H.R.1332 - Thirty-Two Hour Workweek Act
Introduced
H.R.1332 Key Provisions:
- Reduces the standard workweek from 40 hours to 32 hours
- Requires overtime compensation for hours worked beyond 32 per week at 1.5 times the regular rate
- Mandates double-time compensation for hours worked beyond 12 per day
- Implements a gradual reduction of the standard workweek over a 3-year period
Background and Context:
The Thirty-Two Hour Workweek Act aims to amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, which currently sets the standard workweek at 40 hours. The bill's introduction comes amidst ongoing debates about work-life balance, productivity, and the potential benefits of a shorter workweek. Proponents argue that reducing the standard workweek could lead to improved employee well-being, increased productivity, and job creation.
Supporters and Opposition:
Supporters of the bill, including progressive lawmakers and labor advocates, contend that a shorter workweek would benefit workers by providing more leisure time, reducing stress, and improving overall quality of life. They argue that technological advancements have made it possible to maintain productivity while working fewer hours. Opposition to the bill may come from business groups and fiscal conservatives who worry about the potential economic impact of a reduced workweek. They may argue that the change would increase labor costs, reduce competitiveness, and lead to job losses as businesses struggle to adapt to the new requirements.
Dr. Liberty Vittert, professor of practice of data science at Olin Business School at Washington University in St. Louis, recently testified before the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, highlighting statistical flaws in studies frequently cited by proponents of the 32-hour workweek. Vittert pointed out that many of these studies rely on self-reported data, lack proper randomization, and fail to account for long-term negative impacts on productivity and GDP.
Legislative Process and Outlook:
The Thirty-Two Hour Workweek Act was introduced in the House of Representatives on March 1, 2023, by Rep. Mark Takano (D-CA), along with co-sponsors Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) and Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-IL). The bill has been referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce for consideration.
As with any proposed legislation, the bill's prospects for passage will depend on its ability to gather support from both Democrats and Republicans in Congress. Given the potentially controversial nature of the changes proposed, it remains to be seen whether the bill will gain traction and advance through the legislative process.
Impact and Implications:
If enacted, the Thirty-Two Hour Workweek Act would have significant implications for employers and employees across the United States. Businesses would need to adjust their scheduling and staffing practices to comply with the new overtime requirements, potentially leading to increased labor costs or reduced hours for some workers.
Employees could benefit from a better work-life balance and potentially higher wages due to increased overtime compensation. However, some workers may face reduced hours or job losses as businesses navigate the new requirements.
The bill's gradual implementation over a three-year period aims to give businesses time to adapt, but the transition could still prove challenging, particularly for small businesses with limited resources.
As the bill progresses through Congress, stakeholders on all sides will closely monitor its potential impact on the American workforce and economy. Ultimately, the proposed legislation reflects a growing interest in reexamining the traditional 40-hour workweek and exploring alternative approaches to work that prioritize employee well-being and work-life balance.
H.R.1332 In the News:
AI Makes 32-Hour Workweek Possible, Says Rep. Mark Takano
Forbes • 9 months ago
The global movement toward a 32-hour workweek is gaining traction in the United States with an endorsement by Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont).
Bernie Sanders Proposes Reducing Americans’ Workweek to 32 Hours
New York Times • 9 months ago
His proposal would pare down the workweek over a four-year period. The 40-hour workweek has stood as the standard in the U.S. since it became enshrined in federal law in 1940.
Republican Sen Bill Cassidy slams Bernie Sanders' 32-hour workweek
proposal as job-killer
Fox Business • 9 months ago
Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., warned that a proposed 32-hour workweek mandate would kill jobs, cause prices to rise and force employers to ship jobs overseas.
Grassroots Gameplan: Mobilizing Constituents in Critical Districts
To effectively influence the legislative process surrounding H.R.1332, the Thirty-Two Hour Workweek Act, it's crucial to mobilize constituents in districts that can have the greatest impact on lawmakers' decisions. By targeting specific committees, cosponsors, non-cosponsors, and influential caucuses or coalitions, advocacy groups can focus their efforts and resources for maximum effect.
Committees
-
House Committee on Education and the Workforce legislative districts:
-
Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-NC-5), Chair
-
Rep. Bobby Scott (D-VA-3), Ranking Member
-
Rep. Joe Wilson (R-SC-2)
-
Rep. Frederica Wilson (D-FL-24)
-
Rep. Tim Walberg (R-MI-7)
-
Rep. Suzanne Bonamici (D-OR-1)
-
Get Standing Committee Districts for Meta Ads geo-targeting locations
Cosponsors
As of March 1, 2023, H.R.1332 has 3 Democratic cosponsors:
- Rep. Mark Takano (D-CA-41), Sponsor
- Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-WA-7)
- Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-IL-9)
Focus on districts represented by these cosponsors to thank them for their support and encourage them to champion the bill among their colleagues.
Non-cosponsors
Target key non-cosponsors, particularly those from the Democratic party, as they may be more likely to support the legislation given the sponsors' affiliations. Some notable non-cosponsors to consider:
- Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY-8), House Minority Leader
- Rep. Katherine Clark (D-MA-5), House Minority Whip
- Rep. Pete Aguilar (D-CA-33), House Minority Caucus Chair
Thank Cosponsors, Inspire Them to Rally More Representatives
Influential caucuses or coalitions
Targeting members of Congress who belong to relevant caucuses or coalitions can help amplify your message and encourage them to influence their colleagues. Some key groups to consider:
- Congressional Progressive Caucus
- Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-WA-7), Chair
- Rep. Mark Pocan (D-WI-2), Chair Emeritus
- House Labor Caucus
- Rep. Mark DeSaulnier (D-CA-11), Co-Chair
- Rep. Donald Norcross (D-NJ-1), Co-Chair
By targeting these key districts and individuals, advocacy groups can maximize the impact of their grassroots letter-writing campaigns and work towards shaping the outcome of H.R.1332, the Thirty-Two Hour Workweek Act.
Rewrite Tomorrow Today
Start building connections between your supporters and policymakers for meaningful legislative impact, today.
Get Started