to Gila County, Arizona.

Source: U.S. Government Publishing Office

Bill Alerts

Get notified when H.R. 837 moves

Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.

Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.

Public Lands and Natural Resources Bills

9 related bills we're tracking

View all
H.R. 3067

Arctic Refuge Protection Act

Jared Huffman
Jared HuffmanD-CA
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+97
101 cosponsors
+2 this month

Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

Apr 29, 2025

HousePublic Lands and Natural Resources
S. 356

Secure Rural Schools Reauthorization Act of 2025

Mike Crapo
Mike CrapoR-ID
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+24
28 cosponsors
+1 this month

Became Public Law No: 119-58.

Dec 18, 2025

SenatePublic Lands and Natural Resources
H.R. 3692

Captain Accursio “Gus” Sanfilippo Young Fishermen’s Development Act

Seth Moulton
Seth MoultonD-MA
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+4
8 cosponsors

Received in the Senate.

Mar 4, 2026

HousePublic Lands and Natural Resources
H.R. 6365

Wintergreen Emergency Egress Act

John McGuire
John McGuireR-VA
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+3
7 cosponsors

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

Mar 4, 2026

HousePublic Lands and Natural Resources
H.R. 5745

Marine Fisheries Habitat Protection Act

Mike Ezell
Mike EzellR-MS
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
+1
5 cosponsors

Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

Oct 14, 2025

HousePublic Lands and Natural Resources
H.R. 207

SHARKED Act of 2025

Robert Wittman
Robert WittmanR-VA
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
4 cosponsors

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

Jan 22, 2025

HousePublic Lands and Natural Resources
H.R. 1945

America's National Churchill Museum National Historic Landmark Act

Robert Onder
Robert OnderR-MO
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
3 cosponsors

Received in the Senate.

Mar 4, 2026

HousePublic Lands and Natural Resources
H.R. 4386

America the Beautiful Motorcycle Fairness Act

Tim Walberg
Tim WalbergR-MI
Cosponsor
1 cosponsor

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

Mar 4, 2026

HousePublic Lands and Natural Resources
S. 759

Modernizing Access to Our Public Oceans Act

Ted Cruz
Ted CruzR-TX
Cosponsor
1 cosponsor

Held at the desk.

Sep 11, 2025

SenatePublic Lands and Natural Resources

Trending Right Now

Bills gaining momentum across Congress

Tracking Public Lands and Natural Resources in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.