H.R. 7997: Research and Oversight of AI in Courts Act of 2026

Introduced Mar 19, 20263 cosponsors

Sponsor

Harriet Hageman

Harriet Hageman

Republican · WY

Bill Progress

IntroducedMar 19
Committee 
Pass House 
Pass Senate 
Signed 
Law 

Latest Action · Mar 19, 2026

1/3

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Congress orders AI court transcript review

Why it matters

Courts are already testing AI transcription tools, and this bill would force a federal review within 60 days of enactment and require a final report no later than 18 months after the task force is created.

H.R. 7997 would require the Attorney General, acting through the Director of the National Institute of Justice, to stand up an "AI Research and Oversight in Courts Task Force" no later than 60 days after enactment. The group would be temporary but structured: 15 total members, including 4 Federal government members and 11 non-Federal members, with 2 co-chairs — one from each side. If a seat opens up, the co-chairs would have 15 days to fill it.

The bill is built around independence and court expertise. Non-Federal members could not be employed by, contracted with, paid by, or represent any company that develops, markets, sells, or provides AI technologies or related services. Members also must have expertise in the official record-making process or the technology used to create or modify court records. Required perspectives include a specialist in civil liberty law, an active State court judge or a retired Federal court judge with experience reversing a ruling because of a record deficiency, and a member of a professional association focused on judicial record-making and related technology.

What does H.R. 7997 do?

1

Task force must launch within 60 days

The Attorney General, acting through the Director of the National Institute of Justice, must establish the AI Research and Oversight in Courts Task Force not later than 60 days after enactment.

2

15-member panel with 4 Federal and 11 non-Federal seats

The Director of the National Institute of Justice appoints all 15 members: 4 Federal government members and 11 non-Federal members. The Federal group must include employees tied to institutions such as the National Institute of Justice, the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, a clerk of court, a Federal judge, or a Federal prosecutor.

3

Strict conflict-of-interest ban for outside members

Non-Federal members may not be employed by, contracted with, receive compensation from, or represent any entity that develops, markets, sells, or provides AI technologies or related services. The bill also requires members to have expertise in official court record-making or in technology used to create or modify court records.

4

Reports every 4 months, final report by 18 months

Status reports must be sent to the Senate and House Committees on the Judiciary 4 months after enactment and every 4 months after that until the final report is filed. The final report is due not later than 18 months after the task force is established.

5

Final report must cover 15 issues

The final report must address 15 specific areas, including transcription accuracy, the impact on people with speech impediments or accents, cost analysis for litigants and courts, cybersecurity risks, data integrity, evidentiary value, possible watermarking or metadata requirements, and a 10-year outlook on technological advances.

6

No salaries, only travel and per diem

All members serve without compensation, but they may receive travel expenses and per diem at rates authorized under subchapter I of chapter 57 of title 5, United States Code. The Act terminates when the final report is submitted.

Who benefits from H.R. 7997?

Litigants and court users

They could benefit from a formal review of whether AI transcripts are accurate and affordable, since the final report must specifically analyze costs for litigants and courts and examine evidentiary value and data integrity.

People with speech impediments or accents

The bill directly requires the task force to study how AI speech-to-text tools handle speech impediments and accents, which could surface bias or accuracy problems before courts rely on those systems more broadly.

Court reporters and record-making professionals

The task force must include members with expertise in the official record-making process, including a member of a professional association specializing in judicial record-making and related technology, giving record professionals a formal seat in the review.

Judges and court administrators

They would get regular oversight information through status reports every 4 months and a final report within 18 months that addresses practical issues like cybersecurity, metadata, and whether AI-generated records hold up as evidence.

Who is affected by H.R. 7997?

Federal and State courts across the country

The bill defines the "United States judicial system" broadly as all State and Federal courts in the United States and the territories, so the research is meant to cover court systems nationwide, not just Federal trial courts.

National Institute of Justice and the Attorney General

They would be responsible for creating the task force within 60 days of enactment, appointing members through the NIJ Director, and receiving the final report no later than 18 months after the task force is set up.

