H.R. 1713: Agricultural Risk Review Act of 2025

Introduced Feb 27, 202520 cosponsors

Sponsor

Frank Lucas

Frank Lucas

Republican · OK-3

Bill Progress

IntroducedFeb 27
Committee 
Pass HouseJun 23
Pass Senate 
Signed 
Law 

Latest Action · Jun 24, 2025

1/3

Passed the House, received in Senate

House Moves to Scrutinize Foreign Farm Deals

Why it matters

Foreign purchases of U.S. farmland are getting a closer look amid national security concerns.

The Agricultural Risk Review Act of 2025 would place the Secretary of Agriculture on the powerful Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS). This committee reviews foreign business deals—like buying farmland or ag technology—for threats to national security. With foreign investment in farmland on the rise, lawmakers are seeking to protect food supply chains and rural communities.

Until now, agriculture hasn't always been front and center in these security reviews. The bill expands the list of covered transactions to specifically include agricultural land and ag-related businesses. It aims to ensure that experts who understand farming risks are part of the decision-making.

What does H.R. 1713 do?

1

Adds Agriculture Secretary to CFIUS

Gives the Secretary of Agriculture an official seat on the committee that reviews foreign investments in the U.S.

2

Covers Agricultural Land Transactions

Ensures that foreign purchases of farmland must be reviewed for national security risks.

3

Includes Ag Biotech and Ag Industry

Requires reviews of deals that involve agricultural biotechnology or the broader agriculture industry.

4

Permanent Expert Input

Credentials agricultural expertise on a key national security panel for decisions impacting U.S. food and farming.

5

Amends the Defense Production Act

Formally updates the law so agriculture is explicitly part of the review process under the Defense Production Act.

Who benefits from H.R. 1713?

U.S. Farmers

Better protection from foreign acquisitions that could impact their land and supply chains.

Rural Communities

Increased oversight may help keep farmland in local hands, supporting local economies.

National Security Agencies

Gain agricultural expertise when weighing risks of foreign investment in the sector.

U.S. Consumers

Supports efforts to keep the nation's food supply stable and secure.

Who is affected by H.R. 1713?

Foreign Investors

Face new scrutiny and possibly more hurdles when trying to buy U.S. farmland or ag businesses.

Agtech Startups

Deals involving foreign capital will be subject to tougher reviews if linked to national security.

Real Estate Market

Farms and rural properties up for sale to international buyers will be checked more closely.

Multinational Agribusinesses

Could see delays or rejections in mergers and acquisitions involving U.S. agricultural assets.

H.R. 1713 Common Questions

Which countries' farmland buyers would trigger review under the Agricultural Risk Review Act of 2025?

China, North Korea, Russia, and Iran are specifically named for reportable agricultural land transactions under the Agricultural Risk Review Act of 2025 (Section 3).

Can foreign purchases of U.S. farmland be reviewed by CFIUS under HR1713?

Yes. Under HR1713 Section 3, CFIUS must assess certain reported agricultural land deals to determine whether they are covered transactions and whether to start a review.

Does the Agricultural Risk Review Act add the Agriculture Secretary to CFIUS?

Yes. Under the Agricultural Risk Review Act of 2025 (Section 2), the Secretary of Agriculture becomes a CFIUS member for transactions involving agricultural land, ag biotech, and the agriculture industry.

What types of agriculture deals would get Agriculture Secretary involvement on CFIUS?

According to HR1713 Section 2, the Secretary of Agriculture would participate in transactions involving agricultural land, agriculture biotechnology, and the agriculture industry.

Does HR1713 cover agricultural transportation, storage, and processing deals?

Yes. Under the Agricultural Risk Review Act of 2025 (Section 2), the agriculture industry includes agricultural transportation, storage, and processing.

Can ag biotech investments be reviewed under the Agricultural Risk Review Act of 2025?

Yes. The bill expressly includes agriculture biotechnology among the transactions that bring in the Secretary of Agriculture under the Agricultural Risk Review Act of 2025 (Section 2).

What makes a farmland deal a reportable agricultural land transaction under HR1713?

Under HR1713 Section 3, it must involve suspected covered-transaction risk tied to intelligence information, farmland acquisition by a foreign person from a named country, and an AFIDA reporting requirement.

Does the bill rely on intelligence community information for farmland deal reviews?

