H.Res. 189: Censuring Representative Al Green of Texas.
Sponsor
Dan Newhouse
Republican · WA-4
Bill Progress
Latest Action · Mar 6, 2025
Passed the House, received in Senate
Why it matters
This matters now because the House is using one of its most visible punishment tools to respond to a member’s conduct during a high-profile joint session of Congress.
H. Res. 189 is a disciplinary resolution aimed at Representative Al Green of Texas. It says Green interrupted the President on March 4, 2025, during a joint session of Congress, kept disrupting the event after repeated interruptions, and was ultimately removed from the chamber by the Sergeant at Arms. Based on that conduct, the resolution formally censures him.
A censure is a public rebuke by the House. It is serious, but it is not the same as removing a member from office. Under this resolution, Green would have to come to the well of the House while the Speaker reads the censure aloud, making the punishment visible and symbolic in front of the chamber and the public.
The resolution shows how the House polices behavior during major official events, especially moments involving the President and both chambers of Congress. Supporters are likely to argue that the measure protects order, decorum, and the institution itself. Critics may argue that it turns discipline into a partisan spectacle, especially when tempers are already high and disruptions have become more politically charged.
In practical terms, the resolution does not create a new rule, spend money, or change federal programs. Its impact is political and institutional. It puts a formal mark on Green’s record, reinforces expectations for member behavior during official proceedings, and may shape how future disruptions are handled by House leadership.
What does H.Res. 189 do?
Formally censures Representative Al Green
The resolution officially condemns Green’s conduct during the March 4, 2025 joint session.
Ties punishment to the interruption
It states that Green interrupted the President’s remarks and describes that behavior as improper and disruptive.
References repeated disruptions
The resolution says the problem was not a single brief moment, but numerous disruptions during the event.
Notes removal by the Sergeant at Arms
It records that Green was removed from the chamber, underscoring the seriousness of the incident.
Requires Green to appear in the House well
If carried out, Green must present himself in front of the chamber for the punishment to be announced publicly.
Orders a public reading by the Speaker
The Speaker must read the censure resolution aloud, turning the punishment into a formal public reprimand.
Who benefits from H.Res. 189?
House leadership
Leaders gain a formal tool to show they are enforcing order and standards of behavior during major proceedings.
Members who prioritize chamber decorum
They benefit from a clear signal that public disruptions during official events can bring visible consequences.
Institutional defenders of Congress
They may see the resolution as reinforcing the dignity and rules of the House during nationally watched events.
Supporters of stricter floor discipline
They gain a precedent for responding forcefully when members interrupt or disrupt official proceedings.
Who is affected by H.Res. 189?
Representative Al Green
He faces a formal public rebuke that could carry political and reputational consequences, even though he keeps his seat.
House Democrats
They may have to balance defending a colleague with responding to concerns about conduct and public perception.
House Republicans
They are affected politically because the resolution gives them a chance to emphasize order and accountability, but also risks claims of partisan overreach.
Future members involved in floor protests
They are put on notice that highly visible disruptions during major sessions can trigger formal punishment.
HRES189 Legislative Journey
House: Vote: 224-198
Mar 6, 2025
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 224 - 198, 2 Present (Roll no. 62). (text: 03/05/2025 CR H998)
House: Failed
Mar 5, 2025
On motion to table Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 209 - 211, 1 Present (Roll no. 60).
+9 more actions this day
About the Sponsor
Dan Newhouse
Republican, Washington's 4th congressional district · 11 years in Congress
Committees: House Select Committee on the Strategic Competition Between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party, Appropriations, Agriculture
View full profile →
Cosponsors (34)
All 34 cosponsors are Republicans. Cosponsors represent 24 states: Alaska, Arkansas, Arizona, and 21 more.
John Rose
Republican · TN
Nicholas Begich
Republican · AK
Chuck Edwards
Republican · NC
John McGuire
Republican · VA
Claudia Tenney
Republican · NY
Rudy Yakym
Republican · IN
Erin Houchin
Republican · IN
Mike Collins
Republican · GA
Michael Rulli
Republican · OH
Derrick Van Orden
Republican · WI
Scott Franklin
Republican · FL
Roger Williams
Republican · TX
Committee Sponsors
Ethics Committee
0 of 10 committee members cosponsored
No committee members have cosponsored this bill
5 Republicans across this committee haven't cosponsored yet. Mobilize their constituents
H.Res. 189 Quick Facts
- Committee
- Ethics
- Chamber
- House
- Policy
- Congress
- Introduced
- Mar 5, 2025
Passed the House, received in Senate
Mar 6, 2025
H.Res. 189 Bill Text
“Censuring Representative Al Green of Texas.”
Source: U.S. Government Publishing Office
Get notified when H.Res. 189 moves
Committee votes, floor action, cosponsor changes — straight to your inbox.
Bill alerts + Legisletter's monthly briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.
Congress Bills
2 related bills we're tracking
Restore Trust in Congress Act
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Sep 3, 2025
Semiquincentennial Congressional Time Capsule Act
Became Public Law No: 119-79.
Feb 18, 2026
Trending Right Now
Bills gaining momentum across Congress
Federal Extreme Risk Protection Order Act of 2026
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Feb 17, 2026
ALERT Act
Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Feb 20, 2026
Fair Housing for Survivors Act of 2026
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Mar 5, 2026
Tracking Congress in Congress? Monitor bills, track cosponsor momentum, and launch advocacy campaigns — all from one advocacy platform.