AI vendors serving courts

They are not directly fined or banned, but they are indirectly affected because non-Federal task force members cannot have employment, contracts, compensation, or representation ties to companies that develop, market, sell, or provide AI technologies or related services.

Task force members themselves

Members would serve without compensation, must meet expertise standards, and would have to operate under vacancy rules requiring replacement within 15 days if a member leaves.

On the Record

What Congress Is Saying

H.R. 7997 hasn't been debated on the floor yet.

This section updates when a legislator speaks about it on the floor or in committee.

HR7997 Legislative Journey

1 actions

House: Committee Action

Mar 19, 2026

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

About the Sponsor

Harriet Hageman

Harriet Hageman

Republican, Wyoming · 3 years in Congress

Committees: House Select Subcommittee to Investigate the Remaining Questions Surrounding January 6, 2021, Natural Resources, the Judiciary

View full profile →

Cosponsors (3)

This bill gained 2 cosponsors in the last 30 days

This bill has 3 cosponsors: 1 Democrat, 2 Republicans, reflecting bipartisan support. Cosponsors represent 3 states: District of Columbia, Kansas, Minnesota.

1Democrat2Republicans·3 statesBipartisan

Committee Sponsors

Judiciary Committee

18D24R
|1 signed41 not yet

1 of 42 committee members cosponsored

23 Republicans across this committee haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents

H.R. 7997 Quick Facts

Cosponsors
3+2
Pete Stauber
Eleanor Norton
Derek Schmidt
Committee
Judiciary
Chamber
House
Policy
Law
Introduced
Mar 19, 2026

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Mar 19, 2026

Constituent Resources

Get notified when this bill moves

H.R. 7997 Common Questions

How soon would the AI courts task force have to be created?

Under the Research and Oversight of AI in Courts Act of 2026, the Attorney General must establish the task force within 60 days of enactment (Section 2(b)).

How many members are on the AI court transcript task force?

According to H.R. 7997 Section 2(d)(1), the task force has 15 members total: 4 Federal members and 11 non-Federal members.

How long does the AI in courts task force have to issue its final report?

Under the Research and Oversight of AI in Courts Act of 2026, the final report is due no later than 18 months after the task force is established (Section 2(e)).

Does the AI courts bill require reports every 4 months?

Yes. Under H.R. 7997 Section 2(f), status reports are due 4 months after enactment and every 4 months after that until the final report is submitted.

Can AI companies serve on the non-federal court oversight task force?

No. Under the Research and Oversight of AI in Courts Act of 2026, non-Federal members cannot be employed by, paid by, contracted with, or represent AI vendors or related service providers (Section 2(d)(2)).

Which judges must be represented on the AI in courts task force?

According to H.R. 7997 Section 2(d)(1)(B), the non-Federal members must include an active State court judge or a retired Federal court judge who has reversed a ruling because of a record deficiency.

Does the AI court transcript review cover people with accents or speech impediments?

Yes. Under the Research and Oversight of AI in Courts Act of 2026, the final report must examine impacts on people with speech impediments, accents, or dialects (Section 2(e)(2)).

Does the AI in courts bill apply to state courts or only federal courts?

It applies to both. According to H.R. 7997 Section 2(h)(3), the 'United States judicial system' includes all State and Federal courts in the United States and its territories.

What are the reimbursement rules for members of the AI courts task force?

Under H.R. 7997 Section 2(d)(6), members serve without pay but may receive travel expenses and per diem under title 5 reimbursement rates.

Can the AI courts task force recommend watermarking or metadata rules for transcripts?

Yes. Under the Research and Oversight of AI in Courts Act of 2026, the final report must address watermarks, headers, footers, banners, and metadata for court records (Section 2(e)(8)-(10)).

Based on H.R. 7997 bill text

H.R. 7997 Bill Text

PDF

To establish a task force to address legal and ethical issues related to the use of AI speech-to-text technology and automatic speech recognition technology in the United States judicial system, and for other purposes.

Source: U.S. Government Publishing Office

Bill Alerts

Get notified when H.R. 7997 moves

Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.

Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.

Tracking Law in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.