Yes. According to HR1713 Section 3, a reportable agricultural land transaction requires the Secretary of Agriculture to have reason to believe it is covered based on information from or with the intelligence community.

Is a farmland buyer's AFIDA filing part of the trigger for review under the Agricultural Risk Review Act?

Yes. Under the Agricultural Risk Review Act of 2025 (Section 3), the foreign person must be required to report the land purchase to the Agriculture Secretary under AFIDA Section 2(a).

Does HR1713 stop applying to a country if it is no longer listed as a foreign adversary?

Yes. According to HR1713 Section 3, the country-specific requirement ends when that country is removed from the foreign adversaries list in 15 C.F.R. 791.4.

Based on H.R. 1713 bill text

HR1713 Legislative Journey

5 actions

Committee Action

Jun 24, 2025

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.

House: Vote Held

Jun 23, 2025

On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H2865)

House: Committee Action

Jun 3, 2025

Committee on Foreign Affairs discharged.

House: Vote: 48-0

Mar 5, 2025

48-0

Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 48 - 0.

House: Committee Action

Feb 27, 2025

Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committees on Energy and Commerce, and Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

About the Sponsor

Frank Lucas

Frank Lucas

Republican, Oklahoma's 3rd congressional district · 33 years in Congress

Committees: Agriculture, Financial Services

View full profile →

Cosponsors (20)

No new cosponsors in 301 days — momentum stalled

This bill has 20 cosponsors: 10 Democrats, 10 Republicans, reflecting bipartisan support. Cosponsors represent 15 states: California, Colorado, Florida, and 12 more.

10Democrats10Republicans·15 statesBipartisan

Committee Sponsors

Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee

11D13R
|0 signed24 not yet

0 of 24 committee members cosponsored

No committee members have cosponsored this bill

Foreign Affairs Committee

23D28R
|1 signed50 not yet

1 of 51 committee members cosponsored

Energy and Commerce Committee

24D30R
|1 signed53 not yet

1 of 54 committee members cosponsored

Financial Services Committee

24D30R
|9 signed45 not yet

9 of 54 committee members cosponsored

89 Republicans across these committees haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents

What laws does H.R. 1713 change?

1 changes

Full Text

Sections Amended

Section 721(k) of Defense Production Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. 4565(k))

adding at the end the following: ``(8) Inclusion of the secretary of agriculture

H.R. 1713 Quick Facts

Cosponsors
20
Jill Tokuda
Andy Barr
Zachary Nunn
David Rouzer
Monica De La Cruz
+15 more
Committee
Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs
Chamber
House
Policy
Foreign Trade and International Finance
Introduced
Feb 27, 2025

Passed the House, received in Senate

Jun 24, 2025

Constituent Resources

Get notified when this bill moves
Write a letter to your legislator about this bill

Official Sources

H.R. 1713 on Congress.gov

Official bill text, cosponsors, and full legislative history for the Agricultural Risk Review Act of 2025

CFIUS — U.S. Treasury Department

The CFIUS homepage — the interagency committee this bill expands by adding the Secretary of Agriculture

CFIUS Overview: Structure, Process, and Member Agencies

Explains how CFIUS reviews work, committee composition, and filing processes — the mechanism this bill modifies

AFIDA: Agricultural Foreign Investment Disclosure Act — USDA

The USDA program requiring foreign investors to report U.S. farmland purchases — the reporting mechanism that triggers review under this bill

CBO Cost Estimate for H.R. 1713

Congressional Budget Office estimates $10 million in implementation costs over 2025-2030

50 U.S.C. 4565 — Defense Production Act (CFIUS Authority)

The statute this bill amends — Section 721 of the Defense Production Act establishing CFIUS review authority

15 C.F.R. 791.4 — Foreign Adversaries Designation

The federal regulation listing China, Russia, North Korea, and Iran as foreign adversaries — the bill's sunset clause ties to removal from this list

Senate Banking Committee

The Senate committee where this bill was referred after passing the House — next stop in the legislative process

H.R. 1713 Bill Text

PDF

To amend the Defense Production Act of 1950 to include the Secretary of Agriculture as a member of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, and for other purposes.

Source: U.S. Government Publishing Office

Bill Alerts

Get notified when H.R. 1713 moves

Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.

Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.

Trending Right Now

Bills gaining momentum across Congress

Tracking Foreign Trade and International Finance in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.